Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 13:04:33 +0000, Mitchell Holmanpermit.
<[email protected]> wrote:
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 01:48:16 +0000, Mitchell Holman<[email protected]>
<[email protected]> wrote:
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Sun, 11 Oct 2026 16:36:30 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 10/11/2026 4:26 PM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Sun, 11 Oct 2026 13:29:34 +0000, Mitchell Holman
weaponwrote:
The Full Faith And Credit clause of the
Constitution
is still the law.
Not so much. If that were true, my right to carry a
concealed
severlywould be good in Illinois and Minnesota, or else it
would be
anyonerestricted everywhere.
I would support a right to carry concealed with outside
permit if
else in the district in question can carry with a
comparable
governmentto
It's not really a big deal since most states do respect
my Florida permit.
The way that we've failed to integrate states into one
nation is a ridiculous thing,
No, that's a wonderful beautiful thing that allows people
to choose
live in states like California, NY, and Illinois where
the
Wyomingrestricts your freedom, or states like Florida, Nebraska,
and
where people have more freedom.
Freedom to do what - shoot up
a classroom? Gun down a bunch of
shoppers at Walmart?
Parkland schooter - background checks passed,
bought his gun legally,
Las Vegas sniper - background checks passed,
bought his guns legally.
Olando night club shooter - background checks passed,
bought his gun legally.
Aurora CO theater shooter - background checks passed,
bought his gun legally.
DC sniper - background checks passed,
bought his gun legally.
Ft Hood shooter - background checks passed,
bought his gun legally.
Texas Tower sniper - background checks passed,
bought his guns legally.
Pittsburgh Synagogue shooter - background checks passed,
bought his guns legally.
El Paso Walmart shooter - background checks passed,
bought his gun legally
Charleston church shooter - background checks passed,
bought his gun legally
Texas church shooter - background checks passed,
bought his gun legally
Atlanta spa shooter - background checks passed,
boght his guns legally
Buffalo grocery shooter - background checks passed,
bought his guns legally
Uvalde Tx school shooter -background checks passed,
bought his guns legally
Hollowhead would rather talk about his irrational fear of
guns than about freedom. Lefftists aren't in favor of
freedom.
The party that wants to ban drag shows and
rainbows and pride parades and library books
dares to talk about freedom.
Nobody wants to ban your drag shows or library books, Dummy,
we just want to protect children from your perversions.
Why?
WHat children go harmed by watching a
cross-dressing Daffy Duck or Bugs Bunny
or Elmer Fudd?
Holman twists it around to cartoons and non reality. Even
Klinger in MASH admitted he dressed like a woman to make them
think he was crazy.
Oh, good one, I forgot about him.
Another drag performer that changed no
children's lives.
Because they knew it was an act.
All drag performers are an act.
That is why they call them performers.
What adults got harmed by watching
a cross-dressing JD Vance or Rugi Guilini
or Robin Williams or Dustin Hoffman?
Not trying to be a real woman. Dressed like that as a joke or an
act.
Exactly. Drag shows are an ACT. Elmer shooting
Daffy is an ACT. Cross dressing Vance was an ACT.
Children know they are acts.
So where is the harm?
Drag shows are real retards trying to convince people they are
really women.
You are confusing drag performers
with cross dressers. And in either case
where is the harm?
They live that life. Not acting.
Who told you that?
On Tue, 13 Oct 2026 17:36:40 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in >news:[email protected]:
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 13:04:33 +0000, Mitchell Holmanpermit.
<[email protected]> wrote:
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 01:48:16 +0000, Mitchell Holman<[email protected]>
<[email protected]> wrote:
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Sun, 11 Oct 2026 16:36:30 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 10/11/2026 4:26 PM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Sun, 11 Oct 2026 13:29:34 +0000, Mitchell Holman
weaponwrote:
The Full Faith And Credit clause of the
Constitution
is still the law.
Not so much. If that were true, my right to carry a
concealed
severlywould be good in Illinois and Minnesota, or else it
would be
anyonerestricted everywhere.
I would support a right to carry concealed with outside
permit if
else in the district in question can carry with a
comparable
governmentto
It's not really a big deal since most states do respect
my Florida permit.
The way that we've failed to integrate states into one
nation is a ridiculous thing,
No, that's a wonderful beautiful thing that allows people
to choose
live in states like California, NY, and Illinois where
the
Wyomingrestricts your freedom, or states like Florida, Nebraska,
and
where people have more freedom.
Freedom to do what - shoot up
a classroom? Gun down a bunch of
shoppers at Walmart?
Parkland schooter - background checks passed,
bought his gun legally,
Las Vegas sniper - background checks passed,
bought his guns legally.
Olando night club shooter - background checks passed,
bought his gun legally.
Aurora CO theater shooter - background checks passed,
bought his gun legally.
DC sniper - background checks passed,
bought his gun legally.
Ft Hood shooter - background checks passed,
bought his gun legally.
Texas Tower sniper - background checks passed,
bought his guns legally.
Pittsburgh Synagogue shooter - background checks passed,
bought his guns legally.
El Paso Walmart shooter - background checks passed,
bought his gun legally
Charleston church shooter - background checks passed,
bought his gun legally
Texas church shooter - background checks passed,
bought his gun legally
Atlanta spa shooter - background checks passed,
boght his guns legally
Buffalo grocery shooter - background checks passed,
bought his guns legally
Uvalde Tx school shooter -background checks passed,
bought his guns legally
Hollowhead would rather talk about his irrational fear of
guns than about freedom. Lefftists aren't in favor of
freedom.
The party that wants to ban drag shows and
rainbows and pride parades and library books
dares to talk about freedom.
Nobody wants to ban your drag shows or library books, Dummy,
we just want to protect children from your perversions.
Why?
WHat children go harmed by watching a
cross-dressing Daffy Duck or Bugs Bunny
or Elmer Fudd?
Holman twists it around to cartoons and non reality. Even
Klinger in MASH admitted he dressed like a woman to make them
think he was crazy.
Oh, good one, I forgot about him.
Another drag performer that changed no
children's lives.
Because they knew it was an act.
All drag performers are an act.
That is why they call them performers.
What adults got harmed by watching
a cross-dressing JD Vance or Rugi Guilini
or Robin Williams or Dustin Hoffman?
Not trying to be a real woman. Dressed like that as a joke or an
act.
Exactly. Drag shows are an ACT. Elmer shooting
Daffy is an ACT. Cross dressing Vance was an ACT.
Children know they are acts.
So where is the harm?
Drag shows are real retards trying to convince people they are
really women.
You are confusing drag performers
with cross dressers. And in either case
where is the harm?
They live that life. Not acting.
Who told you that?
Skeeter is an expert being a drag queen himself. He knows all about
it.
"chine.bleu" <[email protected]> wrote in news:11aleff$jpgj$1@dont- email.me:
Governor Swill wrote:
On Tue, 13 Oct 2026 02:23:23 -0400, Socialism is for losers
<[email protected]> wrote:
Like I said, Dummy, nobody wants to ban your drag shows or library
books, Dummy, we just want to protect children from your perversions.
But in another recent post you denied doing it because of the
children.
Innocent, impressionable 17 year old children.
Old enough to enlist but too young
to see a drag show. Conservative logic.
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
On Tue, 13 Oct 2026 01:49:58 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> wrote:
Exactly. Drag shows are an ACT. Elmer shooting
Daffy is an ACT. Cross dressing Vance was an ACT.
Children know they are acts.
So where is the harm?
One: He doesn't trust kids to know what's going on.
Two: He has some sneaking suspicions that drag queens with burlap
bags are waiting outside the room to kidnap a few kids and change
their gender.
Gay kids are innundated with hetero
romance stories and stay gay, but if
Bubba's boy gets one look at Heather
Has 2 Mommies he will instantly turn
homosexual and demand a sex change.
On Tue, 13 Oct 2026 17:49:41 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in >news:[email protected]:
On Tue, 13 Oct 2026 01:49:58 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
Exactly. Drag shows are an ACT. Elmer shooting
Daffy is an ACT. Cross dressing Vance was an ACT.
