Ok, I suppose if nothing is wrong, then we carry on like it never happened!
It's more a question of what works than what is right or wrong.
Setting the width so that a quote prefix can be added will assure us
that older DOS-think abandonware doesn't run over it's 79 character
limit for displayed line lengths makes this quoting method superior,
with or without spaces an the end. Leaving them in will make this a lossless method of quoting.
who knows what the abandonware will do with it.
What were they thinking?
That is why we're giving it at least 7 characters to play with. I
have been known to wrap entire messages to 72 characters just to take
care of their obvious handicap. Them were the good ol' days.
Strong like bull, smart like tractor?
As far as I know, quoting has never been covered in ftn standards.
The tradition has become to put the initials of the quotee in the
quote prefix along with the '>' character. However I think just the
' character is more universal and makes things easier, especiallywhen using vim or nano as the MSG editor of choice.
As far as I know, quoting has never been covered in ftn standards.
Not a standard, but there was a proposal: http://ftsc.org/docs/fsc-0032.001
"Good ol' days?" I don't think much has changed.
The '> ' prefix is definitely more universal, not only for FTN,
but newsgroups and email as well.
| Sysop: | DaiTengu |
|---|---|
| Location: | Appleton, WI |
| Users: | 1,142 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 114:30:01 |
| Calls: | 14,706 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 186,498 |
| D/L today: |
2,338 files (576M bytes) |
| Messages: | 2,552,271 |
| Posted today: | 1 |