In article <BC1F8146.395E6%[email protected]>,
Snit <[email protected]> wrote:
(snip of irrelevant material)
----------------------------------------------------------
So again, I ask you: Do you, or do you not, have a refutation for my argument? If so, please present it.
If you do not present one we can safely stay where we are: "with the
idea that while I appear to be right, and no clear accurate
refutations have been made, there is the logical possibility that I
am wrong."
We agree on THIS much? Right? Sheesh... :)
You still fail to help clarify what your argument actually seeks to
argue... amazing. I figured you were going to continue being
disingenuous.
I am seeking to ascertain how you are presenting your argument and what
it seeks to argue. Now, you are attempting to limit the WAY I refute
your argument, an argument you sometimes call your 'logical argument'...
but there doesn't seem to be anything logical about the way you are conducting the argument. You have repeatedly made strawmen arguments for
me and argue against them. You have changed definitions of words when
they didn't fit your argument,(it's all on google) That's bad form. If
you make a challenge to refute, you should live up to it. You said you
would answer ANY and ALL questions. My question was not unreasonable. I
now draw your attention to the fact that you have recently (today)
referred to your argument as a legal argument:
"In other words, while my argument supports the concept of Bush's guilt (based on a system of laws; a legal system), it does not argue for some
sort of justice to be done - even in a mock way (as would happen in a judicial system; or a court case, often even a mock one).
As such, my argument is a legal (but not a judicial) one."
Facts you will undoubtedly choke on where much spinning will ensue:
1 - A legal argument does not require a real courtroom or mock trial setting. Suggesting that it does is unacceptable because you just used
the term legal argument in reference to your argument. For you to make
such a suggestion now shows an attempt by you to utilize a double
standard.
2 - A legal argument does not require adjudication or a penalty phase. Suggesting that it does is unacceptable because you just used the term
legal argument in reference to your argument. For you to make such a suggestion now shows an attempt by you to utilize a double standard.
3 - In any argument, there is a potential necessity to show a burden of proof.
4 - In EVERY legal argument that makes a claim stating a defendant is guilty, the necessity to show burden of proof DEFINITELY exists.
http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/burden-of-proof.html
To stave off the pending strawmen you will undoubtedly attempt to
create, note that there is NO mention of courtroom or mock trial
settings and NO mention of adjudication or imposed penalties contained
in the page I linked you to. Logic dictates that these things are not required in ALL legal arguments. IOW... I AGREE with you to
differentiate YOUR legal argument from legal arguments conducted in real courtroom settings or real mock trial settings. I can do this because
YOU just labeled your argument "a legal (but not a judicial) one."
...and you did so in the exact same context... a context devoid of real court or real mock trial settings with no adjudication or penalty
imposed. For you to deny me this differentiation now would be a double standard on your part.
Additionally, suggesting that the burden of proof does not exist for
your argument is unacceptable because the legal system from whence the charges are derived must be the same legal system offered to defendants
in the argument. For you to suggest otherwise shows an attempt by you
to utilize a double standard with respect to the 'charging' and
'defending' the very nature of your argument demands. For TRUE justice(equity) to exist, they must BOTH(charger and defender) have
access to the same legal system. Anything else is not only disingenuous, it's completely illogical.
Why did I use the term "legal system" up above? Because YOU used the
term "legal system" in the quoted paragraph of today's post in reference
to what your argument is BASED on. I WILL assume you mean U.S. and international legal systems because it is from those that your evidence
is derived. You claim Bush is guilty, that makes him a defendant in your argument that is "based on a system of laws; a legal system". You claim
Bush is guilty based on the breaking of law in two legal systems, U.S.
and international... both which were utilized in the formulation of
charges in your argument and both of which provide defendants (in this
case, Bush) the presumption of innocence. Like I stated above, for you
to deny this presumption (or any other defense mechanism offered by the legal systems your very argument is derived from) is a double standard
that is not only disingenuous, it's also completely illogical. If you
want to call your argument a LOGICAL... *legal argument*... "based on a system of laws; a legal system" (ALL of these are terms you recently and continually use in reference to your argument) you cannot exercise these double standards while doing so. The atmosphere you are conducting your argument in is rapidly running out of oxygen. I suggest you bail out
while you can or I'll start quoting you about your evidence again :)
Now, if you wish to discuss the merits of the content on your website outside the atmosphere of an argument... say... as merely an unproven
legal theory you're kicking around... I might just consider it.
Steve
"Snit" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:BC1706B3.37DCC%[email protected]...
"Gigglz" <[email protected]> wrote on 12/30/03 1:23 AM:
What software are you using to organize your collection ?
VNC Viewer to get to the tunes....then iTunes.
With iTunes, you can install it on all the computers and just share the
music that way (though VNC lets you stop and start computers remotely). >> In any case, that is what my wife and I use - just iTunes.
Yup, he just showed me that. I was a little confused as to why I need to have BOTH of those on my computer when I only want to access the music.
I don't really need the VNC...but he put it on there any way. I just
click on iTunes and there they are :-) I'm really enjoying this SO
much!!
My wife and I just took a road trip - decided we wanted our collection
there, too. No iPod, though, so could not do it in an ideal way. I
just opened our main play list - hit the burn button, and iTunes was
smart enough to tell me there was too much for one CD. It allowed me to
burn the same randomized play list on a series of CD's - so we now have
10 CD's of music we like.
Wow!!! We're going to have RAID to back all of this stuff
up....wouldn't want to have to rip all those CD's again :-(
Isn't this cool?
Tell me...when you use your iTunes...do you get occasional 'bleeps' from
the buffer? I'm wondering if it's just cuz I'm using my computer right
now.
We did not have a CD player in the car, so we got a iRock to connect to
a walkman - allows us to play the music from the walkman on a radio
station and listen via the car's radio. Works like a charm.
That is really cool! I will tell my husband what you shared with me.
He'll love that idea!
For anyone who doubted that google groups did once share the users IP
address in the clear, I present the following.
For anyone who doubted that google groups did once share the users IP
address in the clear,
At Tue, 4 Nov 2025 09:20:14 -0000 (UTC), Gremlin <[email protected]> wrote:
For anyone who doubted that google groups did once share the users IP
address in the clear, I present the following.
It was exactly so.
I even remember recommending to someone that if they were to
use Google Groups for posting, that they use a VPN.
[...snip...]
Thank you for providing the Message-ID's of the posts
in question. I've downloaded the articles, and you-know-who
won't be able to weasel his way out of this one anymore.
On 2025-11-04, Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> wrote:
On Nov 4, 2025 at 4:16:46 AM MST, "vallor" wrote
<10ecnau$3ip9s$[email protected]>:
At Tue, 4 Nov 2025 09:20:14 -0000 (UTC), Gremlin <[email protected]> wrote: >>>
For anyone who doubted that google groups did once share the users IP
address in the clear, I present the following.