Children know they are acts.
So where is the harm?
One: He doesn't trust kids to know what's going on.
Two: He has some sneaking suspicions that drag queens with burlap
bags are waiting outside the room to kidnap a few kids and change
their gender.
Gay kids are innundated with hetero
romance stories and stay gay, but if
Bubba's boy gets one look at Heather
Has 2 Mommies he will instantly turn
homosexual and demand a sex change.
Does he know homosexuality is genetic?
On Tue, 13 Oct 2026 13:09:14 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote<snip>
This is not politics, Dummy, this is Usenet. Nothing even remotely
political is happening here. In this case it's just you asking
irrelevent questions and hoping for the attention you don't get in
your real life.
Usenet posters complaining about the
futility of posting to Usenet.
Oh the irony.................
Where would hardline rightists be without irony?
Projection is their forte.
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Tue, 13 Oct 2026 01:49:58 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
Exactly. Drag shows are an ACT. Elmer shooting
Daffy is an ACT. Cross dressing Vance was an ACT.
Children know they are acts.
So where is the harm?
One: He doesn't trust kids to know what's going on.
Two: He has some sneaking suspicions that drag queens with burlap
bags are waiting outside the room to kidnap a few kids and change
their gender.
Gay kids are innundated with hetero
romance stories and stay gay, but if
Bubba's boy gets one look at Heather
Has 2 Mommies he will instantly turn
homosexual and demand a sex change.
Maybe you should take a day off. You're posting nonsense now.
Skeeter wrote:
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Tue, 13 Oct 2026 01:49:58 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
Exactly. Drag shows are an ACT. Elmer shooting
Daffy is an ACT. Cross dressing Vance was an ACT.
Children know they are acts.
So where is the harm?
One: He doesn't trust kids to know what's going on.
Two: He has some sneaking suspicions that drag queens with burlap
bags are waiting outside the room to kidnap a few kids and change
their gender.
Gay kids are innundated with hetero
romance stories and stay gay, but if
Bubba's boy gets one look at Heather
Has 2 Mommies he will instantly turn
homosexual and demand a sex change.
Maybe you should take a day off. You're posting nonsense now.
I don't know I thought it was kind of gay of Swill too, telling us the vice-president has such paranoid notions. Does Vance really think that nonsense that there were other drag queens waiting nearby with burlap
sacks? It all sounds like The Colonel in The Good The Bad & The Ugly.
I'm going to have to guess that you are just terrorizing Swill with some extra-judicial 3d party acts.
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
"chine.bleu" <[email protected]> wrote in news:11aleff$jpgj$1@dont-
email.me:
Governor Swill wrote:
On Tue, 13 Oct 2026 02:23:23 -0400, Socialism is for losers
<[email protected]> wrote:
Like I said, Dummy, nobody wants to ban your drag shows or libraryBut in another recent post you denied doing it because of the
books, Dummy, we just want to protect children from your perversions. >>>>
children.
Innocent, impressionable 17 year old children.
Old enough to enlist but too young
to see a drag show. Conservative logic.
Says the coward who never enlisted.
Just because Daddy didn't spot that drag queen before he asked her out doesn't mean his kid is too stupid to spot a man in a dress.
You are confusing drag performersHe was emotionally scarred when he was a young man. He didn't know
with cross dressers. And in either case
where is the harm?
the hooker was a man in a dress.
Thanks for that repost earlier, btw.
On Tue, 13 Oct 2026 17:36:40 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>an
wrote:
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in >>news:[email protected]:
What adults got harmed by watching
a cross-dressing JD Vance or Rugi Guilini
or Robin Williams or Dustin Hoffman?
Not trying to be a real woman. Dressed like that as a joke or
act.
Exactly. Drag shows are an ACT. Elmer shooting
Daffy is an ACT. Cross dressing Vance was an ACT.
Children know they are acts.
So where is the harm?
Drag shows are real retards trying to convince people they are
really women.
You are confusing drag performers
with cross dressers. And in either case
where is the harm?
They live that life. Not acting.
Who told you that?
Skeeter is an expert being a drag queen himself. He knows all about
it.
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
What adults got harmed by watching
a cross-dressing JD Vance or Rugi Guilini
or Robin Williams or Dustin Hoffman?
Not trying to be a real woman. Dressed like that as a joke or
an act.
Exactly. Drag shows are an ACT. Elmer shooting
Daffy is an ACT. Cross dressing Vance was an ACT.
Children know they are acts.
So where is the harm?
Drag shows are real retards trying to convince people they are
really women.
You are confusing drag performers
with cross dressers. And in either case
where is the harm?
They live that life. Not acting.
Who told you that?
Nice try. Failure.
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
On Tue, 13 Oct 2026 17:49:41 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Tue, 13 Oct 2026 01:49:58 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
Exactly. Drag shows are an ACT. Elmer shooting
Daffy is an ACT. Cross dressing Vance was an ACT.
Children know they are acts.
So where is the harm?
One: He doesn't trust kids to know what's going on.
Two: He has some sneaking suspicions that drag queens with burlap
bags are waiting outside the room to kidnap a few kids and change
their gender.
Gay kids are innundated with hetero
romance stories and stay gay, but if
Bubba's boy gets one look at Heather
Has 2 Mommies he will instantly turn
homosexual and demand a sex change.
Does he know homosexuality is genetic?
How do you kow? Some faggot said so?
Childish remarks like that is why no one talks to you.
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in >news:[email protected]:<snip>
On Tue, 13 Oct 2026 17:36:40 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote
Mitchell Holman wrote
Skeeter is an expert being a drag queen himself. He knows all aboutWho told you that?You are confusing drag performersThey live that life. Not acting.
with cross dressers. And in either case
where is the harm?
it.
He thinks guys dress in drag while
doing their taxes and changing a flat
tire because "they live that life"
Governor Swill wrote:<snip>
On Tue, 13 Oct 2026 13:02:54 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote
He was emotionally scarred when he was a young man. He didn't knowDrag shows are real retards trying to convince people they are reallyYou are confusing drag performers
women.
with cross dressers. And in either case
where is the harm?
the hooker was a man in a dress.
Thanks for that repost earlier, btw.
You stick the knife in Mitch's back covered with your poison of
Republican blood.
Governor Swill wrote:<snip>
On Tue, 13 Oct 2026 17:49:41 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
Gay kids are innundated with hetero
romance stories and stay gay, but if
Bubba's boy gets one look at Heather
Has 2 Mommies he will instantly turn
homosexual and demand a sex change.
Does he know homosexuality is genetic?
You subtly tell a bullshit lie, overriding Mitch's truth.
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
On Tue, 13 Oct 2026 17:36:40 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> wrote:
anSkeeter <[email protected]> wrote in >>news:[email protected]:
What adults got harmed by watching
a cross-dressing JD Vance or Rugi Guilini
or Robin Williams or Dustin Hoffman?
Not trying to be a real woman. Dressed like that as a joke or
act.
Exactly. Drag shows are an ACT. Elmer shooting
Daffy is an ACT. Cross dressing Vance was an ACT.
Children know they are acts.
So where is the harm?
Drag shows are real retards trying to convince people they are
really women.
You are confusing drag performers
with cross dressers. And in either case
where is the harm?
They live that life. Not acting.
Who told you that?
Skeeter is an expert being a drag queen himself. He knows all about
it.
He thinks guys dress in drag while
doing their taxes and changing a flat
tire because "they live that life"
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
What adults got harmed by watching
a cross-dressing JD Vance or Rugi Guilini
or Robin Williams or Dustin Hoffman?
Not trying to be a real woman. Dressed like that as a joke or
an act.
Exactly. Drag shows are an ACT. Elmer shooting
Daffy is an ACT. Cross dressing Vance was an ACT.
Children know they are acts.
So where is the harm?
Drag shows are real retards trying to convince people they are
really women.
