From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On 2026-06-13, Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter> wrote:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 9, 2026 at 4:29:03?PM MST, "Brock McNuggets" wrote >><6a28a1be$0$22$[email protected]>:

Broken Snit succumbs to his emotions and replies to himself, hoping to
start a conversation with another one of this psychotic personalities.

Yep.
watch out for sigmond, tmelmosfire, desk rabbit, and any nym that appears
with this in the header because it's a seldom used Usenet reader program..

User-Agent: Usenapp for MacOS
X-Usenapp: v1.28/l - Full License

If you see that in the header, it's surely snit.
--
pothead

"Often imitated, never duplicated."

"Socialism is the philosophy of failure,
the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy.
It's inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."

-- Winston Churchill




--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On 2026-06-13, Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter> wrote:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 13, 2026 at 7:21:57?AM MST, "pothead" wrote >><110jp25$2vub7$[email protected]>:

On 2026-06-13, Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter> wrote:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 9, 2026 at 4:29:03?PM MST, "Brock McNuggets" wrote
<6a28a1be$0$22$[email protected]>:

Snit continues to reply to himself, the Usenet equivalent of
masturbation.

ROFLMAO!!!!!

Indeed!

You have broken snit.
LOL!

It is facts that break

Facts like men can't be women. That's what breaks Snit.

snit Michael Glasser attacks me because I am female and he is not.
He's jealous that I have what he wants to have.
He was arrested for public harassment of his now ex wife so obviously
he hates women. Fortunately she dumped him and took every last dime he had.
And looking at his pic and hearing his voice it's obvious that he is
trying to BE a woman.

A real sick puppy IMHO.
--
pothead

"Often imitated, never duplicated."

"Socialism is the philosophy of failure,
the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy.
It's inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."

-- Winston Churchill




--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On Jun 13, 2026 at 3:16:54 PM MST, "pothead" wrote <110kksl$3828j$[email protected]>:

On 2026-06-13, Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter> wrote:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 13, 2026 at 7:21:57?AM MST, "pothead" wrote
<110jp25$2vub7$[email protected]>:

On 2026-06-13, Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter> wrote:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 9, 2026 at 4:29:03?PM MST, "Brock McNuggets" wrote
<6a28a1be$0$22$[email protected]>:

Snit continues to reply to himself, the Usenet equivalent of
masturbation.

ROFLMAO!!!!!

Indeed!

You have broken snit.
LOL!

It is facts that break

Facts like men can't be women. That's what breaks Snit.

snit Michael Glasser attacks me because I am female and he is not.
He's jealous that I have what he wants to have.
He was arrested for public harassment of his now ex wife so obviously
he hates women. Fortunately she dumped him and took every last dime he had. And looking at his pic and hearing his voice it's obvious that he is
trying to BE a woman.

A real sick puppy IMHO.

What silly lies.. and what what you two trolls run from -- evidence.

A lot of good info with 233 sources (extra credit if you find the typo!): https://youtu.be/szf4hzQ5ztg

Quick summary of the whole it all comes down to XX/XY claims: https://www.tiktok.com/@renegadescienceteacher/video/6842833187891055877

More details from authoritative sources:

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-new-science-of-sex-and-gender/ -----
Sex is supposed to be simple—at least at the molecular level. The biological explanations that appear in textbooks amount to X + X = and X + Y = . Venus or Mars, pink or blue. As science looks more closely, however, it becomes increasingly clear that a pair of chromosomes do not always suffice to distinguish girl/boy—either from the standpoint of sex (biological traits) or of gender (social identity).
-----

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-07238-8
-----
Even more scientifically complex is a mismatch between gender and the sex on a person’s birth certificate. Some evidence suggests that transgender identity has genetic or hormonal roots, but its exact biological correlates are
unclear. Whatever the cause, organizations such as the American Academy of Pediatrics advise physicians to treat people according to their preferred gender, regardless of appearance or genetics.

The research and medical community now sees sex as more complex than male and female, and gender as a spectrum that includes transgender people and those
who identify as neither male nor female. The US administration’s proposal would ignore that expert consensus.
-----

https://www.who.int/genomics/gender/en/index1.html#:~:text=Genetic%20Components%20of%20Sex%20and,and%20most%20men%20are%2046XY
-----
The process of biological sex differentiation (development of a given sex) involves many genetically regulated, hierarchical developmental steps.
...
Gender, typically described in terms of masculinity and femininity, is a
social construction that varies across different cultures and over time. (6) There are a number of cultures, for example, in which greater gender diversity exists and sex and gender are not always neatly divided along binary lines
such as male and female or homosexual and heterosexual. The Berdache in North America, the fa’afafine (Samoan for “the way of a woman”) in the Pacific, and
the kathoey in Thailand are all examples of different gender categories that differ from the traditional Western division of people into males and females. Further, among certain North American native communities, gender is seen more in terms of a continuum than categories, with special acknowledgement of “two-spirited” people who encompass both masculine and feminine qualities and
characteristics. It is apparent, then, that different cultures have taken different approaches to creating gender distinctions, with more or less recognition of fluidity and complexity of gender.
-----

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/think-gender-comes-down-to-x-and-y-chromosomes-think-again/article24811543/
-----
Think gender comes down to X and Y chromosomes? Think again
...
But biology doesn't work that way. Biological phenomena don't necessarily fit into human-ordained binary categories. So while humans insist that you're either male or female – that you have either XY or XX sex chromosomes – biology begs to differ.
...
So what's the answer? There isn't one, at least if we're looking for the
answer in biology. We must not fall back on biology. Rather, we must always remember that it is we, not biology, who decide who counts as male or female. And it is we who must take responsibility for our decisions.
-----

http://www.pbs.org/independentlens/content/two-spirits_map-html/
-----
On nearly every continent, and for all of recorded history, thriving cultures have recognized, revered, and integrated more than two genders. Terms such as “transgender” and “gay” are strictly new constructs that assume three things:
that there are only two sexes (male/female), as many as two sexualities (gay/straight), and only two genders (man/woman).

Yet hundreds of distinct societies around the globe have their own long-established traditions for third, fourth, fifth, or more genders. The subject of Two Spirits, Fred Martinez, for example, was not a boy who wanted
to be a girl, but both a boy and a girl — an identity his Navajo culture recognized and revered as nádleehí. Meanwhile, Hina of Kumu Hina is part of a a native Hawaiian culture that has traditionally revered and respected mahu, those who embody both male and female spirit.

Most Western societies have no direct correlation for this tradition, nor for the many other communities without strict either/or conceptions of sex, sexuality, and gender. Worldwide, the sheer variety of gender expression is almost limitless. Take a tour and learn how other cultures see gender diversity.
-----

http://usrf.org/news/010308-guevedoces.html
-----
During the early 1970s, Dr. Julianne Imperato, a Cornell endocrinologist, conducted an expedition to the Dominican Republic to investigate reports of an isolated village where children appearing to be girls turned into men at puberty. In the village, these children were known as 'guevedoces' (literally, penis at 12 years). Also known locally as machihembras ('first women, then man'), these pseudohermaphrodites were documented serially in the following photographs published originally in the American Journal of Medicne (Am. J. Med. 62: 170-191, 1977):
-----
--
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On Jun 13, 2026 at 3:13:00 PM MST, "pothead" wrote <110kklc$3828j$[email protected]>:

On 2026-06-13, Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter> wrote:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 9, 2026 at 4:29:03?PM MST, "Brock McNuggets" wrote
<6a28a1be$0$22$[email protected]>:

Broken Snit succumbs to his emotions and replies to himself, hoping to
start a conversation with another one of this psychotic personalities.

Yep.
watch out for sigmond, tmelmosfire, desk rabbit, and any nym that appears with this in the header because it's a seldom used Usenet reader program..

User-Agent: Usenapp for MacOS
X-Usenapp: v1.28/l - Full License

If you see that in the header, it's surely snit.

Notice you feel the need to lie ... where I bring receipts. What you two are running from:

A lot of good info with 233 sources (extra credit if you find the typo!): https://youtu.be/szf4hzQ5ztg

Quick summary of the whole it all comes down to XX/XY claims: https://www.tiktok.com/@renegadescienceteacher/video/6842833187891055877

More details from authoritative sources:

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-new-science-of-sex-and-gender/ -----
Sex is supposed to be simple—at least at the molecular level. The biological explanations that appear in textbooks amount to X + X = and X + Y = . Venus or Mars, pink or blue. As science looks more closely, however, it becomes increasingly clear that a pair of chromosomes do not always suffice to distinguish girl/boy—either from the standpoint of sex (biological traits) or of gender (social identity).
-----

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-07238-8
-----
Even more scientifically complex is a mismatch between gender and the sex on a person’s birth certificate. Some evidence suggests that transgender identity has genetic or hormonal roots, but its exact biological correlates are
unclear. Whatever the cause, organizations such as the American Academy of Pediatrics advise physicians to treat people according to their preferred gender, regardless of appearance or genetics.

