On 2026-06-13, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <110k034$31rq5$[email protected]>, nuh-This is the classic bleeding heart liberal excuse.
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-11 08:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
NoBody <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:57:57 +0000, Lee <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <[email protected]>,I
[email protected] says...
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <suBVR.86997$6y%[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On 6/6/2026 1:07 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:10vv895$1cb31$[email protected]:
And considering tomorrow, June 6th, is the anniversary of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> D-Day
Germanam overwhelmingly thankful that you left wing, pansy, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> snowflakes weren't invading Normandy because we would all be >>>>>>>>>>>>>> speaking
these days.
You DO realize that DDay was won
by a Democratic President leading a
Democratic Congress fighting fascism
despite the opposition from Republican
appeasers, no?
So? Democrats used to own slaves.
Those Democrats are the ancestors of today's Republiscums/QAnon. >>>>>>>>>>> The parties switched on race. Everyone knows this.
Who wants to preserve memorials to confederate traitors? >>>>>>>>>>> Republiscums/QAnon, not Democrats.
But you're ok with a statue for a woman beating crack
head?
WTF are you talking about?
Play dumb my friend. George Floyd?
Just answer the question.
LAUGHTER!
This from the guy who abandons any thread where he's questioned about >>>>>> his post.
Since your fellow Trumper "Skeeter"
cannot name this "statue for a woman
beating crack head" maybe you can?
George Floyd you ignorant fuck.
George Floyd's last criminal conviction was in 2009, and I haven't seen
anything thing that suggests he EVER beat anyone.
So he's a hero?
He was paroled in 2013, and while he was clearly struggling with
addiction still, he was never so much as charged with a crime after his
parole.
You mean he never got caught.
Poor baby was poor.
Brought up in a single parent home.
Got hooked on drugs.
Took up a life of crime that started small and escalated.
Sorry but this is a free country and people are allowed to make their own choices and decisions.
However those choices and decisions come with consequences which sometimes are not pleasant.
On 2026-06-13 13:21, pothead wrote:
On 2026-06-13, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <110k034$31rq5$[email protected]>, nuh-This is the classic bleeding heart liberal excuse.
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-11 08:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
NoBody <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:57:57 +0000, Lee <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <[email protected]>,I
[email protected] says...
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <suBVR.86997$6y%[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On 6/6/2026 1:07 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:10vv895$1cb31$[email protected]:
And considering tomorrow, June 6th, is the anniversary of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> D-Day
Germanam overwhelmingly thankful that you left wing, pansy, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> snowflakes weren't invading Normandy because we would all be >>>>>>>>>>>>>> speaking
these days.
You DO realize that DDay was won
by a Democratic President leading a
Democratic Congress fighting fascism
despite the opposition from Republican
appeasers, no?
So? Democrats used to own slaves.
Those Democrats are the ancestors of today's Republiscums/QAnon. >>>>>>>>>>> The parties switched on race. Everyone knows this.
Who wants to preserve memorials to confederate traitors? >>>>>>>>>>> Republiscums/QAnon, not Democrats.
But you're ok with a statue for a woman beating crack
head?
WTF are you talking about?
Play dumb my friend. George Floyd?
Just answer the question.
LAUGHTER!
This from the guy who abandons any thread where he's questioned about >>>>>> his post.
Since your fellow Trumper "Skeeter"
cannot name this "statue for a woman
beating crack head" maybe you can?
George Floyd you ignorant fuck.
George Floyd's last criminal conviction was in 2009, and I haven't seen >>> anything thing that suggests he EVER beat anyone.
So he's a hero?
He was paroled in 2013, and while he was clearly struggling with
addiction still, he was never so much as charged with a crime after his >>> parole.
You mean he never got caught.
Poor baby was poor.
Brought up in a single parent home.
Got hooked on drugs.
Took up a life of crime that started small and escalated.
Nope. I don't excuse anything he did.
But he wasn't so much as charged with a crime in the 7 years preceding
his murder.
Sorry but this is a free country and people are allowed to make their own choices and decisions.
However those choices and decisions come with consequences which sometimes are not pleasant.
Indeed a Chauvin chose to keep kneeling on the neck of a man who was handcuffed AND completely unresponsive.
In article <110klkc$38bf3$[email protected]>, nuh-
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-13 13:21, pothead wrote:
On 2026-06-13, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <110k034$31rq5$[email protected]>, nuh-This is the classic bleeding heart liberal excuse.
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-11 08:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
NoBody <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:57:57 +0000, Lee <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <[email protected]>,I
[email protected] says...
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <suBVR.86997$6y%[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On 6/6/2026 1:07 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:10vv895$1cb31$[email protected]:
And considering tomorrow, June 6th, is the anniversary of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> D-Day
Germanam overwhelmingly thankful that you left wing, pansy, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> snowflakes weren't invading Normandy because we would all be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speaking
these days.
You DO realize that DDay was won
by a Democratic President leading a
Democratic Congress fighting fascism
despite the opposition from Republican
appeasers, no?
So? Democrats used to own slaves.
Those Democrats are the ancestors of today's Republiscums/QAnon. >>>>>>>>>>>>> The parties switched on race. Everyone knows this.
Who wants to preserve memorials to confederate traitors? >>>>>>>>>>>>> Republiscums/QAnon, not Democrats.
But you're ok with a statue for a woman beating crack
head?
WTF are you talking about?
Play dumb my friend. George Floyd?
Just answer the question.
LAUGHTER!
This from the guy who abandons any thread where he's questioned about >>>>>>>> his post.
Since your fellow Trumper "Skeeter"
cannot name this "statue for a woman
beating crack head" maybe you can?
George Floyd you ignorant fuck.
George Floyd's last criminal conviction was in 2009, and I haven't seen >>>>> anything thing that suggests he EVER beat anyone.
So he's a hero?
He was paroled in 2013, and while he was clearly struggling with
addiction still, he was never so much as charged with a crime after his >>>>> parole.
You mean he never got caught.
Poor baby was poor.
Brought up in a single parent home.
Got hooked on drugs.
Took up a life of crime that started small and escalated.
Nope. I don't excuse anything he did.
But he wasn't so much as charged with a crime in the 7 years preceding
his murder.
Sorry but this is a free country and people are allowed to make their own >>> choices and decisions.
However those choices and decisions come with consequences which sometimes >>> are not pleasant.
Indeed a Chauvin chose to keep kneeling on the neck of a man who was
handcuffed AND completely unresponsive.
He was yelling "I can't breath" over and over. That sounds
pretty responsive to me.
On 2026-06-13 17:28, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110klkc$38bf3$[email protected]>, nuh-
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-13 13:21, pothead wrote:
On 2026-06-13, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <110k034$31rq5$[email protected]>, nuh-This is the classic bleeding heart liberal excuse.
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-11 08:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
NoBody <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:57:57 +0000, Lee <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <[email protected]>,I
[email protected] says...
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <suBVR.86997$6y%[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On 6/6/2026 1:07 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:10vv895$1cb31$[email protected]:
And considering tomorrow, June 6th, is the anniversary of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> D-Day
Germanam overwhelmingly thankful that you left wing, pansy, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> snowflakes weren't invading Normandy because we would all be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speaking
these days.
You DO realize that DDay was won
by a Democratic President leading a
Democratic Congress fighting fascism
despite the opposition from Republican
appeasers, no?
So? Democrats used to own slaves.
Those Democrats are the ancestors of today's Republiscums/QAnon.
The parties switched on race. Everyone knows this. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Who wants to preserve memorials to confederate traitors? >>>>>>>>>>>>> Republiscums/QAnon, not Democrats.
But you're ok with a statue for a woman beating crack >>>>>>>>>>>> head?
WTF are you talking about?
Play dumb my friend. George Floyd?
Just answer the question.
LAUGHTER!
This from the guy who abandons any thread where he's questioned about
his post.
Since your fellow Trumper "Skeeter"
cannot name this "statue for a woman
beating crack head" maybe you can?
George Floyd you ignorant fuck.
George Floyd's last criminal conviction was in 2009, and I haven't seen >>>>> anything thing that suggests he EVER beat anyone.
So he's a hero?
He was paroled in 2013, and while he was clearly struggling with
addiction still, he was never so much as charged with a crime after his >>>>> parole.
You mean he never got caught.
Poor baby was poor.
Brought up in a single parent home.
Got hooked on drugs.
Took up a life of crime that started small and escalated.
Nope. I don't excuse anything he did.
But he wasn't so much as charged with a crime in the 7 years preceding
his murder.
Sorry but this is a free country and people are allowed to make their own >>> choices and decisions.
However those choices and decisions come with consequences which sometimes
are not pleasant.
Indeed a Chauvin chose to keep kneeling on the neck of a man who was
handcuffed AND completely unresponsive.
He was yelling "I can't breath" over and over. That sounds
pretty responsive to me.
No. He was yelling that for a while...
...and then he wasn't yelling anything at all.
On 2026-06-13 13:21, pothead wrote:
On 2026-06-13, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <110k034$31rq5$[email protected]>, nuh-This is the classic bleeding heart liberal excuse.
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-11 08:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
NoBody <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:57:57 +0000, Lee <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <[email protected]>,I
[email protected] says...
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <suBVR.86997$6y%[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On 6/6/2026 1:07 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:10vv895$1cb31$[email protected]:
And considering tomorrow, June 6th, is the anniversary of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> D-Day
Germanam overwhelmingly thankful that you left wing, pansy, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> snowflakes weren't invading Normandy because we would all be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speaking
these days.
You DO realize that DDay was won
by a Democratic President leading a
Democratic Congress fighting fascism
despite the opposition from Republican
appeasers, no?
So? Democrats used to own slaves.
Those Democrats are the ancestors of today's Republiscums/QAnon. >>>>>>>>>>>> The parties switched on race. Everyone knows this.
Who wants to preserve memorials to confederate traitors? >>>>>>>>>>>> Republiscums/QAnon, not Democrats.
But you're ok with a statue for a woman beating crack
head?
WTF are you talking about?
Play dumb my friend. George Floyd?
Just answer the question.
LAUGHTER!
This from the guy who abandons any thread where he's questioned about >>>>>>> his post.
Since your fellow Trumper "Skeeter"
cannot name this "statue for a woman
beating crack head" maybe you can?
George Floyd you ignorant fuck.
George Floyd's last criminal conviction was in 2009, and I haven't seen >>>> anything thing that suggests he EVER beat anyone.
So he's a hero?
He was paroled in 2013, and while he was clearly struggling with
addiction still, he was never so much as charged with a crime after his >>>> parole.
You mean he never got caught.
Poor baby was poor.
Brought up in a single parent home.
Got hooked on drugs.
Took up a life of crime that started small and escalated.
Nope. I don't excuse anything he did.
But he wasn't so much as charged with a crime in the 7 years preceding
his murder.
Sorry but this is a free country and people are allowed to make their own
choices and decisions.
However those choices and decisions come with consequences which sometimes >> are not pleasant.
Indeed a Chauvin chose to keep kneeling on the neck of a man who was >handcuffed AND completely unresponsive.
On 2026-06-13, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <110k034$31rq5$[email protected]>, nuh-This is the classic bleeding heart liberal excuse.
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-11 08:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
NoBody <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:57:57 +0000, Lee <[email protected]>
wrote:
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <[email protected]>,I
[email protected] says...
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <suBVR.86997$6y%[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On 6/6/2026 1:07 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:10vv895$1cb31$[email protected]:
And considering tomorrow, June 6th, is the anniversary
of D-Day
Germanam overwhelmingly thankful that you left wing, pansy,
snowflakes weren't invading Normandy because we would
all be speaking
these days.
You DO realize that DDay was won
by a Democratic President leading a
Democratic Congress fighting fascism
despite the opposition from Republican
appeasers, no?
So? Democrats used to own slaves.
Those Democrats are the ancestors of today's
Republiscums/QAnon. The parties switched on race. Everyone
knows this.
Who wants to preserve memorials to confederate traitors?
Republiscums/QAnon, not Democrats.
But you're ok with a statue for a woman beating crack
head?
WTF are you talking about?
Play dumb my friend. George Floyd?
Just answer the question.
LAUGHTER!
This from the guy who abandons any thread where he's questioned
about his post.
Since your fellow Trumper "Skeeter"
cannot name this "statue for a woman
beating crack head" maybe you can?
George Floyd you ignorant fuck.
George Floyd's last criminal conviction was in 2009, and I haven't
seen anything thing that suggests he EVER beat anyone.
So he's a hero?
He was paroled in 2013, and while he was clearly struggling with
addiction still, he was never so much as charged with a crime after
his parole.
You mean he never got caught.
Poor baby was poor.
Brought up in a single parent home.
Got hooked on drugs.
Took up a life of crime that started small and escalated.
Sorry but this is a free country and people are allowed to make their
own choices and decisions.
However those choices and decisions come with consequences which
sometimes are not pleasant.
The follow on from the libs will be the race card and how Floyd didn't
have white privilege so he was doomed to fail.
On Sat, 13 Jun 2026 15:29:32 -0700, Alan <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2026-06-13 13:21, pothead wrote:
On 2026-06-13, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <110k034$31rq5$[email protected]>, nuh-This is the classic bleeding heart liberal excuse.
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-11 08:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
NoBody <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:57:57 +0000, Lee <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <[email protected]>,I
[email protected] says...
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <suBVR.86997$6y%[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On 6/6/2026 1:07 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:10vv895$1cb31$[email protected]:
And considering tomorrow, June 6th, is the anniversary of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> D-Day
Germanam overwhelmingly thankful that you left wing, pansy, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> snowflakes weren't invading Normandy because we would all be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speaking
these days.
You DO realize that DDay was won
by a Democratic President leading a
Democratic Congress fighting fascism
despite the opposition from Republican
appeasers, no?
So? Democrats used to own slaves.
Those Democrats are the ancestors of today's Republiscums/QAnon. >>>>>>>>>>>>> The parties switched on race. Everyone knows this.
Who wants to preserve memorials to confederate traitors? >>>>>>>>>>>>> Republiscums/QAnon, not Democrats.
But you're ok with a statue for a woman beating crack
head?
WTF are you talking about?
Play dumb my friend. George Floyd?
Just answer the question.
LAUGHTER!
This from the guy who abandons any thread where he's questioned about >>>>>>>> his post.
Since your fellow Trumper "Skeeter"
cannot name this "statue for a woman
beating crack head" maybe you can?
George Floyd you ignorant fuck.
George Floyd's last criminal conviction was in 2009, and I haven't seen >>>>> anything thing that suggests he EVER beat anyone.
So he's a hero?
He was paroled in 2013, and while he was clearly struggling with
addiction still, he was never so much as charged with a crime after his >>>>> parole.
You mean he never got caught.
Poor baby was poor.
Brought up in a single parent home.
Got hooked on drugs.
Took up a life of crime that started small and escalated.
Nope. I don't excuse anything he did.
But he wasn't so much as charged with a crime in the 7 years preceding
his murder.
Golly what an accomplishment.
<eyeroll>
Sorry but this is a free country and people are allowed to make their own >>> choices and decisions.
However those choices and decisions come with consequences which sometimes >>> are not pleasant.
Indeed a Chauvin chose to keep kneeling on the neck of a man who was
handcuffed AND completely unresponsive.