It was exactly so.
Did anyone say otherwise? If so, who?
I even remember recommending to someone that if they were to
use Google Groups for posting, that they use a VPN.
[...snip...]
Thank you for providing the Message-ID's of the posts
in question. I've downloaded the articles, and you-know-who
won't be able to weasel his way out of this one anymore.
Who ever said that was not posted? Gremlin is arguing against a straw man.
Said GoOfy as he forgets another issue here.
Despite the fact that you, GoOfY, have wrongfully accused me (and
"others") of posting as your most infamous sock puppet (you've even
flung that accusation in acw, even within the last year or so IIRC),
that IP address is one you and your puppet used.
Of course, as is 'your way', you created an insane and ridiculous story
(to 'support' your story that I was the perp) when you goofishly tried
to 'sell' the idea that I paid for an account in your area (as I've
proven, that ISP doesn't serve CO) in order to pull off this feat. Out
here in the real world, away from the borders of 'delusion-land', only
a complete idiot would attempt to 'sell' something *that* idiotic... but that's you <shrug>.
To "others": Part of Glasser's MO is to accuse "others" of what *he* is
doing (or has done). The passage of time, even 20+ years (as in this
case) matters not, the idiot will still try to 'sell' his stale garbage. Another example of this is his idiotic floodbot, for which he once
wrote:
<https://al.howardknight.net/?ID=160372745600>
Notably, he lied about his having authored that post, too (big shock
there <eyeroll>. He initially tried to 'shine the light' onto me (big
shock there, too) but that fell apart when Apd had eyes on it.
I've been passing out truncated versions of my db that are devoid of his 'work'... which explains why he's done so much whining about it lately (narcissists hate it when their 'work' is ignored). Re my db...
Arranged in no particular order, guess who wrote the following recently
in as many posts?
1 - "Even with all of this, if someone shares the DB software (for SQL Lite) I
still might play."
2 - "OK, to help you I might follow the instructions. Do you have a MID where I can
find them all in one place? This includes the database software or whatever."
3 - "If you have a link to his DB and data I might play some."
4 - "If someone points to the DB and data I might play... but I fear this is more
about trolling than DB info."
5 - "I said if there was a link to the software, the DB, and the data I would be
open to playing."
6 - "OK. Downloaded. Not sure what I will do with it, if anything."
Not much of a 'puzzle' there, is it? ;)
More 'puzzling is why, between this author and DSB, the latter was able
to 'get his act together' with the same level of hand holding by Apd
that's been available to all readers (get the DB Browser app, get the
db, open it... duh!). The answer is simple and obvious once you consider
who the author is. It's called: attention... and this author will say
and/or do *anything* to get it. Is there anyone who *isn't* aware of
this?
On 2025-11-04, Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> wrote:
Who ever said that was not posted? Gremlin is arguing against a straw man.
Said GoOfy as he forgets another issue here.
This is the issue Gremlin brought up.
And I'm bringing up another reality that *you* created.
Talk 'tech', fool... you lose when you lie about 'personalities'.
At Tue, 4 Nov 2025 09:20:14 -0000 (UTC), Gremlin <[email protected]> wrote:
For anyone who doubted that google groups did once share the users IP
address in the clear, I present the following.
It was exactly so.
I even remember recommending to someone that if they were to
use Google Groups for posting, that they use a VPN.
[...snip...]
Thank you for providing the Message-ID's of the posts
in question. I've downloaded the articles, and you-know-who
won't be able to weasel his way out of this one anymore.
At Tue, 4 Nov 2025 09:20:14 -0000 (UTC), Gremlin <[email protected]> wrote:
For anyone who doubted that google groups did once share the users IP
address in the clear, I present the following.
It was exactly so.
I even remember recommending to someone that if they were to
use Google Groups for posting, that they use a VPN.
[...snip...]
Thank you for providing the Message-ID's of the posts
in question. I've downloaded the articles, and you-know-who
won't be able to weasel his way out of this one anymore.
vallor <[email protected]> news:10ecnau$3ip9s$[email protected] Tue, 04 Nov 2025 11:16:46 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
At Tue, 4 Nov 2025 09:20:14 -0000 (UTC), Gremlin <[email protected]> wrote:
For anyone who doubted that google groups did once share the users IP
address in the clear, I present the following.
It was exactly so.
:) I wasn't making it up. ROFL!
For anyone who doubted that google groups did once share the users IP
address in the clear, I present the following. You will also notice that
the 1st post from "Sigmond" who posted via Google Groups is using the
same IP address as the one from Snit. When Snit was asked why the IP
matched - he attempted to provide several different reasons for it.
Anything to avoid admitting he was posting as Sigmond of course.
On Tue, 4 Nov 2025 09:20:14 -0000 (UTC), Gremlin wrote:
For anyone who doubted that google groups did once share the users IP
address in the clear, I present the following. You will also notice that
the 1st post from "Sigmond" who posted via Google Groups is using the
same IP address as the one from Snit. When Snit was asked why the IP
matched - he attempted to provide several different reasons for it.
Anything to avoid admitting he was posting as Sigmond of course.
fwiw, my IP address is dynamic and assigned by Verizon. It changes
frequently and usually looks like I'm in Denver. It's amusing since if I'm watching a streaming video I get targeted ads for the Denver Mattress
Company and other businesses in that area. Sometimes it's SLC for variety.
Path: not-for-mail
From: Gremlin <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: google groups did publish IP address
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2025 09:04:25 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 139
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Injection-Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2025 09:04:26 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f2eae7ec7645b46b2f7e6881176e291d";
logging-data="3703735";
mail-complaints-to="[email protected]"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+IPgfJ1WnkfDVt2xYMXlJU+hicX71fvTI="
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
Cancel-Lock: sha1:oGqsbj7YJ331r+1ChSl4NvGQQKw=
Bytes: 6714
For anyone who doubted that google groups did once share the users IP
address in the clear, I present the following. You will also notice that
the 1st post from "Sigmond" who posted via Google Groups is using the same
IP address as the one from Snit. When Snit was asked why the IP matched -
he attempted to provide several different reasons for it. Anything to
avoid admitting he was posting as Sigmond of course.