You are confusing drag performers
with cross dressers. And in either case
where is the harm?
Well?
They live that life. Not acting.
Who told you that?
Nice try. Failure.
Can't answer the question, can you..............
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
On Tue, 13 Oct 2026 17:49:41 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Tue, 13 Oct 2026 01:49:58 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> >> >> wrote:
Exactly. Drag shows are an ACT. Elmer shooting
Daffy is an ACT. Cross dressing Vance was an ACT.
Children know they are acts.
So where is the harm?
One: He doesn't trust kids to know what's going on.
Two: He has some sneaking suspicions that drag queens with burlap
bags are waiting outside the room to kidnap a few kids and change
their gender.
Gay kids are innundated with hetero
romance stories and stay gay, but if
Bubba's boy gets one look at Heather
Has 2 Mommies he will instantly turn
homosexual and demand a sex change.
Does he know homosexuality is genetic?
How do you kow? Some faggot said so?
You think Dick Cheney raised is daughter to be gay?
Do you think Ronald Reagan taught his son to be gay?
On Tue, 13 Oct 2026 15:13:11 -0600, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
Childish remarks like that is why no one talks to you.
Several talk to me. Those who don't are those who got tired of having
their delusions shot down with facts.
You don't post facts. You cheer your heroes from the sideline hoping they will
notice.
On Wed, 14 Oct 2026 05:22:31 -0600, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
You don't post facts. You cheer your heroes from the sideline hoping they will
notice.
<laughs and points>
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
On Tue, 13 Oct 2026 15:13:11 -0600, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
Childish remarks like that is why no one talks to you.
Several talk to me. Those who don't are those who got tired of having their delusions shot down with facts.
You don't post facts. You cheer your heroes from the sideline hoping they will
notice.
--
https://rootbadger.com/invite/i7w9b9K7BUMNXZUDwPUvCxxZYcx4aKXrcoIVKJFt https://ibb.co/q26Rmhn https://play.google.com/store/search?q=rootbadger&c=apps&utm_source=na_Med NNTP friendly.
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 13:04:33 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in >>news:[email protected]:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 01:48:16 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>weapon
wrote:
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>news:[email protected]:
On Sun, 11 Oct 2026 16:36:30 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 10/11/2026 4:26 PM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Sun, 11 Oct 2026 13:29:34 +0000, Mitchell Holman >><[email protected]>
wrote:
The Full Faith And Credit clause of the Constitution
is still the law.
Not so much. If that were true, my right to carry a concealed
severlywould be good in Illinois and Minnesota, or else it would be
toIt's not really a big deal since most states do respect my Floridarestricted everywhere.
I would support a right to carry concealed with outside permit if >>>>anyone
else in the district in question can carry with a comparable permit. >>>>>
permit.
The way that we've failed to integrate states into one nation is a >>>>>>ridiculous thing,
No, that's a wonderful beautiful thing that allows people to choose
live in states like California, NY, and Illinois where the government >>>>> restricts your freedom, or states like Florida, Nebraska, and Wyoming >>>>> where people have more freedom.
Freedom to do what - shoot up
a classroom? Gun down a bunch of
shoppers at Walmart?
Parkland schooter - background checks passed,
bought his gun legally,
Las Vegas sniper - background checks passed,
bought his guns legally.
Olando night club shooter - background checks passed,
bought his gun legally.
Aurora CO theater shooter - background checks passed,
bought his gun legally.
DC sniper - background checks passed,
bought his gun legally.
Ft Hood shooter - background checks passed,
bought his gun legally.
Texas Tower sniper - background checks passed,
bought his guns legally.
Pittsburgh Synagogue shooter - background checks passed,
bought his guns legally.
El Paso Walmart shooter - background checks passed,
bought his gun legally
Charleston church shooter - background checks passed,
bought his gun legally
Texas church shooter - background checks passed,
bought his gun legally
Atlanta spa shooter - background checks passed,
boght his guns legally
Buffalo grocery shooter - background checks passed,
bought his guns legally
Uvalde Tx school shooter -background checks passed,
bought his guns legally
Hollowhead would rather talk about his irrational fear of guns than
about freedom. Lefftists aren't in favor of freedom.
The party that wants to ban drag shows and
rainbows and pride parades and library books
dares to talk about freedom.
Nobody wants to ban your drag shows or library books, Dummy, we just
want to protect children from your perversions.
In article <11aiqmt$3lrjk$[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
On 10/12/2026 10:04 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 09:54:03 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 10/12/2026 9:39 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 13:04:33 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
Lefftists aren't in favor of freedom.
The party that wants to ban drag shows and
rainbows and pride parades and library books
dares to talk about freedom.
Nobody wants to ban your drag shows or library books, Dummy, we just
want to protect children from your perversions.
You mean you want to control children, instead of letting them grow up
naturally.
Indeed, I favor parental control over "it takes a village." That's
why me, my siblings and my children are living the good life.
There's a certain amazement, frankly, that you're so clueless as to
think your preference can be the ruling point of view. We're not trying
to meddle with your lifestyle, but there are other ones out there that
you might come across, you don't get to control diversity. 16 and 17
year-old people have certain adult rights, and any kid has the right to
express him or herself, parents have to step back and allow development
to progress, and let people have connections with others.
Unless they are 18 and leaving the house they will live by my rules.
On 2026-10-12, Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 13:04:33 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 01:48:16 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]><[email protected]>
wrote:
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Sun, 11 Oct 2026 16:36:30 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 10/11/2026 4:26 PM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Sun, 11 Oct 2026 13:29:34 +0000, Mitchell Holman
weaponwrote:
The Full Faith And Credit clause of the Constitution
is still the law.
Not so much. If that were true, my right to carry a concealed
severlywould be good in Illinois and Minnesota, or else it would be
toanyonerestricted everywhere.
I would support a right to carry concealed with outside permit if
else in the district in question can carry with a comparable permit. >>>>>>It's not really a big deal since most states do respect my Florida >>>>>> permit.
The way that we've failed to integrate states into one nation is a >>>>>>> ridiculous thing,
No, that's a wonderful beautiful thing that allows people to choose
live in states like California, NY, and Illinois where the government >>>>>> restricts your freedom, or states like Florida, Nebraska, and Wyoming >>>>>> where people have more freedom.
Freedom to do what - shoot up
a classroom? Gun down a bunch of
shoppers at Walmart?
Parkland schooter - background checks passed,
bought his gun legally,
Las Vegas sniper - background checks passed,
bought his guns legally.
Olando night club shooter - background checks passed,
bought his gun legally.
Aurora CO theater shooter - background checks passed,
bought his gun legally.
DC sniper - background checks passed,
bought his gun legally.
Ft Hood shooter - background checks passed,
bought his gun legally.
Texas Tower sniper - background checks passed,
bought his guns legally.
Pittsburgh Synagogue shooter - background checks passed,
bought his guns legally.
El Paso Walmart shooter - background checks passed,
bought his gun legally
Charleston church shooter - background checks passed,
bought his gun legally
Texas church shooter - background checks passed,
bought his gun legally
Atlanta spa shooter - background checks passed,
boght his guns legally
Buffalo grocery shooter - background checks passed,
bought his guns legally
Uvalde Tx school shooter -background checks passed,
bought his guns legally
Hollowhead would rather talk about his irrational fear of guns than
about freedom. Lefftists aren't in favor of freedom.
The party that wants to ban drag shows and
rainbows and pride parades and library books
dares to talk about freedom.
Nobody wants to ban your drag shows or library books, Dummy, we just
want to protect children from your perversions.
Age appropriate is what it should be.
And the parents are the final authority.
Kids are highly impressionable and teachers are authority figures in their minds.
And that's precisely why the teacher's union wants to flood the schools with alternate
lifestyle propaganda.
Train them while they are young and you own them.
It's all very sick.