What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in
Britain?
On 2026-06-14 07:45, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jun 2026 15:29:32 -0700, Alan <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2026-06-13 13:21, pothead wrote:
On 2026-06-13, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <110k034$31rq5$[email protected]>, nuh-This is the classic bleeding heart liberal excuse.
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-11 08:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
NoBody <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:57:57 +0000, Lee <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <[email protected]>,I
[email protected] says...
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <suBVR.86997$6y%[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On 6/6/2026 1:07 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:10vv895$1cb31$[email protected]:
And considering tomorrow, June 6th, is the anniversary of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> D-Day
Germanam overwhelmingly thankful that you left wing, pansy, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> snowflakes weren't invading Normandy because we would all be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speaking
these days.
You DO realize that DDay was won
by a Democratic President leading a
Democratic Congress fighting fascism
despite the opposition from Republican
appeasers, no?
So? Democrats used to own slaves.
Those Democrats are the ancestors of today's Republiscums/QAnon.
The parties switched on race. Everyone knows this. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Who wants to preserve memorials to confederate traitors? >>>>>>>>>>>>> Republiscums/QAnon, not Democrats.
But you're ok with a statue for a woman beating crack >>>>>>>>>>>> head?
WTF are you talking about?
Play dumb my friend. George Floyd?
Just answer the question.
LAUGHTER!
This from the guy who abandons any thread where he's questioned about
his post.
Since your fellow Trumper "Skeeter"
cannot name this "statue for a woman
beating crack head" maybe you can?
George Floyd you ignorant fuck.
George Floyd's last criminal conviction was in 2009, and I haven't seen >>>>> anything thing that suggests he EVER beat anyone.
So he's a hero?
He was paroled in 2013, and while he was clearly struggling with
addiction still, he was never so much as charged with a crime after his >>>>> parole.
You mean he never got caught.
Poor baby was poor.
Brought up in a single parent home.
Got hooked on drugs.
Took up a life of crime that started small and escalated.
Nope. I don't excuse anything he did.
But he wasn't so much as charged with a crime in the 7 years preceding
his murder.
Golly what an accomplishment.
<eyeroll>
Thank you from agree that there is no evidence he ever beat any woman...
...ever.
Sorry but this is a free country and people are allowed to make their own >>> choices and decisions.
However those choices and decisions come with consequences which sometimes
are not pleasant.
Indeed a Chauvin chose to keep kneeling on the neck of a man who was
handcuffed AND completely unresponsive.
What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in
Britain?
I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did?
In article <110piep$j9ln$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-14 07:45, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jun 2026 15:29:32 -0700, Alan <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2026-06-13 13:21, pothead wrote:
On 2026-06-13, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <110k034$31rq5$[email protected]>, nuh-This is the classic bleeding heart liberal excuse.
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-11 08:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
NoBody <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:57:57 +0000, Lee <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <[email protected]>,I
[email protected] says...
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <suBVR.86997$6y%[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On 6/6/2026 1:07 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:10vv895$1cb31$[email protected]:
And considering tomorrow, June 6th, is the anniversary of >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> D-Day
Germanam overwhelmingly thankful that you left wing, pansy,
snowflakes weren't invading Normandy because we would all be
speaking
these days.
You DO realize that DDay was won
by a Democratic President leading a
Democratic Congress fighting fascism
despite the opposition from Republican
appeasers, no?
So? Democrats used to own slaves.
Those Democrats are the ancestors of today's Republiscums/QAnon.
The parties switched on race. Everyone knows this.
Who wants to preserve memorials to confederate traitors?
Republiscums/QAnon, not Democrats.
But you're ok with a statue for a woman beating crack
head?
WTF are you talking about?
Play dumb my friend. George Floyd?
Just answer the question.
LAUGHTER!
This from the guy who abandons any thread where he's questioned about
his post.
Since your fellow Trumper "Skeeter"
cannot name this "statue for a woman
beating crack head" maybe you can?
George Floyd you ignorant fuck.
George Floyd's last criminal conviction was in 2009, and I haven't seen
anything thing that suggests he EVER beat anyone.
So he's a hero?
He was paroled in 2013, and while he was clearly struggling with
addiction still, he was never so much as charged with a crime after his
parole.
You mean he never got caught.
Poor baby was poor.
Brought up in a single parent home.
Got hooked on drugs.
Took up a life of crime that started small and escalated.
Nope. I don't excuse anything he did.
But he wasn't so much as charged with a crime in the 7 years preceding
his murder.
Golly what an accomplishment.
<eyeroll>
Thank you from agree that there is no evidence he ever beat any woman...
...ever.
So you are ok with all the crimes he did commit and have
to cherry pick. The fact is you approve a statue of him.
Sorry but this is a free country and people are allowed to make their own
choices and decisions.
However those choices and decisions come with consequences which sometimes
are not pleasant.
Indeed a Chauvin chose to keep kneeling on the neck of a man who was
handcuffed AND completely unresponsive.
What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in
Britain?
I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did?
You keep talking about him.
In article <110piep$j9ln$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-14 07:45, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jun 2026 15:29:32 -0700, Alan <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2026-06-13 13:21, pothead wrote:
On 2026-06-13, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <110k034$31rq5$[email protected]>, nuh-This is the classic bleeding heart liberal excuse.
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-11 08:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
NoBody <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:57:57 +0000, Lee <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...I
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>
In article <suBVR.86997$6y%[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On 6/6/2026 1:07 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:10vv895$1cb31$[email protected]:
And considering tomorrow, June 6th, is the anniversary of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> D-Day
Germanam overwhelmingly thankful that you left wing, pansy, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> snowflakes weren't invading Normandy because we would all be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speaking
these days.
You DO realize that DDay was won
by a Democratic President leading a
Democratic Congress fighting fascism
despite the opposition from Republican
appeasers, no?
So? Democrats used to own slaves.
Those Democrats are the ancestors of today's Republiscums/QAnon.
The parties switched on race. Everyone knows this. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Who wants to preserve memorials to confederate traitors? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republiscums/QAnon, not Democrats.
But you're ok with a statue for a woman beating crack >>>>>>>>>>>>>> head?
WTF are you talking about?
Play dumb my friend. George Floyd?
Just answer the question.
LAUGHTER!
This from the guy who abandons any thread where he's questioned about
his post.
Since your fellow Trumper "Skeeter"
cannot name this "statue for a woman
beating crack head" maybe you can?
George Floyd you ignorant fuck.
George Floyd's last criminal conviction was in 2009, and I haven't seen >>>>>>> anything thing that suggests he EVER beat anyone.
So he's a hero?
He was paroled in 2013, and while he was clearly struggling with >>>>>>> addiction still, he was never so much as charged with a crime after his >>>>>>> parole.
You mean he never got caught.
Poor baby was poor.
Brought up in a single parent home.
Got hooked on drugs.
Took up a life of crime that started small and escalated.
Nope. I don't excuse anything he did.
But he wasn't so much as charged with a crime in the 7 years preceding >>>> his murder.
Golly what an accomplishment.
<eyeroll>
Thank you from agree that there is no evidence he ever beat any woman...
...ever.
So you are ok with all the crimes he did commit and have
to cherry pick. The fact is you approve a statue of him.
You brought him into this discussion, cupcake.
Sorry but this is a free country and people are allowed to make their own >>>>> choices and decisions.
However those choices and decisions come with consequences which sometimes
are not pleasant.
Indeed a Chauvin chose to keep kneeling on the neck of a man who was
handcuffed AND completely unresponsive.
What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in
Britain?
I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did?
You keep talking about him.
Alan is sealioning again.You keep talking about him.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened inI didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did?
Britain?
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd. If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried.
They love to deify the criminals.
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in
Britain?
I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did?
You keep talking about him.
Alan is sealioning again.
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for
Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried.
They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled
in 2013.
And even if Chauvin knew everything that Floyd had done, and even if he
had knowledge of a (hypothetically now) murder that Floyd had recently committed...
...would that make Chauvin murdering Floyd OK with you?
...would that make Chauvin murdering Floyd OK with you?
On 2026-06-15, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <110piep$j9ln$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-14 07:45, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jun 2026 15:29:32 -0700, Alan <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2026-06-13 13:21, pothead wrote:
On 2026-06-13, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <110k034$31rq5$[email protected]>, nuh-This is the classic bleeding heart liberal excuse.
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-11 08:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
NoBody <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:57:57 +0000, Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <[email protected]>,I
[email protected] says...
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <suBVR.86997$6y%[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On 6/6/2026 1:07 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:10vv895$1cb31$[email protected]:
And considering tomorrow, June 6th, is the anniversary of >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> D-Day
Germanam overwhelmingly thankful that you left wing, pansy,
snowflakes weren't invading Normandy because we would all be
speaking
these days.
You DO realize that DDay was won
by a Democratic President leading a
Democratic Congress fighting fascism
despite the opposition from Republican
appeasers, no?
So? Democrats used to own slaves.
Those Democrats are the ancestors of today's Republiscums/QAnon.
The parties switched on race. Everyone knows this.
Who wants to preserve memorials to confederate traitors?
Republiscums/QAnon, not Democrats.
But you're ok with a statue for a woman beating crack
head?
WTF are you talking about?
Play dumb my friend. George Floyd?
Just answer the question.
LAUGHTER!
This from the guy who abandons any thread where he's questioned about
his post.
Since your fellow Trumper "Skeeter"
cannot name this "statue for a woman
beating crack head" maybe you can?
George Floyd you ignorant fuck.
George Floyd's last criminal conviction was in 2009, and I haven't seen
anything thing that suggests he EVER beat anyone.
So he's a hero?
He was paroled in 2013, and while he was clearly struggling with
addiction still, he was never so much as charged with a crime after his
parole.
You mean he never got caught.
Poor baby was poor.
Brought up in a single parent home.
Got hooked on drugs.
Took up a life of crime that started small and escalated.
Nope. I don't excuse anything he did.
But he wasn't so much as charged with a crime in the 7 years preceding >> >> his murder.
Golly what an accomplishment.
<eyeroll>
Thank you from agree that there is no evidence he ever beat any woman... >>
...ever.
So you are ok with all the crimes he did commit and have
to cherry pick. The fact is you approve a statue of him.
Sorry but this is a free country and people are allowed to make their own
choices and decisions.
However those choices and decisions come with consequences which sometimes
are not pleasant.
Indeed a Chauvin chose to keep kneeling on the neck of a man who was
handcuffed AND completely unresponsive.
What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in
Britain?
I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did?
You keep talking about him.
Alan is sealioning again.
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd. If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried.
They love to deify the criminals.
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.You keep talking about him.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened inI didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did?
Britain?
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd. If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried.
They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled
in 2013.
And even if Chauvin knew everything that Floyd had done, and even if he
had knowledge of a (hypothetically now) murder that Floyd had recently committed...
...would that make Chauvin murdering Floyd OK with you?
On 6/15/2026 6:14 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in
Britain?
I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did?
You keep talking about him.
Alan is sealioning again.
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for
Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried.
They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled
in 2013.
And even if Chauvin knew everything that Floyd had done, and even if he had knowledge of a (hypothetically now) murder that Floyd had recently committed...
...would that make Chauvin murdering Floyd OK with you?
The lengths to which people will go to blame Floyd for his own death by homicide is astounding, the video clearly shows a white cop kneeling on
his neck, continuing to do so when he says he's having trouble
breathing, not posing a threat to anyone being face down and restrained,
not having committed a violent crime, but because they found traces of fentanyl in his system people jump to the conclusion he overdosed,
despite all evidence to the contrary, despite the fact Chauvin was
convicted at trial! Just unreal. They don't think black lives matter,
is the real reason.
On 2026-06-15 13:44, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110piep$j9ln$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-14 07:45, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jun 2026 15:29:32 -0700, Alan <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2026-06-13 13:21, pothead wrote:
On 2026-06-13, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <110k034$31rq5$[email protected]>, nuh-This is the classic bleeding heart liberal excuse.
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-11 08:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
NoBody <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:57:57 +0000, Lee <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...I
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>
In article <suBVR.86997$6y%[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On 6/6/2026 1:07 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:10vv895$1cb31$[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
And considering tomorrow, June 6th, is the anniversary of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> D-Day
Germanam overwhelmingly thankful that you left wing, pansy, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> snowflakes weren't invading Normandy because we would all be
speaking
these days.
You DO realize that DDay was won
by a Democratic President leading a
Democratic Congress fighting fascism
despite the opposition from Republican
appeasers, no?
So? Democrats used to own slaves.
Those Democrats are the ancestors of today's Republiscums/QAnon.
The parties switched on race. Everyone knows this. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Who wants to preserve memorials to confederate traitors? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republiscums/QAnon, not Democrats.
But you're ok with a statue for a woman beating crack >>>>>>>>>>>>>> head?
WTF are you talking about?
Play dumb my friend. George Floyd?
Just answer the question.
LAUGHTER!
This from the guy who abandons any thread where he's questioned about
his post.
Since your fellow Trumper "Skeeter"
cannot name this "statue for a woman
beating crack head" maybe you can?
George Floyd you ignorant fuck.
George Floyd's last criminal conviction was in 2009, and I haven't seen
anything thing that suggests he EVER beat anyone.
So he's a hero?
He was paroled in 2013, and while he was clearly struggling with >>>>>>> addiction still, he was never so much as charged with a crime after his
parole.
You mean he never got caught.
Poor baby was poor.
Brought up in a single parent home.
Got hooked on drugs.
Took up a life of crime that started small and escalated.
Nope. I don't excuse anything he did.
But he wasn't so much as charged with a crime in the 7 years preceding >>>> his murder.
Golly what an accomplishment.
<eyeroll>
Thank you from agree that there is no evidence he ever beat any woman... >>
...ever.
So you are ok with all the crimes he did commit and have
to cherry pick. The fact is you approve a statue of him.
I approve a of statue that reminds people that a man was murdered by a cop.
Sorry but this is a free country and people are allowed to make their own
choices and decisions.
However those choices and decisions come with consequences which sometimes
are not pleasant.
Indeed a Chauvin chose to keep kneeling on the neck of a man who was >>>> handcuffed AND completely unresponsive.
What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in
Britain?
I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did?
You keep talking about him.You brought him into this discussion, cupcake.
Alan wrote:
...would that make Chauvin murdering Floyd OK with you?
Chauvin is a POS, but Floyd wouldn't have died without all the drugs
in his system.
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelper/6992-george-floyd-full-autopsy/4c5bdf52fbbd775ce156/optimized/full.pdf
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.You keep talking about him.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened inI didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did?
Britain?
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd. >>> If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried.
They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled
in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
In article <110ptce$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 13:44, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110piep$j9ln$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-14 07:45, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jun 2026 15:29:32 -0700, Alan <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2026-06-13 13:21, pothead wrote:
On 2026-06-13, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <110k034$31rq5$[email protected]>, nuh-This is the classic bleeding heart liberal excuse.
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-11 08:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
NoBody <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:57:57 +0000, Lee <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>
In article <[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...I
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
In article <suBVR.86997$6y%[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On 6/6/2026 1:07 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:10vv895$1cb31$[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
And considering tomorrow, June 6th, is the anniversary of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> D-Day
Germanam overwhelmingly thankful that you left wing, pansy, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> snowflakes weren't invading Normandy because we would all be
speaking
these days.