The research and medical community now sees sex as more complex than male and female, and gender as a spectrum that includes transgender people and those
who identify as neither male nor female. The US administration’s proposal would ignore that expert consensus.
-----

https://www.who.int/genomics/gender/en/index1.html#:~:text=Genetic%20Components%20of%20Sex%20and,and%20most%20men%20are%2046XY
-----
The process of biological sex differentiation (development of a given sex) involves many genetically regulated, hierarchical developmental steps.
...
Gender, typically described in terms of masculinity and femininity, is a
social construction that varies across different cultures and over time. (6) There are a number of cultures, for example, in which greater gender diversity exists and sex and gender are not always neatly divided along binary lines
such as male and female or homosexual and heterosexual. The Berdache in North America, the fa’afafine (Samoan for “the way of a woman”) in the Pacific, and
the kathoey in Thailand are all examples of different gender categories that differ from the traditional Western division of people into males and females. Further, among certain North American native communities, gender is seen more in terms of a continuum than categories, with special acknowledgement of “two-spirited” people who encompass both masculine and feminine qualities and
characteristics. It is apparent, then, that different cultures have taken different approaches to creating gender distinctions, with more or less recognition of fluidity and complexity of gender.
-----

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/think-gender-comes-down-to-x-and-y-chromosomes-think-again/article24811543/
-----
Think gender comes down to X and Y chromosomes? Think again
...
But biology doesn't work that way. Biological phenomena don't necessarily fit into human-ordained binary categories. So while humans insist that you're either male or female – that you have either XY or XX sex chromosomes – biology begs to differ.
...
So what's the answer? There isn't one, at least if we're looking for the
answer in biology. We must not fall back on biology. Rather, we must always remember that it is we, not biology, who decide who counts as male or female. And it is we who must take responsibility for our decisions.
-----

http://www.pbs.org/independentlens/content/two-spirits_map-html/
-----
On nearly every continent, and for all of recorded history, thriving cultures have recognized, revered, and integrated more than two genders. Terms such as “transgender” and “gay” are strictly new constructs that assume three things:
that there are only two sexes (male/female), as many as two sexualities (gay/straight), and only two genders (man/woman).

Yet hundreds of distinct societies around the globe have their own long-established traditions for third, fourth, fifth, or more genders. The subject of Two Spirits, Fred Martinez, for example, was not a boy who wanted
to be a girl, but both a boy and a girl — an identity his Navajo culture recognized and revered as nádleehí. Meanwhile, Hina of Kumu Hina is part of a a native Hawaiian culture that has traditionally revered and respected mahu, those who embody both male and female spirit.

Most Western societies have no direct correlation for this tradition, nor for the many other communities without strict either/or conceptions of sex, sexuality, and gender. Worldwide, the sheer variety of gender expression is almost limitless. Take a tour and learn how other cultures see gender diversity.
-----

http://usrf.org/news/010308-guevedoces.html
-----
During the early 1970s, Dr. Julianne Imperato, a Cornell endocrinologist, conducted an expedition to the Dominican Republic to investigate reports of an isolated village where children appearing to be girls turned into men at puberty. In the village, these children were known as 'guevedoces' (literally, penis at 12 years). Also known locally as machihembras ('first women, then man'), these pseudohermaphrodites were documented serially in the following photographs published originally in the American Journal of Medicne (Am. J. Med. 62: 170-191, 1977):
-----
--
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On 13 Jun 2026, pothead <[email protected]> posted some news:110kksl$3828j$[email protected]:

On 2026-06-13, Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter>
wrote:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 13, 2026 at 7:21:57?AM MST, "pothead" wrote >>><110jp25$2vub7$[email protected]>:

On 2026-06-13, Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter> wrote:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 9, 2026 at 4:29:03?PM MST, "Brock McNuggets" wrote
<6a28a1be$0$22$[email protected]>:

Snit continues to reply to himself, the Usenet equivalent of
masturbation.

ROFLMAO!!!!!

Indeed!

You have broken snit.
LOL!

It is facts that break

Facts like men can't be women. That's what breaks Snit.

snit Michael Glasser attacks me because I am female and he is not.
He's jealous that I have what he wants to have.
He was arrested for public harassment of his now ex wife so obviously
he hates women. Fortunately she dumped him and took every last dime he
had. And looking at his pic and hearing his voice it's obvious that he
is trying to BE a woman.

AI says so.

A real sick puppy IMHO.

Check this out.

Message-ID: <6a2d7cae$0$20$[email protected]>

Klaus is now crying that I keep reminding him of how he runs from
evidence. Says my doing so speaks poorly of me. Well, sure, I am
responding to trolls more than I can defend, but like so many trolls
before him he forgets that responding to trolling is not as bad as
trolling itself.

Bottom line: he has spent FAR more energy running from facts than he
has thinking about facts. He is proving me right -- right wingers
focus on emotion over evidence. He wants to deny evidence but has no
counter. How pathetic of him.

Survey says,

Female
56.58% confident

https://www.nyckel.com/pretrained-classifiers/gender-text-identifier/
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

[Default] pothead <[email protected]> typed:

On 2026-06-13, Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�ter> wrote: >> [Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 13, 2026 at 7:21:57?AM MST, "pothead" wrote >>><110jp25$2vub7$[email protected]>:

On 2026-06-13, Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�ter> wrote:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 9, 2026 at 4:29:03?PM MST, "Brock McNuggets" wrote
<6a28a1be$0$22$[email protected]>:

Snit continues to reply to himself, the Usenet equivalent of
masturbation.

ROFLMAO!!!!!

Indeed!

You have broken snit.
LOL!

It is facts that break

Facts like men can't be women. That's what breaks Snit.

snit Michael Glasser attacks me because I am female and he is not.

I believe that's called misogyny.

He's jealous that I have what he wants to have.
He was arrested for public harassment of his now ex wife so obviously
he hates women. Fortunately she dumped him and took every last dime he had. >And looking at his pic and hearing his voice it's obvious that he is
trying to BE a woman.

A real sick puppy IMHO.

His jenkem consumption has tripled in the past few weeks.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 9, 2026 at 4:29:03?PM MST, "Brock McNuggets" wrote ><6a28a1be$0$22$[email protected]>:

Snit continues to converse with himself. LOL
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

In news:I_1XR.78628$[email protected], Joel W. Crump <[email protected]> typed:

On 6/12/2026 4:03 PM, max headroom wrote:

In news:zvsWR.1212$[email protected], Joel W. Crump <[email protected]>
typed:

On 6/11/2026 1:18 AM, max headroom wrote:

... a dick on a trans woman is a woman's dick.

No, it's a dick on a man who wants to be a woman.

HTH.

That ignores the evidence.

So trot out the physiological evidence for us to poke.

Observation of trans people.

Trot out the objective physiological evidence for us to poke.

It's there to be seen, if you will, but could be denied, if you're a difficult person.

And you can't produce any.


--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

In news:6a2cd2b4$1$26$[email protected], Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 12, 2026 at 5:54:44?PM MST, ""max headroom"" wrote 110i9ta$39c7r$[email protected]:

You are the one pushing FEELINGS... the feelings of "transgendered' >>>>>>>> people who feel they inhabit the wrong body. "Feelings" are subjective,
dicks and pussies are not.

You FEEL you are in a body that fits you. Just as much of a feeling >>>>>>> based determination. No more. No less....

Wait a sec, let me check... YUP, just as I suspected. I have a dick.

And?

And my feeling is correct-- I am a male homo sapien. My feelings are based >>>> on evidence.

I trust you know yourself. And? The discussion is about your demands for >>> special entitlements to push your feeling onto others... have your feelings >>> impact their rights....

You lie.

Based on your feelings...

Based on fact.. I make no demands. Deal with it.

... not reason or evidence. OK. You can FEEL that way.

... I, on the other side, back evidence and equal rights.

If they coincide with your feelings.

Sure... I am not denying having feelings. But on policy we should go with evidence and equal rights in MY value system. For those on the right it is more about protecting themselves and those in their in-group.

No more than those on the left.

I will say I am happy to hear you speak of having feelings about your
gender... this implies you can understand others do, too. But you error[sic]
in thinking gender is tied to physical attributes as strongly as you imply.

Gender is a quality of words. Sex is a quality of many lifeforms.

HTH.

As a statement about etymology and traditional grammar: it has some truth to it.

It is fact.

As a statement about how the words are actually used today: it is too simplistic and misleading.

Due to pinkies redefining words to suit their agendas.

... With trans folks. If anything, your choice is
the easy one. Being trans isn't a casual, fleeting feeling. It's a deep,
stable, and neurologically grounded identity that resists conversion or >>>>>>> suppression.

https://dailycaller.com/2024/02/05/ex-therapist-hospital-require-misdiagnose-trouble-teens-trans/

https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/affirmation-at-all-costs-what-internal-files-reveal-about-transgender-care-5603853

Not scientific sources. Not unbiased ones.

Your feeling.

You have cited PBS and SPLC, and now you whine about bias?!?

I have cited well respected sites....

PBS and SPLC?

Yes. Certainly more than the Gateway and the like....

Only by those on the far left

...Which does not imply perfect.

... Ones based on evidence. The two above are NOT that. To pretend they are >>> would be irrational.