On 2026-10-12, Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 13:04:33 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in >>>news:[email protected]:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 01:48:16 +0000, Mitchell Holmanto
<[email protected]> wrote:
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>news:[email protected]:
On Sun, 11 Oct 2026 16:36:30 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 10/11/2026 4:26 PM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Sun, 11 Oct 2026 13:29:34 +0000, Mitchell Holman >>><[email protected]>
wrote:
The Full Faith And Credit clause of the Constitution
is still the law.
Not so much. If that were true, my right to carry a concealed >>>weapon
would be good in Illinois and Minnesota, or else it would be >>>severly
restricted everywhere.
I would support a right to carry concealed with outside permit if >>>>>anyone
else in the district in question can carry with a comparable >>>>>>>permit.
It's not really a big deal since most states do respect my
Florida permit.
The way that we've failed to integrate states into one nation is >>>>>>>a ridiculous thing,
No, that's a wonderful beautiful thing that allows people to
choose
live in states like California, NY, and Illinois where the
government restricts your freedom, or states like Florida,
Nebraska, and Wyoming where people have more freedom.
Freedom to do what - shoot up
a classroom? Gun down a bunch of
shoppers at Walmart?
Parkland schooter - background checks passed,
bought his gun legally,
Las Vegas sniper - background checks passed,
bought his guns legally.
Olando night club shooter - background checks passed,
bought his gun legally.
Aurora CO theater shooter - background checks passed,
bought his gun legally.
DC sniper - background checks passed,
bought his gun legally.
Ft Hood shooter - background checks passed,
bought his gun legally.
Texas Tower sniper - background checks passed,
bought his guns legally.
Pittsburgh Synagogue shooter - background checks passed,
bought his guns legally.
El Paso Walmart shooter - background checks passed,
bought his gun legally
Charleston church shooter - background checks passed,
bought his gun legally
Texas church shooter - background checks passed,
bought his gun legally
Atlanta spa shooter - background checks passed,
boght his guns legally
Buffalo grocery shooter - background checks passed,
bought his guns legally
Uvalde Tx school shooter -background checks passed,
bought his guns legally
Hollowhead would rather talk about his irrational fear of guns than
about freedom. Lefftists aren't in favor of freedom.
The party that wants to ban drag shows and
rainbows and pride parades and library books
dares to talk about freedom.
Nobody wants to ban your drag shows or library books, Dummy, we just
want to protect children from your perversions.
Age appropriate is what it should be.
And the parents are the final authority.
Kids are highly impressionable and teachers are authority figures in
their minds.
On 2026-10-12, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <11aiqmt$3lrjk$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 10/12/2026 10:04 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 09:54:03 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 10/12/2026 9:39 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 13:04:33 +0000, Mitchell Holman
<[email protected]> wrote:
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
Lefftists aren't in favor of freedom.
The party that wants to ban drag shows and
rainbows and pride parades and library books
dares to talk about freedom.
Nobody wants to ban your drag shows or library books, Dummy, we
just want to protect children from your perversions.
You mean you want to control children, instead of letting them
grow up naturally.
Indeed, I favor parental control over "it takes a village."
That's why me, my siblings and my children are living the good
life.
There's a certain amazement, frankly, that you're so clueless as to
think your preference can be the ruling point of view. We're not
trying to meddle with your lifestyle, but there are other ones out
there that you might come across, you don't get to control
diversity. 16 and 17 year-old people have certain adult rights, and
any kid has the right to express him or herself, parents have to
step back and allow development to progress, and let people have
connections with others.
Unless they are 18 and leaving the house they will live by my rules.
Correct.
My kids turned out fine with useful advanced degrees that have allowed
them to purchase homes.
It's called discipline.
Something that is lacking in today's youth which is why our younger generations are becoming lazy, complainers who expect the government
to pay their way through life. And the country, USA, is currently
supporting this way of life. AKA socialism.
The party that wants to ban drag shows and
rainbows and pride parades and library books
dares to talk about freedom.
Nobody wants to ban your drag shows or library books, Dummy, we just
want to protect children from your perversions.
Age appropriate is what it should be.
The most meaningless quote this month.
And the parents are the final authority.
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in >news:11ap157$1tcm8$[email protected]:
On 2026-10-12, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <11aiqmt$3lrjk$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 10/12/2026 10:04 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 09:54:03 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 10/12/2026 9:39 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 13:04:33 +0000, Mitchell Holman
<[email protected]> wrote:
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
Lefftists aren't in favor of freedom.
The party that wants to ban drag shows and
rainbows and pride parades and library books
dares to talk about freedom.
Nobody wants to ban your drag shows or library books, Dummy, we
just want to protect children from your perversions.
You mean you want to control children, instead of letting them
grow up naturally.
Indeed, I favor parental control over "it takes a village."
That's why me, my siblings and my children are living the good
life.
There's a certain amazement, frankly, that you're so clueless as to
think your preference can be the ruling point of view. We're not
trying to meddle with your lifestyle, but there are other ones out
there that you might come across, you don't get to control
diversity. 16 and 17 year-old people have certain adult rights, and
any kid has the right to express him or herself, parents have to
step back and allow development to progress, and let people have
connections with others.
Unless they are 18 and leaving the house they will live by my rules.
Correct.
My kids turned out fine with useful advanced degrees that have allowed
them to purchase homes.
Thanks to government schools and government
insured loans.
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in >news:11ap157$1tcm8$[email protected]:
On 2026-10-12, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <11aiqmt$3lrjk$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 10/12/2026 10:04 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 09:54:03 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 10/12/2026 9:39 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 13:04:33 +0000, Mitchell Holman
<[email protected]> wrote:
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
Lefftists aren't in favor of freedom.
The party that wants to ban drag shows and
rainbows and pride parades and library books
dares to talk about freedom.
Nobody wants to ban your drag shows or library books, Dummy, we
just want to protect children from your perversions.
You mean you want to control children, instead of letting them
grow up naturally.
Indeed, I favor parental control over "it takes a village."
That's why me, my siblings and my children are living the good
life.
There's a certain amazement, frankly, that you're so clueless as to
think your preference can be the ruling point of view. We're not
trying to meddle with your lifestyle, but there are other ones out
there that you might come across, you don't get to control
diversity. 16 and 17 year-old people have certain adult rights, and
any kid has the right to express him or herself, parents have to
step back and allow development to progress, and let people have
connections with others.
Unless they are 18 and leaving the house they will live by my rules.
Correct.
My kids turned out fine with useful advanced degrees that have allowed
them to purchase homes.
Thanks to government schools and government
insured loans.
It's called discipline.
Something that is lacking in today's youth which is why our younger
generations are becoming lazy, complainers who expect the government
to pay their way through life. And the country, USA, is currently
supporting this way of life. AKA socialism.
Modern Conservative: Someone who complains about
people depending on government while demanding to know
when city snowplows will clear his street.
Kids are highly impressionable and teachers are authority figures in their minds.
And that's precisely why the teacher's union wants to flood the schools with alternate
lifestyle propaganda.
Train them while they are young and you own them.
pothead wrote:<snip>
On 2026-10-12, Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote:
Nobody wants to ban your drag shows or library books, Dummy, we just
want to protect children from your perversions.
Age appropriate is what it should be.
And the parents are the final authority.
Kids are highly impressionable and teachers are authority figures in their minds.
And that's precisely why the teacher's union wants to flood the schools with alternate
lifestyle propaganda.
Train them while they are young and you own them.
It's all very sick.
The horror if we raised a generation with no bigots.
On Thu, 15 Oct 2026 02:15:09 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in >news:11ap157$1tcm8$[email protected]:
On 2026-10-12, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <11aiqmt$3lrjk$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 10/12/2026 10:04 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 09:54:03 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 10/12/2026 9:39 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 13:04:33 +0000, Mitchell Holman
<[email protected]> wrote:
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
Lefftists aren't in favor of freedom.
The party that wants to ban drag shows and
rainbows and pride parades and library books
dares to talk about freedom.
Nobody wants to ban your drag shows or library books, Dummy, we
just want to protect children from your perversions.