You DO realize that DDay was won >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by a Democratic President leading a
Democratic Congress fighting fascism
despite the opposition from Republican
appeasers, no?
So? Democrats used to own slaves.
Those Democrats are the ancestors of today's Republiscums/QAnon.
The parties switched on race. Everyone knows this. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Who wants to preserve memorials to confederate traitors? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republiscums/QAnon, not Democrats.
But you're ok with a statue for a woman beating crack >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> head?
WTF are you talking about?
Play dumb my friend. George Floyd?
Just answer the question.
LAUGHTER!
This from the guy who abandons any thread where he's questioned about
his post.
Since your fellow Trumper "Skeeter"
cannot name this "statue for a woman
beating crack head" maybe you can?
George Floyd you ignorant fuck.
George Floyd's last criminal conviction was in 2009, and I haven't seen
anything thing that suggests he EVER beat anyone.
So he's a hero?
He was paroled in 2013, and while he was clearly struggling with >>>>>>>>> addiction still, he was never so much as charged with a crime after his
parole.
You mean he never got caught.
Poor baby was poor.
Brought up in a single parent home.
Got hooked on drugs.
Took up a life of crime that started small and escalated.
Nope. I don't excuse anything he did.
But he wasn't so much as charged with a crime in the 7 years preceding >>>>>> his murder.
Golly what an accomplishment.
<eyeroll>
Thank you from agree that there is no evidence he ever beat any woman... >>>>
...ever.
So you are ok with all the crimes he did commit and have
to cherry pick. The fact is you approve a statue of him.
I approve a of statue that reminds people that a man was murdered by a cop.
We don't need your approval.
You brought him into this discussion, cupcake.
Sorry but this is a free country and people are allowed to make their own
choices and decisions.
However those choices and decisions come with consequences which sometimes
are not pleasant.
Indeed a Chauvin chose to keep kneeling on the neck of a man who was >>>>>> handcuffed AND completely unresponsive.
What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in
Britain?
I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did?
You keep talking about him.
More sealion attempts. Floyd was scum as was that kid in
Texas. They got what they deserved.
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.You keep talking about him.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in >>>>>>> Britain?I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did?
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried.
They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled
in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.You keep talking about him.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in >>>>>> Britain?I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did?
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried.
They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled
in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
On Jun 15, 2026 at 4:21:04�PM MST, "Alan" wrote <110q1d1$njjl$[email protected]>:
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.You keep talking about him.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in >>>>>>> Britain?I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did?
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried.
They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled >>> in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
But the party of law and order excuses him.
On Jun 15, 2026 at 4:21:04�PM MST, "Alan" wrote <110q1d1$njjl$[email protected]>:
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.You keep talking about him.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in >>>>>>> Britain?I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did?
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried.
They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled >>> in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
But the party of law and order excuses him.
On 2026-06-15 16:12, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptce$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 13:44, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110piep$j9ln$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-14 07:45, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jun 2026 15:29:32 -0700, Alan <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2026-06-13 13:21, pothead wrote:
On 2026-06-13, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <110k034$31rq5$[email protected]>, nuh-This is the classic bleeding heart liberal excuse.
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-11 08:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
NoBody <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:57:57 +0000, Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>
In article <[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...I
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
In article <suBVR.86997$6y%[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...
On 6/6/2026 1:07 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:10vv895$1cb31$[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
And considering tomorrow, June 6th, is the anniversary of
D-Day
Germanam overwhelmingly thankful that you left wing, pansy, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> snowflakes weren't invading Normandy because we would all be
speaking
these days.
You DO realize that DDay was won >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by a Democratic President leading a
Democratic Congress fighting fascism
despite the opposition from Republican >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeasers, no?
So? Democrats used to own slaves.
Those Democrats are the ancestors of today's Republiscums/QAnon.
The parties switched on race. Everyone knows this. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Who wants to preserve memorials to confederate traitors? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republiscums/QAnon, not Democrats.
But you're ok with a statue for a woman beating crack >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> head?
WTF are you talking about?
Play dumb my friend. George Floyd?
Just answer the question.
LAUGHTER!
This from the guy who abandons any thread where he's questioned about
his post.
Since your fellow Trumper "Skeeter"
cannot name this "statue for a woman
beating crack head" maybe you can?
George Floyd you ignorant fuck.
George Floyd's last criminal conviction was in 2009, and I haven't seen
anything thing that suggests he EVER beat anyone.
So he's a hero?
He was paroled in 2013, and while he was clearly struggling with >>>>>>>>> addiction still, he was never so much as charged with a crime after his
parole.
You mean he never got caught.
Poor baby was poor.
Brought up in a single parent home.
Got hooked on drugs.
Took up a life of crime that started small and escalated.
Nope. I don't excuse anything he did.
But he wasn't so much as charged with a crime in the 7 years preceding >>>>>> his murder.
Golly what an accomplishment.
<eyeroll>
Thank you from agree that there is no evidence he ever beat any woman... >>>>
...ever.
So you are ok with all the crimes he did commit and have
to cherry pick. The fact is you approve a statue of him.
I approve a of statue that reminds people that a man was murdered by a cop.
We don't need your approval.
You brought him into this discussion, cupcake.
Sorry but this is a free country and people are allowed to make their own
choices and decisions.
However those choices and decisions come with consequences which sometimes
are not pleasant.
Indeed a Chauvin chose to keep kneeling on the neck of a man who was >>>>>> handcuffed AND completely unresponsive.
What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in
Britain?
I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did?
You keep talking about him.
More sealion attempts. Floyd was scum as was that kid in
Texas. They got what they deserved.
So you're not even trying to deny that Chauvin killed him.
Got it.
On 2026-06-15 15:58, chrisv wrote:
Alan wrote:
...would that make Chauvin murdering Floyd OK with you?
Chauvin is a POS, but Floyd wouldn't have died without all the drugs
in his system.
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelper/6992-george-floyd-full-autopsy/4c5bdf52fbbd775ce156/optimized/full.pdf
Whether that's true or not doesn't make Chauvin's actions acceptable.
In article <110q1c9$njjl$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 15:58, chrisv wrote:
Alan wrote:
...would that make Chauvin murdering Floyd OK with you?
Chauvin is a POS, but Floyd wouldn't have died without all the drugs
in his system.
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelper/6992-george-floyd-full-autopsy/4c5bdf52fbbd775ce156/optimized/full.pdf
Whether that's true or not doesn't make Chauvin's actions acceptable.
It's not about him stupid.
In article <6a308abb$1$21$[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
On Jun 15, 2026 at 4:21:04 PM MST, "Alan" wrote
<110q1d1$njjl$[email protected]>:
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in >>>>>>>>> Britain?I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did? >>>>>>> You keep talking about him.
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried.
They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled >>>>> in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
But the party of law and order excuses him.
More spin. By Alans logic Trump could have mended his
ways.
In article <6a308abb$1$21$[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
On Jun 15, 2026 at 4:21:04 PM MST, "Alan" wrote
<110q1d1$njjl$[email protected]>:
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in >>>>>>>>> Britain?I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did? >>>>>>> You keep talking about him.
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried.
They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled >>>>> in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
But the party of law and order excuses him.
Like pardoning your whole family for not committing any
crimes?
In article <6a308abb$1$21$[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
On Jun 15, 2026 at 4:21:04 PM MST, "Alan" wrote
<110q1d1$njjl$[email protected]>:
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in >>>>>>>>> Britain?I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did? >>>>>>> You keep talking about him.
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried.
They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled >>>>> in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
But the party of law and order excuses him.
More spin. By Alans logic Trump could have mended his
ways.
In article <110q1d1$njjl$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.You keep talking about him.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in >>>>>>>> Britain?I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did?
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried.
They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled >>>> in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
A misdemeanor changed into a felony over night and broken
into 34 separate charges. Guess what? No fines and no
jail. Appealed. Even the banks said they were happy with
Trump and would do business with him again. You have no
argument.
In article <110q1d1$njjl$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.You keep talking about him.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in >>>>>>>> Britain?I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did?
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried.
They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled >>>> in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
A misdemeanor changed into a felony over night and broken
into 34 separate charges. Guess what? No fines and no
jail. Appealed. Even the banks said they were happy with
Trump and would do business with him again. You have no
argument.
In article <110q1e0$njjl$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:12, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptce$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 13:44, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110piep$j9ln$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-14 07:45, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jun 2026 15:29:32 -0700, Alan <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>
On 2026-06-13 13:21, pothead wrote:
On 2026-06-13, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <110k034$31rq5$[email protected]>, nuh-This is the classic bleeding heart liberal excuse.
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-11 08:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...
NoBody <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:57:57 +0000, Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
In article <[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...I
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
In article <suBVR.86997$6y%[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...
On 6/6/2026 1:07 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:10vv895$1cb31$[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
And considering tomorrow, June 6th, is the anniversary of
D-Day
Germanam overwhelmingly thankful that you left wing, pansy, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> snowflakes weren't invading Normandy because we would all be
speaking
these days.
You DO realize that DDay was won >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by a Democratic President leading a
Democratic Congress fighting fascism >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> despite the opposition from Republican >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeasers, no?
So? Democrats used to own slaves.
Those Democrats are the ancestors of today's Republiscums/QAnon.
The parties switched on race. Everyone knows this. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Who wants to preserve memorials to confederate traitors? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republiscums/QAnon, not Democrats.
But you're ok with a statue for a woman beating crack >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> head?
WTF are you talking about?
Play dumb my friend. George Floyd?
Just answer the question.
LAUGHTER!
This from the guy who abandons any thread where he's questioned about
his post.
Since your fellow Trumper "Skeeter"
cannot name this "statue for a woman
beating crack head" maybe you can?
George Floyd you ignorant fuck.
George Floyd's last criminal conviction was in 2009, and I haven't seen
anything thing that suggests he EVER beat anyone.
So he's a hero?
He was paroled in 2013, and while he was clearly struggling with >>>>>>>>>>> addiction still, he was never so much as charged with a crime after his
parole.
You mean he never got caught.
Poor baby was poor.
Brought up in a single parent home.
Got hooked on drugs.
Took up a life of crime that started small and escalated.
Nope. I don't excuse anything he did.
But he wasn't so much as charged with a crime in the 7 years preceding >>>>>>>> his murder.
Golly what an accomplishment.
<eyeroll>
Thank you from agree that there is no evidence he ever beat any woman... >>>>>>
...ever.
So you are ok with all the crimes he did commit and have
to cherry pick. The fact is you approve a statue of him.
I approve a of statue that reminds people that a man was murdered by a cop.
We don't need your approval.
You brought him into this discussion, cupcake.
Sorry but this is a free country and people are allowed to make their own
choices and decisions.
However those choices and decisions come with consequences which sometimes
are not pleasant.
Indeed a Chauvin chose to keep kneeling on the neck of a man who was >>>>>>>> handcuffed AND completely unresponsive.
What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in >>>>>>> Britain?
I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did?
You keep talking about him.
More sealion attempts. Floyd was scum as was that kid in
Texas. They got what they deserved.
So you're not even trying to deny that Chauvin killed him.
Got it.
I'm not allowing you to spin the topic around. It's about
statues you fake twit.
On 2026-06-15 16:45, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q1d1$njjl$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in >>>>>>>> Britain?I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did? >>>>>> You keep talking about him.
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried.
They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled >>>> in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
A misdemeanor changed into a felony over night and broken
into 34 separate charges. Guess what? No fines and no
jail. Appealed. Even the banks said they were happy with
Trump and would do business with him again. You have no
argument.
You admit he was found guilty.
So what argument do I need?
On Jun 15, 2026 at 4:45:41�PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote <[email protected]>:
In article <110q1d1$njjl$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in >>>>>>>> Britain?I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did? >>>>>> You keep talking about him.
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried.
They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled >>>> in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
A misdemeanor changed into a felony over night and broken
into 34 separate charges. Guess what? No fines and no
jail. Appealed. Even the banks said they were happy with
Trump and would do business with him again. You have no
argument.
He is a felon. He is a pedophile. He is a rapist. He pushed an insurrection. He killed school girls. You do not care.
On 2026-06-15 16:46, Skeeter wrote:
In article <6a308abb$1$21$[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
On Jun 15, 2026 at 4:21:04�PM MST, "Alan" wrote
<110q1d1$njjl$[email protected]>:
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in >>>>>>>>> Britain?I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did? >>>>>>> You keep talking about him.
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried.
They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled >>>>> in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
But the party of law and order excuses him.
More spin. By Alans logic Trump could have mended his
ways.
I've never denied he could have...
...but the evidence is that he didn't.
On Jun 15, 2026 at 4:46:31�PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote <[email protected]>:
In article <6a308abb$1$21$[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
On Jun 15, 2026 at 4:21:04 PM MST, "Alan" wrote
<110q1d1$njjl$[email protected]>:
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in >>>>>>>>> Britain?I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did? >>>>>>> You keep talking about him.
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried.
They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled >>>>> in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
But the party of law and order excuses him.
More spin. By Alans logic Trump could have mended his
ways.
Trump has not paid the price for his wrong doings.
On Jun 15, 2026 at 4:47:32�PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote <[email protected]>:
In article <6a308abb$1$21$[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
On Jun 15, 2026 at 4:21:04 PM MST, "Alan" wrote
<110q1d1$njjl$[email protected]>:
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in >>>>>>>>> Britain?I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did? >>>>>>> You keep talking about him.
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried.
They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled >>>>> in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
But the party of law and order excuses him.
Like pardoning your whole family for not committing any
crimes?
Trump has been very open about using the Justice Department to attack his political enemies (a fascist tactic). Protecting people from that makes sense.
On 2026-06-15 16:48, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q1e0$njjl$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:12, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptce$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 13:44, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110piep$j9ln$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-14 07:45, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jun 2026 15:29:32 -0700, Alan <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>
On 2026-06-13 13:21, pothead wrote:
On 2026-06-13, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <110k034$31rq5$[email protected]>, nuh-This is the classic bleeding heart liberal excuse.
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-11 08:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...
NoBody <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:57:57 +0000, Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
In article <[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...I
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
In article <suBVR.86997$6y%[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...
On 6/6/2026 1:07 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:10vv895$1cb31$[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
And considering tomorrow, June 6th, is the anniversary of
D-Day
Germanam overwhelmingly thankful that you left wing, pansy, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> snowflakes weren't invading Normandy because we would all be
speaking
these days.
You DO realize that DDay was won >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by a Democratic President leading a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Democratic Congress fighting fascism >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> despite the opposition from Republican >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeasers, no?
So? Democrats used to own slaves.
Those Democrats are the ancestors of today's Republiscums/QAnon.
The parties switched on race. Everyone knows this. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Who wants to preserve memorials to confederate traitors? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republiscums/QAnon, not Democrats.
But you're ok with a statue for a woman beating crack >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> head?
WTF are you talking about?
Play dumb my friend. George Floyd?
Just answer the question.
LAUGHTER!
This from the guy who abandons any thread where he's questioned about
his post.
Since your fellow Trumper "Skeeter"
cannot name this "statue for a woman
beating crack head" maybe you can?
