From Newsgroup: comp.lang.awk


Can Awk directly interact with some RDBMS engine (that is, within
'BEGIN{}')?

I haven't done a Google Search yet. Is looking for a direct answer. :)
--- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114

From Newsgroup: comp.lang.awk

On 01.03.2024 17:29, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:

Can Awk directly interact with some RDBMS engine (that is, within
'BEGIN{}')?

It depends on the interface the RDBMS provides.

What you can do with GNU awk is, for example, to create a co-process
and send requests to that co-process and intercept its replies to
process them.

Janis

--- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114

From Newsgroup: comp.lang.awk

On 2/3/2024 1:25 am, Janis Papanagnou wrote:

It depends on the interface the RDBMS provides.

What you can do with GNU awk is, for example, to create a co-process
and send requests to that co-process and intercept its replies to
process them.

I suppose it's the only solution, unless you extend Awk's syntax to
SQLconnect some RDBMS. :)
--- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114

From Newsgroup: comp.lang.awk

On 03.03.2024 11:16, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:

On 2/3/2024 1:25 am, Janis Papanagnou wrote:

It depends on the interface the RDBMS provides.

What you can do with GNU awk is, for example, to create a co-process
and send requests to that co-process and intercept its replies to
process them.

I suppose it's the only solution, unless you extend Awk's syntax to SQLconnect some RDBMS. :)

Well, in the past there was xgawk that supported database handling.
This feature is now available in GNU Awk as part of its extension
library. You can handle PostgreSQL with it. But since I have never
used it myself you have to look up the details yourself. (Or maybe
there's someone around here who has experiences with the extension
or can answer any specific questions.)

Janis

--- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114

From Newsgroup: comp.lang.awk

On 3/1/24 9:29 AM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:

Can Awk directly interact with some RDBMS engine (that is, within 'BEGIN{}')?

I haven't done a Google Search yet. Is looking for a direct answer. :)

I *think* most SQL type DBs have CLI interaction capabilities.

A SQLite3 example; 'csv' used for DB output mode since it's easy to run split() on and several awks now have native CSV support:

--
$ sqlite3 -header -column site.db 'select * from site'
Station SSID CHAN
---------- ---------- ----------
1 CIA 9
2 FBI 11
3 NSA 1
4 DOD 10

$ cat site.awk
BEGIN {
DBfile = "./site.db"
CMD = "sqlite3 -csv " DBfile " \"" ARGV[1] "\""
while (CMD | getline == 1) arr[++cnt] = $0
close(CMD)
for (i=1; i<=cnt; i++) printf "arr[%d] = %s\n", i, arr[i]
print ""
}

$ nawk -f site.awk 'select * from site'
arr[1] = 1,CIA,9
arr[2] = 2,FBI,11
arr[3] = 3,NSA,1
arr[4] = 4,DOD,10

$ nawk -f site.awk 'select SSID from site'
arr[1] = CIA
arr[2] = FBI
arr[3] = NSA
arr[4] = DOD

--

This is just read-only of course; would need to use gawk for fancier things.

--- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114

From Newsgroup: comp.lang.awk

On 3/3/2024 11:28 pm, Janis Papanagnou wrote:

Well, in the past there was xgawk that supported database handling.
This feature is now available in GNU Awk as part of its extension
library. You can handle PostgreSQL with it. But since I have never
used it myself you have to look up the details yourself. (Or maybe
there's someone around here who has experiences with the extension
or can answer any specific questions.)

Thanks!
--- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114

From Newsgroup: comp.lang.awk

On 4/3/2024 6:20 am, Arti F. Idiot wrote:

On 3/1/24 9:29 AM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:

Can Awk directly interact with some RDBMS engine (that is, within
'BEGIN{}')?

I haven't done a Google Search yet. Is looking for a direct answer. :)

I *think* most SQL type DBs have CLI interaction capabilities.

A SQLite3 example; 'csv' used for DB output mode since it's easy to run split() on and several awks now have native CSV support:
....

Thank you for putting up an example!

--- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114

From Newsgroup: comp.lang.awk

On 3/3/24 16:20, Arti F. Idiot wrote:

BEGIN {
  DBfile = "./site.db"
  CMD = "sqlite3 -csv " DBfile " \"" ARGV[1] "\""
  while (CMD | getline == 1) arr[++cnt] = $0
  close(CMD)
  for (i=1; i<=cnt; i++) printf "arr[%d] = %s\n", i, arr[i]
  print ""
}

Would someone please help me understand why you'd want to have the
sqlite3 (et al.) inside of awk (in the BEGIN{...}) verses having sqlite3 outside of awk and piping the output from sqlite3's STDOUT into awk's STDIN?

sqlite3 ... | awk ...
--
Grant. . . .
--- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114

From Newsgroup: comp.lang.awk

On 2024-03-04, Grant Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:

On 3/3/24 16:20, Arti F. Idiot wrote:

BEGIN {
  DBfile = "./site.db"
  CMD = "sqlite3 -csv " DBfile " \"" ARGV[1] "\""
  while (CMD | getline == 1) arr[++cnt] = $0
  close(CMD)
  for (i=1; i<=cnt; i++) printf "arr[%d] = %s\n", i, arr[i]
  print ""
}

Would someone please help me understand why you'd want to have the
sqlite3 (et al.) inside of awk (in the BEGIN{...}) verses having sqlite3 outside of awk and piping the output from sqlite3's STDOUT into awk's STDIN?

1. You could just have a #!/usr/bin/awk -f script instead of
a #!/bin/sh script that calls awk.

2. That script's standard input is available for other use. For
it could process the sqlite file to populate the array in the
above way, and then process standard input with the help of that
array.
--
TXR Programming Language: http://nongnu.org/txr
Cygnal: Cygwin Native Application Library: http://kylheku.com/cygnal
Mastodon: @[email protected]
--- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114