You mean you want to control children, instead of letting them
grow up naturally.
Indeed, I favor parental control over "it takes a village."
That's why me, my siblings and my children are living the good
life.
There's a certain amazement, frankly, that you're so clueless as to >>>> think your preference can be the ruling point of view. We're not
trying to meddle with your lifestyle, but there are other ones out
there that you might come across, you don't get to control
diversity. 16 and 17 year-old people have certain adult rights, and >>>> any kid has the right to express him or herself, parents have to
step back and allow development to progress, and let people have
connections with others.
Unless they are 18 and leaving the house they will live by my rules.
Correct.
My kids turned out fine with useful advanced degrees that have allowed
them to purchase homes.
Thanks to government schools and government
insured loans.
It's called discipline.
Something that is lacking in today's youth which is why our younger
generations are becoming lazy, complainers who expect the government
to pay their way through life. And the country, USA, is currently
supporting this way of life. AKA socialism.
You're right about the lazy complainers. The children of the boomers
and their kids, feel *entitled*. That is due to parenting failures.
The boomers' parents were busy giving their kids all the things they themselves couldn't have during the depression and now they think
they're entitled to be *given* prosperity.
This emphasis on materiality has done a great deal of damage to family--
values and American Puritan culture.
Modern Conservative: Someone who complains about
people depending on government while demanding to know
when city snowplows will clear his street.
"I've got a hot date! I need to get out of my driveway ten minutes
ago! I VOTED FOR YOU!!!"
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
On Thu, 15 Oct 2026 02:15:09 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:11ap157$1tcm8$[email protected]:
On 2026-10-12, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <11aiqmt$3lrjk$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 10/12/2026 10:04 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 09:54:03 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 10/12/2026 9:39 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 13:04:33 +0000, Mitchell Holman
<[email protected]> wrote:
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
Lefftists aren't in favor of freedom.
The party that wants to ban drag shows and
rainbows and pride parades and library books
dares to talk about freedom.
Nobody wants to ban your drag shows or library books, Dummy, we >>>>>>>>> just want to protect children from your perversions.
You mean you want to control children, instead of letting them >>>>>>>> grow up naturally.
Indeed, I favor parental control over "it takes a village."
That's why me, my siblings and my children are living the good
life.
There's a certain amazement, frankly, that you're so clueless as to >>>>>> think your preference can be the ruling point of view. We're not
trying to meddle with your lifestyle, but there are other ones out >>>>>> there that you might come across, you don't get to control
diversity. 16 and 17 year-old people have certain adult rights, and >>>>>> any kid has the right to express him or herself, parents have to
step back and allow development to progress, and let people have
connections with others.
Unless they are 18 and leaving the house they will live by my rules. >>>>>
Correct.
My kids turned out fine with useful advanced degrees that have allowed >>>> them to purchase homes.
Thanks to government schools and government
insured loans.
It's called discipline.
Something that is lacking in today's youth which is why our younger
generations are becoming lazy, complainers who expect the government
to pay their way through life. And the country, USA, is currently
supporting this way of life. AKA socialism.
You're right about the lazy complainers. The children of the boomers
and their kids, feel *entitled*. That is due to parenting failures.
The boomers' parents were busy giving their kids all the things they
themselves couldn't have during the depression and now they think
they're entitled to be *given* prosperity.
What a load of shit.
On Thu, 15 Oct 2026 02:15:09 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>and
wrote:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in >>news:11ap157$1tcm8$[email protected]:
On 2026-10-12, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <11aiqmt$3lrjk$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 10/12/2026 10:04 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 09:54:03 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 10/12/2026 9:39 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 13:04:33 +0000, Mitchell Holman
<[email protected]> wrote:
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
Lefftists aren't in favor of freedom.
The party that wants to ban drag shows and
rainbows and pride parades and library books
dares to talk about freedom.
Nobody wants to ban your drag shows or library books, Dummy, we
just want to protect children from your perversions.
You mean you want to control children, instead of letting them
grow up naturally.
Indeed, I favor parental control over "it takes a village."
That's why me, my siblings and my children are living the good
life.
There's a certain amazement, frankly, that you're so clueless as to >>>>> think your preference can be the ruling point of view. We're not
trying to meddle with your lifestyle, but there are other ones out
there that you might come across, you don't get to control
diversity. 16 and 17 year-old people have certain adult rights,
allowedany kid has the right to express him or herself, parents have to
step back and allow development to progress, and let people have
connections with others.
Unless they are 18 and leaving the house they will live by my rules.
Correct.
My kids turned out fine with useful advanced degrees that have
them to purchase homes.
Thanks to government schools and government
insured loans.
It's called discipline.
Something that is lacking in today's youth which is why our younger
generations are becoming lazy, complainers who expect the government
to pay their way through life. And the country, USA, is currently
supporting this way of life. AKA socialism.
You're right about the lazy complainers. The children of the boomers
and their kids, feel *entitled*. That is due to parenting failures.
The boomers' parents were busy giving their kids all the things they themselves couldn't have during the depression and now they think
they're entitled to be *given* prosperity.
This emphasis on materiality has done a great deal of damage to family
values and American Puritan culture.
Modern Conservative: Someone who complains about
people depending on government while demanding to know
when city snowplows will clear his street.
"I've got a hot date! I need to get out of my driveway ten minutes
ago! I VOTED FOR YOU!!!"
Indeed. A person would be a fool not to take advantage of all that if
it was needed. Of course the fact that my siblings and my kids had
good parents who provided good role models and enough income to have a
good safe home, clothes to wear, food on the table, and safe reliable >transportation to and from where they needed to go were even bigger >contributing factors.
"Hard times make for productive people, productive
people make good times, good times make lazy people,
lazy people make hard times"
On Thu, 15 Oct 2026 02:15:09 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in >>news:11ap157$1tcm8$[email protected]:
On 2026-10-12, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <11aiqmt$3lrjk$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 10/12/2026 10:04 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 09:54:03 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 10/12/2026 9:39 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 13:04:33 +0000, Mitchell Holman
<[email protected]> wrote:
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
Lefftists aren't in favor of freedom.
The party that wants to ban drag shows and
rainbows and pride parades and library books
dares to talk about freedom.
Nobody wants to ban your drag shows or library books, Dummy, we
just want to protect children from your perversions.
You mean you want to control children, instead of letting them
grow up naturally.
Indeed, I favor parental control over "it takes a village."
That's why me, my siblings and my children are living the good
life.
There's a certain amazement, frankly, that you're so clueless as to >>>>> think your preference can be the ruling point of view. We're not
trying to meddle with your lifestyle, but there are other ones out
there that you might come across, you don't get to control
diversity. 16 and 17 year-old people have certain adult rights, and >>>>> any kid has the right to express him or herself, parents have to
step back and allow development to progress, and let people have
connections with others.
Unless they are 18 and leaving the house they will live by my rules.
Correct.
My kids turned out fine with useful advanced degrees that have allowed
them to purchase homes.
Thanks to government schools and government
insured loans.
Indeed. A person would be a fool not to take advantage of all that if
it was needed.
Of course the fact that my siblings and my kids had
good parents who provided good role models and enough income to have a
good safe home, clothes to wear, food on the table, and safe reliable transportation to and from where they needed to go were even bigger contributing factors.
----
Two kinds of people in the USA, today
1) Conservatives, whose glass is always half full. :)
2) Leftists, whose glass is always half empty. :(
On 2026-10-15, Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2026 02:15:09 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in >>>news:11ap157$1tcm8$[email protected]:
On 2026-10-12, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <11aiqmt$3lrjk$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 10/12/2026 10:04 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 09:54:03 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 10/12/2026 9:39 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 13:04:33 +0000, Mitchell Holman
<[email protected]> wrote:
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
Lefftists aren't in favor of freedom.
The party that wants to ban drag shows and
rainbows and pride parades and library books
dares to talk about freedom.
Nobody wants to ban your drag shows or library books, Dummy,
we just want to protect children from your perversions.