George Floyd you ignorant fuck.
George Floyd's last criminal conviction was in 2009, and I haven't seen
anything thing that suggests he EVER beat anyone.
So he's a hero?
He was paroled in 2013, and while he was clearly struggling with >>>>>>>>>>> addiction still, he was never so much as charged with a crime after his
parole.
You mean he never got caught.
Poor baby was poor.
Brought up in a single parent home.
Got hooked on drugs.
Took up a life of crime that started small and escalated.
Nope. I don't excuse anything he did.
But he wasn't so much as charged with a crime in the 7 years preceding
his murder.
Golly what an accomplishment.
<eyeroll>
Thank you from agree that there is no evidence he ever beat any woman...
...ever.
So you are ok with all the crimes he did commit and have
to cherry pick. The fact is you approve a statue of him.
I approve a of statue that reminds people that a man was murdered by a cop.
We don't need your approval.
You brought him into this discussion, cupcake.
Sorry but this is a free country and people are allowed to make their own
choices and decisions.
However those choices and decisions come with consequences which sometimes
are not pleasant.
Indeed a Chauvin chose to keep kneeling on the neck of a man who was >>>>>>>> handcuffed AND completely unresponsive.
What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in >>>>>>> Britain?
I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did?
You keep talking about him.
More sealion attempts. Floyd was scum as was that kid in
Texas. They got what they deserved.
So you're not even trying to deny that Chauvin killed him.
Got it.
I'm not allowing you to spin the topic around. It's about
statues you fake twit.
Hilarious for the guy who spun the topic from "be[ing] a Christian In Britain."
On 2026-06-15 16:48, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q1c9$njjl$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 15:58, chrisv wrote:
Alan wrote:
...would that make Chauvin murdering Floyd OK with you?
Chauvin is a POS, but Floyd wouldn't have died without all the drugs
in his system.
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelper/6992-george-floyd-full-autopsy/4c5bdf52fbbd775ce156/optimized/full.pdf
Whether that's true or not doesn't make Chauvin's actions acceptable.
It's not about him stupid.
It wasn't... ...but you made it about him when you claimed that Floyd
"got what he deserved".
In article <110q39v$numh$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:45, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q1d1$njjl$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in >>>>>>>>>> Britain?I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did? >>>>>>>> You keep talking about him.
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried.
They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled >>>>>> in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
A misdemeanor changed into a felony over night and broken
into 34 separate charges. Guess what? No fines and no
jail. Appealed. Even the banks said they were happy with
Trump and would do business with him again. You have no
argument.
You admit he was found guilty.
So what argument do I need?
It was a shame trial with sham members. Even the judge got
caught doing what they blamed Trump for. They know it's a
sham and that's why they aren't pursuing it.
In article <6a30905c$1$23$[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
On Jun 15, 2026 at 4:47:32 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<[email protected]>:
In article <6a308abb$1$21$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On Jun 15, 2026 at 4:21:04 PM MST, "Alan" wrote
<110q1d1$njjl$[email protected]>:
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in >>>>>>>>>>> Britain?I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did? >>>>>>>>> You keep talking about him.
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried.
They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled >>>>>>> in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
But the party of law and order excuses him.
Like pardoning your whole family for not committing any
crimes?
Trump has been very open about using the Justice Department to attack his
political enemies (a fascist tactic). Protecting people from that makes sense.
So he does what the left did to him and all of a sudden
it's bad?
In article <110q37t$numh$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:48, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q1c9$njjl$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 15:58, chrisv wrote:
Alan wrote:
...would that make Chauvin murdering Floyd OK with you?
Chauvin is a POS, but Floyd wouldn't have died without all the drugs >>>>> in his system.
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelper/6992-george-floyd-full-autopsy/4c5bdf52fbbd775ce156/optimized/full.pdf
Whether that's true or not doesn't make Chauvin's actions acceptable.
It's not about him stupid.
It wasn't... ...but you made it about him when you claimed that Floyd
"got what he deserved".
I mentioned no names. He got a FAFO.
In article <110q38o$numh$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:46, Skeeter wrote:
In article <6a308abb$1$21$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On Jun 15, 2026 at 4:21:04 PM MST, "Alan" wrote
<110q1d1$njjl$[email protected]>:
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in >>>>>>>>>>> Britain?I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did? >>>>>>>>> You keep talking about him.
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried.
They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled >>>>>>> in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
But the party of law and order excuses him.
More spin. By Alans logic Trump could have mended his
ways.
I've never denied he could have...
...but the evidence is that he didn't.
How do you know? Who are you to judge?
In article <110q39v$numh$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:45, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q1d1$njjl$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in >>>>>>>>>> Britain?I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did? >>>>>>>> You keep talking about him.
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried.
They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled >>>>>> in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
A misdemeanor changed into a felony over night and broken
into 34 separate charges. Guess what? No fines and no
jail. Appealed. Even the banks said they were happy with
Trump and would do business with him again. You have no
argument.
You admit he was found guilty.
So what argument do I need?
It was a shame trial with sham members. Even the judge got
caught doing what they blamed Trump for. They know it's a
sham and that's why they aren't pursuing it.
In article <110q3bm$numh$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:48, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q1e0$njjl$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:12, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptce$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 13:44, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110piep$j9ln$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-14 07:45, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jun 2026 15:29:32 -0700, Alan <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>
On 2026-06-13 13:21, pothead wrote:
On 2026-06-13, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:Nope. I don't excuse anything he did.
In article <110k034$31rq5$[email protected]>, nuh-This is the classic bleeding heart liberal excuse.
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-11 08:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...
NoBody <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:57:57 +0000, Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
In article <[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...I
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
In article <suBVR.86997$6y%[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...
On 6/6/2026 1:07 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:10vv895$1cb31$[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
And considering tomorrow, June 6th, is the anniversary of
D-Day
Germanam overwhelmingly thankful that you left wing, pansy, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> snowflakes weren't invading Normandy because we would all be
speaking
these days.
You DO realize that DDay was won >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by a Democratic President leading a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Democratic Congress fighting fascism >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> despite the opposition from Republican >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeasers, no?
So? Democrats used to own slaves.
Those Democrats are the ancestors of today's Republiscums/QAnon.
The parties switched on race. Everyone knows this. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Who wants to preserve memorials to confederate traitors? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republiscums/QAnon, not Democrats.
But you're ok with a statue for a woman beating crack >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> head?
WTF are you talking about?
Play dumb my friend. George Floyd?
Just answer the question.
LAUGHTER!
This from the guy who abandons any thread where he's questioned about
his post.
Since your fellow Trumper "Skeeter"
cannot name this "statue for a woman
beating crack head" maybe you can?
George Floyd you ignorant fuck.
George Floyd's last criminal conviction was in 2009, and I haven't seen
anything thing that suggests he EVER beat anyone.
So he's a hero?
He was paroled in 2013, and while he was clearly struggling with >>>>>>>>>>>>> addiction still, he was never so much as charged with a crime after his
parole.
You mean he never got caught.
Poor baby was poor.
Brought up in a single parent home.
Got hooked on drugs.
Took up a life of crime that started small and escalated. >>>>>>>>>>
But he wasn't so much as charged with a crime in the 7 years preceding
his murder.
Golly what an accomplishment.
<eyeroll>
Thank you from agree that there is no evidence he ever beat any woman...
...ever.
So you are ok with all the crimes he did commit and have
to cherry pick. The fact is you approve a statue of him.
I approve a of statue that reminds people that a man was murdered by a cop.
We don't need your approval.
You brought him into this discussion, cupcake.You keep talking about him.
Sorry but this is a free country and people are allowed to make their own
choices and decisions.
However those choices and decisions come with consequences which sometimes
are not pleasant.
Indeed a Chauvin chose to keep kneeling on the neck of a man who was >>>>>>>>>> handcuffed AND completely unresponsive.
What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in >>>>>>>>> Britain?
I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did? >>>>>>>
More sealion attempts. Floyd was scum as was that kid in
Texas. They got what they deserved.
So you're not even trying to deny that Chauvin killed him.
Got it.
I'm not allowing you to spin the topic around. It's about
statues you fake twit.
Hilarious for the guy who spun the topic from "be[ing] a Christian In
Britain."
Hey stupid I wasn't even involved in that thread. Stop
drinking.
In article <6a30906d$2$18$[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
On Jun 15, 2026 at 4:46:31 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<[email protected]>:
In article <6a308abb$1$21$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On Jun 15, 2026 at 4:21:04 PM MST, "Alan" wrote
<110q1d1$njjl$[email protected]>:
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in >>>>>>>>>>> Britain?I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did? >>>>>>>>> You keep talking about him.
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried.
They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled >>>>>>> in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
But the party of law and order excuses him.
More spin. By Alans logic Trump could have mended his
ways.
Trump has not paid the price for his wrong doings.
Because there will be no price.
The left knows it was a--
sham and that's why they are not pursuing it.
In article <6a309091$1$25$[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
On Jun 15, 2026 at 4:45:41 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<[email protected]>:
In article <110q1d1$njjl$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in >>>>>>>>>> Britain?I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did? >>>>>>>> You keep talking about him.
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried.
They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled >>>>>> in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
A misdemeanor changed into a felony over night and broken
into 34 separate charges. Guess what? No fines and no
jail. Appealed. Even the banks said they were happy with
Trump and would do business with him again. You have no
argument.
He is a felon. He is a pedophile. He is a rapist. He pushed an insurrection. >> He killed school girls. You do not care.
But by your logic he is still innocent.
You can't prove he did any of that.
On Jun 15, 2026 at 5:52:44�PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote <[email protected]>:
In article <110q39v$numh$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:45, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q1d1$njjl$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in >>>>>>>>>> Britain?I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did? >>>>>>>> You keep talking about him.
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried.
They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled
in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
A misdemeanor changed into a felony over night and broken
into 34 separate charges. Guess what? No fines and no
jail. Appealed. Even the banks said they were happy with
Trump and would do business with him again. You have no
argument.
You admit he was found guilty.
So what argument do I need?
It was a shame trial with sham members. Even the judge got
caught doing what they blamed Trump for. They know it's a
sham and that's why they aren't pursuing it.
You back a convicted felon of a pedophile.
On 2026-06-15 17:52, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q39v$numh$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:45, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q1d1$njjl$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in >>>>>>>>>> Britain?I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did? >>>>>>>> You keep talking about him.
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried.
They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled
in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
A misdemeanor changed into a felony over night and broken
into 34 separate charges. Guess what? No fines and no
jail. Appealed. Even the banks said they were happy with
Trump and would do business with him again. You have no
argument.
You admit he was found guilty.
So what argument do I need?
It was a shame trial with sham members. Even the judge got
caught doing what they blamed Trump for. They know it's a
sham and that's why they aren't pursuing it.
They're not pursuing it because the judge didn't know HOW to do it in
the face of Trump being elected.
But his convictions stand.
On Jun 15, 2026 at 5:53:25�PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote <[email protected]>:
In article <6a309091$1$25$[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
On Jun 15, 2026 at 4:45:41 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<[email protected]>:
In article <110q1d1$njjl$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in >>>>>>>>>> Britain?I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did? >>>>>>>> You keep talking about him.
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried.
They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled
in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
A misdemeanor changed into a felony over night and broken
into 34 separate charges. Guess what? No fines and no
jail. Appealed. Even the banks said they were happy with
Trump and would do business with him again. You have no
argument.
He is a felon. He is a pedophile. He is a rapist. He pushed an insurrection.
He killed school girls. You do not care.
But by your logic he is still innocent.
This is not true in any way.
You can't prove he did any of that.
He has been convicted and otherwise found guilty in court for some of it and he brags about being a pedophile. We also know he is from even what he has been willing to release -- and what he has not been willing to -- from the Epstein files.
You defend a pedophile.
And we know he killed a school full of girls. This is not a secret. We know he
pushed an insurrection and then worked to pay off these horrid people to the tune of $1.8 billion.
And you STILL defend him.
On 2026-06-15 17:54, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q38o$numh$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:46, Skeeter wrote:
In article <6a308abb$1$21$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On Jun 15, 2026 at 4:21:04�PM MST, "Alan" wrote
<110q1d1$njjl$[email protected]>:
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in >>>>>>>>>>> Britain?I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did? >>>>>>>>> You keep talking about him.
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried. >>>>>>>> They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled
in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
But the party of law and order excuses him.
More spin. By Alans logic Trump could have mended his
ways.
I've never denied he could have...
...but the evidence is that he didn't.
How do you know? Who are you to judge?
A person of reasonable intelligent and observation.
Is Trump's administration still hiding the Epstein files?
Are they doing that to protect Democrats, do you think?
On Jun 15, 2026 at 5:54:55�PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote <[email protected]>:
In article <6a30906d$2$18$[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
On Jun 15, 2026 at 4:46:31 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<[email protected]>:
In article <6a308abb$1$21$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On Jun 15, 2026 at 4:21:04 PM MST, "Alan" wrote
<110q1d1$njjl$[email protected]>:
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in >>>>>>>>>>> Britain?I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did? >>>>>>>>> You keep talking about him.
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried. >>>>>>>> They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled
in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
But the party of law and order excuses him.
More spin. By Alans logic Trump could have mended his
ways.
Trump has not paid the price for his wrong doings.
Because there will be no price.
Right. Fascist leaders do not pay the price of their crimes.
The left knows it was a
sham and that's why they are not pursuing it.
On Jun 15, 2026 at 5:55:36�PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote <[email protected]>:
In article <6a30905c$1$23$[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
On Jun 15, 2026 at 4:47:32 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<[email protected]>:
In article <6a308abb$1$21$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On Jun 15, 2026 at 4:21:04 PM MST, "Alan" wrote
<110q1d1$njjl$[email protected]>:
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in >>>>>>>>>>> Britain?I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did? >>>>>>>>> You keep talking about him.
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried. >>>>>>>> They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled
in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
But the party of law and order excuses him.
Like pardoning your whole family for not committing any
crimes?
Trump has been very open about using the Justice Department to attack his >> political enemies (a fascist tactic). Protecting people from that makes sense.
So he does what the left did to him and all of a sudden
it's bad?
Notice you feel the need to lie. FEEL. You are all about emotion. I am about evidence.
But look at the left vs. right. If it turns out that Clinton did what Trump did in terms of Epstein island and raping children the left would reject him in a heartbeat. The right STILL embraces Trump.
On 2026-06-15 17:56, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q3bm$numh$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:48, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q1e0$njjl$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:12, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptce$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 13:44, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110piep$j9ln$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-14 07:45, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jun 2026 15:29:32 -0700, Alan <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>
On 2026-06-13 13:21, pothead wrote:
On 2026-06-13, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:Nope. I don't excuse anything he did.
In article <110k034$31rq5$[email protected]>, nuh-This is the classic bleeding heart liberal excuse.
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-11 08:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...
NoBody <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:57:57 +0000, Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
In article <[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...I
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
In article <suBVR.86997$6y%[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...
On 6/6/2026 1:07 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:10vv895$1cb31$[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
And considering tomorrow, June 6th, is the anniversary of
D-Day
Germanam overwhelmingly thankful that you left wing, pansy,
snowflakes weren't invading Normandy because we would all be
speaking
Those Democrats are the ancestors of today's Republiscums/QAnon.these days.
