I'm on the left
as such but I'm a realist and a pragmatist, I will work with anyone with
common sense, left or right. It's the crackpots who divide us by
demanding that their way be dominant, it's arbitrary, onerous, I demand
a system that can meet people where they are, and that's what the
revolution is going to be about. No more two-party pendulum swing.
Stable, rational government.
<chuckle> Joel and his imaginary revolution....
You don't know how to think, but you are going to judge this? Heh.
The critical thinker who says guys in dresses are normal has spoken.
You're a marginal half-wit, no more.
That still makes him an order of magnitude more than you.
On 9/11/2025 8:04 PM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
You think I have no idea who he [Charlie Kirk] is? He's a buffoon, he was only 31 FFS.
Don't kid yourself that he was some intellect. He was a sham.
He had more intelligence in one ear lobe than you would have if you
lived to be 1,000 years old.
You are a joke, saying that, cracker, redneck.
You think I have no idea who he [Charlie Kirk] is? He's a buffoon, he was only 31 FFS.
Don't kid yourself that he was some intellect. He was a sham.
He had more intelligence in one ear lobe than you would have if you
lived to be 1,000 years old.
<FAG CRICKETS>
You are a joke, saying that, cracker, redneck.
You are a pathetic disease-ridden faggot.
On 9/12/2025 7:14 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
You think I have no idea who he [Charlie Kirk] is? He's a buffoon, he was only 31 FFS.
Don't kid yourself that he was some intellect. He was a sham.
He had more intelligence in one ear lobe than you would have if you
lived to be 1,000 years old.
<FAG CRICKETS>
You are a joke, saying that, cracker, redneck.
You are a pathetic disease-ridden faggot.
No, loser. You are a pathetic 2025-Usenet drone. I'm an enigmatic
force in the world.
Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 9/11/2025 11:05 PM, Felix wrote:
pothead wrote:
On 2025-09-12, chine.bleu <[email protected]> wrote:
Joel W. Crump wrote:
Sure, but that is the problem.Watching enough of that to get the gist, it's very clear, he's not a >>>>>> good debater, he just takes on weaker opponents in debate andCollege students can be rather buffoonish themselves. That is the
talks over
them.� I would tear him a new asshole with his stupidity. And you can >>>>>> sit there and fantasize that I'm full of it, but you are gonna
read 'em
and weep before long.� I'm ascending.
point
of college. To expose high schoolers to the bigger world, and to give >>>>> them the tools and challenges to improve their brains. He chose a
target
rich field. He did not go up to people further along in education and >>>>> experience.
College is supposed to teach young minds� HOW TO THINK not WHAT to
think.
exactly
You don't know how to think, but you are going to judge this? Heh.
Our colleges and universities have morphed into indoctrination centers >>>> instead of bee hives of learning.
here in Australia leftist indoctrination starts in primary school
You're a marginal half-wit, no more.
you don't know me. I've never spoken to you before. if it's your
practice to judge people you don't know, then it's you who's the half wit.
On 9/12/2025 2:52 AM, Felix wrote:
Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 9/11/2025 11:05 PM, Felix wrote:
pothead wrote:
On 2025-09-12, chine.bleu <[email protected]> wrote:
Joel W. Crump wrote:
Sure, but that is the problem.Watching enough of that to get the gist, it's very clear, he's not a >>>>>>> good debater, he just takes on weaker opponents in debate andCollege students can be rather buffoonish themselves. That is the >>>>>> point
talks over
them.� I would tear him a new asshole with his stupidity. And you can >>>>>>> sit there and fantasize that I'm full of it, but you are gonna
read 'em
and weep before long.� I'm ascending.
of college. To expose high schoolers to the bigger world, and to give >>>>>> them the tools and challenges to improve their brains. He chose a >>>>>> target
rich field. He did not go up to people further along in education and >>>>>> experience.
College is supposed to teach young minds� HOW TO THINK not WHAT to
think.
exactly
You don't know how to think, but you are going to judge this? Heh.
Our colleges and universities have morphed into indoctrination centers >>>>> instead of bee hives of learning.
here in Australia leftist indoctrination starts in primary school
You're a marginal half-wit, no more.
you don't know me. I've never spoken to you before. if it's your
practice to judge people you don't know, then it's you who's the half wit.