You mean you want to control children, instead of letting them
grow up naturally.
Indeed, I favor parental control over "it takes a village."
That's why me, my siblings and my children are living the good
life.
There's a certain amazement, frankly, that you're so clueless as
to think your preference can be the ruling point of view. We're
not trying to meddle with your lifestyle, but there are other
ones out there that you might come across, you don't get to
control diversity. 16 and 17 year-old people have certain adult
rights, and any kid has the right to express him or herself,
parents have to step back and allow development to progress, and
let people have connections with others.
Unless they are 18 and leaving the house they will live by my
rules.
Correct.
My kids turned out fine with useful advanced degrees that have
allowed them to purchase homes.
Thanks to government schools and government
insured loans.
Indeed. A person would be a fool not to take advantage of all that if
it was needed.
Absolutely.
Along with scholarships, grants, work-study programs and so forth.
My kids worked hard during high school and thus were able to take
advantage of grants and so forth.
The lazy kids ran up their student loans, in many cases never
graduated or graduated with basket weaving degrees and thus were deep
in debt. It's called responsibility.
Of course the fact that my siblings and my kids had
good parents who provided good role models and enough income to have
a good safe home, clothes to wear, food on the table, and safe
reliable transportation to and from where they needed to go were even
bigger contributing factors.
Once again in many cases success or failure is a direct result of
parenting. Spare the rod and spoil the child has more than a little
truth in it.
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in news:11b0987$ck4e$[email protected]:
On 2026-10-15, Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2026 02:15:09 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:11ap157$1tcm8$[email protected]:
On 2026-10-12, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <11aiqmt$3lrjk$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 10/12/2026 10:04 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 09:54:03 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 10/12/2026 9:39 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 13:04:33 +0000, Mitchell Holman
<[email protected]> wrote:
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
Lefftists aren't in favor of freedom.
The party that wants to ban drag shows and
rainbows and pride parades and library books
dares to talk about freedom.
Nobody wants to ban your drag shows or library books, Dummy, >>>>>>>>>> we just want to protect children from your perversions.
You mean you want to control children, instead of letting them >>>>>>>>> grow up naturally.
Indeed, I favor parental control over "it takes a village."
That's why me, my siblings and my children are living the good >>>>>>>> life.
There's a certain amazement, frankly, that you're so clueless as >>>>>>> to think your preference can be the ruling point of view. We're >>>>>>> not trying to meddle with your lifestyle, but there are other
ones out there that you might come across, you don't get to
control diversity. 16 and 17 year-old people have certain adult >>>>>>> rights, and any kid has the right to express him or herself,
parents have to step back and allow development to progress, and >>>>>>> let people have connections with others.
Unless they are 18 and leaving the house they will live by my
rules.
Correct.
My kids turned out fine with useful advanced degrees that have
allowed them to purchase homes.
Thanks to government schools and government
insured loans.
Indeed. A person would be a fool not to take advantage of all that if
it was needed.
Absolutely.
Along with scholarships, grants, work-study programs and so forth.
My kids worked hard during high school and thus were able to take
advantage of grants and so forth.
Even your kids depended on others
to their bills.
The lazy kids ran up their student loans, in many cases never
graduated or graduated with basket weaving degrees and thus were deep
in debt. It's called responsibility.
Responsibiity, like in going to
bankruptcy court to dodge your bills
over and over?
Resonsibility, like divorcing
wife after wife whenever a sexy
younger woman catches your eye?
"Children, come meet your newest mother"
Of course the fact that my siblings and my kids had
good parents who provided good role models and enough income to have
a good safe home, clothes to wear, food on the table, and safe
reliable transportation to and from where they needed to go were even
bigger contributing factors.
Once again in many cases success or failure is a direct result of
parenting. Spare the rod and spoil the child has more than a little
truth in it.
Spoiled children, like Trump's
offspring who have never earned a dime
their Daddy didn't steer to them.
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in >news:11b0987$ck4e$[email protected]:
On 2026-10-15, Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2026 02:15:09 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>news:11ap157$1tcm8$[email protected]:
On 2026-10-12, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <11aiqmt$3lrjk$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 10/12/2026 10:04 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 09:54:03 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 10/12/2026 9:39 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 13:04:33 +0000, Mitchell Holman
<[email protected]> wrote:
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
Lefftists aren't in favor of freedom.
The party that wants to ban drag shows and
rainbows and pride parades and library books
dares to talk about freedom.
Nobody wants to ban your drag shows or library books, Dummy, >>>>>>> >>> we just want to protect children from your perversions.
You mean you want to control children, instead of letting them >>>>>>> >> grow up naturally.
Indeed, I favor parental control over "it takes a village."
That's why me, my siblings and my children are living the good >>>>>>> > life.
There's a certain amazement, frankly, that you're so clueless as >>>>>>> to think your preference can be the ruling point of view. We're >>>>>>> not trying to meddle with your lifestyle, but there are other
ones out there that you might come across, you don't get to
control diversity. 16 and 17 year-old people have certain adult >>>>>>> rights, and any kid has the right to express him or herself,
parents have to step back and allow development to progress, and >>>>>>> let people have connections with others.
Unless they are 18 and leaving the house they will live by my
rules.
Correct.
My kids turned out fine with useful advanced degrees that have
allowed them to purchase homes.
Thanks to government schools and government
insured loans.
Indeed. A person would be a fool not to take advantage of all that if
it was needed.
Absolutely.
Along with scholarships, grants, work-study programs and so forth.
My kids worked hard during high school and thus were able to take
advantage of grants and so forth.
Even your kids depended on others
to their bills.
The lazy kids ran up their student loans, in many cases never
graduated or graduated with basket weaving degrees and thus were deep
in debt. It's called responsibility.
Responsibiity, like in going to
bankruptcy court to dodge your bills
over and over?
Resonsibility, like divorcing
wife after wife whenever a sexy
younger woman catches your eye?
"Children, come meet your newest mother"
Of course the fact that my siblings and my kids had
good parents who provided good role models and enough income to have
a good safe home, clothes to wear, food on the table, and safe
reliable transportation to and from where they needed to go were even
bigger contributing factors.
Once again in many cases success or failure is a direct result of
parenting. Spare the rod and spoil the child has more than a little
truth in it.
Spoiled children, like Trump's
offspring who have never earned a dime
their Daddy didn't steer to them.
Once again in many cases success or failure is a direct result of
parenting. Spare the rod and spoil the child has more than a little
truth in it.
Spoiled children, like Trump's
offspring who have never earned a dime
their Daddy didn't steer to them.
But Trump. Hollowhead complains.....
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in news:11b0987$ck4e$[email protected]:
On 2026-10-15, Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2026 02:15:09 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in >>>news:11ap157$1tcm8$[email protected]:
On 2026-10-12, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <11aiqmt$3lrjk$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 10/12/2026 10:04 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 09:54:03 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 10/12/2026 9:39 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 13:04:33 +0000, Mitchell Holman
<[email protected]> wrote:
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
Lefftists aren't in favor of freedom.
The party that wants to ban drag shows and
rainbows and pride parades and library books
dares to talk about freedom.
Nobody wants to ban your drag shows or library books, Dummy, >>>>>> >>> we just want to protect children from your perversions.
You mean you want to control children, instead of letting them >>>>>> >> grow up naturally.
Indeed, I favor parental control over "it takes a village."
That's why me, my siblings and my children are living the good >>>>>> > life.
There's a certain amazement, frankly, that you're so clueless as >>>>>> to think your preference can be the ruling point of view. We're >>>>>> not trying to meddle with your lifestyle, but there are other
ones out there that you might come across, you don't get to
control diversity. 16 and 17 year-old people have certain adult >>>>>> rights, and any kid has the right to express him or herself,
parents have to step back and allow development to progress, and >>>>>> let people have connections with others.
Unless they are 18 and leaving the house they will live by my
rules.
Correct.
My kids turned out fine with useful advanced degrees that have
allowed them to purchase homes.
Thanks to government schools and government
insured loans.