As you can see though, Snit did post as Sigmond and made an effort to fool people into believing that Sigmond was another person. :)
Also contrary to Snits claims previously, Google groups DID share the
posters IP address in the clear. So much for no evidence of that. And so
much for Snit not using socks. h0h0h0
From: [email protected] (sigmond)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: Why I hate MS
Date: 6 Jan 2004 17:25:29 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 122
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <BC1E3AC7.39507%[email protected]> <[email protected]> <BC1EC6A8.39537%[email protected]> <[email protected]> <BC1F350E.3957E%[email protected]> <[email protected]> <BC1F8146.395E6%[email protected]> <[email protected]> NNTP-Posting-Host:24.117.214.4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1073438730 13627 127.0.0.1 (7 Jan 2004
01:25:30 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 01:25:30 +0000 (UTC)
And now Snits post:
From: Snit <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: alt.support.anxiety-panic.moderated
Subject: Re: OT...Very cool husband
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 15:10:47 CST
Organization: Altopia Corp. - Usenet Access - www.altopia.com
Lines: 55
Approved: ASAPM Robomoderator <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <BC172FBE.37F1C%[email protected]>
References: <Kc6Ib.22208$[email protected]> <bsr1fh$hkfo$[email protected]> <uc9Ib.195310$[email protected]> <BC1706B3.37DCC%[email protected]> <zIkIb.26$[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.117.214.4
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 14:35:58 -0600
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.0.2006
***
Here's the full posts without anything trimmed:
From: [email protected] (sigmond)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: Why I hate MS
Date: 6 Jan 2004 17:25:29 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 122
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <BC1E3AC7.39507%[email protected]> <[email protected]> <BC1EC6A8.39537%[email protected]> <[email protected]> <BC1F350E.3957E%[email protected]> <[email protected]> <BC1F8146.395E6%[email protected]> <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.117.214.4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1073438730 13627 127.0.0.1 (7 Jan 2004
01:25:30 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 01:25:30 +0000 (UTC)
And now Snits post:
From: Snit <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: alt.support.anxiety-panic.moderated
Subject: Re: OT...Very cool husband
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 15:10:47 CST
Organization: Altopia Corp. - Usenet Access - www.altopia.com
Lines: 55
Approved: ASAPM Robomoderator <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <BC172FBE.37F1C%[email protected]>
References: <Kc6Ib.22208$[email protected]> <bsr1fh$hkfo$[email protected]> <uc9Ib.195310$[email protected]> <BC1706B3.37DCC%[email protected]> <zIkIb.26$[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.117.214.4
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
X-ASAPM-Policy: http://stump.algebra.com/~asapm
X-ASAPM-Info-1: Send submissions to [email protected] X-ASAPM-Info-2: Send complaints to [email protected] X-Comment: moderators do not necessarily agree or disagree with this
article.
X-Robomod: STUMP, [email protected] (Igor Chudov)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 14:35:58 -0600
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.0.2006
X-Trace: sv3-e0G8tH29YnaYlKCXVdqlZymrPlhWPObSC/lAwT9dFmuXUHXnwOHlJrJRyMgR4gJV7DJL4QtW O7hW5tq!CdwacocxdGt83olIbwZ45aQO/M1wuDL/tFRqtT3BgwFTD9vcxeYVmgbVcIY3wM6LfUMKD nFVDpLn!5wHVFQ==
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: [email protected]
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your
complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.1
X-Spam-Level: Level
X-Spamscanner: mailbox7.ucsd.edu (v1.4 Oct 30 2003 22:20:52, 0.1/5.0 2.60) X-MailScanner: PASSED (v1.2.8 68804 hBUKa1C6076834 mailbox7.ucsd.edu)
X-Auth: PGPMoose V1.1 PGP alt.support.anxiety-panic.moderated
iQBVAwUAP/Hp19SA5OiGMwvNAQHK5AH/SrEqPX16EILVE2Wm4O75QcH3g7J9VajX
UZETnOM/7srOIsQobW9OrIa4eh9ktIu9igJhVdOYwxz+YjFVLlDvoA==
=uZN9
At Tue, 4 Nov 2025 09:20:14 -0000 (UTC), Gremlin <[email protected]> wrote:
For anyone who doubted that google groups did once share the users IP
address in the clear, I present the following.
It was exactly so.
Thank you for providing the Message-ID's of the posts
in question. I've downloaded the articles, and you-know-who
won't be able to weasel his way out of this one anymore.
vallor <[email protected]> news:10ecnau$3ip9s$[email protected] Tue, 04 Nov 2025 11:16:46 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
At Tue, 4 Nov 2025 09:20:14 -0000 (UTC), Gremlin <[email protected]> wrote:
For anyone who doubted that google groups did once share the users IP
address in the clear, I present the following.
It was exactly so.
Yep. And when google started censoring it, you could still get it by forwarding the post to your google email address. They eventually put a stop to that too. But for awhile, it was a loop hole that could be exploited.
Snit has denied this was ever so. <G>
Snit denied he socked up as Sigmond too though. As we can all see though, he >certainly lied about that.
Gremlin wrote:
Snit denied he socked up as Sigmond too though. As we can all see though, he >> certainly lied about that.
Related to the "Snit" thing being busted for posting as "Sigmond" and
then lying about it, have you read this thread?
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/UBoZtO1I4fg/m/2LKHHKv3fNYJ
It's absolutely hilarious, and a classic example of what a
pathological liar the "Snit" thing is. Lying his ass off, forging
documents, denying facts and clear explanations of evidence, calling
the honest people liars, and on and on.
It's fascinating to see the thing forging pdf documents in an attempt
to show that the honest guy dishonestly altered evidence. All the
while the original, unaltered, not-created-on-a-Mac document was
always available. It's just *crazy* that it thought that anyone could
be fooled. Just *lying* without shame.
The most relevant posts are from Sandman and Steve Mackay.
Gremlin wrote:
Snit denied he socked up as Sigmond too though. As we can all see though, he >>certainly lied about that.
Related to the "Snit" thing being busted for posting as "Sigmond" and
then lying about it, have you read this thread?
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/UBoZtO1I4fg/m/2LKHHKv3fNYJ
It's absolutely hilarious, and a classic example of what a
pathological liar the "Snit" thing is. Lying his ass off, forging
documents, denying facts and clear explanations of evidence, calling
the honest people liars, and on and on.
It's fascinating to see the thing forging pdf documents in an attempt
to show that the honest guy dishonestly altered evidence. All the
while the original, unaltered, not-created-on-a-Mac document was
always available. It's just *crazy* that it thought that anyone could
be fooled. Just *lying* without shame.
The most relevant posts are from Sandman and Steve Mackay.
On 2025-11-06, chrisv <[email protected]d> wrote:
Gremlin wrote:
Snit denied he socked up as Sigmond too though. As we can all see though, he
certainly lied about that.
Related to the "Snit" thing being busted for posting as "Sigmond" and
then lying about it, have you read this thread?
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/UBoZtO1I4fg/m/2LKHHKv3fNYJ
It's absolutely hilarious, and a classic example of what a
pathological liar the "Snit" thing is. Lying his ass off, forging
documents, denying facts and clear explanations of evidence, calling
the honest people liars, and on and on.
It's fascinating to see the thing forging pdf documents in an attempt
to show that the honest guy dishonestly altered evidence. All the
while the original, unaltered, not-created-on-a-Mac document was
always available. It's just *crazy* that it thought that anyone could
be fooled. Just *lying* without shame.