The anti-trans position is the one actually driven by emotional bias and
personal feelings. Pro-trans arguments simply align with established >>>>>>> medical and scientific consensus.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/amy-curtis/2026/02/24/nyt-trans-medical-associations-put-politics-over-science-n2671810

The NYTimes says you're wrong.

What article?

Click the link.

See below....

Where?

... But I will go into more here.

The existence of disagreement or institutional mistakes does not prove that "it was never about the science." Science is a process of evaluating evidence and revising conclusions....

Unless it's global warming. There "the science is settled."

... A more reasonable criticism is that some medical
organizations may have overstated the certainty of the evidence regarding certain interventions for minors. THAT is fair.

Detransitioning *proves* the "evidence" was overstated.

Improving a patient's mental well-being and making them a "healthier, >>>>>>> happier person" is the standard, valid goal of any medical treatment >>>>>>> (just like treating depression, anxiety, cancer, or chronic pain).

https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/california-study-finds-suicide-risk-doubles-after-male-female-surgeries

https://thepopulisttimes.com/trans-care-linked-to-mental-health-risks-including-suicide/

https://www.newsmax.com/michaeldorstewitz/care-finland-gender/2026/04/13/id/1252703/

So you have nothing approaching anything any reasoned person would call >>>>> reliable evidence....

You imply you consider yourself "reasonable," but your behavior suggests >>>> otherwise.

Your opinion on that is of no value. Again: I am speaking of evidence. No >>> personal attacks or insults. It is simply a fact I back equal rights and >>> evidence and you are backing special entitlements based on your feelings.

Again you lie.

Based on your feelings....

Based on fact. You just can't stop lying, can you?

... OK... but remember I go with evidence.

Only the evidence that supports your feelings.

... But you go with those clearly biased sources and reject scientific >>>>> ones.

Then you should have little trouble refuting the articles.

I'll wait....

Easy. The Daily Caller one is not based on peer review or the like. It is >>> tied to one person's allegations. And it gets the basics wrong. "Gender
dysphoria" and "transgender identity" are not the same. It is based on
emotions.

The Epoch Times one jumps from the idea of internal disagreements, which is >>> common in science to claims that the entire field is fraudulent. It offers >>> no evidence of this. Doctors also debate when chemotherapy is appropriate >>> and how much and what type and with what other treatments, they debate how >>> to treat chronic pain. It also gets key points wrong, such as saying
European countries have rejected gender-affirming care. They have not. They >>> have taken a more cautious model. Also, it is focused on teens -- and the >>> issue is a lot bigger than that. I agree that there should be time to
evaluate and mature.

Keep going.

See above. :)

Keep going.

https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/california-study-finds-suicide-risk-doubles-after-male-female-surgeries

https://thepopulisttimes.com/trans-care-linked-to-mental-health-risks-including-suicide/

https://www.newsmax.com/michaeldorstewitz/care-finland-gender/2026/04/13/id/1252703/

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On Jun 14, 2026 at 9:19:08 AM MST, "Name" wrote <[email protected]>:

[Default] pothead <[email protected]> typed:

On 2026-06-13, Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter> wrote:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 13, 2026 at 7:21:57?AM MST, "pothead" wrote
<110jp25$2vub7$[email protected]>:

On 2026-06-13, Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter> wrote:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 9, 2026 at 4:29:03?PM MST, "Brock McNuggets" wrote
<6a28a1be$0$22$[email protected]>:

Snit continues to reply to himself, the Usenet equivalent of
masturbation.

ROFLMAO!!!!!

Indeed!

You have broken snit.
LOL!

It is facts that break

Facts like men can't be women. That's what breaks Snit.

snit Michael Glasser attacks me because I am female and he is not.

I believe that's called misogyny.

He's jealous that I have what he wants to have.
He was arrested for public harassment of his now ex wife so obviously
he hates women. Fortunately she dumped him and took every last dime he had. >> And looking at his pic and hearing his voice it's obvious that he is
trying to BE a woman.

A real sick puppy IMHO.

His jenkem consumption has tripled in the past few weeks.

Notice you trolls feel the need to lie about people. Backs what I have been saying.
--
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On Jun 14, 2026 at 8:49:40 AM MST, ""max headroom"" wrote <110mkt7$3ofmb$[email protected]>:

In news:6a2cd2b4$1$26$[email protected], Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 12, 2026 at 5:54:44?PM MST, ""max headroom"" wrote
110i9ta$39c7r$[email protected]:

You are the one pushing FEELINGS... the feelings of "transgendered' >>>>>>>>> people who feel they inhabit the wrong body. "Feelings" are subjective,
dicks and pussies are not.

You FEEL you are in a body that fits you. Just as much of a feeling >>>>>>>> based determination. No more. No less....

Wait a sec, let me check... YUP, just as I suspected. I have a dick.

And?

And my feeling is correct-- I am a male homo sapien. My feelings are based
on evidence.

I trust you know yourself. And? The discussion is about your demands for >>>> special entitlements to push your feeling onto others... have your feelings
impact their rights....

You lie.

Based on your feelings...

Based on fact.. I make no demands. Deal with it.

... not reason or evidence. OK. You can FEEL that way.

... I, on the other side, back evidence and equal rights.

If they coincide with your feelings.

Sure... I am not denying having feelings. But on policy we should go with
evidence and equal rights in MY value system. For those on the right it is >> more about protecting themselves and those in their in-group.

No more than those on the left.

I will say I am happy to hear you speak of having feelings about your
gender... this implies you can understand others do, too. But you error[sic]
in thinking gender is tied to physical attributes as strongly as you imply.

Gender is a quality of words. Sex is a quality of many lifeforms.

HTH.

As a statement about etymology and traditional grammar: it has some truth to >> it.

It is fact.

As a statement about how the words are actually used today: it is too
simplistic and misleading.

Due to pinkies redefining words to suit their agendas.

... With trans folks. If anything, your choice is
the easy one. Being trans isn't a casual, fleeting feeling. It's a deep,
stable, and neurologically grounded identity that resists conversion or
suppression.

https://dailycaller.com/2024/02/05/ex-therapist-hospital-require-misdiagnose-trouble-teens-trans/

https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/affirmation-at-all-costs-what-internal-files-reveal-about-transgender-care-5603853

Not scientific sources. Not unbiased ones.

Your feeling.

You have cited PBS and SPLC, and now you whine about bias?!?

I have cited well respected sites....

PBS and SPLC?

Yes. Certainly more than the Gateway and the like....

Only by those on the far left

...Which does not imply perfect.

... Ones based on evidence. The two above are NOT that. To pretend they are
would be irrational.

The anti-trans position is the one actually driven by emotional bias and
personal feelings. Pro-trans arguments simply align with established >>>>>>>> medical and scientific consensus.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/amy-curtis/2026/02/24/nyt-trans-medical-associations-put-politics-over-science-n2671810

The NYTimes says you're wrong.

What article?

Click the link.

See below....

Where?

... But I will go into more here.

The existence of disagreement or institutional mistakes does not prove that >> "it was never about the science." Science is a process of evaluating evidence
and revising conclusions....

Unless it's global warming. There "the science is settled."

While science is always growing —- we learn more, we do better —- there is no
reasonable doubt that man-made climate change is real and causing genuine
harm. That's not a political opinion. That's where the evidence has landed.

The pushback follows a predictable pattern: huge corporations pocket
short-term profits from denial, and conservatives provide the ideological cover. Their method is to find errors in the science —- or in the conduct of scientists, or even in how non-scientists communicate the science —- and treat
those errors as grounds to dismiss the underlying evidence entirely. That's
not skepticism. That's misdirection.

Identifying mistakes and demanding rigor is completely valid —- if you're doing it in good faith, with the full picture in view. Conservatives consistently fail that condition. They're not stress-testing the science, they're mining for confirmation that they don't have to change anything.
That's not critical thinking. That's motivated reasoning dressed up as it.

... A more reasonable criticism is that some medical
organizations may have overstated the certainty of the evidence regarding
certain interventions for minors. THAT is fair.

Detransitioning *proves* the "evidence" was overstated.

There are cases when it has been overstated, but detransitioning no more disproves anything about trans folks than someone murdering someone with a gun "proves" nobody should own a gun.

<snipped your ad hominem... you humiliate yourself>
--
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On Jun 14, 2026 at 8:11:55 AM MST, ""max headroom"" wrote <110mkt5$3ofmb$[email protected]>:

In news:I_1XR.78628$[email protected], Joel W. Crump <[email protected]> typed:

On 6/12/2026 4:03 PM, max headroom wrote:

In news:zvsWR.1212$[email protected], Joel W. Crump <[email protected]> >>> typed:

On 6/11/2026 1:18 AM, max headroom wrote:

... a dick on a trans woman is a woman's dick.

No, it's a dick on a man who wants to be a woman.

HTH.

That ignores the evidence.

So trot out the physiological evidence for us to poke.

Observation of trans people.

Trot out the objective physiological evidence for us to poke.

It's there to be seen, if you will, but could be denied, if you're a
difficult person.

And you can't produce any.

I have. Many times. But the trolls just run.