You DO realize that DDay was won >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by a Democratic President leading a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Democratic Congress fighting fascism >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> despite the opposition from Republican >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeasers, no?
So? Democrats used to own slaves. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The parties switched on race. Everyone knows this. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Who wants to preserve memorials to confederate traitors?
Republiscums/QAnon, not Democrats.
But you're ok with a statue for a woman beating crack >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> head?
WTF are you talking about?
Play dumb my friend. George Floyd?
Just answer the question.
LAUGHTER!
This from the guy who abandons any thread where he's questioned about
his post.
Since your fellow Trumper "Skeeter"
cannot name this "statue for a woman
beating crack head" maybe you can?
George Floyd you ignorant fuck.
George Floyd's last criminal conviction was in 2009, and I haven't seen
anything thing that suggests he EVER beat anyone.
So he's a hero?
He was paroled in 2013, and while he was clearly struggling with
addiction still, he was never so much as charged with a crime after his
parole.
You mean he never got caught.
Poor baby was poor.
Brought up in a single parent home.
Got hooked on drugs.
Took up a life of crime that started small and escalated. >>>>>>>>>>
But he wasn't so much as charged with a crime in the 7 years preceding
his murder.
Golly what an accomplishment.
<eyeroll>
Thank you from agree that there is no evidence he ever beat any woman...
...ever.
So you are ok with all the crimes he did commit and have
to cherry pick. The fact is you approve a statue of him.
I approve a of statue that reminds people that a man was murdered by a cop.
We don't need your approval.
You brought him into this discussion, cupcake.You keep talking about him.
Sorry but this is a free country and people are allowed to make their own
choices and decisions.
However those choices and decisions come with consequences which sometimes
are not pleasant.
Indeed a Chauvin chose to keep kneeling on the neck of a man who was
handcuffed AND completely unresponsive.
What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in >>>>>>>>> Britain?
I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did? >>>>>>>
More sealion attempts. Floyd was scum as was that kid in
Texas. They got what they deserved.
So you're not even trying to deny that Chauvin killed him.
Got it.
I'm not allowing you to spin the topic around. It's about
statues you fake twit.
Hilarious for the guy who spun the topic from "be[ing] a Christian In
Britain."
Hey stupid I wasn't even involved in that thread. Stop
drinking.
Hey, cupcake: look at the subject of this reply and the one that was in
YOUR post to which I'm replying now.
On 2026-06-15 17:57, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q37t$numh$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:48, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q1c9$njjl$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
It's not about him stupid.
On 2026-06-15 15:58, chrisv wrote:
Alan wrote:
...would that make Chauvin murdering Floyd OK with you?
Chauvin is a POS, but Floyd wouldn't have died without all the drugs >>>>> in his system.
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelper/6992-george-floyd-full-autopsy/4c5bdf52fbbd775ce156/optimized/full.pdf
Whether that's true or not doesn't make Chauvin's actions acceptable. >>>
It wasn't... ...but you made it about him when you claimed that Floyd
"got what he deserved".
I mentioned no names. He got a FAFO.
Yes, but when asked to clarify, you identified him.
Chauvin FAFO, too...
In article <110qab1$polc$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 17:57, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q37t$numh$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:48, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q1c9$njjl$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
It's not about him stupid.
On 2026-06-15 15:58, chrisv wrote:
Alan wrote:
...would that make Chauvin murdering Floyd OK with you?
Chauvin is a POS, but Floyd wouldn't have died without all the drugs >>>>>>> in his system.
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelper/6992-george-floyd-full-autopsy/4c5bdf52fbbd775ce156/optimized/full.pdf
Whether that's true or not doesn't make Chauvin's actions acceptable. >>>>>
It wasn't... ...but you made it about him when you claimed that Floyd
"got what he deserved".
I mentioned no names. He got a FAFO.
Yes, but when asked to clarify, you identified him.
I mentioned no names. You lose again.
In article <110qad2$polc$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 17:54, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q38o$numh$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:46, Skeeter wrote:
In article <6a308abb$1$21$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On Jun 15, 2026 at 4:21:04 PM MST, "Alan" wrote
<110q1d1$njjl$[email protected]>:
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in >>>>>>>>>>>>> Britain?I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did? >>>>>>>>>>> You keep talking about him.
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried. >>>>>>>>>> They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled
in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
But the party of law and order excuses him.
More spin. By Alans logic Trump could have mended his
ways.
I've never denied he could have...
...but the evidence is that he didn't.
How do you know? Who are you to judge?
A person of reasonable intelligent and observation.
You are bragging again?
Is Trump's administration still hiding the Epstein files?
Why didn't Biden release them?
So why aren't they (the Trump administration)...
Are they doing that to protect Democrats, do you think?
I don't think "they" are doing anything.
In article <110qah2$polc$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 17:56, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q3bm$numh$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:48, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q1e0$njjl$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:12, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptce$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 13:44, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110piep$j9ln$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-14 07:45, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jun 2026 15:29:32 -0700, Alan <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-06-13 13:21, pothead wrote:
On 2026-06-13, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:Nope. I don't excuse anything he did.
In article <110k034$31rq5$[email protected]>, nuh-This is the classic bleeding heart liberal excuse.
[email protected] says...
So he's a hero?
On 2026-06-11 08:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...
NoBody <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:57:57 +0000, Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
In article <[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...I
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
In article <suBVR.86997$6y%[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...
On 6/6/2026 1:07 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:10vv895$1cb31$[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
And considering tomorrow, June 6th, is the anniversary of
D-Day
Germanam overwhelmingly thankful that you left wing, pansy,
snowflakes weren't invading Normandy because we would all be
speaking
But you're ok with a statue for a woman beating crack >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> head?Those Democrats are the ancestors of today's Republiscums/QAnon.these days.
You DO realize that DDay was won >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by a Democratic President leading a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Democratic Congress fighting fascism >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> despite the opposition from Republican >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeasers, no?
So? Democrats used to own slaves. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The parties switched on race. Everyone knows this. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Who wants to preserve memorials to confederate traitors?
Republiscums/QAnon, not Democrats. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
WTF are you talking about?
Play dumb my friend. George Floyd?
Just answer the question.
LAUGHTER!
This from the guy who abandons any thread where he's questioned about
his post.
Since your fellow Trumper "Skeeter" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot name this "statue for a woman
beating crack head" maybe you can?
George Floyd you ignorant fuck.
George Floyd's last criminal conviction was in 2009, and I haven't seen
anything thing that suggests he EVER beat anyone. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
He was paroled in 2013, and while he was clearly struggling with
addiction still, he was never so much as charged with a crime after his
parole.
You mean he never got caught.
Poor baby was poor.
Brought up in a single parent home.
Got hooked on drugs.
Took up a life of crime that started small and escalated. >>>>>>>>>>>>
But he wasn't so much as charged with a crime in the 7 years preceding
his murder.
Golly what an accomplishment.
<eyeroll>
Thank you from agree that there is no evidence he ever beat any woman...
...ever.
So you are ok with all the crimes he did commit and have
to cherry pick. The fact is you approve a statue of him.
I approve a of statue that reminds people that a man was murdered by a cop.
We don't need your approval.
You brought him into this discussion, cupcake.You keep talking about him.
Sorry but this is a free country and people are allowed to make their own
choices and decisions.
However those choices and decisions come with consequences which sometimes
are not pleasant.
Indeed a Chauvin chose to keep kneeling on the neck of a man who was
handcuffed AND completely unresponsive.
What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in >>>>>>>>>>> Britain?
I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did? >>>>>>>>>
More sealion attempts. Floyd was scum as was that kid in
Texas. They got what they deserved.
So you're not even trying to deny that Chauvin killed him.
Got it.
I'm not allowing you to spin the topic around. It's about
statues you fake twit.
Hilarious for the guy who spun the topic from "be[ing] a Christian In
Britain."
Hey stupid I wasn't even involved in that thread. Stop
drinking.
Hey, cupcake: look at the subject of this reply and the one that was in
YOUR post to which I'm replying now.
You lied. I never responded in that thread. Nice try but
epic fail.
On 2026-06-16 07:55, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110qad2$polc$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 17:54, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q38o$numh$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:46, Skeeter wrote:
In article <6a308abb$1$21$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On Jun 15, 2026 at 4:21:04�PM MST, "Alan" wrote
<110q1d1$njjl$[email protected]>:
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened inI didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did? >>>>>>>>>>> You keep talking about him.
Britain?
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried. >>>>>>>>>> They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled
in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
But the party of law and order excuses him.
More spin. By Alans logic Trump could have mended his
ways.
I've never denied he could have...
...but the evidence is that he didn't.
How do you know? Who are you to judge?
A person of reasonable intelligent and observation.
You are bragging again?
Is Trump's administration still hiding the Epstein files?
Why didn't Biden release them?
They were still part of an active investigation and criminal proceeding.
Are they doing that to protect Democrats, do you think?
I don't think "they" are doing anything.So why aren't they (the Trump administration)...
...OBEYING THE LAW?
On 2026-06-16 07:58, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110qah2$polc$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 17:56, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q3bm$numh$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:48, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q1e0$njjl$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:12, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptce$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 13:44, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110piep$j9ln$[email protected]>, [email protected] >>>>>>>>> says...
On 2026-06-14 07:45, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jun 2026 15:29:32 -0700, Alan <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>
On 2026-06-13 13:21, pothead wrote:
On 2026-06-13, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:Nope. I don't excuse anything he did.
In article <110k034$31rq5$[email protected]>, nuh- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...This is the classic bleeding heart liberal excuse. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Poor baby was poor.
So he's a hero?
On 2026-06-11 08:16, Skeeter wrote:
In article <[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...
NoBody <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:57:57 +0000, Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
In article <[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...I
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
In article <suBVR.86997$6y%[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...
On 6/6/2026 1:07 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:10vv895$1cb31$[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
And considering tomorrow, June 6th, is the anniversary of
D-Day
Germanam overwhelmingly thankful that you left wing, pansy,
snowflakes weren't invading Normandy because we would all be
speaking
Play dumb my friend. George Floyd?But you're ok with a statue for a woman beating crack >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> head?Those Democrats are the ancestors of today's Republiscums/QAnon.these days.
You DO realize that DDay was won >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by a Democratic President leading a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Democratic Congress fighting fascism >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> despite the opposition from Republican >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeasers, no?
So? Democrats used to own slaves. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The parties switched on race. Everyone knows this. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Who wants to preserve memorials to confederate traitors?
Republiscums/QAnon, not Democrats. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
WTF are you talking about? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Just answer the question.
LAUGHTER!
This from the guy who abandons any thread where he's questioned about
his post.
Since your fellow Trumper "Skeeter" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot name this "statue for a woman
beating crack head" maybe you can?
George Floyd you ignorant fuck.
George Floyd's last criminal conviction was in 2009, and I haven't seen
anything thing that suggests he EVER beat anyone. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
He was paroled in 2013, and while he was clearly struggling with
addiction still, he was never so much as charged with a crime after his
parole.
You mean he never got caught.
Brought up in a single parent home.
Got hooked on drugs.
Took up a life of crime that started small and escalated. >>>>>>>>>>>>
But he wasn't so much as charged with a crime in the 7 years preceding
his murder.
Golly what an accomplishment.
<eyeroll>
Thank you from agree that there is no evidence he ever beat any woman...
...ever.
So you are ok with all the crimes he did commit and have
to cherry pick. The fact is you approve a statue of him.
I approve a of statue that reminds people that a man was murdered by a cop.
We don't need your approval.
You brought him into this discussion, cupcake.You keep talking about him.
Sorry but this is a free country and people are allowed to make their own
choices and decisions.
However those choices and decisions come with consequences which sometimes
are not pleasant.
Indeed a Chauvin chose to keep kneeling on the neck of a man who was
handcuffed AND completely unresponsive.
What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in >>>>>>>>>>> Britain?
I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did? >>>>>>>>>
More sealion attempts. Floyd was scum as was that kid in
Texas. They got what they deserved.
So you're not even trying to deny that Chauvin killed him.
Got it.
I'm not allowing you to spin the topic around. It's about
statues you fake twit.
Hilarious for the guy who spun the topic from "be[ing] a Christian In >>>> Britain."
Hey stupid I wasn't even involved in that thread. Stop
drinking.
Hey, cupcake: look at the subject of this reply and the one that was in
YOUR post to which I'm replying now.
You lied. I never responded in that thread. Nice try but
epic fail.
This IS that thread, cupcake.
On 2026-06-16 07:59, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110qab1$polc$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 17:57, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q37t$numh$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:48, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q1c9$njjl$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
It's not about him stupid.
On 2026-06-15 15:58, chrisv wrote:
Alan wrote:
...would that make Chauvin murdering Floyd OK with you?
Chauvin is a POS, but Floyd wouldn't have died without all the drugs >>>>>>> in his system.
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelper/6992-george-floyd-full-autopsy/4c5bdf52fbbd775ce156/optimized/full.pdf
Whether that's true or not doesn't make Chauvin's actions acceptable. >>>>>
It wasn't... ...but you made it about him when you claimed that Floyd >>>> "got what he deserved".
I mentioned no names. He got a FAFO.
Yes, but when asked to clarify, you identified him.
I mentioned no names. You lose again.
And you think that is an excuse?
In article <6a30b8d9$3$24$[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
On Jun 15, 2026 at 5:53:25 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<[email protected]>:
In article <6a309091$1$25$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On Jun 15, 2026 at 4:45:41 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<[email protected]>:
In article <110q1d1$njjl$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.You keep talking about him.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in >> >>>>>>>>>> Britain?I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did?
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried.
They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled
in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
A misdemeanor changed into a felony over night and broken
into 34 separate charges. Guess what? No fines and no
jail. Appealed. Even the banks said they were happy with
Trump and would do business with him again. You have no
argument.
He is a felon. He is a pedophile. He is a rapist. He pushed an insurrection.
He killed school girls. You do not care.
But by your logic he is still innocent.
This is not true in any way.
You can't prove he did any of that.
He has been convicted and otherwise found guilty in court for some of it and >> he brags about being a pedophile. We also know he is from even what he has >> been willing to release -- and what he has not been willing to -- from the >> Epstein files.
More lies with no proof.
You defend a pedophile.
Prove he's a pedo.
And we know he killed a school full of girls. This is not a secret. We know he
pushed an insurrection and then worked to pay off these horrid people to the >> tune of $1.8 billion.
He didn't bomb any school but stupid Iran did. So what if
he paid people who where thrown under the bus by the left.
And you STILL defend him.
You defend a child hair sniffing retard.
In article <110rp5u$171f2$[email protected]>, nuh-
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-16 07:59, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110qab1$polc$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 17:57, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q37t$numh$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:48, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q1c9$njjl$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
It's not about him stupid.
On 2026-06-15 15:58, chrisv wrote:
Alan wrote:
...would that make Chauvin murdering Floyd OK with you?
Chauvin is a POS, but Floyd wouldn't have died without all the drugs >>>>>>>>> in his system.