Indeed. A person would be a fool not to take advantage of all that if
it was needed.
Absolutely.
Along with scholarships, grants, work-study programs and so forth.
My kids worked hard during high school and thus were able to take
advantage of grants and so forth.
Even your kids depended on others
to their bills.
The lazy kids ran up their student loans, in many cases never
graduated or graduated with basket weaving degrees and thus were deep
in debt. It's called responsibility.
Responsibiity, like in going to
bankruptcy court to dodge your bills
over and over?
Resonsibility, like divorcing
wife after wife whenever a sexy
younger woman catches your eye?
"Children, come meet your newest mother"
Of course the fact that my siblings and my kids had
good parents who provided good role models and enough income to have
a good safe home, clothes to wear, food on the table, and safe
reliable transportation to and from where they needed to go were even
bigger contributing factors.
Once again in many cases success or failure is a direct result of parenting. Spare the rod and spoil the child has more than a little
truth in it.
Spoiled children, like Trump's
offspring who have never earned a dime
their Daddy didn't steer to them.
Mitchell Holman wrote:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in news:11b0987$ck4e$[email protected]:
On 2026-10-15, Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2026 02:15:09 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:11ap157$1tcm8$[email protected]:
On 2026-10-12, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <11aiqmt$3lrjk$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 10/12/2026 10:04 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 09:54:03 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 10/12/2026 9:39 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 13:04:33 +0000, Mitchell Holman
<[email protected]> wrote:
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
Lefftists aren't in favor of freedom.
The party that wants to ban drag shows and
rainbows and pride parades and library books
dares to talk about freedom.
Nobody wants to ban your drag shows or library books, Dummy, >>>>>>>>>> we just want to protect children from your perversions.
You mean you want to control children, instead of letting them >>>>>>>>> grow up naturally.
Indeed, I favor parental control over "it takes a village."
That's why me, my siblings and my children are living the good >>>>>>>> life.
There's a certain amazement, frankly, that you're so clueless as >>>>>>> to think your preference can be the ruling point of view. We're >>>>>>> not trying to meddle with your lifestyle, but there are other
ones out there that you might come across, you don't get to
control diversity. 16 and 17 year-old people have certain adult >>>>>>> rights, and any kid has the right to express him or herself,
parents have to step back and allow development to progress, and >>>>>>> let people have connections with others.
Unless they are 18 and leaving the house they will live by my
rules.
Correct.
My kids turned out fine with useful advanced degrees that have
allowed them to purchase homes.
Thanks to government schools and government
insured loans.
Indeed. A person would be a fool not to take advantage of all that if
it was needed.
Absolutely.
Along with scholarships, grants, work-study programs and so forth.
My kids worked hard during high school and thus were able to take
advantage of grants and so forth.
Even your kids depended on others
to their bills.
The lazy kids ran up their student loans, in many cases never
graduated or graduated with basket weaving degrees and thus were deep
in debt. It's called responsibility.
Responsibiity, like in going to
bankruptcy court to dodge your bills
over and over?
Resonsibility, like divorcing
wife after wife whenever a sexy
younger woman catches your eye?
"Children, come meet your newest mother"
Of course the fact that my siblings and my kids had
good parents who provided good role models and enough income to have
a good safe home, clothes to wear, food on the table, and safe
reliable transportation to and from where they needed to go were even
bigger contributing factors.
Once again in many cases success or failure is a direct result of
parenting. Spare the rod and spoil the child has more than a little
truth in it.
Spoiled children, like Trump's
offspring who have never earned a dime
their Daddy didn't steer to them.
Someone here said yeah, so his father gave him money, what of it? You
have ignored this repeatedly, more content to post the same thing over & over.
My father didn't give me much money except allowance, but one time he
bought me an ounce of gold. It was worth over $600. I'm not going to
stand around and complain that my father never gave me anything. Why do
you feel that to be compelling?
Mitchell Holman wrote:<[email protected]>
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:11b0987$ck4e$[email protected]:
On 2026-10-15, Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2026 02:15:09 +0000, Mitchell Holman
ifwrote:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:11ap157$1tcm8$[email protected]:
On 2026-10-12, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <11aiqmt$3lrjk$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 10/12/2026 10:04 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 09:54:03 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 10/12/2026 9:39 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 13:04:33 +0000, Mitchell Holman
<[email protected]> wrote:
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
Lefftists aren't in favor of freedom.
The party that wants to ban drag shows and
rainbows and pride parades and library books
dares to talk about freedom.
Nobody wants to ban your drag shows or library books, Dummy, >>>>>>>>>>> we just want to protect children from your perversions.
You mean you want to control children, instead of letting them >>>>>>>>>> grow up naturally.
Indeed, I favor parental control over "it takes a village."
That's why me, my siblings and my children are living the good >>>>>>>>> life.
There's a certain amazement, frankly, that you're so clueless as >>>>>>>> to think your preference can be the ruling point of view. We're >>>>>>>> not trying to meddle with your lifestyle, but there are other
ones out there that you might come across, you don't get to
control diversity. 16 and 17 year-old people have certain adult >>>>>>>> rights, and any kid has the right to express him or herself,
parents have to step back and allow development to progress, and >>>>>>>> let people have connections with others.
Unless they are 18 and leaving the house they will live by my
rules.
Correct.
My kids turned out fine with useful advanced degrees that have
allowed them to purchase homes.
Thanks to government schools and government
insured loans.
Indeed. A person would be a fool not to take advantage of all that
evenit was needed.
Absolutely.
Along with scholarships, grants, work-study programs and so forth.
My kids worked hard during high school and thus were able to take
advantage of grants and so forth.
Even your kids depended on others
to their bills.
The lazy kids ran up their student loans, in many cases never
graduated or graduated with basket weaving degrees and thus were deep
in debt. It's called responsibility.
Responsibiity, like in going to
bankruptcy court to dodge your bills
over and over?
Resonsibility, like divorcing
wife after wife whenever a sexy
younger woman catches your eye?
"Children, come meet your newest mother"
Of course the fact that my siblings and my kids had
good parents who provided good role models and enough income to have
a good safe home, clothes to wear, food on the table, and safe
reliable transportation to and from where they needed to go were
&bigger contributing factors.
Once again in many cases success or failure is a direct result of
parenting. Spare the rod and spoil the child has more than a little
truth in it.
Spoiled children, like Trump's
offspring who have never earned a dime
their Daddy didn't steer to them.
Someone here said yeah, so his father gave him money, what of it? You
have ignored this repeatedly, more content to post the same thing over
over.
The Trump children have spent their
entire lives living in their fathers inner
circle. Even the Reagan and Bush and Clinton
children broke out of their paternal nest
and started careers of their own.
What sort of "success requires hard work"
example can be learned from the current First
Family?
Someone here said yeah, so his father gave him money, what of it? You
have ignored this repeatedly, more content to post the same thing over & >over.
My father didn't give me much money except allowance, but one time he
bought me an ounce of gold. It was worth over $600. I'm not going to
stand around and complain that my father never gave me anything. Why do
you feel that to be compelling?
On Sat, 17 Oct 2026 13:10:48 -0600, Blaine <[email protected]>
wrote:
Someone here said yeah, so his father gave him money, what of it? You
have ignored this repeatedly, more content to post the same thing
over & over.
My father didn't give me much money except allowance, but one time he
bought me an ounce of gold. It was worth over $600. I'm not going to
stand around and complain that my father never gave me anything. Why
do you feel that to be compelling?
The point you missed is that Trump and his fans love to brag on his
enormous skills as a businessman and wealth creator when in fact, his
wealth was inherited and all he did was spend decades finding ways to
steal money because he wasn't competent enough as a businessman to
make it legitimately.
On Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:06:23 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
The Trump children have spent their
entire lives living in their fathers inner
circle. Even the Reagan and Bush and Clinton
children broke out of their paternal nest
and started careers of their own.
What sort of "success requires hard work"
example can be learned from the current First
Family?