The most relevant posts are from Sandman and Steve Mackay.
ROTFLMAO!!
Thanks for posting this gem.
Sandman's site has tons of information on the snit Brock McNuggets, Michael Glasser from Prescott Arizona troll.
The interesting part is that there is so much information about snit's dishonesty,
psychopath like behavior and trolling but yet it's almost impossible to find people
who have supported snit for any length of time.
And those that fall for snit's circus routine quickly find out and become snit
detractors.
The snit Brock McNuggets, Michael Glasser from Prescott Arizona troll
is one hell of a toxic person.
He should have one of those radioactive signs from the 60's around his neck so people are warned.
Gremlin wrote:
Snit denied he socked up as Sigmond too though. As we can all see
though, he certainly lied about that.
Related to the "Snit" thing being busted for posting as "Sigmond" and
then lying about it, have you read this thread?
[https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/UBoZtO1I4fg/m/2LKHHK v3fNYJ]
It's absolutely hilarious, and a classic example of what a
pathological liar the "Snit" thing is. Lying his ass off, forging
documents, denying facts and clear explanations of evidence, calling
the honest people liars, and on and on.
It's fascinating to see the thing forging pdf documents in an attempt
to show that the honest guy dishonestly altered evidence. All the
while the original, unaltered, not-created-on-a-Mac document was
always available. It's just *crazy* that it thought that anyone could
be fooled. Just *lying* without shame.
The most relevant posts are from Sandman and Steve Mackay.
In article <BD3E9B07.5BA3B%[email protected]>,
Snit <[email protected]> wrote:
Michael - it is quite clear that there is no chance that there ever
will be any meaningful exchange between you and I.
I am open to meaningful exchanges with you.
Hehe, no you're not. :-D
I told you already - I won't post things from a liar.
Look at the Sandman Trolling FAQ. It shows, fully linked, some lies from >>you.
Haha! :-D
Indeed ironic. :)
You have to give me at least some credit for backing you into this
corner, eh? :)
Haha, of course. Where to go, where to go!? :-D
In any case, I did some hunting through my backup drive, and I found the >>PDF printout Steve Mackay provided of the e-mail in question. Please
note the word "unverified" appears directly before my IP. What do *you* >>think the word "unverified" means in this context? Here is the PDF:
It means that the IP your computer set when you sent the message was 192.168.0.2, but the IP the email was recieved from was 24.117.214.36,
since that was the IP your router had at the moment.
On Nov 6, 2025 at 5:51:18�PM MST, "pothead" wrote <10ejfq5$1h7vc$[email protected]>:
On 2025-11-06, chrisv <[email protected]d> wrote:
Gremlin wrote:
Snit denied he socked up as Sigmond too though. As we can all see though, he
certainly lied about that.
Related to the "Snit" thing being busted for posting as "Sigmond" and
then lying about it, have you read this thread?
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/UBoZtO1I4fg/m/2LKHHKv3fNYJ
It's absolutely hilarious, and a classic example of what a
pathological liar the "Snit" thing is. Lying his ass off, forging
documents, denying facts and clear explanations of evidence, calling
the honest people liars, and on and on.
It's fascinating to see the thing forging pdf documents in an attempt
to show that the honest guy dishonestly altered evidence. All the
while the original, unaltered, not-created-on-a-Mac document was
always available. It's just *crazy* that it thought that anyone could
be fooled. Just *lying* without shame.
The most relevant posts are from Sandman and Steve Mackay.
ROTFLMAO!!
Thanks for posting this gem.
Sandman's site has tons of information on the snit Brock McNuggets, Michael Glasser from Prescott Arizona troll.
Tons of information... but little of it TRUE.
But truth does not matter to you.
Nor to other white supremacists.
<683367db$9$10360$[email protected]> <6831d3ac$0$16$[email protected]> <688ff1ad$0$26$[email protected]> <6895600b$0$10360$[email protected]>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
* "Open borders" and "flooding the country" -- classic Great Replacement rhetoric claiming elites import non-white migrants to weaken America. https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/great-replacement-theory
* Dehumanizing immigrants -- calling them "criminals," "terrorists," "mental patients" mirrors far-right propaganda that paints migrants as threats rather than people. https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/group/vdare
* "Lazy grifters" vs. "hard-working taxpayers" -- Reagan-era dog whistle that racializes poverty and casts minorities as parasites. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/americas-welfare-myths/
* "America First" -- a slogan with origins in white-nationalist movements; see
the Anti-Defamation League background: https://www.adl.org/resources/blog/history-phrase-america-first
Bottom Line: Pothead repeats the core "logic" of white-supremacist politics --
outsiders as invaders, welfare as theft, and "real Americans" as victims -- using coded language that normalizes racial hierarchy. ----------------------------------------------------------------------
The interesting part is that there is so much information about snit's dishonesty,
psychopath like behavior and trolling but yet it's almost impossible to find
people
who have supported snit for any length of time.
You look to coalitions. Or as I have said: tribalism and scapegoating. Thanks for backing that.
And those that fall for snit's circus routine quickly find out and become snit
detractors.
The snit Brock McNuggets, Michael Glasser from Prescott Arizona troll
is one hell of a toxic person.
He should have one of those radioactive signs from the 60's around his neck so people are warned.
If you really thought so you would just ignore me. But you want to harm me. People attack the market leader, not the nobody.
In article <690d59b8$0$24$[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
On Nov 6, 2025 at 5:51:18 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
<10ejfq5$1h7vc$[email protected]>:
On 2025-11-06, chrisv <[email protected]d> wrote:
Gremlin wrote:
Snit denied he socked up as Sigmond too though. As we can all see though, he
certainly lied about that.
Related to the "Snit" thing being busted for posting as "Sigmond" and
then lying about it, have you read this thread?
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/UBoZtO1I4fg/m/2LKHHKv3fNYJ
It's absolutely hilarious, and a classic example of what a
pathological liar the "Snit" thing is. Lying his ass off, forging
documents, denying facts and clear explanations of evidence, calling
the honest people liars, and on and on.
It's fascinating to see the thing forging pdf documents in an attempt
to show that the honest guy dishonestly altered evidence. All the
while the original, unaltered, not-created-on-a-Mac document was
always available. It's just *crazy* that it thought that anyone could
be fooled. Just *lying* without shame.
The most relevant posts are from Sandman and Steve Mackay.
ROTFLMAO!!
Thanks for posting this gem.
Sandman's site has tons of information on the snit Brock McNuggets, Michael
Glasser from Prescott Arizona troll.
Tons of information... but little of it TRUE.
So then prove it's not true.
How about some receipts snit?
Where are they?
But truth does not matter to you.
So claims the biggest liar on USENET.