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelper/6992-george-floyd-full-autopsy/4c5bdf52fbbd775ce156/optimized/full.pdf
Whether that's true or not doesn't make Chauvin's actions acceptable. >>>>>>>
It wasn't... ...but you made it about him when you claimed that Floyd >>>>>> "got what he deserved".
I mentioned no names. He got a FAFO.
Yes, but when asked to clarify, you identified him.
I mentioned no names. You lose again.
And you think that is an excuse?
Excuse for you to change the topic from statues?
On 2026-06-16 08:38, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110rp5u$171f2$[email protected]>, nuh-
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-16 07:59, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110qab1$polc$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 17:57, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q37t$numh$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:48, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q1c9$njjl$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 15:58, chrisv wrote:
Alan wrote:
...would that make Chauvin murdering Floyd OK with you?
Chauvin is a POS, but Floyd wouldn't have died without all the drugs
in his system.
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelper/6992-george-floyd-full-autopsy/4c5bdf52fbbd775ce156/optimized/full.pdf
Whether that's true or not doesn't make Chauvin's actions acceptable.
It's not about him stupid.
It wasn't... ...but you made it about him when you claimed that Floyd >>>>>> "got what he deserved".
I mentioned no names. He got a FAFO.
Yes, but when asked to clarify, you identified him.
I mentioned no names. You lose again.
And you think that is an excuse?
Excuse for you to change the topic from statues?
You changed the topic to George Floyd first.
Again: LOOK AT THE SUBJECT.
On 2026-06-16, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <6a30b8d9$3$24$[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
On Jun 15, 2026 at 5:53:25�PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<[email protected]>:
In article <6a309091$1$25$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On Jun 15, 2026 at 4:45:41 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<[email protected]>:
In article <110q1d1$njjl$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened inI didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did? >> >>>>>>>> You keep talking about him.
Britain?
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried.
They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled
in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
A misdemeanor changed into a felony over night and broken
into 34 separate charges. Guess what? No fines and no
jail. Appealed. Even the banks said they were happy with
Trump and would do business with him again. You have no
argument.
He is a felon. He is a pedophile. He is a rapist. He pushed an insurrection.
He killed school girls. You do not care.
But by your logic he is still innocent.
This is not true in any way.
You can't prove he did any of that.
He has been convicted and otherwise found guilty in court for some of it and
he brags about being a pedophile. We also know he is from even what he has >> been willing to release -- and what he has not been willing to -- from the >> Epstein files.
More lies with no proof.
You defend a pedophile.
Prove he's a pedo.
Notice how snit's claims about Trump being a pedo which he combined with
his false claim that Trump was convicted of being a rapist.
Now the pedo claim morphs into Trump BRAGGED about being a pedo.
This is a classic example of how the dishonest troll snit operates.
He thinks people are stupid and will not notice his ever changing stories.
And we know he killed a school full of girls. This is not a secret. We know he
pushed an insurrection and then worked to pay off these horrid people to the
tune of $1.8 billion.
He didn't bomb any school but stupid Iran did. So what if
he paid people who where thrown under the bus by the left.
And you STILL defend him.
You defend a child hair sniffing retard.
Snit's a strange duck, that's for sure.
In article <110ru9d$18of9$[email protected]>, nuh-
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-16 08:38, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110rp5u$171f2$[email protected]>, nuh-
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-16 07:59, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110qab1$polc$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 17:57, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q37t$numh$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:48, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q1c9$njjl$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 15:58, chrisv wrote:
Alan wrote:
...would that make Chauvin murdering Floyd OK with you? >>>>>>>>>>>Chauvin is a POS, but Floyd wouldn't have died without all the drugs
in his system.
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelper/6992-george-floyd-full-autopsy/4c5bdf52fbbd775ce156/optimized/full.pdf
Whether that's true or not doesn't make Chauvin's actions acceptable.
It's not about him stupid.
It wasn't... ...but you made it about him when you claimed that Floyd >>>>>>>> "got what he deserved".
I mentioned no names. He got a FAFO.
Yes, but when asked to clarify, you identified him.
I mentioned no names. You lose again.
And you think that is an excuse?
Excuse for you to change the topic from statues?
You changed the topic to George Floyd first.
Again: LOOK AT THE SUBJECT.
I don't care. It's now about statues. If you don't like it
stay in your own lane.
On 2026-06-16 10:12, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ru9d$18of9$[email protected]>, nuh-
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-16 08:38, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110rp5u$171f2$[email protected]>, nuh-
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-16 07:59, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110qab1$polc$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 17:57, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q37t$numh$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:48, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q1c9$njjl$[email protected]>, [email protected] >>>>>>>>> says...
On 2026-06-15 15:58, chrisv wrote:
Alan wrote:
...would that make Chauvin murdering Floyd OK with you? >>>>>>>>>>>Chauvin is a POS, but Floyd wouldn't have died without all the drugs
in his system.
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelper/6992-george-floyd-full-autopsy/4c5bdf52fbbd775ce156/optimized/full.pdf
Whether that's true or not doesn't make Chauvin's actions acceptable.
It's not about him stupid.
It wasn't... ...but you made it about him when you claimed that Floyd
"got what he deserved".
I mentioned no names. He got a FAFO.
Yes, but when asked to clarify, you identified him.
I mentioned no names. You lose again.
And you think that is an excuse?
Excuse for you to change the topic from statues?
You changed the topic to George Floyd first.
Again: LOOK AT THE SUBJECT.
I don't care. It's now about statues. If you don't like it
stay in your own lane.
So then that same rule applies to any change ANYONE chooses to make, right?
In article <110s0br$193n7$[email protected]>, nuh-
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-16 10:12, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ru9d$18of9$[email protected]>, nuh-
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-16 08:38, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110rp5u$171f2$[email protected]>, nuh-
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-16 07:59, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110qab1$polc$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 17:57, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q37t$numh$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:48, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q1c9$njjl$[email protected]>, [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>> says...
On 2026-06-15 15:58, chrisv wrote:
Alan wrote:
...would that make Chauvin murdering Floyd OK with you? >>>>>>>>>>>>>Chauvin is a POS, but Floyd wouldn't have died without all the drugs
in his system.
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelper/6992-george-floyd-full-autopsy/4c5bdf52fbbd775ce156/optimized/full.pdf
Whether that's true or not doesn't make Chauvin's actions acceptable.
It's not about him stupid.
It wasn't... ...but you made it about him when you claimed that Floyd
"got what he deserved".
I mentioned no names. He got a FAFO.
Yes, but when asked to clarify, you identified him.
I mentioned no names. You lose again.
And you think that is an excuse?
Excuse for you to change the topic from statues?
You changed the topic to George Floyd first.
Again: LOOK AT THE SUBJECT.
I don't care. It's now about statues. If you don't like it
stay in your own lane.
So then that same rule applies to any change ANYONE chooses to make, right?
Are you looking for an excuse to explain your daily
actions?
In article <6a30ac47$6$21$[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
On Jun 15, 2026 at 5:55:36 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<[email protected]>:
In article <6a30905c$1$23$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On Jun 15, 2026 at 4:47:32 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<[email protected]>:
In article <6a308abb$1$21$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On Jun 15, 2026 at 4:21:04 PM MST, "Alan" wrote
<110q1d1$njjl$[email protected]>:
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in >>>>>>>>>>>>> Britain?I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did? >>>>>>>>>>> You keep talking about him.
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried. >>>>>>>>>> They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled
in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
But the party of law and order excuses him.
Like pardoning your whole family for not committing any
crimes?
Trump has been very open about using the Justice Department to attack his >>>> political enemies (a fascist tactic). Protecting people from that makes sense.
So he does what the left did to him and all of a sudden
it's bad?
Notice you feel the need to lie. FEEL. You are all about emotion. I am about >> evidence.
Yet you have shown none.
But look at the left vs. right. If it turns out that Clinton did what Trump >> did in terms of Epstein island and raping children the left would reject him >> in a heartbeat. The right STILL embraces Trump.
Clinton is guilty.
No proof on Trump. Show us this
"evidence" you keep crying about.
In article <6a30b7ea$2$21$[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
On Jun 15, 2026 at 5:54:55 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<[email protected]>:
In article <6a30906d$2$18$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On Jun 15, 2026 at 4:46:31 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<[email protected]>:
In article <6a308abb$1$21$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On Jun 15, 2026 at 4:21:04 PM MST, "Alan" wrote
<110q1d1$njjl$[email protected]>:
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in >>>>>>>>>>>>> Britain?I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did? >>>>>>>>>>> You keep talking about him.
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried. >>>>>>>>>> They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled
in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
But the party of law and order excuses him.
More spin. By Alans logic Trump could have mended his
ways.
Trump has not paid the price for his wrong doings.
Because there will be no price.
Right. Fascist leaders do not pay the price of their crimes.
You mean trumped up crimes?
In article <110qad2$polc$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 17:54, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q38o$numh$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:46, Skeeter wrote:
In article <6a308abb$1$21$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On Jun 15, 2026 at 4:21:04 PM MST, "Alan" wrote
<110q1d1$njjl$[email protected]>:
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in >>>>>>>>>>>>> Britain?I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did? >>>>>>>>>>> You keep talking about him.
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried. >>>>>>>>>> They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled
in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
But the party of law and order excuses him.
More spin. By Alans logic Trump could have mended his
ways.
I've never denied he could have...
...but the evidence is that he didn't.
How do you know? Who are you to judge?
A person of reasonable intelligent and observation.
You are bragging again?
Is Trump's administration still hiding the Epstein files?
Why didn't Biden release them?
--
Are they doing that to protect Democrats, do you think?
I don't think "they" are doing anything.
In article <6a30b8d9$3$24$[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
On Jun 15, 2026 at 5:53:25 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<[email protected]>:
In article <6a309091$1$25$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On Jun 15, 2026 at 4:45:41 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<[email protected]>:
In article <110q1d1$njjl$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in >>>>>>>>>>>> Britain?I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did? >>>>>>>>>> You keep talking about him.
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried. >>>>>>>>> They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled
in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
A misdemeanor changed into a felony over night and broken
into 34 separate charges. Guess what? No fines and no
jail. Appealed. Even the banks said they were happy with
Trump and would do business with him again. You have no
argument.
He is a felon. He is a pedophile. He is a rapist. He pushed an insurrection.
He killed school girls. You do not care.
But by your logic he is still innocent.
This is not true in any way.
You can't prove he did any of that.
He has been convicted and otherwise found guilty in court for some of it and >> he brags about being a pedophile. We also know he is from even what he has >> been willing to release -- and what he has not been willing to -- from the >> Epstein files.
More lies with no proof.
You defend a pedophile.
Prove he's a pedo.
And we know he killed a school full of girls. This is not a secret. We know he
pushed an insurrection and then worked to pay off these horrid people to the >> tune of $1.8 billion.
He didn't bomb any school but stupid Iran did. So what if--
he paid people who where thrown under the bus by the left.
And you STILL defend him.
You defend a child hair sniffing retard.
In article <110qafc$polc$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 17:52, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q39v$numh$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:45, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q1d1$njjl$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in >>>>>>>>>>>> Britain?I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did? >>>>>>>>>> You keep talking about him.
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried. >>>>>>>>> They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled
in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
A misdemeanor changed into a felony over night and broken
into 34 separate charges. Guess what? No fines and no
jail. Appealed. Even the banks said they were happy with
Trump and would do business with him again. You have no
argument.
You admit he was found guilty.
So what argument do I need?
It was a shame trial with sham members. Even the judge got
caught doing what they blamed Trump for. They know it's a
sham and that's why they aren't pursuing it.
They're not pursuing it because the judge didn't know HOW to do it in
the face of Trump being elected.
Bullshit. They had no case.
--
But his convictions stand.
So do the impeachments and they failed also.
On 2026-06-16 10:47, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110s0br$193n7$[email protected]>, nuh-
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-16 10:12, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ru9d$18of9$[email protected]>, nuh-
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-16 08:38, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110rp5u$171f2$[email protected]>, nuh-
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-16 07:59, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110qab1$polc$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 17:57, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q37t$numh$[email protected]>, [email protected] >>>>>>>>> says...
On 2026-06-15 16:48, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q1c9$njjl$[email protected]>, [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>> says...
On 2026-06-15 15:58, chrisv wrote:
Alan wrote:
...would that make Chauvin murdering Floyd OK with you? >>>>>>>>>>>>>Chauvin is a POS, but Floyd wouldn't have died without all the drugs
in his system.
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelper/6992-george-floyd-full-autopsy/4c5bdf52fbbd775ce156/optimized/full.pdf
Whether that's true or not doesn't make Chauvin's actions acceptable.
It's not about him stupid.
It wasn't... ...but you made it about him when you claimed that Floyd
"got what he deserved".
I mentioned no names. He got a FAFO.
Yes, but when asked to clarify, you identified him.
I mentioned no names. You lose again.
And you think that is an excuse?
Excuse for you to change the topic from statues?
You changed the topic to George Floyd first.
Again: LOOK AT THE SUBJECT.
I don't care. It's now about statues. If you don't like it
stay in your own lane.
So then that same rule applies to any change ANYONE chooses to make, right?
Are you looking for an excuse to explain your daily
actions?
I'm looking to understand why you want it to be OK when you change the subject...
...but not OK when other people do.
On Jun 16, 2026 at 7:55:13�AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote <[email protected]>:
In article <110qad2$polc$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 17:54, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q38o$numh$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:46, Skeeter wrote:
In article <6a308abb$1$21$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On Jun 15, 2026 at 4:21:04 PM MST, "Alan" wrote
<110q1d1$njjl$[email protected]>:
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened inI didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did? >>>>>>>>>>> You keep talking about him.
Britain?
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried. >>>>>>>>>> They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled
in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
But the party of law and order excuses him.
More spin. By Alans logic Trump could have mended his
ways.
I've never denied he could have...
...but the evidence is that he didn't.
How do you know? Who are you to judge?
A person of reasonable intelligent and observation.
You are bragging again?
Is Trump's administration still hiding the Epstein files?
Why didn't Biden release them?
There was no court order... and given an investigation they could not.
At least 28 women have accused Donald Trump of sexual misconduct spanning five
decades. Groping, grabbing, kissing without consent, walking in on naked teenagers ? the allegations are so numerous and consistent they have their own
Wikipedia page. A long one.
The only case that actually made it to trial ? E. Jean Carroll ? resulted in a
jury finding Trump liable for sexual abuse, a judge clarifying that what happened met the common definition of rape, and Trump being ordered to pay $88
million across two trials. His response was to keep defaming her, which kept costing him more money. Genius.
He owned beauty pageants specifically for the access it gave him to undressing
women ? including girls as young as 15 ? and openly bragged about it to Howard
Stern. Contestants corroborated it. His own daughter Ivanka reportedly shrugged it off with "Yeah, he does that."
Then there's the 2005 Access Hollywood tape, where he explained his philosophy: "When you're a star, they let you do anything." This was used as evidence in court. Against him. In a sexual abuse trial. That he lost.
The Epstein connection adds a darker layer: a 13-year-old plaintiff alleged rape. The case was dropped after her attorney reported death threats. She was never heard from again.
To his credit, Trump has denied everything. He also once vowed to sue all 28+ women for defamation. He sued one. He lost.
Are they doing that to protect Democrats, do you think?
