Mike Powell wrote to All <=-
'I think we're going to have a human-level performance on most, if not all, professional tasks': Microsoft AI chief thinks AI will replace
most white-collar work in the 12 to 18 months - so is this the end for human workers?
'I think we're going to have a human-level performance on most, if not all, professional tasks': Microsoft AI chief thinks AI will replace
most white-collar work in the 12 to 18 months - so is this the end for human workers?
The slope is increasing, but most of the doomsayers are saying something
more like 5 years for most jobs.
I'm sure the increased profits reaped by labor replacement with AI will
be turned into a universal income and we'll enter tech utopia. Right?
Right?
So, how many employee's will be left at Redmond?
When you think about it, executive positions could most easily be
replaced by AI - when you have an AI that understands the current market
and future trends better than a human, there's no need for a CEO.
>> replaced by AI - when you have an AI that understands the current marketWhen you think about it, executive positions could most easily be
While I don't disagree, I don't see many CEO's and upper management>wanting to make such a decision.
Rob Mccart wrote to MIKE POWELL <=-
IOW, all upper management is incompetent.. B)
>> replaced by AI - when you have an AI that understands the current marketWhen you think about it, executive positions could most easily be
>> and future trends better than a human, there's no need for a CEO.
While I don't disagree, I don't see many CEO's and upper management>wanting to make such a decision.
When I first read the above what popped into my mind Re: CEO's was
the Peter Principle, the idea that workers will continue to be
promoted if they do their jobs well, meaning that when they
finally stop promoting a person, it's because they have finally
reached the point where they can no longer handle the job they
are supposed to be doing..
IOW, all upper management is incompetent.. B)
I worked at a a multimedia company, left in 1997. When I left, they had>about 400 employees. They ditched their multimedia roots and went all in
They made fuckedcompany.com because the new company had 80 vice>presidents. For a company of 800. 10 employees per VP. Just goes to
Yeah, I have heard that many times and would agree that they are either (1)>incompetent or (2) never really got to hand off the responsibilities of
I think that second one usually happens not so much to people that get>promoted but maybe lateralled. ;)
They made fuckedcompany.com because the new company had 80 vice>presidents. For a company of 800. 10 employees per VP. Just goes to
>confirm that upper management is great at keeping themselves employed.
Yes, good example.. You also see quite often, especially in companies
that have some attachment to the gov't like Power or Mail systems,
that they have terrible losses due to bad management and yet the
top people are making many $Millions a year. Rarely do they ever
get rid of those people, and when they do, there is always a
severance package worth many more $Millions..
Mike Powell wrote to ROB MCCART <=-
Living in California, Kurt probably knows several good examples
regarding Pacific Gas and Electric (PGE).
>> that have some attachment to the gov't like Power or Mail systems,You also see quite often, especially in companies
Living in California, Kurt probably knows several good examples regarding>Pacific Gas and Electric (PGE).
Living in California, Kurt probably knows several good examples regarding Pacific Gas and Electric (PGE).
Make stupid deals with Enron.
Enron manipulates the market, stupid deals bite PG&E in the ass.
PG&E transfers billions to PGE Corp, then files for bankrupcy.
Later, in better economic times, buy back the stock to raise prices.
Don't spend money on infrastructure maintenance.
Fires caused by faulty infrastructure causes millions in damages.
Petition the PUC to raise prices to pay for PR ad campaigns and
deferred maintenance (which should have been done instead of buying
back stock)
Encourage electric vehicles and solar buyback programs.
Increase EV rates and hamstring residential solar buyback rates.
Living in California, Kurt probably knows several good examples regarding>Pacific Gas and Electric (PGE).
Is that to suggest that the more 'Liberal' states are more likely to
have those sorts of problems? Thinking on this, I'm sure there are
a lot of more Conservative (Republican) States/Provinces that also
greatly over-pay the top business people, the main difference probably
being how they treat their lower income people.. B)
>> have those sorts of problems?Is that to suggest that the more 'Liberal' states are more likely to
No there was no real political inference there. The inference is that PG&E>has been bad enough about it that even someone that lives far away from
I see.. We have a few provinces here that end up in the news for odd
reasons more than most others too..
Mostly Alberta and British Columbia.. One super Conservative and the
other super Liberal.. B)
>> reasons more than most others too..We have a few provinces here that end up in the news for odd
>> other super Liberal.. B)Mostly Alberta and British Columbia.. One super Conservative and the
LOL they wind up in the news here, too! :D Lately, one for a separatist>movement and the other for out-of-control housing prices/cost of living.
Also, Alberta has made the news in recent past for an advertising ploy to>attempt to convince British Columbians to move to Alberta, which used BC's
I'm sure the increased profits reaped by labor replacement with AI will
be turned into a universal income and we'll enter tech utopia. Right?
Right?
| Sysop: | DaiTengu |
|---|---|
| Location: | Appleton, WI |
| Users: | 1,098 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 492350:24:57 |
| Calls: | 14,102 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 187,123 |
| D/L today: |
1,559 files (604M bytes) |
| Messages: | 2,495,346 |