A lot of good info with 233 sources (extra credit if you find the typo!): https://youtu.be/szf4hzQ5ztg

Quick summary of the whole it all comes down to XX/XY claims: https://www.tiktok.com/@renegadescienceteacher/video/6842833187891055877

More details from authoritative sources:

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-new-science-of-sex-and-gender/ -----
Sex is supposed to be simple—at least at the molecular level. The biological explanations that appear in textbooks amount to X + X = and X + Y = . Venus or Mars, pink or blue. As science looks more closely, however, it becomes increasingly clear that a pair of chromosomes do not always suffice to distinguish girl/boy—either from the standpoint of sex (biological traits) or of gender (social identity).
-----

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-07238-8
-----
Even more scientifically complex is a mismatch between gender and the sex on a person’s birth certificate. Some evidence suggests that transgender identity has genetic or hormonal roots, but its exact biological correlates are
unclear. Whatever the cause, organizations such as the American Academy of Pediatrics advise physicians to treat people according to their preferred gender, regardless of appearance or genetics.

The research and medical community now sees sex as more complex than male and female, and gender as a spectrum that includes transgender people and those
who identify as neither male nor female. The US administration’s proposal would ignore that expert consensus.
-----

https://www.who.int/genomics/gender/en/index1.html#:~:text=Genetic%20Components%20of%20Sex%20and,and%20most%20men%20are%2046XY
-----
The process of biological sex differentiation (development of a given sex) involves many genetically regulated, hierarchical developmental steps.
...
Gender, typically described in terms of masculinity and femininity, is a
social construction that varies across different cultures and over time. (6) There are a number of cultures, for example, in which greater gender diversity exists and sex and gender are not always neatly divided along binary lines
such as male and female or homosexual and heterosexual. The Berdache in North America, the fa’afafine (Samoan for “the way of a woman”) in the Pacific, and
the kathoey in Thailand are all examples of different gender categories that differ from the traditional Western division of people into males and females. Further, among certain North American native communities, gender is seen more in terms of a continuum than categories, with special acknowledgement of “two-spirited” people who encompass both masculine and feminine qualities and
characteristics. It is apparent, then, that different cultures have taken different approaches to creating gender distinctions, with more or less recognition of fluidity and complexity of gender.
-----

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/think-gender-comes-down-to-x-and-y-chromosomes-think-again/article24811543/
-----
Think gender comes down to X and Y chromosomes? Think again
...
But biology doesn't work that way. Biological phenomena don't necessarily fit into human-ordained binary categories. So while humans insist that you're either male or female – that you have either XY or XX sex chromosomes – biology begs to differ.
...
So what's the answer? There isn't one, at least if we're looking for the
answer in biology. We must not fall back on biology. Rather, we must always remember that it is we, not biology, who decide who counts as male or female. And it is we who must take responsibility for our decisions.
-----

http://www.pbs.org/independentlens/content/two-spirits_map-html/
-----
On nearly every continent, and for all of recorded history, thriving cultures have recognized, revered, and integrated more than two genders. Terms such as “transgender” and “gay” are strictly new constructs that assume three things:
that there are only two sexes (male/female), as many as two sexualities (gay/straight), and only two genders (man/woman).

Yet hundreds of distinct societies around the globe have their own long-established traditions for third, fourth, fifth, or more genders. The subject of Two Spirits, Fred Martinez, for example, was not a boy who wanted
to be a girl, but both a boy and a girl — an identity his Navajo culture recognized and revered as nádleehí. Meanwhile, Hina of Kumu Hina is part of a a native Hawaiian culture that has traditionally revered and respected mahu, those who embody both male and female spirit.

Most Western societies have no direct correlation for this tradition, nor for the many other communities without strict either/or conceptions of sex, sexuality, and gender. Worldwide, the sheer variety of gender expression is almost limitless. Take a tour and learn how other cultures see gender diversity.
-----

http://usrf.org/news/010308-guevedoces.html
-----
During the early 1970s, Dr. Julianne Imperato, a Cornell endocrinologist, conducted an expedition to the Dominican Republic to investigate reports of an isolated village where children appearing to be girls turned into men at puberty. In the village, these children were known as 'guevedoces' (literally, penis at 12 years). Also known locally as machihembras ('first women, then man'), these pseudohermaphrodites were documented serially in the following photographs published originally in the American Journal of Medicne (Am. J. Med. 62: 170-191, 1977):
-----
--
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On 2026-06-14, Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter> wrote:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 9, 2026 at 4:29:03?PM MST, "Brock McNuggets" wrote >><6a28a1be$0$22$[email protected]>:

Snit continues to converse with himself. LOL

Just like a babbling retard.
--
pothead

"Often imitated, never duplicated."

"Socialism is the philosophy of failure,
the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy.
It's inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."

-- Winston Churchill




--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On Jun 14, 2026 at 6:05:35 PM MST, "pothead" wrote <110nj4v$vl5$[email protected]>:

On 2026-06-14, Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter> wrote:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 9, 2026 at 4:29:03?PM MST, "Brock McNuggets" wrote
<6a28a1be$0$22$[email protected]>:

Snit continues to converse with himself. LOL

Just like a babbling retard.

What you two run from:

A lot of good info with 233 sources (extra credit if you find the typo!): https://youtu.be/szf4hzQ5ztg

Quick summary of the whole it all comes down to XX/XY claims: https://www.tiktok.com/@renegadescienceteacher/video/6842833187891055877

More details from authoritative sources:

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-new-science-of-sex-and-gender/ -----
Sex is supposed to be simple—at least at the molecular level. The biological explanations that appear in textbooks amount to X + X = and X + Y = . Venus or Mars, pink or blue. As science looks more closely, however, it becomes increasingly clear that a pair of chromosomes do not always suffice to distinguish girl/boy—either from the standpoint of sex (biological traits) or of gender (social identity).
-----

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-07238-8
-----
Even more scientifically complex is a mismatch between gender and the sex on a person’s birth certificate. Some evidence suggests that transgender identity has genetic or hormonal roots, but its exact biological correlates are
unclear. Whatever the cause, organizations such as the American Academy of Pediatrics advise physicians to treat people according to their preferred gender, regardless of appearance or genetics.

The research and medical community now sees sex as more complex than male and female, and gender as a spectrum that includes transgender people and those
who identify as neither male nor female. The US administration’s proposal would ignore that expert consensus.
-----

https://www.who.int/genomics/gender/en/index1.html#:~:text=Genetic%20Components%20of%20Sex%20and,and%20most%20men%20are%2046XY
-----
The process of biological sex differentiation (development of a given sex) involves many genetically regulated, hierarchical developmental steps.
...
Gender, typically described in terms of masculinity and femininity, is a
social construction that varies across different cultures and over time. (6) There are a number of cultures, for example, in which greater gender diversity exists and sex and gender are not always neatly divided along binary lines
such as male and female or homosexual and heterosexual. The Berdache in North America, the fa’afafine (Samoan for “the way of a woman”) in the Pacific, and
the kathoey in Thailand are all examples of different gender categories that differ from the traditional Western division of people into males and females. Further, among certain North American native communities, gender is seen more in terms of a continuum than categories, with special acknowledgement of “two-spirited” people who encompass both masculine and feminine qualities and
characteristics. It is apparent, then, that different cultures have taken different approaches to creating gender distinctions, with more or less recognition of fluidity and complexity of gender.
-----

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/think-gender-comes-down-to-x-and-y-chromosomes-think-again/article24811543/
-----
Think gender comes down to X and Y chromosomes? Think again
...
But biology doesn't work that way. Biological phenomena don't necessarily fit into human-ordained binary categories. So while humans insist that you're either male or female – that you have either XY or XX sex chromosomes – biology begs to differ.
...
So what's the answer? There isn't one, at least if we're looking for the
answer in biology. We must not fall back on biology. Rather, we must always remember that it is we, not biology, who decide who counts as male or female. And it is we who must take responsibility for our decisions.
-----

http://www.pbs.org/independentlens/content/two-spirits_map-html/
-----
On nearly every continent, and for all of recorded history, thriving cultures have recognized, revered, and integrated more than two genders. Terms such as “transgender” and “gay” are strictly new constructs that assume three things:
that there are only two sexes (male/female), as many as two sexualities (gay/straight), and only two genders (man/woman).

Yet hundreds of distinct societies around the globe have their own long-established traditions for third, fourth, fifth, or more genders. The subject of Two Spirits, Fred Martinez, for example, was not a boy who wanted
to be a girl, but both a boy and a girl — an identity his Navajo culture recognized and revered as nádleehí. Meanwhile, Hina of Kumu Hina is part of a a native Hawaiian culture that has traditionally revered and respected mahu, those who embody both male and female spirit.

Most Western societies have no direct correlation for this tradition, nor for the many other communities without strict either/or conceptions of sex, sexuality, and gender. Worldwide, the sheer variety of gender expression is almost limitless. Take a tour and learn how other cultures see gender diversity.
-----

http://usrf.org/news/010308-guevedoces.html
-----
During the early 1970s, Dr. Julianne Imperato, a Cornell endocrinologist, conducted an expedition to the Dominican Republic to investigate reports of an isolated village where children appearing to be girls turned into men at puberty. In the village, these children were known as 'guevedoces' (literally, penis at 12 years). Also known locally as machihembras ('first women, then man'), these pseudohermaphrodites were documented serially in the following photographs published originally in the American Journal of Medicne (Am. J. Med. 62: 170-191, 1977):
-----
--
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On 14 Jun 2026, pothead <[email protected]> posted some news:110nj4v$vl5$[email protected]:

On 2026-06-14, Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter>
wrote:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 9, 2026 at 4:29:03?PM MST, "Brock McNuggets" wrote >>><6a28a1be$0$22$[email protected]>:

Snit continues to converse with himself. LOL

Just like a babbling retard.

