Lots of team meetings coming up with the Rocky Linux folks. Going to be a bu
Lots of team meetings coming up with the Rocky Linux folks.
Going to be a busyt 2 months.
... I wish life had a scroll-back buffer.
Re: Rocky Linux
By: Warp 4 to All on Fri Sep 05 2025 01:28 pm
Lots of team meetings coming up with the Rocky Linux folks. Going to be
Using Rocky Linux in a work or personal environment? I run my synchronet linux bbs on Rocky Linux 9.6
Warp 4 wrote to Amessyroom <=-
Personal. Mainly to keep my red hat skills active. :)
I'm an Ubuntu/Debian guy for the last couple of years. Unfortunately, my
new corporate environment is all RedHat and SuSe. I didn't think SuSe
was still around? Apparently, SAP runs on it and it's free.
Dumas Walker wrote to POINDEXTER FORTRAN <=-
Sounds like, commercially, SuSe is still around, and may be popular
with folks who bought it from Novell or successors.
Warp 4 wrote to Amessyroom <=-
Personal. Mainly to keep my red hat skills active. :)
I'm an Ubuntu/Debian guy for the last couple of years. Unfortunately, my new corporate environment is all RedHat and SuSe. I didn't think SuSe
was still around? Apparently, SAP runs on it and it's free.
Sounds like, commercially, SuSe is still around, and may be popular with folks who bought it from Novell or successors.
Mortar wrote to Dumas Walker <=-
Re: Re: Rocky Linux
By: Dumas Walker to POINDEXTER FORTRAN on Fri Sep 12 2025 18:36:42
Sounds like, commercially, SuSe is still around, and may be popular with folks who bought it from Novell or successors.
On DistroWatch I couldn't find a listing for "SUSE Linux", but OpenSUSE
is currently the third most popular DL'ed distro.
The former "SUSE Linux" is now commercial/paid only, like the original RedHat. Not sure what it's actual name is now though.
Accession wrote to Gamgee <=-
The former "SUSE Linux" is now commercial/paid only, like the original RedHat. Not sure what it's actual name is now though.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SUSE_Linux_Enterprise
I'm not going to look, but maybe Distrowatch has them listed as SLES
and SLED (Server and Desktop editions)? Eh well, not interested anyway.
;)
Hehe, yeah me neither. Always thought Suse was weird even back before
it "split". Certainly don't have any interest in it now.
Hehe, yeah me neither. Always thought Suse was weird even back before it "split". Certainly don't have any interest in it now.
Accession wrote to Gamgee <=-
Hehe, yeah me neither. Always thought Suse was weird even back before
it "split". Certainly don't have any interest in it now.
Same goes for Mandrake, Mandriva, or RedHat and anything that spawned
from RedHat. I can't say anything bad about any of them, as I've never used them. None of them ever interested me, though.. and I don't even
know why. ;)
Nightfox wrote to Gamgee <=-
Re: Re: Rocky Linux
By: Gamgee to Accession on Thu Sep 25 2025 09:15 pm
Hehe, yeah me neither. Always thought Suse was weird even back before it "split". Certainly don't have any interest in it now.
Although I had tried Slackware in the mid-90s, SuSE was one of the
first Linux distros I seriously got into, around 1999 or so. At the
time, SuSE had its own configurator for X that I found to be more successful at detecting my video hardware and its valid settings, so I
was able to get XFree86 running fairly easily with SuSE. Also, it had
a fairly large repository of included software (and from what I
remember, it was one of the earlier distibutions available for DVD-R, whereas most other distros at the time were on a CD or two).
Eventually though, its X configurator didn't work so well anymore, and
I moved on to other Linux distros. I found similar problems with other Linux distros around that time, where one version would work fairly
well but the next version wouldn't. It seems like most Linux distros these days don't really have that issue.
Same goes for Mandrake, Mandriva, or RedHat and anything that spawned
from RedHat. I can't say anything bad about any of them, as I've never used them. None of them ever interested me, though.. and I don't even
know why. ;)
As they tried to get everything back together (sans "business manager")
they merged with another dist called Connectiva (from Brazil?). Hence Mandriva now.
Mandriva is very polished and probably one of the best distros for non-commercial users of Linux. Right now, my systems run Ubuntu, but
when it's time for a tech refresh, it will be Mandriva for me.
Accession wrote to Dr. What <=-
I'm assuming you're referring to OpenMandriva Lx here, which might
still have some devs from the original Mandriva, but is a completely different distro.
I just assumed that OpenMandriva was the latest rev of Mandriva with less corporation and more community.
I just assumed that OpenMandriva was the latest rev of Mandriva with
less corporation and more community.
Ah the marketing power of the word "Open" these days.
I think it's the same for any distro that users "Open" in their name. The entire distro is free and open source. If you want anything proprietary, you
I'm curious what you're basing the statement of OpenSUSE being the third most popular distro is though... I don't see any indication of that on Distrowatch.
phigan wrote to Accession <=-
Re: Rocky Linux
By: Accession to phigan on Mon Sep 29 2025 03:58 pm
I think it's the same for any distro that users "Open" in their name. The entire distro is free and open source. If you want anything proprietary, you
Linux distros, maybe. There have been some OSes/products with the word Open that ... weren't. OpenVMS is one, I think.
Sysop: | DaiTengu |
---|---|
Location: | Appleton, WI |
Users: | 1,071 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 88:42:20 |
Calls: | 13,755 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 186,984 |
D/L today: |
9,486 files (2,598M bytes) |
Messages: | 2,426,141 |