• Re: pls suggest me a simple but good compiler for F77

    From Thomas Koenig@[email protected] to comp.lang.fortran,openwatcom.users.fortran on Mon Nov 3 06:42:16 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.lang.fortran

    [Didn't see the original post]

    merl the perl <[email protected]> schrieb:

    "ginko" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
    hello, i am using FORCE 2.0 compiler for fortran 77.
    can you please suggest me a good and simple compiler for fortran 77?

    Fortran 77 is a subset of more modern version of the languages defined
    in Fortran 90, 95, 2003, 2008, 2018 and 2023.

    I would suggest gfortran, which is freely available and supported,
    also for new architectures.

    force is not good as it adds automatically a new line after every WRITE
    statement

    That has always been the case. In the past, non-standard edit
    descriptors such as "$" have been used to suppess this. Never
    versions have ADVANCE="NO" for that reason.

    [x-posted to openwatcom.users.fortran]
    I think openwatcom might be just the ticket. They even have a fledgling newsgroup started.

    I don't know about that compiler.
    --
    This USENET posting was made without artificial intelligence,
    artificial impertinence, artificial arrogance, artificial stupidity,
    artificial flavorings or artificial colorants.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Lynn McGuire@[email protected] to comp.lang.fortran,openwatcom.users.fortran on Mon Nov 3 14:09:17 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.lang.fortran

    On 11/3/2025 12:42 AM, Thomas Koenig wrote:
    [Didn't see the original post]

    merl the perl <[email protected]> schrieb:

    "ginko" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    hello, i am using FORCE 2.0 compiler for fortran 77.
    can you please suggest me a good and simple compiler for fortran 77?

    Fortran 77 is a subset of more modern version of the languages defined
    in Fortran 90, 95, 2003, 2008, 2018 and 2023.

    I would suggest gfortran, which is freely available and supported,
    also for new architectures.

    force is not good as it adds automatically a new line after every WRITE
    statement

    That has always been the case. In the past, non-standard edit
    descriptors such as "$" have been used to suppess this. Never
    versions have ADVANCE="NO" for that reason.

    [x-posted to openwatcom.users.fortran]
    I think openwatcom might be just the ticket. They even have a fledgling
    newsgroup started.

    I don't know about that compiler.

    This was a 2007 post that you responded to. Ray Banana kindly
    resurrected the openwatcom groups at my question of their existence with
    all of their posts. If asked, I would have told him to just let them go.

    Lynn

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2