Snit is a very busy person. You should all be nicer to him.

https://usenet.sandman.net/texter/category.php/Digests?categories%5B%5D=Di gests&cond=and

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

In news:[email protected], Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�[email protected]> typed:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 9, 2026 at 4:29:03?PM MST, "Brock McNuggets" wrote >>6a28a1be$0$22$[email protected]:

Snit continues to converse with himself. LOL

He's broken again. Must be a tougher crowd than linux.advocacy.


--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

In news:6a2ef4d7$0$23$[email protected], Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 14, 2026 at 8:49:40?AM MST, ""max headroom"" wrote <110mkt7$3ofmb$[email protected]>:

In news:6a2cd2b4$1$26$[email protected], Brock McNuggets
<[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 12, 2026 at 5:54:44?PM MST, ""max headroom"" wrote
110i9ta$39c7r$[email protected]:

You are the one pushing FEELINGS... the feelings of "transgendered' >>>>>>>>>> people who feel they inhabit the wrong body. "Feelings" are >>>>>>>>>> subjective, dicks and pussies are not.

You FEEL you are in a body that fits you. Just as much of a feeling >>>>>>>>> based determination. No more. No less....

Wait a sec, let me check... YUP, just as I suspected. I have a dick.

And?

And my feeling is correct-- I am a male homo sapien. My feelings are >>>>>> based on evidence.

I trust you know yourself. And? The discussion is about your demands for >>>>> special entitlements to push your feeling onto others... have your
feelings impact their rights....

You lie.

Based on your feelings...

Based on fact.. I make no demands. Deal with it.

... not reason or evidence. OK. You can FEEL that way.

... I, on the other side, back evidence and equal rights.

If they coincide with your feelings.

Sure... I am not denying having feelings. But on policy we should go with >>> evidence and equal rights in MY value system. For those on the right it is >>> more about protecting themselves and those in their in-group.

No more than those on the left.

I will say I am happy to hear you speak of having feelings about your >>>>> gender... this implies you can understand others do, too. But you
error[sic] in thinking gender is tied to physical attributes as strongly >>>>> as you imply.

Gender is a quality of words. Sex is a quality of many lifeforms.

HTH.

As a statement about etymology and traditional grammar: it has some truth to
it.

It is fact.

As a statement about how the words are actually used today: it is too
simplistic and misleading.

Due to pinkies redefining words to suit their agendas.

... With trans folks. If anything, your choice is
the easy one. Being trans isn't a casual, fleeting feeling. It's a >>>>>>>>> deep, stable, and neurologically grounded identity that resists >>>>>>>>> conversion or suppression.

https://dailycaller.com/2024/02/05/ex-therapist-hospital-require-misdiagnose-trouble-teens-trans/

https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/affirmation-at-all-costs-what-internal-files-reveal-about-transgender-care-5603853

Not scientific sources. Not unbiased ones.

Your feeling.

You have cited PBS and SPLC, and now you whine about bias?!?

I have cited well respected sites....

PBS and SPLC?

Yes. Certainly more than the Gateway and the like....

Only by those on the far left

...Which does not imply perfect.

... Ones based on evidence. The two above are NOT that. To pretend they >>>>> are would be irrational.

The anti-trans position is the one actually driven by emotional bias >>>>>>>>> and personal feelings. Pro-trans arguments simply align with >>>>>>>>> established medical and scientific consensus.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/amy-curtis/2026/02/24/nyt-trans-medical-associations-put-politics-over-science-n2671810

The NYTimes says you're wrong.

What article?

Click the link.

See below....

Where?

]crickets]

... But I will go into more here.

The existence of disagreement or institutional mistakes does not prove that >>> "it was never about the science." Science is a process of evaluating
evidence and revising conclusions....

Unless it's global warming. There "the science is settled."

While science is always growing -- we learn more, we do better -- there is no reasonable doubt that man-made climate change is real and causing genuine harm. That's not a political opinion. That's where the evidence has landed.

And one hundred years ago science told us that radio was possible because of vibrations in the aether.

... A more reasonable criticism is that some medical
organizations may have overstated the certainty of the evidence regarding >>> certain interventions for minors. THAT is fair.

Detransitioning *proves* the "evidence" was overstated.

There are cases when it has been overstated, but detransitioning no more disproves anything about trans folks ...

But it does disprove aomething about the evidence.

...than someone murdering someone with a gun "proves" nobody should own a gun.

<snipped your ad hominem... you humiliate yourself>

I'll restore it, since it humiliates YOU, snit.

Improving a patient's mental well-being and making them a "healthier, >>>>>>> happier person" is the standard, valid goal of any medical treatment >>>>>>> (just like treating depression, anxiety, cancer, or chronic pain).

https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/california-study-finds-suicide-risk-doubles-after-male-female-surgeries

https://thepopulisttimes.com/trans-care-linked-to-mental-health-risks-including-suicide/

https://www.newsmax.com/michaeldorstewitz/care-finland-gender/2026/04/13/id/1252703/

So you have nothing approaching anything any reasoned person would call >>>>> reliable evidence....

You imply you consider yourself "reasonable," but your behavior suggests >>>> otherwise.

Your opinion on that is of no value. Again: I am speaking of evidence. No >>> personal attacks or insults. It is simply a fact I back equal rights and >>> evidence and you are backing special entitlements based on your feelings.

Again you lie.

Based on your feelings....

Based on fact. You just can't stop lying, can you?

... OK... but remember I go with evidence.

Only the evidence that supports your feelings.

... But you go with those clearly biased sources and reject scientific >>>>> ones.

Then you should have little trouble refuting the articles.

I'll wait....

Easy. The Daily Caller one is not based on peer review or the like. It is >>> tied to one person's allegations. And it gets the basics wrong. "Gender
dysphoria" and "transgender identity" are not the same. It is based on
emotions.

The Epoch Times one jumps from the idea of internal disagreements, which is >>> common in science to claims that the entire field is fraudulent. It offers >>> no evidence of this. Doctors also debate when chemotherapy is appropriate >>> and how much and what type and with what other treatments, they debate how >>> to treat chronic pain. It also gets key points wrong, such as saying
European countries have rejected gender-affirming care. They have not. They >>> have taken a more cautious model. Also, it is focused on teens -- and the >>> issue is a lot bigger than that. I agree that there should be time to
evaluate and mature.

Keep going.

See above. :)

Keep going.

https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/california-study-finds-suicide-risk-doubles-after-male-female-surgeries

https://thepopulisttimes.com/trans-care-linked-to-mental-health-risks-including-suicide/

https://www.newsmax.com/michaeldorstewitz/care-finland-gender/2026/04/13/id/1252703/

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On Jun 14, 2026 at 10:40:56 PM MST, ""max headroom"" wrote <110o3l1$4r75$[email protected]>:

In news:6a2ef4d7$0$23$[email protected], Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

...

... But I will go into more here.

The existence of disagreement or institutional mistakes does not prove that
"it was never about the science." Science is a process of evaluating
evidence and revising conclusions....

Unless it's global warming. There "the science is settled."

While science is always growing -- we learn more, we do better -- there is no
reasonable doubt that man-made climate change is real and causing genuine
harm. That's not a political opinion. That's where the evidence has landed.

And one hundred years ago science told us that radio was possible because of vibrations in the aether.

And?

... A more reasonable criticism is that some medical
organizations may have overstated the certainty of the evidence regarding >>>> certain interventions for minors. THAT is fair.

Detransitioning *proves* the "evidence" was overstated.

There are cases when it has been overstated, but detransitioning no more
disproves anything about trans folks ...

But it does disprove aomething about the evidence.

Be very specific: what?

And are you willing to go with ALL the evidence or just hand picking things to push bigotry.

...than someone murdering someone with a gun "proves" nobody should own a gun.

<snipped your ad hominem... you humiliate yourself>

I'll restore it, since it humiliates YOU, snit.

You acting poorly is a reflection on you... not me.

...
--
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 14, 2026 at 9:19:08?AM MST, "Name" wrote ><[email protected]>:

[Default] pothead <[email protected]> typed:

On 2026-06-13, Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�ter> wrote:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 13, 2026 at 7:21:57?AM MST, "pothead" wrote
<110jp25$2vub7$[email protected]>:

On 2026-06-13, Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�ter> wrote:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 9, 2026 at 4:29:03?PM MST, "Brock McNuggets" wrote
<6a28a1be$0$22$[email protected]>:

Snit continues to reply to himself, the Usenet equivalent of
masturbation.

ROFLMAO!!!!!

Indeed!

You have broken snit.
LOL!

It is facts that break

Facts like men can't be women. That's what breaks Snit.

snit Michael Glasser attacks me because I am female and he is not.