Stop projecting snit.
You suck at it.
Oh, and how about some receipts proving the truth doesn't
matter to the op?
You keep claiming you bring receipts, so where are they?
Did I somehow miss them or is this just another one of
your lies snit?
Nor to other white supremacists.
How do you figure that?
Hitting the glue bag again snit?
<683367db$9$10360$[email protected]>
<6831d3ac$0$16$[email protected]>
<688ff1ad$0$26$[email protected]>
<6895600b$0$10360$[email protected]>
So?
Those mid have nothing to do with the op being a white
supremacist.
Can you read?
Are you retarded?
Just plain stupid?
----------------------------------------------------------------------So what?
* "Open borders" and "flooding the country" -- classic Great Replacement
rhetoric claiming elites import non-white migrants to weaken America.
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/great-replacement-theory
* Dehumanizing immigrants -- calling them "criminals," "terrorists," "mental >> patients" mirrors far-right propaganda that paints migrants as threats rather
than people.
https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/group/vdare
* "Lazy grifters" vs. "hard-working taxpayers" -- Reagan-era dog whistle that
racializes poverty and casts minorities as parasites.
https://www.brookings.edu/articles/americas-welfare-myths/
* "America First" -- a slogan with origins in white-nationalist movements; see
the Anti-Defamation League background:
https://www.adl.org/resources/blog/history-phrase-america-first
Bottom Line: Pothead repeats the core "logic" of white-supremacist politics --
outsiders as invaders, welfare as theft, and "real Americans" as victims -- >> using coded language that normalizes racial hierarchy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your above links in no way connect the op to those
beliefs.
You are a very dishonest person
The interesting part is that there is so much information about snit's
dishonesty,
psychopath like behavior and trolling but yet it's almost impossible to find
people
who have supported snit for any length of time.
You look to coalitions. Or as I have said: tribalism and scapegoating. Thanks
for backing that.
Call it what you will however the facts are that you are
not liked by literally anyone but despised by many.
Why is that?
And those that fall for snit's circus routine quickly find out and become snit
detractors.
The snit Brock McNuggets, Michael Glasser from Prescott Arizona troll
is one hell of a toxic person.
He should have one of those radioactive signs from the 60's around his neck
so people are warned.
If you really thought so you would just ignore me. But you want to harm me. >> People attack the market leader, not the nobody.
Pointing out the truth about you snit is not attacking
you. In fact you are the one making all types of false
accusations against others so in effect you are the one
who started this but others are going to finish it.
You a market leader? You need to address that NPD you seem
to be suffering with. You make Trump look humble in
comparison.
Maybe as a troll and the head village idiot but otherwise
you are a lying, dishonest, piece of shit grifter who has
never worked a legitimate job in his entire life but
instead trolls the Internet twenty four hours a day.
In article <690d59b8$0$24$[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
On Nov 6, 2025 at 5:51:18 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
<10ejfq5$1h7vc$[email protected]>:
On 2025-11-06, chrisv <[email protected]d> wrote:
Gremlin wrote:
Snit denied he socked up as Sigmond too though. As we can all see though, he
certainly lied about that.
Related to the "Snit" thing being busted for posting as "Sigmond" and
then lying about it, have you read this thread?
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/UBoZtO1I4fg/m/2LKHHKv3fNYJ
It's absolutely hilarious, and a classic example of what a
pathological liar the "Snit" thing is. Lying his ass off, forging
documents, denying facts and clear explanations of evidence, calling
the honest people liars, and on and on.
It's fascinating to see the thing forging pdf documents in an attempt
to show that the honest guy dishonestly altered evidence. All the
while the original, unaltered, not-created-on-a-Mac document was
always available. It's just *crazy* that it thought that anyone could >>>> be fooled. Just *lying* without shame.
The most relevant posts are from Sandman and Steve Mackay.
ROTFLMAO!!
Thanks for posting this gem.
Sandman's site has tons of information on the snit Brock McNuggets, Michael >>> Glasser from Prescott Arizona troll.
Tons of information... but little of it TRUE.
So then prove it's not true.
chrisv <[email protected]d> news:[email protected] Thu, 06 Nov 2025 22:53:01
GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
Gremlin wrote:
Snit denied he socked up as Sigmond too though. As we can all see
though, he certainly lied about that.
Related to the "Snit" thing being busted for posting as "Sigmond" and
then lying about it, have you read this thread?
[https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/UBoZtO1I4fg/m/2LKHHK
v3fNYJ]
I had not. Thanks for sharing the link!
It's absolutely hilarious, and a classic example of what a
pathological liar the "Snit" thing is. Lying his ass off, forging
documents, denying facts and clear explanations of evidence, calling
the honest people liars, and on and on.
He's been at this for a very long time. I've been enjoying his "I bring reciepts" routines.
He doesn't understand that he's not only exposing how
dishonest he actually is - He's also showing everyone that reading comprehension is a skill that he doesn't have. The ones for pothead are
easy as frak to spot, too. The ones for me are a little more difficult because they're sampled from multiple conversations from different
threads. But, even a 3rd grader can see what he's doing and also see that
he doesn't comprehend what he reads. His antics wouldn't fool a kid at the end of the day.
It's fascinating to see the thing forging pdf documents in an attempt
to show that the honest guy dishonestly altered evidence. All the
while the original, unaltered, not-created-on-a-Mac document was
always available. It's just *crazy* that it thought that anyone could
be fooled. Just *lying* without shame.
He's not even really fooling David Brooks. He just doesn't realize what
David actually considers him to be. Cannon fodder. A means to an end.
David did the same with Jenn and Eagle. Two posters I showed how things
can get real serious and real nasty well outside of usenet. He told them
they were his friend and that he had their backs. He wasn't and he didn't.
He used them as he does Snit - hoping I'd make a mistake and get myself in
a legal bind. David believes that I should have a prison record for some things I've done. That I got away with it. He sees it as his "job" to have
me punished. He has no problem using others to see that his job gets completed. And that's exactly what he's doing with Snit. He will use any sucker dumb enough not to see things for what they actually are.
It's why David hasn't told Snit what actually happened to the other two.
He doesn't want to discourage snit from becoming the 3rd one. Not that
Snit would listen, mind you. He thinks he's untouchable. Jenn and Eagle
once did too. Jenn especially so - I didn't even know her last name when
it started. She assumed I couldn't find out. Just as David once assumed
due to the fact we don't live in the same country that I couldn't get any useful information on him, either. That he was free to try and dox me
without recourse on my part. He was quite wrong in that assumption as he learned. I taught him what an .NFO file is. <G>
He promised me a visit from the authorities for that lesson. They must
have tried to cross the ocean via canoe and it sank. I never got a visit.
