From Newsgroup: comp.lang.misc
On 2025-10-18, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
On 2025-10-18, Nuno Silva <[email protected]d> wrote:
On 2025-10-18, Tristan Wibberley wrote:
The message body is Copyright (C) 2025 Tristan Wibberley except
citations and quotations noted. All Rights Reserved except as noted in
the sig.
Eh, do drop the quite inaccurate and nowadays even not necessary at all
(given that all signataries to the Buenos Aires convention have adhered
to the Berne convention) "All Rights Reserved" ...
"All Rights Reserved" means that the author has not waived any
copyrights; the work may not be copied or redistributed other than by
the copyright holder.
That is precisely the problem, it does not imply that, the author may
not have waived any rights, but their rights are still not absolute in a
way that it cannot be copied or redistributed without their
approval. Several countries limit the extent of the limitations imposed
by copyright. "All rights reserved" is misleading precisely because it
may be understood as "no copying or redistribution allowed".
"This work may be freely redistributed under such and such conditions"
and "all rights reserved" are conflicting statements, since the author
has waived (thus not reserved) the distribution right (to be the sole redistributor).
--
Nuno Silva
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2