I believe that's called misogyny.

He's jealous that I have what he wants to have.
He was arrested for public harassment of his now ex wife so obviously
he hates women. Fortunately she dumped him and took every last dime he had. >>> And looking at his pic and hearing his voice it's obvious that he is
trying to BE a woman.

A real sick puppy IMHO.

His jenkem consumption has tripled in the past few weeks.

Notice you trolls feel the need to lie about people. Backs what I have been >saying.

Nobody has lied about anyone, Snit, except for your lies.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 9, 2026 at 4:29:03?PM MST, "Brock McNuggets" wrote ><6a28a1be$0$22$[email protected]>:

Broken Snit continues to talk to himself.

LOL
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On Jun 15, 2026 at 12:13:51 PM MST, "Name" wrote <[email protected]>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 9, 2026 at 4:29:03?PM MST, "Brock McNuggets" wrote
<6a28a1be$0$22$[email protected]>:

Broken Snit continues to talk to himself.

LOL

This is what you are running from:

A lot of good info with 233 sources (extra credit if you find the typo!): https://youtu.be/szf4hzQ5ztg

Quick summary of the whole it all comes down to XX/XY claims: https://www.tiktok.com/@renegadescienceteacher/video/6842833187891055877

More details from authoritative sources:

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-new-science-of-sex-and-gender/ -----
Sex is supposed to be simple—at least at the molecular level. The biological explanations that appear in textbooks amount to X + X = and X + Y = . Venus or Mars, pink or blue. As science looks more closely, however, it becomes increasingly clear that a pair of chromosomes do not always suffice to distinguish girl/boy—either from the standpoint of sex (biological traits) or of gender (social identity).
-----

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-07238-8
-----
Even more scientifically complex is a mismatch between gender and the sex on a person’s birth certificate. Some evidence suggests that transgender identity has genetic or hormonal roots, but its exact biological correlates are
unclear. Whatever the cause, organizations such as the American Academy of Pediatrics advise physicians to treat people according to their preferred gender, regardless of appearance or genetics.

The research and medical community now sees sex as more complex than male and female, and gender as a spectrum that includes transgender people and those
who identify as neither male nor female. The US administration’s proposal would ignore that expert consensus.
-----

https://www.who.int/genomics/gender/en/index1.html#:~:text=Genetic%20Components%20of%20Sex%20and,and%20most%20men%20are%2046XY
-----
The process of biological sex differentiation (development of a given sex) involves many genetically regulated, hierarchical developmental steps.
...
Gender, typically described in terms of masculinity and femininity, is a
social construction that varies across different cultures and over time. (6) There are a number of cultures, for example, in which greater gender diversity exists and sex and gender are not always neatly divided along binary lines
such as male and female or homosexual and heterosexual. The Berdache in North America, the fa’afafine (Samoan for “the way of a woman”) in the Pacific, and
the kathoey in Thailand are all examples of different gender categories that differ from the traditional Western division of people into males and females. Further, among certain North American native communities, gender is seen more in terms of a continuum than categories, with special acknowledgement of “two-spirited” people who encompass both masculine and feminine qualities and
characteristics. It is apparent, then, that different cultures have taken different approaches to creating gender distinctions, with more or less recognition of fluidity and complexity of gender.
-----

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/think-gender-comes-down-to-x-and-y-chromosomes-think-again/article24811543/
-----
Think gender comes down to X and Y chromosomes? Think again
...
But biology doesn't work that way. Biological phenomena don't necessarily fit into human-ordained binary categories. So while humans insist that you're either male or female – that you have either XY or XX sex chromosomes – biology begs to differ.
...
So what's the answer? There isn't one, at least if we're looking for the
answer in biology. We must not fall back on biology. Rather, we must always remember that it is we, not biology, who decide who counts as male or female. And it is we who must take responsibility for our decisions.
-----

http://www.pbs.org/independentlens/content/two-spirits_map-html/
-----
On nearly every continent, and for all of recorded history, thriving cultures have recognized, revered, and integrated more than two genders. Terms such as “transgender” and “gay” are strictly new constructs that assume three things:
that there are only two sexes (male/female), as many as two sexualities (gay/straight), and only two genders (man/woman).

Yet hundreds of distinct societies around the globe have their own long-established traditions for third, fourth, fifth, or more genders. The subject of Two Spirits, Fred Martinez, for example, was not a boy who wanted
to be a girl, but both a boy and a girl — an identity his Navajo culture recognized and revered as nádleehí. Meanwhile, Hina of Kumu Hina is part of a a native Hawaiian culture that has traditionally revered and respected mahu, those who embody both male and female spirit.

Most Western societies have no direct correlation for this tradition, nor for the many other communities without strict either/or conceptions of sex, sexuality, and gender. Worldwide, the sheer variety of gender expression is almost limitless. Take a tour and learn how other cultures see gender diversity.
-----

http://usrf.org/news/010308-guevedoces.html
-----
During the early 1970s, Dr. Julianne Imperato, a Cornell endocrinologist, conducted an expedition to the Dominican Republic to investigate reports of an isolated village where children appearing to be girls turned into men at puberty. In the village, these children were known as 'guevedoces' (literally, penis at 12 years). Also known locally as machihembras ('first women, then man'), these pseudohermaphrodites were documented serially in the following photographs published originally in the American Journal of Medicne (Am. J. Med. 62: 170-191, 1977):
-----
--
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On Jun 15, 2026 at 12:13:14 PM MST, "Name" wrote <[email protected]>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 14, 2026 at 9:19:08?AM MST, "Name" wrote
<[email protected]>:

[Default] pothead <[email protected]> typed:

On 2026-06-13, Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter> wrote:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 13, 2026 at 7:21:57?AM MST, "pothead" wrote
<110jp25$2vub7$[email protected]>:

On 2026-06-13, Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter> wrote:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 9, 2026 at 4:29:03?PM MST, "Brock McNuggets" wrote
<6a28a1be$0$22$[email protected]>:

Snit continues to reply to himself, the Usenet equivalent of
masturbation.

ROFLMAO!!!!!

Indeed!

You have broken snit.
LOL!

It is facts that break

Facts like men can't be women. That's what breaks Snit.

snit Michael Glasser attacks me because I am female and he is not.

I believe that's called misogyny.

He's jealous that I have what he wants to have.
He was arrested for public harassment of his now ex wife so obviously
he hates women. Fortunately she dumped him and took every last dime he had.
And looking at his pic and hearing his voice it's obvious that he is
trying to BE a woman.

A real sick puppy IMHO.

His jenkem consumption has tripled in the past few weeks.

Notice you trolls feel the need to lie about people. Backs what I have been >> saying.

Nobody has lied about anyone, Snit, except for your lies.

What is it about evidence and equal rights that get you so angry you sink to your tribalism and scapegoating? Do you just enjoy proving me right time and time again?
--
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On 13 Jun 2026 00:32:31 GMT, Glock <[email protected]> wrote:

The Force must be strong with this "Snit" person of whom you speak.

On Fri, 12 Jun 2026 17:16:36 -0400, Nobodies Child wrote:

On Fri, 12 Jun 2026 04:06:57 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:

[Default] pothead <[email protected]> typed:

On 2026-06-11, Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�ter> >>>>wrote:

An emotional Snit goes off the rails again.

Indeed!
snit is replying to his own posts!

He must be high as a kite again.
Jenkem?
Gluebag?
Both?

Oh, I'm going with both, in addition to his debilitating mental
illness.

My semi-professional diagnosis, in layman's terms of course, is that
snit is mentally retarded. People with a normal, healthy brain do not
behave like he does. Maybe he is posting from a group home filled with
retards like him? If that is the case, the staff needs to take away his
computer and phone privileges before he harms himself because he clearly
doesn't have a clue what he is doing.

Your assessment aligns with the conclusions reached by a number of other >observers regarding "snit troll." The prevailing view among those >commentators is that years of prescription drug use may have had a >significant impact on his cognitive functioning and behavior.

If you have not seen it previously, the following material provides a >detailed overview of Michael Glasser, also known as "Brock McNuggets" and >"snit troll." It presents information and perspectives that some
individuals have cited when discussing his online presence and conduct.
The short of it is, Michael Glasser is one fucked in the head individual.

<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-teddybear>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitonduck>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitongoogle>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse3>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse4>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse5>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse6>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse7>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse8>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse9>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse10>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse11>

--
Latest from the left wing rumor mill:

It's been another weird week: Knicks vs Bone Spurs edition

<https://www.youtube.com/shorts/qWUTo5uJhOA>


MAGA: "embrace the suck".
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

In news:6a301775$0$19$[email protected], Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 14, 2026 at 10:40:56?PM MST, ""max headroom"" wrote <110o3l1$4r75$[email protected]>:

In news:6a2ef4d7$0$23$[email protected], Brock McNuggets
<[email protected]> typed:

The anti-trans position is the one actually driven by emotional bias
and personal feelings. Pro-trans arguments simply align with >>>>>>>>>>> established medical and scientific consensus.

https://townhall,com/tipsheet/amy-curtis/2026/02-24/nyt-trans-medical-associations-put-politics-over-science-n2651810

The NYTimes says you're wrong.