I don't think "they" are doing anything.
On Jun 16, 2026 at 7:54:03�AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote <[email protected]>:
In article <6a30b8d9$3$24$[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
On Jun 15, 2026 at 5:53:25 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<[email protected]>:
In article <6a309091$1$25$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On Jun 15, 2026 at 4:45:41 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<[email protected]>:
In article <110q1d1$njjl$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in >>>>>>>>>>>> Britain?I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did? >>>>>>>>>> You keep talking about him.
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried. >>>>>>>>> They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled
in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
A misdemeanor changed into a felony over night and broken
into 34 separate charges. Guess what? No fines and no
jail. Appealed. Even the banks said they were happy with
Trump and would do business with him again. You have no
argument.
He is a felon. He is a pedophile. He is a rapist. He pushed an insurrection.
He killed school girls. You do not care.
But by your logic he is still innocent.
This is not true in any way.
You can't prove he did any of that.
He has been convicted and otherwise found guilty in court for some of it and
he brags about being a pedophile. We also know he is from even what he has >> been willing to release -- and what he has not been willing to -- from the >> Epstein files.
More lies with no proof.
At least 28 women have accused Donald Trump of sexual misconduct spanning five
decades. Groping, grabbing, kissing without consent, walking in on naked teenagers ? the allegations are so numerous and consistent they have their own
Wikipedia page. A long one.
The only case that actually made it to trial ? E. Jean Carroll ? resulted in a
jury finding Trump liable for sexual abuse, a judge clarifying that what happened met the common definition of rape, and Trump being ordered to pay $88
million across two trials. His response was to keep defaming her, which kept costing him more money. Genius.
He owned beauty pageants specifically for the access it gave him to undressing
women ? including girls as young as 15 ? and openly bragged about it to Howard
Stern. Contestants corroborated it. His own daughter Ivanka reportedly shrugged it off with "Yeah, he does that."
Then there's the 2005 Access Hollywood tape, where he explained his philosophy: "When you're a star, they let you do anything." This was used as evidence in court. Against him. In a sexual abuse trial. That he lost.
The Epstein connection adds a darker layer: a 13-year-old plaintiff alleged rape. The case was dropped after her attorney reported death threats. She was never heard from again.
To his credit, Trump has denied everything. He also once vowed to sue all 28+ women for defamation. He sued one. He lost.
You defend a pedophile.
Prove he's a pedo.
He bragged about it and his daughter verified it.
And we know he killed a school full of girls. This is not a secret. We know he
pushed an insurrection and then worked to pay off these horrid people to the
tune of $1.8 billion.
You ignored this to lie and deflect.
He didn't bomb any school but stupid Iran did. So what if
he paid people who where thrown under the bus by the left.
And you STILL defend him.
You defend a child hair sniffing retard.
On Jun 16, 2026 at 7:51:42�AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote <[email protected]>:
In article <110qafc$polc$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 17:52, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q39v$numh$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:45, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q1d1$njjl$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in >>>>>>>>>>>> Britain?I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did? >>>>>>>>>> You keep talking about him.
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried. >>>>>>>>> They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled
in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
A misdemeanor changed into a felony over night and broken
into 34 separate charges. Guess what? No fines and no
jail. Appealed. Even the banks said they were happy with
Trump and would do business with him again. You have no
argument.
You admit he was found guilty.
So what argument do I need?
It was a shame trial with sham members. Even the judge got
caught doing what they blamed Trump for. They know it's a
sham and that's why they aren't pursuing it.
They're not pursuing it because the judge didn't know HOW to do it in
the face of Trump being elected.
Bullshit. They had no case.
At least 28 women have accused Donald Trump of sexual misconduct spanning five
decades. Groping, grabbing, kissing without consent, walking in on naked teenagers ? the allegations are so numerous and consistent they have their own
Wikipedia page. A long one.
The only case that actually made it to trial ? E. Jean Carroll ? resulted in a
jury finding Trump liable for sexual abuse, a judge clarifying that what happened met the common definition of rape, and Trump being ordered to pay $88
million across two trials. His response was to keep defaming her, which kept costing him more money. Genius.
He owned beauty pageants specifically for the access it gave him to undressing
women ? including girls as young as 15 ? and openly bragged about it to Howard
Stern. Contestants corroborated it. His own daughter Ivanka reportedly shrugged it off with "Yeah, he does that."
Then there's the 2005 Access Hollywood tape, where he explained his philosophy: "When you're a star, they let you do anything." This was used as evidence in court. Against him. In a sexual abuse trial. That he lost.
The Epstein connection adds a darker layer: a 13-year-old plaintiff alleged rape. The case was dropped after her attorney reported death threats. She was never heard from again.
To his credit, Trump has denied everything. He also once vowed to sue all 28+ women for defamation. He sued one. He lost.
But his convictions stand.
So do the impeachments and they failed also.
In article <6a319d1a$2$27$[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
On Jun 16, 2026 at 7:51:42 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<[email protected]>:
In article <110qafc$polc$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 17:52, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q39v$numh$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:45, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q1d1$njjl$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Britain?I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did? >>>>>>>>>>>> You keep talking about him.
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried. >>>>>>>>>>> They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled
in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
A misdemeanor changed into a felony over night and broken
into 34 separate charges. Guess what? No fines and no
jail. Appealed. Even the banks said they were happy with
Trump and would do business with him again. You have no
argument.
You admit he was found guilty.
So what argument do I need?
It was a shame trial with sham members. Even the judge got
caught doing what they blamed Trump for. They know it's a
sham and that's why they aren't pursuing it.
They're not pursuing it because the judge didn't know HOW to do it in
the face of Trump being elected.
Bullshit. They had no case.
At least 28 women have accused Donald Trump of sexual misconduct spanning five
decades. Groping, grabbing, kissing without consent, walking in on naked
teenagers ? the allegations are so numerous and consistent they have their own
Wikipedia page. A long one.
The only case that actually made it to trial ? E. Jean Carroll ? resulted in a
jury finding Trump liable for sexual abuse, a judge clarifying that what
happened met the common definition of rape, and Trump being ordered to pay $88
million across two trials. His response was to keep defaming her, which kept >> costing him more money. Genius.
He owned beauty pageants specifically for the access it gave him to undressing
women ? including girls as young as 15 ? and openly bragged about it to Howard
Stern. Contestants corroborated it. His own daughter Ivanka reportedly
shrugged it off with "Yeah, he does that."
Then there's the 2005 Access Hollywood tape, where he explained his
philosophy: "When you're a star, they let you do anything." This was used as >> evidence in court. Against him. In a sexual abuse trial. That he lost.
The Epstein connection adds a darker layer: a 13-year-old plaintiff alleged >> rape. The case was dropped after her attorney reported death threats. She was
never heard from again.
To his credit, Trump has denied everything. He also once vowed to sue all 28+
women for defamation. He sued one. He lost.
And still no fines and no jail because they know it's all
bullshit.
In article <6a319d08$1$22$[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
On Jun 16, 2026 at 7:54:03 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<[email protected]>:
In article <6a30b8d9$3$24$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On Jun 15, 2026 at 5:53:25 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<[email protected]>:
In article <6a309091$1$25$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On Jun 15, 2026 at 4:45:41 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<[email protected]>:
In article <110q1d1$njjl$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Britain?I didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did? >>>>>>>>>>>> You keep talking about him.
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried. >>>>>>>>>>> They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled
in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
A misdemeanor changed into a felony over night and broken
into 34 separate charges. Guess what? No fines and no
jail. Appealed. Even the banks said they were happy with
Trump and would do business with him again. You have no
argument.
He is a felon. He is a pedophile. He is a rapist. He pushed an insurrection.
He killed school girls. You do not care.
But by your logic he is still innocent.
This is not true in any way.
You can't prove he did any of that.
He has been convicted and otherwise found guilty in court for some of it and
he brags about being a pedophile. We also know he is from even what he has >>>> been willing to release -- and what he has not been willing to -- from the >>>> Epstein files.
More lies with no proof.
At least 28 women have accused Donald Trump of sexual misconduct spanning five
decades. Groping, grabbing, kissing without consent, walking in on naked
teenagers ? the allegations are so numerous and consistent they have their own
Wikipedia page. A long one.
The only case that actually made it to trial ? E. Jean Carroll ? resulted in a
jury finding Trump liable for sexual abuse, a judge clarifying that what
happened met the common definition of rape, and Trump being ordered to pay $88
million across two trials. His response was to keep defaming her, which kept >> costing him more money. Genius.
He owned beauty pageants specifically for the access it gave him to undressing
women ? including girls as young as 15 ? and openly bragged about it to Howard
Stern. Contestants corroborated it. His own daughter Ivanka reportedly
shrugged it off with "Yeah, he does that."
Then there's the 2005 Access Hollywood tape, where he explained his
philosophy: "When you're a star, they let you do anything." This was used as >> evidence in court. Against him. In a sexual abuse trial. That he lost.
The Epstein connection adds a darker layer: a 13-year-old plaintiff alleged >> rape. The case was dropped after her attorney reported death threats. She was
never heard from again.
To his credit, Trump has denied everything. He also once vowed to sue all 28+
women for defamation. He sued one. He lost.
So far he has lost nothing and a lot of accusers have been
know liars. Kavanaugh for instance.
You defend a pedophile.
Prove he's a pedo.
He bragged about it and his daughter verified it.
Show me proof then.
You ignored this to lie and deflect.
And we know he killed a school full of girls. This is not a secret. We know he
pushed an insurrection and then worked to pay off these horrid people to the
tune of $1.8 billion.
He didn't kill anyone. It was Irans fault and this has
been backed up.
He didn't bomb any school but stupid Iran did. So what if
he paid people who where thrown under the bus by the left.
And you STILL defend him.
You defend a child hair sniffing retard.
You ignored this.
In article <110s453$1amqb$[email protected]>, nuh-
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-16 10:47, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110s0br$193n7$[email protected]>, nuh-
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-16 10:12, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ru9d$18of9$[email protected]>, nuh-
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-16 08:38, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110rp5u$171f2$[email protected]>, nuh-
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-16 07:59, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110qab1$polc$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 17:57, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q37t$numh$[email protected]>, [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>> says...
On 2026-06-15 16:48, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q1c9$njjl$[email protected]>, [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
On 2026-06-15 15:58, chrisv wrote:
Alan wrote:
...would that make Chauvin murdering Floyd OK with you? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Chauvin is a POS, but Floyd wouldn't have died without all the drugs
in his system.
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelper/6992-george-floyd-full-autopsy/4c5bdf52fbbd775ce156/optimized/full.pdf
Whether that's true or not doesn't make Chauvin's actions acceptable.
It's not about him stupid.
It wasn't... ...but you made it about him when you claimed that Floyd
"got what he deserved".
I mentioned no names. He got a FAFO.
Yes, but when asked to clarify, you identified him.
I mentioned no names. You lose again.
And you think that is an excuse?
Excuse for you to change the topic from statues?
You changed the topic to George Floyd first.
Again: LOOK AT THE SUBJECT.
I don't care. It's now about statues. If you don't like it
stay in your own lane.
So then that same rule applies to any change ANYONE chooses to make, right?
Are you looking for an excuse to explain your daily
actions?
I'm looking to understand why you want it to be OK when you change the
subject...
...but not OK when other people do.
And he changes the subject again. Oh the irony.
In article <6a319cdb$2$21$[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
On Jun 16, 2026 at 7:55:13 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<[email protected]>:
In article <110qad2$polc$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 17:54, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q38o$numh$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:46, Skeeter wrote:
In article <6a308abb$1$21$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On Jun 15, 2026 at 4:21:04 PM MST, "Alan" wrote
<110q1d1$njjl$[email protected]>:
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened inI didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did? >>>>>>>>>>>>> You keep talking about him.
Britain?
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried. >>>>>>>>>>>> They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled
in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
But the party of law and order excuses him.
More spin. By Alans logic Trump could have mended his
ways.
I've never denied he could have...
...but the evidence is that he didn't.
How do you know? Who are you to judge?
A person of reasonable intelligent and observation.
You are bragging again?
Is Trump's administration still hiding the Epstein files?
Why didn't Biden release them?
There was no court order... and given an investigation they could not.
That's the story but you know if there was anything about
Trump they would have released or leaked them.
--
At least 28 women have accused Donald Trump of sexual misconduct spanning five
decades. Groping, grabbing, kissing without consent, walking in on naked
teenagers ? the allegations are so numerous and consistent they have their own
Wikipedia page. A long one.
The only case that actually made it to trial ? E. Jean Carroll ? resulted in a
jury finding Trump liable for sexual abuse, a judge clarifying that what
happened met the common definition of rape, and Trump being ordered to pay $88
million across two trials. His response was to keep defaming her, which kept >> costing him more money. Genius.
He owned beauty pageants specifically for the access it gave him to undressing
women ? including girls as young as 15 ? and openly bragged about it to Howard
Stern. Contestants corroborated it. His own daughter Ivanka reportedly
shrugged it off with "Yeah, he does that."
Then there's the 2005 Access Hollywood tape, where he explained his
philosophy: "When you're a star, they let you do anything." This was used as >> evidence in court. Against him. In a sexual abuse trial. That he lost.
The Epstein connection adds a darker layer: a 13-year-old plaintiff alleged >> rape. The case was dropped after her attorney reported death threats. She was
never heard from again.
To his credit, Trump has denied everything. He also once vowed to sue all 28+
women for defamation. He sued one. He lost.
On Jun 16, 2026 at 12:59:42�PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote <[email protected]>:
In article <6a319cdb$2$21$[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
On Jun 16, 2026 at 7:55:13 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<[email protected]>:
In article <110qad2$polc$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 17:54, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q38o$numh$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:46, Skeeter wrote:
In article <6a308abb$1$21$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On Jun 15, 2026 at 4:21:04 PM MST, "Alan" wrote
<110q1d1$njjl$[email protected]>:
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.You keep talking about him.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened inI didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did?
Britain?
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried. >>>>>>>>>>>> They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled
in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
But the party of law and order excuses him.
More spin. By Alans logic Trump could have mended his
ways.
I've never denied he could have...
...but the evidence is that he didn't.
How do you know? Who are you to judge?
A person of reasonable intelligent and observation.
You are bragging again?
Is Trump's administration still hiding the Epstein files?
Why didn't Biden release them?
There was no court order... and given an investigation they could not.
That's the story but you know if there was anything about
Trump they would have released or leaked them.
Tons comes out. Nonstop. But his cult does not care. That is the nature of cults.
https://youtu.be/iXlv4M_MY9w?si=fYSXxBeC8eswAKGU--
At least 28 women have accused Donald Trump of sexual misconduct spanning five
decades. Groping, grabbing, kissing without consent, walking in on naked >> teenagers ? the allegations are so numerous and consistent they have their own
Wikipedia page. A long one.
The only case that actually made it to trial ? E. Jean Carroll ? resulted in a
jury finding Trump liable for sexual abuse, a judge clarifying that what >> happened met the common definition of rape, and Trump being ordered to pay $88
million across two trials. His response was to keep defaming her, which kept
costing him more money. Genius.