He did though, for threatening another posters kids with a 9mm handgun
that he claimed he had permission (permission rofl, what a country to live in!) to have. He lied about all of that, too. Cops did come to see him
about it. They found no record of his permission and he turned over no firearm. I don't think he ever actually had one. I do though. He's offered
to send people to whatever address he thinks I live at this time - so I
did what I feel that I'm morally obligated to do. Let them know that
unless you've been invited by me, you will leave zipped up in a bag and
toted to a van for proper disposal by the coronor. I live in a 2nd
amendment friendly state and I don't have to run away. I don't even have
to enter my house to flee or avoid you. I can do what needs to be done on
my property and call it a day. All nice and legal. Not that I'm actually expecting to have to do anything like that. I also realize some people are crazy though and the world is a dangerous place. That's why I carry,
that's why there's always one near by too. I keep myself and those around
me safe.
David is just as fucked up in the head as Snit, but has no FAS or other medical reasons *excuses rather* to justify any of it. David was a natural fuckup.
It means that the IP your computer set when you sent the message was
192.168.0.2, but the IP the email was recieved from was 24.117.214.36,
since that was the IP your router had at the moment.
Here's the IP address for the public library in Snit's hometown:
http://ws.arin.net/cgi-bin/whois.pl?queryinput=!%20NET-216-160-210-0-1
Here are the IP addresses for colleges around Snit's hometown including
the one he currently works at:
http://ws.arin.net/cgi-bin/whois.pl?queryinput=!%20NET-198-60-121-0-1 http://ws.arin.net/cgi-bin/whois.pl?queryinput=!%20NET-198-60-121-0-2
Here's another post that Snit made with sigmond's IP address:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=BC060CF1.35F49%25snit-nospam%40cableone.n et&output=gplain
(Note that Snit was not yet working at the lab due to his lack of a job.
He was posting from home, as he inadvertently admitted when he stated
that sigmond was "Maybe someone who snuck into my house."
In short, Snit is telling lies when he claims the IP address
24.117.214.4 is from the computer lab.
Muahaha. So fucking funny. Thanks again man! Those contents are a fucking gold mine. :)
On 2025-11-07, Wilson <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <690d59b8$0$24$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On Nov 6, 2025 at 5:51:18 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
<10ejfq5$1h7vc$[email protected]>:
On 2025-11-06, chrisv <[email protected]d> wrote:
Gremlin wrote:
Snit denied he socked up as Sigmond too though. As we can all see though, he
certainly lied about that.
Related to the "Snit" thing being busted for posting as "Sigmond" and >>>>> then lying about it, have you read this thread?
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/UBoZtO1I4fg/m/2LKHHKv3fNYJ
It's absolutely hilarious, and a classic example of what a
pathological liar the "Snit" thing is. Lying his ass off, forging
documents, denying facts and clear explanations of evidence, calling >>>>> the honest people liars, and on and on.
It's fascinating to see the thing forging pdf documents in an attempt >>>>> to show that the honest guy dishonestly altered evidence. All the
while the original, unaltered, not-created-on-a-Mac document was
always available. It's just *crazy* that it thought that anyone could >>>>> be fooled. Just *lying* without shame.
The most relevant posts are from Sandman and Steve Mackay.
ROTFLMAO!!
Thanks for posting this gem.
Sandman's site has tons of information on the snit Brock McNuggets, Michael
Glasser from Prescott Arizona troll.
Tons of information... but little of it TRUE.
So then prove it's not true.
How about some receipts snit?
Where are they?
Good luck with that one..
Even if snit Brock McNuggets Michael Glasser of Prescott Arizona does post some
sort of receipt, rest assured it has nothing to do with the topic being discussed.
He's the biggest liar on planet earth.
But truth does not matter to you.
So claims the biggest liar on USENET.
Stop projecting snit.
You suck at it.
Oh, and how about some receipts proving the truth doesn't
matter to the op?
You keep claiming you bring receipts, so where are they?
Did I somehow miss them or is this just another one of
your lies snit?
You'll never see them.
Nor to other white supremacists.
How do you figure that?
Hitting the glue bag again snit?
Snit Brock McNuggets Michael Glasser of Prescott Arizona
simply makes things up.
Don't know about snit and glue but he's well known for mixing up jenkem.
<683367db$9$10360$[email protected]>
<6831d3ac$0$16$[email protected]>
<688ff1ad$0$26$[email protected]>
<6895600b$0$10360$[email protected]>
So?
Those mid have nothing to do with the op being a white
supremacist.
Can you read?
Are you retarded?
Just plain stupid?
All of the above.
And then some.
----------------------------------------------------------------------So what?
* "Open borders" and "flooding the country" -- classic Great Replacement >>> rhetoric claiming elites import non-white migrants to weaken America.
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/great-replacement-theory
* Dehumanizing immigrants -- calling them "criminals," "terrorists," "mental
patients" mirrors far-right propaganda that paints migrants as threats rather
than people.
https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/group/vdare
* "Lazy grifters" vs. "hard-working taxpayers" -- Reagan-era dog whistle that
racializes poverty and casts minorities as parasites.
https://www.brookings.edu/articles/americas-welfare-myths/
* "America First" -- a slogan with origins in white-nationalist movements; see
the Anti-Defamation League background:
https://www.adl.org/resources/blog/history-phrase-america-first
Bottom Line: Pothead repeats the core "logic" of white-supremacist politics --
outsiders as invaders, welfare as theft, and "real Americans" as victims -- >>> using coded language that normalizes racial hierarchy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your above links in no way connect the op to those
beliefs.
You are a very dishonest person
Yep.
In case you have not seen this already, here are the typical methods that snit Brock McNuggets Michael Glasser of Prescott Arizona employs to lie. <https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html>
The interesting part is that there is so much information about snit's >>>> dishonesty,
psychopath like behavior and trolling but yet it's almost impossible to find
people
who have supported snit for any length of time.
You look to coalitions. Or as I have said: tribalism and scapegoating. Thanks
for backing that.
Call it what you will however the facts are that you are
not liked by literally anyone but despised by many.
Why is that?
True statement. <https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html>
And those that fall for snit's circus routine quickly find out and become snit
detractors.
The snit Brock McNuggets, Michael Glasser from Prescott Arizona troll
is one hell of a toxic person.
He should have one of those radioactive signs from the 60's around his neck
so people are warned.
If you really thought so you would just ignore me. But you want to harm me. >>> People attack the market leader, not the nobody.
Pointing out the truth about you snit is not attacking
you. In fact you are the one making all types of false
accusations against others so in effect you are the one
who started this but others are going to finish it.
Good.
The sooner someone steps on the snit cockroach the better.
You a market leader? You need to address that NPD you seem
to be suffering with. You make Trump look humble in
comparison.
Maybe as a troll and the head village idiot but otherwise
you are a lying, dishonest, piece of shit grifter who has
never worked a legitimate job in his entire life but
instead trolls the Internet twenty four hours a day.