What article?

Click the link.

See below....

Where?

{crickets]

... But I will go into more here.

The existence of disagreement or institutional mistakes does not prove >>>>> that "it was never about the science." Science is a process of evaluating >>>>> evidence and revising conclusions....

Unless it's global warming. There "the science is settled."

While science is always growing -- we learn more, we do better -- there is >>> no reasonable doubt that man-made climate change is real and causing genuine
harm. That's not a political opinion. That's where the evidence has landed.

And one hundred years ago science told us that radio was possible because of >> vibrations in the aether.

And?

"Settled" science isn't.

... A more reasonable criticism is that some medical
organizations may have overstated the certainty of the evidence regarding >>>>> certain interventions for minors. THAT is fair.

Detransitioning *proves* the "evidence" was overstated.

There are cases when it has been overstated, but detransitioning no more >>> disproves anything about trans folks ...

But it does disprove something about the evidence.

Be very specific: what?

That it can be misleading.

And are you willing to go with ALL the evidence or just hand picking things to
push bigotry.

Like you?

...than someone murdering someone with a gun "proves" nobody should own a >>> gun.

<snipped your ad hominem... you humiliate yourself>

I'll restore it, since it humiliates YOU, snit.

You acting poorly is a reflection on you... not me.

...
I am acting excellently by restoring the text that sent you running for your teddy bear--

Improving a patient's mental well-being and making them a "healthier, >>>>>>> happier person" is the standard, valid goal of any medical treatment >>>>>>> (just like treating depression, anxiety, cancer, or chronic pain).

https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/california-study-finds-suicide-risk-doubles-after-male-female-surgeries

https://thepopulisttimes.com/trans-care-linked-to-mental-health-risks-including-suicide/

https://www.newsmax.com/michaeldorstewitz/care-finland-gender/2026/04/13/id/1252703/

So you have nothing approaching anything any reasoned person would call >>>>> reliable evidence....

You imply you consider yourself "reasonable," but your behavior suggests >>>> otherwise.

Your opinion on that is of no value. Again: I am speaking of evidence. No >>> personal attacks or insults. It is simply a fact I back equal rights and >>> evidence and you are backing special entitlements based on your feelings.

Again you lie.

Based on your feelings....

Based on fact. You just can't stop lying, can you?

... OK... but remember I go with evidence.

Only the evidence that supports your feelings.

... But you go with those clearly biased sources and reject scientific >>>>> ones.

Then you should have little trouble refuting the articles.

I'll wait....

Easy. The Daily Caller one is not based on peer review or the like. It is >>> tied to one person's allegations. And it gets the basics wrong. "Gender
dysphoria" and "transgender identity" are not the same. It is based on
emotions.

The Epoch Times one jumps from the idea of internal disagreements, which is >>> common in science to claims that the entire field is fraudulent. It offers >>> no evidence of this. Doctors also debate when chemotherapy is appropriate >>> and how much and what type and with what other treatments, they debate how >>> to treat chronic pain. It also gets key points wrong, such as saying
European countries have rejected gender-affirming care. They have not. They >>> have taken a more cautious model. Also, it is focused on teens -- and the >>> issue is a lot bigger than that. I agree that there should be time to
evaluate and mature.

Keep going.

See above. :)

Keep going.

https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/california-study-finds-suicide-risk-doubles-after-male-female-surgeries

https://thepopulisttimes.com/trans-care-linked-to-mental-health-risks-including-suicide/

https://www.newsmax.com/michaeldorstewitz/care-finland-gender/2026/04/13/id/1252703/

Have at it, snit -- refute away.



--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

Omar Murad Asfour <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:

On 14 Jun 2026, pothead <[email protected]> posted some news:110nj4v$vl5$[email protected]:

On 2026-06-14, Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter> wrote:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 9, 2026 at 4:29:03?PM MST, "Brock McNuggets" wrote >>>><6a28a1be$0$22$[email protected]>:

Snit continues to converse with himself. LOL

Just like a babbling retard.

Snit is a very busy person. You should all be nicer to him.

https://usenet.sandman.net/texter/category.php/Digests?categories%5B%5D
=Di gests&cond=and

From the little I have read, this snit creep seems like a total loser
with the IQ of a gnat.
WTF is wrong with him or her?



--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On Jun 15, 2026 at 7:45:11 PM MST, "Jimmy Mack" wrote <[email protected]>:

Omar Murad Asfour <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:

On 14 Jun 2026, pothead <[email protected]> posted some
news:110nj4v$vl5$[email protected]:

On 2026-06-14, Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter> wrote:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 9, 2026 at 4:29:03?PM MST, "Brock McNuggets" wrote
<6a28a1be$0$22$[email protected]>:

Snit continues to converse with himself. LOL

Just like a babbling retard.

Snit is a very busy person. You should all be nicer to him.

https://usenet.sandman.net/texter/category.php/Digests?categories%5B%5D
=Di gests&cond=and

From the little I have read, this snit creep seems like a total loser
with the IQ of a gnat.
WTF is wrong with him or her?

At least I am not a sock like you.
--
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 15, 2026 at 12:13:14?PM MST, "Name" wrote ><[email protected]>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 14, 2026 at 9:19:08?AM MST, "Name" wrote
<[email protected]>:

[Default] pothead <[email protected]> typed:

On 2026-06-13, Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�ter> wrote:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 13, 2026 at 7:21:57?AM MST, "pothead" wrote
<110jp25$2vub7$[email protected]>:

On 2026-06-13, Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�ter> wrote:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed: >>>>>>>>>

On Jun 9, 2026 at 4:29:03?PM MST, "Brock McNuggets" wrote
<6a28a1be$0$22$[email protected]>:

Snit continues to reply to himself, the Usenet equivalent of >>>>>>>>> masturbation.

ROFLMAO!!!!!

Indeed!

You have broken snit.
LOL!

It is facts that break

Facts like men can't be women. That's what breaks Snit.

snit Michael Glasser attacks me because I am female and he is not.

I believe that's called misogyny.

He's jealous that I have what he wants to have.
He was arrested for public harassment of his now ex wife so obviously >>>>> he hates women. Fortunately she dumped him and took every last dime he had.
And looking at his pic and hearing his voice it's obvious that he is >>>>> trying to BE a woman.

A real sick puppy IMHO.

His jenkem consumption has tripled in the past few weeks.

Notice you trolls feel the need to lie about people. Backs what I have been >>> saying.

Nobody has lied about anyone, Snit, except for your lies.

What is it about evidence

When will you provide some? You keep claiming men can be women.

Abraham Lincoln faced with some thorny issue that could be settled by
a twist of language, or a slight abuse of power, asks his questioner
how many legs would a calf have, if we called the calf�s tail, a leg.
�Five,� the questioner responds confident in his mathematical ability
to do simple addition.

�No,� Lincoln says. �Calling a calf�s tail a leg, doesn�t make it a
leg.�
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 15, 2026 at 12:13:51?PM MST, "Name" wrote ><[email protected]>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 9, 2026 at 4:29:03?PM MST, "Brock McNuggets" wrote
<6a28a1be$0$22$[email protected]>:

Broken Snit continues to talk to himself.

LOL

This is what you are running from:

Snit insists than men can be women just by wishing.

Too funny!
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On Jun 16, 2026 at 4:37:08 AM MST, "Name" wrote <[email protected]>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 15, 2026 at 12:13:51?PM MST, "Name" wrote
<[email protected]>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 9, 2026 at 4:29:03?PM MST, "Brock McNuggets" wrote
<6a28a1be$0$22$[email protected]>:

Broken Snit continues to talk to himself.

LOL

This is what you are running from:

Snit insists than men can be women just by wishing.

Too funny!

Tho the contrary, I am the one telling you that despite your FEELINGS, the evidence shows they can't.
--
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On Jun 16, 2026 at 4:34:54 AM MST, "Name" wrote <[email protected]>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 15, 2026 at 12:13:14?PM MST, "Name" wrote
<[email protected]>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 14, 2026 at 9:19:08?AM MST, "Name" wrote
<[email protected]>:

[Default] pothead <[email protected]> typed:

On 2026-06-13, Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter> wrote:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 13, 2026 at 7:21:57?AM MST, "pothead" wrote
<110jp25$2vub7$[email protected]>:

On 2026-06-13, Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter> wrote:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed: >>>>>>>>>>

On Jun 9, 2026 at 4:29:03?PM MST, "Brock McNuggets" wrote >>>>>>>>>>> <6a28a1be$0$22$[email protected]>:

Snit continues to reply to himself, the Usenet equivalent of >>>>>>>>>> masturbation.

ROFLMAO!!!!!

Indeed!

You have broken snit.
LOL!

It is facts that break

Facts like men can't be women. That's what breaks Snit.

snit Michael Glasser attacks me because I am female and he is not.

I believe that's called misogyny.

He's jealous that I have what he wants to have.
He was arrested for public harassment of his now ex wife so obviously >>>>>> he hates women. Fortunately she dumped him and took every last dime he had.
And looking at his pic and hearing his voice it's obvious that he is >>>>>> trying to BE a woman.

A real sick puppy IMHO.

His jenkem consumption has tripled in the past few weeks.