Normally, you'd have a point there, that I was ASSuming a lot about you
from one post. But this is the kind of example where one post is enough
to do that. You want schools and colleges to be neutral, well they are, >right-wing morons call sensible things "liberal" and once it's labeled
that it's something to despise, well, fuck that noise, I'm on the left
as such but I'm a realist and a pragmatist, I will work with anyone with >common sense, left or right. It's the crackpots who divide us by
demanding that their way be dominant, it's arbitrary, onerous, I demand
a system that can meet people where they are, and that's what the
revolution is going to be about. No more two-party pendulum swing.
Stable, rational government.
On 9/11/2025 8:39 PM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
On 9/11/2025 11:05 PM, Felix wrote:
pothead wrote:
On 2025-09-12, chine.bleu <[email protected]> wrote:
Joel W. Crump wrote:
Sure, but that is the problem.Watching enough of that to get the gist, it's very clear, he's not a >>>>>> good debater, he just takes on weaker opponents in debate and talks >>>>>> overCollege students can be rather buffoonish themselves. That is the point >>>>> of college. To expose high schoolers to the bigger world, and to give >>>>> them the tools and challenges to improve their brains. He chose a
them.� I would tear him a new asshole with his stupidity.� And you can >>>>>> sit there and fantasize that I'm full of it, but you are gonna read >>>>>> 'em
and weep before long.� I'm ascending.
target
rich field. He did not go up to people further along in education and >>>>> experience.
College is supposed to teach young minds� HOW TO THINK not WHAT to
think.
exactly
You don't know how to think, but you are going to judge this?� Heh.
The critical thinker who says guys in dresses are normal has spoken.
Our colleges and universities have morphed into indoctrination centers >>>> instead of bee hives of learning.
here in Australia leftist indoctrination starts in primary school
You're a marginal half-wit, no more.
That still makes him an order of magnitude more than you.
On 9/12/2025 3:58 AM, cyrus rance wrote:
You don't know how to think, but you are going to judge this?� Heh.
The critical thinker who says guys in dresses are normal has spoken.
You're a marginal half-wit, no more.
That still makes him an order of magnitude more than you.
And yet you posted that from a remailer? Sorry, pal, I'm bigger and
badder than you, I don't need to refute your stupidity.
But some leftists can't tolerate anyone who disagrees with them.
... he said as he snipped what leftists said that he didn't agree
with.
On 9/12/2025 7:14 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
You think I have no idea who he [Charlie Kirk] is? He's a buffoon, he was only 31 FFS.
Don't kid yourself that he was some intellect. He was a sham.
He had more intelligence in one ear lobe than you would have if you
lived to be 1,000 years old.
<FAG CRICKETS>
You are a joke, saying that, cracker, redneck.
You are a pathetic disease-ridden faggot.
No, loser.
I'm an enematic farce in the world.
chine.bleu wrote:
Governor Swill wrote:
chine.bleu wrote:
Kirk was not the important outside his family.
Idiot.
Given his reputation and his actions, yes, he was important to
rightists causes outside his family.
Clearly, and a true, valiant proponent of honest debate.
But some leftists can't tolerate anyone who disagrees with them.
(more idiocy snipped)
Stop proving how stupid and ignorant you are.
Your response will be deleted, unread.
Governor Swill wrote:
But some leftists can't tolerate anyone who disagrees with them.
... he said as he snipped what leftists said that he didn't agree
with.
My snipping doesn't silence anyone, much less harm them in any way.
Joel W. Chump <[email protected]> wrote:
I'm an enematic farce in the world.
Testify, brother.
Governor Swill wrote:
But some leftists can't tolerate anyone who disagrees with them.
... he said as he snipped what leftists said that he didn't agree
with.
My snipping doesn't silence anyone, much less harm them in any way.
chrisv wrote:
Governor Swill wrote:
But some leftists can't tolerate anyone who disagrees with them.
... he said as he snipped what leftists said that he didn't agree
with.
My snipping doesn't silence anyone, much less harm them in any way.
I thought you said my response would be deleted unread?
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Yep, you sure did!
<laughs and points>
If you want an example of deleting and/or not reading posts, reply to
this one and I'll show you how it's done.
chrisv wrote:
Governor Swill wrote:
But some leftists can't tolerate anyone who disagrees with them.
... he said as he snipped what leftists said that he didn't agree
with.