Our tax dollars at work.
Sandman's site has tons of information on the snit Brock McNuggets, Michael
Glasser from Prescott Arizona troll.
Tons of information... but little of it TRUE.
So then prove it's not true.
In article <690e8db0$2$27$[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
Sandman's site has tons of information on the snit Brock McNuggets, Michael
Glasser from Prescott Arizona troll.
Tons of information... but little of it TRUE.
So then prove it's not true.
You made the claim above so it is up to you to prove it's
true.
Your weasel words will not work this time.
It is not my job to prove innocence, it is the job of you trolls to
prove guilt.
Burden of proof is something you simply do not understand.
On Nov 7, 2025 at 2:23:22 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote <[email protected]>:
Clearly not... you do not even know how to spell receipts. LOL! But hey,
if you enjoy it, here are some more:
Notice you have insults. I have receipts.
And is my home town Prescott or Phoenix these days? LOL!
Here are the IP addresses for colleges around Snit's hometown including
the one he currently works at:
http://ws.arin.net/cgi-bin/whois.pl?queryinput=!%20NET-198-60-121-0-1
http://ws.arin.net/cgi-bin/whois.pl?queryinput=!%20NET-198-60-121-0-2
More dead links from you.
You really have no clue how to use the web, do you? LOL!
(Note that Snit was not yet working at the lab due to his lack of a
job. He was posting from home, as he inadvertently admitted when he
stated that sigmond was "Maybe someone who snuck into my house."
In short, Snit is telling lies when he claims the IP address
24.117.214.4 is from the computer lab.
Muahaha. So fucking funny. Thanks again man! Those contents are a
fucking gold mine. :)
You really can't make a point to save your life. :)
On Nov 7, 2025 at 5:35:04 PM MST, "Wilson" wrote <[email protected]>:
In article <690e8db0$2$27$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
Sandman's site has tons of information on the snit Brock McNuggets, >>>>>> Michael Glasser from Prescott Arizona troll.
Tons of information... but little of it TRUE.
So then prove it's not true.
You made the claim above so it is up to you to prove it's
true.
Your weasel words will not work this time.
The site is not shown to be accurate in any way. Done.
Now go to your KKK meetings and leave me alone.
Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> news:690ec70c$1$23$[email protected] Sat, 08 Nov 2025 04:29:00
GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
On Nov 7, 2025 at 5:35:04 PM MST, "Wilson" wrote
<[email protected]>:
In article <690e8db0$2$27$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
Sandman's site has tons of information on the snit Brock McNuggets, >>>>>>> Michael Glasser from Prescott Arizona troll.
Tons of information... but little of it TRUE.
So then prove it's not true.
You made the claim above so it is up to you to prove it's
true.
Your weasel words will not work this time.
The site is not shown to be accurate in any way. Done.
AI disagrees with you, bud.
Please analyze this website. How accurate are these claims against
Usenet snit ? http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html"
[![Usenet Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)] (https://images.openai.com/thumbnails/666eccffd0e4720b6873ef7256cc304a.jp eg)](https://www.comparitech.com/fr/usenet/faq/)
The webpage you referenced, [cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html] (http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html), presents a detailed
critique of Michael Glasser, known online as "Snit," alleging a pattern
of disruptive behavior and dishonesty in Usenet newsgroups. The document outlines various tactics purportedly employed by Snit, such as misrepresentation, evasion, and personal attacks.([Google Groups][1])
### Context and Community Feedback
The claims on the site are corroborated by numerous Usenet participants
who have documented similar behaviors over an extended period. For
instance, discussions in groups like comp.os.linux.advocacy and alt.computer.workshop highlight recurring patterns of Snit's conduct, including accusations of dishonesty and attempts to undermine other
users. These accounts suggest that the behaviors described on the Cosmic Penguin site align with broader community experiences. ([Google Groups]
[2], [Google Groups][1])
### Evaluating the Claims
While the Cosmic Penguin document provides an in-depth analysis, it's important to approach such critiques with a critical eye. The content is presented from a perspective that is clearly antagonistic toward Snit,
which may influence the tone and emphasis of the claims. However, the consistency of the behaviors described across various independent sources lends credibility to the assertions.
### Conclusion
The allegations presented on the Cosmic Penguin site appear to be
grounded in documented interactions within Usenet communities. While the
site serves as a comprehensive compilation of these incidents, readers
should consider the context and potential biases inherent in such a
focused critique. Engaging with a range of sources can provide a more balanced understanding of the situation.([Google Groups][1])
[1]: https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/iJE1h4m9 _uc/m/9xreK8lxAQAJ?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Re: Snit destroys another
USENET group"
[2]: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.computer.workshop/c/AVU7J_lMYmU? utm_source=chatgpt.com "Snit *The Despicable, lying, troll*"
***
This is a working link for the one it analyzed, too. In case
anyone else who doesn't? know your history and what you're really about.
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
Now go to your KKK meetings and leave me alone.
Damn Michael. That's an all new low even for you. Any proof to support
your statements? Why do I hear crickets this time of year...
Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> news:690e8d19$2$3785$[email protected] Sat, 08 Nov 2025 00:21:45 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
On Nov 7, 2025 at 2:23:22 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote
<[email protected]>:
Clearly not... you do not even know how to spell receipts. LOL! But hey,
if you enjoy it, here are some more:
Oh you got me! I made a typo. My bad. How terrible of me. Doh!
Notice you have insults. I have receipts.
ROFLMFAO! No, you don't. What you have is a serious inability to comprehend what you read.
And is my home town Prescott or Phoenix these days? LOL!
Here are the IP addresses for colleges around Snit's hometown including
the one he currently works at:
http://ws.arin.net/cgi-bin/whois.pl?queryinput=!%20NET-198-60-121-0-1
http://ws.arin.net/cgi-bin/whois.pl?queryinput=!%20NET-198-60-121-0-2
More dead links from you.
None of that came from me, actually. It was a c/p from the url chrisv shared.
Are you sure you know how to use the web, Michael? :)
Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> news:690e8db0$2$27$[email protected] Sat, 08 Nov 2025 00:24:16
GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
It is not my job to prove innocence, it is the job of you trolls to
prove guilt.
There are only three trolls posting to acw. David Brooks, Snit Brock McNuggets Michael Glasser of prescott arizona and peescent %
Burden of proof is something you simply do not understand.
I accept your challenge, Michael.