He owned beauty pageants specifically for the access it gave him to undressing
women ? including girls as young as 15 ? and openly bragged about it to Howard
Stern. Contestants corroborated it. His own daughter Ivanka reportedly
shrugged it off with "Yeah, he does that."
Then there's the 2005 Access Hollywood tape, where he explained his
philosophy: "When you're a star, they let you do anything." This was used as
evidence in court. Against him. In a sexual abuse trial. That he lost.
The Epstein connection adds a darker layer: a 13-year-old plaintiff alleged
rape. The case was dropped after her attorney reported death threats. She was
never heard from again.
To his credit, Trump has denied everything. He also once vowed to sue all 28+
women for defamation. He sued one. He lost.
On Jun 16, 2026 at 1:02:42�PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote <[email protected]>:
In article <6a319d1a$2$27$[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
On Jun 16, 2026 at 7:51:42 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<[email protected]>:
In article <110qafc$polc$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 17:52, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q39v$numh$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:45, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q1d1$njjl$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected] >>>>>>>>> says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened inI didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did? >>>>>>>>>>>> You keep talking about him.
Britain?
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried. >>>>>>>>>>> They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled
in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
A misdemeanor changed into a felony over night and broken
into 34 separate charges. Guess what? No fines and no
jail. Appealed. Even the banks said they were happy with
Trump and would do business with him again. You have no
argument.
You admit he was found guilty.
So what argument do I need?
It was a shame trial with sham members. Even the judge got
caught doing what they blamed Trump for. They know it's a
sham and that's why they aren't pursuing it.
They're not pursuing it because the judge didn't know HOW to do it in >>>> the face of Trump being elected.
Bullshit. They had no case.
At least 28 women have accused Donald Trump of sexual misconduct spanning five
decades. Groping, grabbing, kissing without consent, walking in on naked >> teenagers ? the allegations are so numerous and consistent they have their own
Wikipedia page. A long one.
The only case that actually made it to trial ? E. Jean Carroll ? resulted in a
jury finding Trump liable for sexual abuse, a judge clarifying that what >> happened met the common definition of rape, and Trump being ordered to pay $88
million across two trials. His response was to keep defaming her, which kept
costing him more money. Genius.
He owned beauty pageants specifically for the access it gave him to undressing
women ? including girls as young as 15 ? and openly bragged about it to Howard
Stern. Contestants corroborated it. His own daughter Ivanka reportedly
shrugged it off with "Yeah, he does that."
Then there's the 2005 Access Hollywood tape, where he explained his
philosophy: "When you're a star, they let you do anything." This was used as
evidence in court. Against him. In a sexual abuse trial. That he lost.
The Epstein connection adds a darker layer: a 13-year-old plaintiff alleged
rape. The case was dropped after her attorney reported death threats. She was
never heard from again.
To his credit, Trump has denied everything. He also once vowed to sue all 28+
women for defamation. He sued one. He lost.
And still no fines and no jail because they know it's all
bullshit.
I get that is how you feel. Remember, I care about evidence.
On 2026-06-16 12:56, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110s453$1amqb$[email protected]>, nuh-
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-16 10:47, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110s0br$193n7$[email protected]>, nuh-
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-16 10:12, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ru9d$18of9$[email protected]>, nuh-
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-16 08:38, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110rp5u$171f2$[email protected]>, nuh-
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-16 07:59, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110qab1$polc$[email protected]>, [email protected] >>>>>>>>> says...
On 2026-06-15 17:57, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q37t$numh$[email protected]>, [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>> says...
On 2026-06-15 16:48, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q1c9$njjl$[email protected]>, [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
On 2026-06-15 15:58, chrisv wrote:
Alan wrote:
...would that make Chauvin murdering Floyd OK with you? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Chauvin is a POS, but Floyd wouldn't have died without all the drugs
in his system.
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelper/6992-george-floyd-full-autopsy/4c5bdf52fbbd775ce156/optimized/full.pdf
Whether that's true or not doesn't make Chauvin's actions acceptable.
It's not about him stupid.
It wasn't... ...but you made it about him when you claimed that Floyd
"got what he deserved".
I mentioned no names. He got a FAFO.
Yes, but when asked to clarify, you identified him.
I mentioned no names. You lose again.
And you think that is an excuse?
Excuse for you to change the topic from statues?
You changed the topic to George Floyd first.
Again: LOOK AT THE SUBJECT.
I don't care. It's now about statues. If you don't like it
stay in your own lane.
So then that same rule applies to any change ANYONE chooses to make, right?
Are you looking for an excuse to explain your daily
actions?
I'm looking to understand why you want it to be OK when you change the
subject...
...but not OK when other people do.
And he changes the subject again. Oh the irony.
Nope. YOU changed the subject to changing the subject, cupcake!
Anyone can see that in just the last few lines!
:-)
In article <110snde$1g7ae$[email protected]>, nuh-
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-16 12:56, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110s453$1amqb$[email protected]>, nuh-
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-16 10:47, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110s0br$193n7$[email protected]>, nuh-
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-16 10:12, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ru9d$18of9$[email protected]>, nuh-
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-16 08:38, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110rp5u$171f2$[email protected]>, nuh-
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-16 07:59, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110qab1$polc$[email protected]>, [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>> says...
On 2026-06-15 17:57, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q37t$numh$[email protected]>, [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
On 2026-06-15 16:48, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q1c9$njjl$[email protected]>, [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
On 2026-06-15 15:58, chrisv wrote:
Alan wrote:
...would that make Chauvin murdering Floyd OK with you? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Chauvin is a POS, but Floyd wouldn't have died without all the drugs
in his system.
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelper/6992-george-floyd-full-autopsy/4c5bdf52fbbd775ce156/optimized/full.pdf
Whether that's true or not doesn't make Chauvin's actions acceptable.
It's not about him stupid.
It wasn't... ...but you made it about him when you claimed that Floyd
"got what he deserved".
I mentioned no names. He got a FAFO.
Yes, but when asked to clarify, you identified him.
I mentioned no names. You lose again.
And you think that is an excuse?
Excuse for you to change the topic from statues?
You changed the topic to George Floyd first.
Again: LOOK AT THE SUBJECT.
I don't care. It's now about statues. If you don't like it
stay in your own lane.
So then that same rule applies to any change ANYONE chooses to make, right?
Are you looking for an excuse to explain your daily
actions?
I'm looking to understand why you want it to be OK when you change the >>>> subject...
...but not OK when other people do.
And he changes the subject again. Oh the irony.
Nope. YOU changed the subject to changing the subject, cupcake!
Anyone can see that in just the last few lines!
:-)
Now I have you spinning like a top. That didn't take long.
On 2026-06-16 16:58, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110snde$1g7ae$[email protected]>, nuh-
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-16 12:56, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110s453$1amqb$[email protected]>, nuh-
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-16 10:47, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110s0br$193n7$[email protected]>, nuh-
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-16 10:12, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ru9d$18of9$[email protected]>, nuh-
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-16 08:38, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110rp5u$171f2$[email protected]>, nuh-
[email protected] says...
On 2026-06-16 07:59, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110qab1$polc$[email protected]>, [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>> says...
On 2026-06-15 17:57, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q37t$numh$[email protected]>, [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
On 2026-06-15 16:48, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q1c9$njjl$[email protected]>, [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
On 2026-06-15 15:58, chrisv wrote:
Alan wrote:
...would that make Chauvin murdering Floyd OK with you? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Chauvin is a POS, but Floyd wouldn't have died without all the drugs
in his system.
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelper/6992-george-floyd-full-autopsy/4c5bdf52fbbd775ce156/optimized/full.pdf
Whether that's true or not doesn't make Chauvin's actions acceptable.
It's not about him stupid.
It wasn't... ...but you made it about him when you claimed that Floyd
"got what he deserved".
I mentioned no names. He got a FAFO.
Yes, but when asked to clarify, you identified him.
I mentioned no names. You lose again.
And you think that is an excuse?
Excuse for you to change the topic from statues?
You changed the topic to George Floyd first.
Again: LOOK AT THE SUBJECT.
I don't care. It's now about statues. If you don't like it
stay in your own lane.
So then that same rule applies to any change ANYONE chooses to make, right?
Are you looking for an excuse to explain your daily
actions?
I'm looking to understand why you want it to be OK when you change the >>>> subject...
...but not OK when other people do.
And he changes the subject again. Oh the irony.
Nope. YOU changed the subject to changing the subject, cupcake!
Anyone can see that in just the last few lines!
:-)
Now I have you spinning like a top. That didn't take long.
The "I meant to do that" white flag!
In article <6a31c50c$2$25$[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
On Jun 16, 2026 at 1:02:42 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<[email protected]>:
In article <6a319d1a$2$27$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On Jun 16, 2026 at 7:51:42 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<[email protected]>:
In article <110qafc$polc$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 17:52, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q39v$numh$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:45, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q1d1$njjl$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>> says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened inI didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You keep talking about him.
Britain?
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried. >>>>>>>>>>>>> They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled
in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
A misdemeanor changed into a felony over night and broken
into 34 separate charges. Guess what? No fines and no
jail. Appealed. Even the banks said they were happy with
Trump and would do business with him again. You have no
argument.
You admit he was found guilty.
So what argument do I need?
It was a shame trial with sham members. Even the judge got
caught doing what they blamed Trump for. They know it's a
sham and that's why they aren't pursuing it.
They're not pursuing it because the judge didn't know HOW to do it in >>>>>> the face of Trump being elected.
Bullshit. They had no case.
At least 28 women have accused Donald Trump of sexual misconduct spanning five
decades. Groping, grabbing, kissing without consent, walking in on naked >>>> teenagers ? the allegations are so numerous and consistent they have their own
Wikipedia page. A long one.
The only case that actually made it to trial ? E. Jean Carroll ? resulted in a
jury finding Trump liable for sexual abuse, a judge clarifying that what >>>> happened met the common definition of rape, and Trump being ordered to pay $88
million across two trials. His response was to keep defaming her, which kept
costing him more money. Genius.
He owned beauty pageants specifically for the access it gave him to undressing
women ? including girls as young as 15 ? and openly bragged about it to Howard
Stern. Contestants corroborated it. His own daughter Ivanka reportedly >>>> shrugged it off with "Yeah, he does that."
Then there's the 2005 Access Hollywood tape, where he explained his
philosophy: "When you're a star, they let you do anything." This was used as
evidence in court. Against him. In a sexual abuse trial. That he lost. >>>> The Epstein connection adds a darker layer: a 13-year-old plaintiff alleged
rape. The case was dropped after her attorney reported death threats. She was
never heard from again.
To his credit, Trump has denied everything. He also once vowed to sue all 28+
women for defamation. He sued one. He lost.
And still no fines and no jail because they know it's all
bullshit.
I get that is how you feel. Remember, I care about evidence.
I don't care.
They tried and lost. No proof of anything.--
Well maybe liberal tears. "WAHHHH Trump made me cry"
In article <6a31e145$1$20$[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
On Jun 16, 2026 at 12:59:42 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<[email protected]>:
In article <6a319cdb$2$21$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On Jun 16, 2026 at 7:55:13 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<[email protected]>:
In article <110qad2$polc$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 17:54, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110q38o$numh$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 2026-06-15 16:46, Skeeter wrote:
In article <6a308abb$1$21$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
On Jun 15, 2026 at 4:21:04 PM MST, "Alan" wrote
<110q1d1$njjl$[email protected]>:
On 2026-06-15 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
In article <110ptfo$mf6u$[email protected]>, [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>> says...
On 2026-06-15 14:41, pothead wrote:
Alan is sealioning again.You keep talking about him.What the heck does George Floyd have to to with what happened inI didn't bring him up, so why don't you ask the person who did?
Britain?
BTW I'm surprised the leftists didn't add a spot on Mt. Rushmore for Floyd.
If Floyd was an illegal invader they surely would have tried. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> They love to deify the criminals.
Floyd had a criminal past, that's true.
But he hadn't been so much as arrested for a crime after he was paroled
in 2013.
Neither has Trump but you keep saying he's guilty.
Trump was convicted of 35 felonies.
But the party of law and order excuses him.
More spin. By Alans logic Trump could have mended his
ways.
I've never denied he could have...
...but the evidence is that he didn't.
How do you know? Who are you to judge?
A person of reasonable intelligent and observation.
You are bragging again?
Is Trump's administration still hiding the Epstein files?
Why didn't Biden release them?
There was no court order... and given an investigation they could not.
That's the story but you know if there was anything about
Trump they would have released or leaked them.
Tons comes out. Nonstop. But his cult does not care. That is the nature of >> cults.
Where is it? Show me where it says he was a pedophile and
he raped children and that he was even on that island.
Show it.
https://youtu.be/iXlv4M_MY9w?si=fYSXxBeC8eswAKGU
At least 28 women have accused Donald Trump of sexual misconduct spanning five
decades. Groping, grabbing, kissing without consent, walking in on naked >>>> teenagers ? the allegations are so numerous and consistent they have their own
Wikipedia page. A long one.
The only case that actually made it to trial ? E. Jean Carroll ? resulted in a
jury finding Trump liable for sexual abuse, a judge clarifying that what >>>> happened met the common definition of rape, and Trump being ordered to pay $88
million across two trials. His response was to keep defaming her, which kept
costing him more money. Genius.
He owned beauty pageants specifically for the access it gave him to undressing
women ? including girls as young as 15 ? and openly bragged about it to Howard
Stern. Contestants corroborated it. His own daughter Ivanka reportedly >>>> shrugged it off with "Yeah, he does that."
Then there's the 2005 Access Hollywood tape, where he explained his
philosophy: "When you're a star, they let you do anything." This was used as
evidence in court. Against him. In a sexual abuse trial. That he lost. >>>> The Epstein connection adds a darker layer: a 13-year-old plaintiff alleged
rape. The case was dropped after her attorney reported death threats. She was
never heard from again.
To his credit, Trump has denied everything. He also once vowed to sue all 28+
women for defamation. He sued one. He lost.
Notice how snit's claims about Trump being a pedo which he combined with
his false claim that Trump was convicted of being a rapist.
Now the pedo claim morphs into Trump BRAGGED about being a pedo.
This is a classic example of how the dishonest troll snit operates.
He thinks people are stupid and will not notice his ever changing stories.
Alan sez...<snip>
Skeeter sez ...
I never said what you claimed. Stop lying.This IS that thread, cupcake.You lied. I never responded in that thread. Nice try butHey stupid I wasn't even involved in that thread. StopHey, cupcake: look at the subject of this reply and the one that was in >> >> YOUR post to which I'm replying now.
drinking.
epic fail.
On Tue, 16 Jun 2026 15:59:01 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
Notice how snit's claims about Trump being a pedo which he combined with
his false claim that Trump was convicted of being a rapist.
Now the pedo claim morphs into Trump BRAGGED about being a pedo.
This is a classic example of how the dishonest troll snit operates.
He thinks people are stupid and will not notice his ever changing stories.
Everything Trump says is a lie even when he says, "I'm lying."
| Sysop: | DaiTengu |
|---|---|
| Location: | Appleton, WI |
| Users: | 1,123 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 36:39:32 |
| Calls: | 14,371 |
| Files: | 186,380 |
| D/L today: |
2,757 files (775M bytes) |
| Messages: | 2,540,652 |