Notice you trolls feel the need to lie about people. Backs what I have been
saying.

Nobody has lied about anyone, Snit, except for your lies.

What is it about evidence

When will you provide some? You keep claiming men can be women.

Abraham Lincoln faced with some thorny issue that could be settled by
a twist of language, or a slight abuse of power, asks his questioner
how many legs would a calf have, if we called the calf’s tail, a leg. “Five,” the questioner responds confident in his mathematical ability
to do simple addition.

“No,” Lincoln says. “Calling a calf’s tail a leg, doesn’t make it a leg.”

More of your FEELINGS based nonsense... you are projecting. I am the one telling you the EVIDENCE shows someone cannot change their gender by just wishing. You insist they can.

And you snip all evidence that shows you are wrong.
--
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

In article <6a30bdfa$1$27$[email protected]>, [email protected] says...

On Jun 15, 2026 at 7:45:11�PM MST, "Jimmy Mack" wrote <[email protected]>:

Omar Murad Asfour <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:

On 14 Jun 2026, pothead <[email protected]> posted some
news:110nj4v$vl5$[email protected]:

On 2026-06-14, Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�ter> wrote:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 9, 2026 at 4:29:03?PM MST, "Brock McNuggets" wrote
<6a28a1be$0$22$[email protected]>:

Snit continues to converse with himself. LOL

Just like a babbling retard.

Snit is a very busy person. You should all be nicer to him.

https://usenet.sandman.net/texter/category.php/Digests?categories%5B%5D
=Di gests&cond=and

From the little I have read, this snit creep seems like a total loser
with the IQ of a gnat.
WTF is wrong with him or her?

At least I am not a sock like you.

Yes Snit, you are.
--

Trans women are really just men.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 16, 2026 at 4:34:54?AM MST, "Name" wrote ><[email protected]>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 15, 2026 at 12:13:14?PM MST, "Name" wrote
<[email protected]>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 14, 2026 at 9:19:08?AM MST, "Name" wrote
<[email protected]>:

[Default] pothead <[email protected]> typed:

On 2026-06-13, Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�ter> wrote:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 13, 2026 at 7:21:57?AM MST, "pothead" wrote
<110jp25$2vub7$[email protected]>:

On 2026-06-13, Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�ter> wrote:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed: >>>>>>>>>>>

On Jun 9, 2026 at 4:29:03?PM MST, "Brock McNuggets" wrote >>>>>>>>>>>> <6a28a1be$0$22$[email protected]>:

Snit continues to reply to himself, the Usenet equivalent of >>>>>>>>>>> masturbation.

ROFLMAO!!!!!

Indeed!

You have broken snit.
LOL!

It is facts that break

Facts like men can't be women. That's what breaks Snit.

snit Michael Glasser attacks me because I am female and he is not. >>>>>>

I believe that's called misogyny.

He's jealous that I have what he wants to have.
He was arrested for public harassment of his now ex wife so obviously >>>>>>> he hates women. Fortunately she dumped him and took every last dime he had.
And looking at his pic and hearing his voice it's obvious that he is >>>>>>> trying to BE a woman.

A real sick puppy IMHO.

His jenkem consumption has tripled in the past few weeks.

Notice you trolls feel the need to lie about people. Backs what I have been
saying.

Nobody has lied about anyone, Snit, except for your lies.

What is it about evidence

When will you provide some? You keep claiming men can be women.

Abraham Lincoln faced with some thorny issue that could be settled by
a twist of language, or a slight abuse of power, asks his questioner
how many legs would a calf have, if we called the calf?s tail, a leg.
?Five,? the questioner responds confident in his mathematical ability
to do simple addition.

?No,? Lincoln says. ?Calling a calf?s tail a leg, doesn?t make it a
leg.?

More of your FEELINGS based nonsense..

Snit thinks saying men can't be women is "nonsense." LOL

He also thinks calves have five legs.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 16, 2026 at 4:37:08?AM MST, "Name" wrote ><[email protected]>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 15, 2026 at 12:13:51?PM MST, "Name" wrote
<[email protected]>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 9, 2026 at 4:29:03?PM MST, "Brock McNuggets" wrote
<6a28a1be$0$22$[email protected]>:

Broken Snit continues to talk to himself.

LOL

This is what you are running from:

Snit insists than men can be women just by wishing.

Too funny!

Tho the contrary, I am the one telling you that despite your FEELINGS, the >evidence shows they can't.

Correct. Men can't be women just by wanting to be women.

Thanks for finally admitting it.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

In news:6a315c9e$1$18$[email protected], Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 16, 2026 at 4:37:08?AM MST, "Name" wrote <[email protected]>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 15, 2026 at 12:13:51?PM MST, "Name" wrote
<[email protected]>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 9, 2026 at 4:29:03?PM MST, "Brock McNuggets" wrote
<6a28a1be$0$22$[email protected]>:

Broken Snit continues to talk to himself.

LOL

This is what you are running from:

Snit insists than men can be women just by wishing.

Too funny!

Tho the contrary, I am the one telling you that despite your FEELINGS, the evidence shows they can't.

The snit is so broken that it can't remember what it's arguing.


--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On Jun 16, 2026 at 3:29:26 PM MST, ""max headroom"" wrote <110siq6$1f7o7$[email protected]>:

In news:6a315c9e$1$18$[email protected], Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 16, 2026 at 4:37:08?AM MST, "Name" wrote
<[email protected]>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 15, 2026 at 12:13:51?PM MST, "Name" wrote
<[email protected]>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 9, 2026 at 4:29:03?PM MST, "Brock McNuggets" wrote
<6a28a1be$0$22$[email protected]>:

Broken Snit continues to talk to himself.

LOL

This is what you are running from:

Snit insists than men can be women just by wishing.

Too funny!

Tho the contrary, I am the one telling you that despite your FEELINGS, the >> evidence shows they can't.

The snit is so broken that it can't remember what it's arguing.

I am saying evidence and equal rights matter. Simple.
--
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On Jun 16, 2026 at 12:56:03 PM MST, "Name" wrote <[email protected]>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 16, 2026 at 4:37:08?AM MST, "Name" wrote
<[email protected]>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 15, 2026 at 12:13:51?PM MST, "Name" wrote
<[email protected]>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 9, 2026 at 4:29:03?PM MST, "Brock McNuggets" wrote
<6a28a1be$0$22$[email protected]>:

Broken Snit continues to talk to himself.

LOL

This is what you are running from:

Snit insists than men can be women just by wishing.

Too funny!

Tho the contrary, I am the one telling you that despite your FEELINGS, the >> evidence shows they can't.

Correct. Men can't be women just by wanting to be women.

Thanks for finally admitting it.

I am the one telling YOU that one cannot change their gender just because they -- or you -- want them to. If you finally agree then that is good.
--
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On Jun 16, 2026 at 12:55:15 PM MST, "Name" wrote <[email protected]>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 16, 2026 at 4:34:54?AM MST, "Name" wrote
<[email protected]>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 15, 2026 at 12:13:14?PM MST, "Name" wrote
<[email protected]>:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed:

On Jun 14, 2026 at 9:19:08?AM MST, "Name" wrote
<[email protected]>:

[Default] pothead <[email protected]> typed:

On 2026-06-13, Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter> wrote:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed: >>>>>>>>>

On Jun 13, 2026 at 7:21:57?AM MST, "pothead" wrote
<110jp25$2vub7$[email protected]>:

On 2026-06-13, Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter> wrote:

[Default] Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> typed: >>>>>>>>>>>>

On Jun 9, 2026 at 4:29:03?PM MST, "Brock McNuggets" wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>> <6a28a1be$0$22$[email protected]>:

Snit continues to reply to himself, the Usenet equivalent of >>>>>>>>>>>> masturbation.

ROFLMAO!!!!!

Indeed!

You have broken snit.
LOL!

It is facts that break

Facts like men can't be women. That's what breaks Snit.

snit Michael Glasser attacks me because I am female and he is not. >>>>>>>

I believe that's called misogyny.

He's jealous that I have what he wants to have.
He was arrested for public harassment of his now ex wife so obviously >>>>>>>> he hates women. Fortunately she dumped him and took every last dime he had.
And looking at his pic and hearing his voice it's obvious that he is >>>>>>>> trying to BE a woman.

A real sick puppy IMHO.

His jenkem consumption has tripled in the past few weeks.

Notice you trolls feel the need to lie about people. Backs what I have been
saying.

Nobody has lied about anyone, Snit, except for your lies.

What is it about evidence

When will you provide some? You keep claiming men can be women.

Abraham Lincoln faced with some thorny issue that could be settled by
a twist of language, or a slight abuse of power, asks his questioner
how many legs would a calf have, if we called the calf?s tail, a leg.
?Five,? the questioner responds confident in his mathematical ability
to do simple addition.

?No,? Lincoln says. ?Calling a calf?s tail a leg, doesn?t make it a
leg.?

More of your FEELINGS based nonsense..

Snit thinks saying men can't be women is "nonsense." LOL

He also thinks calves have five legs.

Notice how you speak FOR me. Remember, I am the one saying you are wrong to insist YOUR feelings define someone's gender.
--
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2