My snipping doesn't silence anyone, much less harm them in any way.
I thought you said my response would be deleted unread?
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Yep, you sure did!
<snip>
On 9/12/2025 3:31 AM, LeftistsAreFools wrote:
I'm on the left
as such but I'm a realist and a pragmatist, I will work with anyone with >>> common sense, left or right. It's the crackpots who divide us by
demanding that their way be dominant, it's arbitrary, onerous, I demand
a system that can meet people where they are, and that's what the
revolution is going to be about. No more two-party pendulum swing.
Stable, rational government.
<chuckle> Joel and his imaginary revolution....
You have no idea who I am, then.
The liberal left had better start looking for places to hide.
They may have the trannys, but we have the weapons.
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115181934991844419
chrisv wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
<snip>
Just let it go, Chris.
The liberal left had better start looking for places to hide.
They may have the trannys, but we have the weapons.
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115181934991844419
On Thu, 11 Sep 2025 22:38:40 -0000 (UTC), "pothole," chromosomally and anatomically male but not the least bit masculine, and who is deathly afraid of Rudy, lied:
On 2025-09-11, Governor Swill wrote:
On Thu, 11 Sep 2025 "Joel W. Crump" wrote:
On 9/11/2025 2:36 PM, chrisv wrote:Can you work with a large?
chine.bleu wrote:That comment did kind of come out of nowhere.
Governor Swill wrote:Idiot.
chine.bleu wrote:
Kirk was not the important outside his family.
If I debated him he'd be fucked, but of course I'd have to sell out to >>>> get the chance, I got an offer to be on TV, I declined it. I can't work >>>> with that medium.Clearly, and a true, valiant proponent of honest debate.Given his reputation and his actions, yes, he was important to
rightists causes outside his family.
But some leftists can't tolerate anyone who disagrees with them.
RE: your sig Swilly.
I answered that question already, I think.
However, here it is again.
You haven't answered squat, poohead. You want to bang on daily about
how horrible crime infested Democrat cities are but you won't even acknowledge that at state level, that stat flips. You want to
maintain crime is entirely political, but if you're right, crime is
worse under Republicans.
Cities exist within states and cities within red states have worse
crime rates than cities within blue states. Red states outside cities
have higher crime rates than blue states outside cities.
THAT is the issue you keep dodging.
Yeah, crime is worse in cities than in other areas,
but why is it even worse in cities in red states?
Answer that or stfu with your daily crime whines.
One has nothing to do with the other.
So you're just going to lie about it? Cities and states have nothing
to do with each other?
My comments are based upon CITIES, which in many states, like NYS, slant the >> stats big time.
Here we go again, "The facts don't support my beliefs therefore the
facts are wrong."
So consider if NYC car owners purchased far more Fords than the rest of the >> state. Does that allow the Ford owners across the country to claim NYS is
a Ford supporting state?
Buying a Ford isn't a crime. Yet.
As for cities, more blacks = more crime especially black on black crime.
It's not racist it's a fact backed up by countless statistics.
I'm not disputing that either. In fact, I'm not disputing anything
you've claimed about urban crime. I just want know why you think
being in a red state amplifies the problem.
That's my answer.
It's not an answer, it's a dodge.
Now either return to your usual reasonable and normal or you will go from -6666 to -9999.
Your choice.
You think I care how you "score" me? You're a coward running from the
truth. Crime, especially violent crime, is worse under Republicans
than Democrats and you won't admit it.
Run, poohead, run!
You're a dishonest coward who can't face a fact, let alone himself.
Why is crime worse in red states? Why does Alaska, the least
populated state in the USA, the least "citified", have the nation's
highest crime rates?
On 10 Sep 2025 20:50:30 GMT, "Pye R. Squared" <[email protected]>
wrote:
The liberal left had better start looking for places to hide.
They may have the trannys, but we have the weapons.
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115181934991844419
You've wanted Civil War for years. Here's your first casualty.
Having a good time yet?
NP: Ohio Express - Yummy, Yummy, Yummy--
| Sysop: | DaiTengu |
|---|---|
| Location: | Appleton, WI |
| Users: | 1,071 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 58:49:25 |
| Calls: | 13,754 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 186,984 |
| D/L today: |
5,061 files (1,476M bytes) |
| Messages: | 2,425,322 |