AI analyzed a website dedicated to--
exposing the methods in which you lie. These are the results:
Please analyze this website. How accurate are these claims against
Usenet snit ? http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html"
[![Usenet Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)] (https://images.openai.com/thumbnails/666eccffd0e4720b6873ef7256cc304a.jp eg)](https://www.comparitech.com/fr/usenet/faq/)
The webpage you referenced, [cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html] (http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html), presents a detailed
critique of Michael Glasser, known online as "Snit," alleging a pattern
of disruptive behavior and dishonesty in Usenet newsgroups. The document outlines various tactics purportedly employed by Snit, such as misrepresentation, evasion, and personal attacks.([Google Groups][1])
### Context and Community Feedback
The claims on the site are corroborated by numerous Usenet participants
who have documented similar behaviors over an extended period. For
instance, discussions in groups like comp.os.linux.advocacy and alt.computer.workshop highlight recurring patterns of Snit's conduct, including accusations of dishonesty and attempts to undermine other
users. These accounts suggest that the behaviors described on the Cosmic Penguin site align with broader community experiences. ([Google Groups]
[2], [Google Groups][1])
### Evaluating the Claims
While the Cosmic Penguin document provides an in-depth analysis, it's important to approach such critiques with a critical eye. The content is presented from a perspective that is clearly antagonistic toward Snit,
which may influence the tone and emphasis of the claims. However, the consistency of the behaviors described across various independent sources lends credibility to the assertions.
### Conclusion
The allegations presented on the Cosmic Penguin site appear to be
grounded in documented interactions within Usenet communities. While the
site serves as a comprehensive compilation of these incidents, readers
should consider the context and potential biases inherent in such a
focused critique. Engaging with a range of sources can provide a more balanced understanding of the situation.([Google Groups][1])
[1]: https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/iJE1h4m9 _uc/m/9xreK8lxAQAJ?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Re: Snit destroys another
USENET group"
[2]: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.computer.workshop/c/AVU7J_lMYmU? utm_source=chatgpt.com "Snit *The Despicable, lying, troll*"
***
This is a working link for the one it analyzed, too. In case
anyone else who doesn't? know your history and what you're really about.
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> news:690e8d19$2$3785$[email protected] Sat, 08 Nov 2025 00:21:45 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
On Nov 7, 2025 at 2:23:22 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote
<[email protected]>:
Clearly not... you do not even know how to spell receipts. LOL! But hey,
if you enjoy it, here are some more:
Oh you got me! I made a typo. My bad. How terrible of me. Doh!
Notice you have insults. I have receipts.
ROFLMFAO! No, you don't. What you have is a serious inability to comprehend what you read.
And is my home town Prescott or Phoenix these days? LOL!
Here are the IP addresses for colleges around Snit's hometown including
the one he currently works at:
http://ws.arin.net/cgi-bin/whois.pl?queryinput=!%20NET-198-60-121-0-1
http://ws.arin.net/cgi-bin/whois.pl?queryinput=!%20NET-198-60-121-0-2
More dead links from you.
None of that came from me, actually. It was a c/p from the url chrisv shared.
Are you sure you know how to use the web, Michael? :)
Can you possibly be anymore dishonest than what you just demonstrated misattributing those links as coming from me? <G>
You really have no clue how to use the web, do you? LOL!
ROFL!!!
(Note that Snit was not yet working at the lab due to his lack of a
job. He was posting from home, as he inadvertently admitted when he
stated that sigmond was "Maybe someone who snuck into my house."
In short, Snit is telling lies when he claims the IP address
24.117.214.4 is from the computer lab.
Muahaha. So fucking funny. Thanks again man! Those contents are a
fucking gold mine. :)
You really can't make a point to save your life. :)
ROFL!! I made the point already, dumbass. You socked up as Sigmond. Nobody spoofed an IP to make it appear as if you did that. You actually did.
So how was the person who snuck into your house able to use your computer? Was it unlocked? That wasn't smart of you if so. If it was locked, how did they know your password? How did they know exactly where to go on usenet and which threads to impersonate you? LOL!!!
Btw, I also have something interesting and very amusing to share concerning the methods you use to lie about people. AI analyzed the contents and determined it's accurate. That damn AI. <G>
Please analyze this website. How accurate are these claims against
Usenet snit ? http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html"
[![Usenet Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)] (https://images.openai.com/thumbnails/666eccffd0e4720b6873ef7256cc304a.jp eg)](https://www.comparitech.com/fr/usenet/faq/)
The webpage you referenced, [cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html] (http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html), presents a detailed
critique of Michael Glasser, known online as "Snit," alleging a pattern
of disruptive behavior and dishonesty in Usenet newsgroups. The document outlines various tactics purportedly employed by Snit, such as misrepresentation, evasion, and personal attacks.([Google Groups][1])
### Context and Community Feedback
The claims on the site are corroborated by numerous Usenet participants
who have documented similar behaviors over an extended period. For
instance, discussions in groups like comp.os.linux.advocacy and alt.computer.workshop highlight recurring patterns of Snit's conduct, including accusations of dishonesty and attempts to undermine other
users. These accounts suggest that the behaviors described on the Cosmic Penguin site align with broader community experiences. ([Google Groups]
[2], [Google Groups][1])
### Evaluating the Claims
While the Cosmic Penguin document provides an in-depth analysis, it's important to approach such critiques with a critical eye. The content is presented from a perspective that is clearly antagonistic toward Snit,
which may influence the tone and emphasis of the claims. However, the consistency of the behaviors described across various independent sources lends credibility to the assertions.
### Conclusion
The allegations presented on the Cosmic Penguin site appear to be
grounded in documented interactions within Usenet communities. While the site serves as a comprehensive compilation of these incidents, readers should consider the context and potential biases inherent in such a
focused critique. Engaging with a range of sources can provide a more balanced understanding of the situation.([Google Groups][1])
[1]: https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/iJE1h4m9 _uc/m/9xreK8lxAQAJ?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Re: Snit destroys another
USENET group"
[2]: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.computer.workshop/c/AVU7J_lMYmU? utm_source=chatgpt.com "Snit *The Despicable, lying, troll*"
***
This is a working link for the one it analyzed, too. In case
anyone else who doesn't? know your history and what you're really about.
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
Well Michael? ROFLMFAO!
On 2025-11-08, Gremlin <[email protected]> wrote:
None of that came from me, actually. It was a c/p from the url chrisv shared.
Are you sure you know how to use the web, Michael? :)
Can you possibly be anymore dishonest than what you just demonstrated
misattributing those links as coming from me? <G>
Didn't snit once claim something along the lines of his news client can download parts of a header?
Also remember when snit had to be schooled on how to look up msg-id ?
Hilarious!
A few months ago someone else posted a few AI results regarding snit and it was spot on.
It looks like snit's God is turning on him!
| Sysop: | DaiTengu |
|---|---|
| Location: | Appleton, WI |
| Users: | 1,076 |
| Nodes: | 10 (1 / 9) |
| Uptime: | 78:39:33 |
| Calls: | 13,805 |
| Files: | 186,990 |
| D/L today: |
5,991 files (1,958M bytes) |
| Messages: | 2,443,207 |