What kind of hard work have you done, Hollowhead?
--
Hollowhead is always ready to make accusations about the people he
doesn't like. Here's a little backatcha
Apparently, Hollowhead believes conservative leaders would treat their families as he would treat his... which makes me stop and contemplate
the fact that Hollowhead has never posted anything about his family
life.... Has he ever had one? He snips, cuts and runs whenever I
mention his employment.
I don't recall that I don't recall him (if, indeed, Hollow is a him)
posting anything about his life, past or present...
Hollowhead is very secretive....
IHollowhead must have a lot to be secretive about.
On Sat, 17 Oct 2026 Mitchell Holman wrote:<snip>
pothead <[email protected]> wrote
On 2026-10-15, Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote:
Even your kids depended on othersIndeed. A person would be a fool not to take advantage of all that ifAbsolutely.
it was needed.
Along with scholarships, grants, work-study programs and so forth.
My kids worked hard during high school and thus were able to take
advantage of grants and so forth.
to their bills.
Everybody in the USA does, Hollowhead, so what's your point?
Blaine <[email protected]> wrote in news:11b0h7t$gv67$[email protected]:
Mitchell Holman wrote:<[email protected]>
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:11b0987$ck4e$[email protected]:
On 2026-10-15, Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2026 02:15:09 +0000, Mitchell Holman
ifwrote:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:11ap157$1tcm8$[email protected]:
On 2026-10-12, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <11aiqmt$3lrjk$[email protected]>, [email protected] >>>>>>> says...
On 10/12/2026 10:04 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 09:54:03 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 10/12/2026 9:39 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 13:04:33 +0000, Mitchell HolmanYou mean you want to control children, instead of letting them >>>>>>>>>> grow up naturally.
<[email protected]> wrote:
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]:
Lefftists aren't in favor of freedom.
The party that wants to ban drag shows and
rainbows and pride parades and library books
dares to talk about freedom.
Nobody wants to ban your drag shows or library books, Dummy, >>>>>>>>>>> we just want to protect children from your perversions. >>>>>>>>>>
Indeed, I favor parental control over "it takes a village." >>>>>>>>> That's why me, my siblings and my children are living the good >>>>>>>>> life.
There's a certain amazement, frankly, that you're so clueless as >>>>>>>> to think your preference can be the ruling point of view. We're >>>>>>>> not trying to meddle with your lifestyle, but there are other >>>>>>>> ones out there that you might come across, you don't get to
control diversity. 16 and 17 year-old people have certain adult >>>>>>>> rights, and any kid has the right to express him or herself, >>>>>>>> parents have to step back and allow development to progress, and >>>>>>>> let people have connections with others.
Unless they are 18 and leaving the house they will live by my
rules.
Correct.
My kids turned out fine with useful advanced degrees that have
allowed them to purchase homes.
Thanks to government schools and government
insured loans.
Indeed. A person would be a fool not to take advantage of all that
evenit was needed.
Absolutely.
Along with scholarships, grants, work-study programs and so forth.
My kids worked hard during high school and thus were able to take
advantage of grants and so forth.
Even your kids depended on others
to their bills.
The lazy kids ran up their student loans, in many cases never
graduated or graduated with basket weaving degrees and thus were deep
in debt. It's called responsibility.
Responsibiity, like in going to
bankruptcy court to dodge your bills
over and over?
Resonsibility, like divorcing
wife after wife whenever a sexy
younger woman catches your eye?
"Children, come meet your newest mother"
Of course the fact that my siblings and my kids had
good parents who provided good role models and enough income to have >>>> a good safe home, clothes to wear, food on the table, and safe
reliable transportation to and from where they needed to go were
bigger contributing factors.
Once again in many cases success or failure is a direct result of
parenting. Spare the rod and spoil the child has more than a little
truth in it.
Spoiled children, like Trump's
offspring who have never earned a dime
their Daddy didn't steer to them.
Someone here said yeah, so his father gave him money, what of it? You&
have ignored this repeatedly, more content to post the same thing over
over.
The Trump children have spent their
entire lives living in their fathers inner
circle. Even the Reagan and Bush and Clinton
children broke out of their paternal nest
and started careers of their own.
What sort of "success requires hard work"
example can be learned from the current First
Family?
On Sat, 17 Oct 2026 13:10:48 -0600, Blaine <[email protected]>
wrote:
Someone here said yeah, so his father gave him money, what of it? You
have ignored this repeatedly, more content to post the same thing over & >over.
My father didn't give me much money except allowance, but one time he >bought me an ounce of gold. It was worth over $600. I'm not going to
stand around and complain that my father never gave me anything. Why do >you feel that to be compelling?
The point you missed is that Trump and his fans love to brag on his
enormous skills as a businessman and wealth creator when in fact, his
wealth was inherited and all he did was spend decades finding ways to
steal money because he wasn't competent enough as a businessman to
make it legitimately.
On Sat, 17 Oct 2026 15:28:01 -0400, Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sat, 17 Oct 2026 Mitchell Holman wrote:<snip>
pothead <[email protected]> wrote
On 2026-10-15, Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote:
Even your kids depended on othersIndeed. A person would be a fool not to take advantage of all that if >>>> it was needed.Absolutely.
Along with scholarships, grants, work-study programs and so forth.
My kids worked hard during high school and thus were able to take
advantage of grants and so forth.
to their bills.
Everybody in the USA does, Hollowhead, so what's your point?
That your "I'm a 100% self made man" brag is bullshit.
Marjorie Taylor Greene discusses the future of the Republican Party. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZT7mYDBhPIY>
It's an hour long, but you may be astonished at the depth of her
anti-Trump, post Republican epiphany.
I am seriously impressed with what she's saying.
She admits to her age.
She admits she didn't become a Republican until she ran for Congress.
She admits she wasn't a habitual voter before she ran.
She confirms Trump's hypocrisies.
She admits MAGA is a cult, refers to MAGAs as "them" and says,
"they're liars and hypocrites and they're in a cult."
She relates a story about Trump trying to force her to vote for a bill
she didn't like.
She refers to Republicans as "them".
She complains that both parties have "screwed us over".
I clicked on this and figured I'd skip about and hear a few words. I clicked, she had just started speaking and I can't stop listening. I
very much like, well, *almost* everything that's coming out of her
mouth.
Whether or not you watch any of this video, keep an eye on Greene. She
could prove to be a powerful ally of centrist causes.
On Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:06:23 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
The Trump children have spent their
entire lives living in their fathers inner
circle. Even the Reagan and Bush and Clinton
children broke out of their paternal nest
and started careers of their own.
What sort of "success requires hard work"
example can be learned from the current First
Family?
What kind of hard work have you done, Hollowhead?
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
On Sat, 17 Oct 2026 13:10:48 -0600, Blaine <[email protected]>
wrote:
Someone here said yeah, so his father gave him money, what of it?
You have ignored this repeatedly, more content to post the same
thing over & over.
My father didn't give me much money except allowance, but one time
he bought me an ounce of gold. It was worth over $600. I'm not going
to stand around and complain that my father never gave me anything.
Why do you feel that to be compelling?
The point you missed is that Trump and his fans love to brag on his
enormous skills as a businessman and wealth creator when in fact, his
wealth was inherited and all he did was spend decades finding ways to
steal money because he wasn't competent enough as a businessman to
make it legitimately.
So all those hotels and holdings don't really exist?
On Sat, 17 Oct 2026 15:28:01 -0400, Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote:if
On Sat, 17 Oct 2026 Mitchell Holman wrote:<snip>
pothead <[email protected]> wrote
On 2026-10-15, Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote:
Indeed. A person would be a fool not to take advantage of all that
Even your kids depended on othersit was needed.Absolutely.
Along with scholarships, grants, work-study programs and so forth.
My kids worked hard during high school and thus were able to take
advantage of grants and so forth.
to their bills.
Everybody in the USA does, Hollowhead, so what's your point?
That your "I'm a 100% self made man" brag is bullshit.
Marjorie Taylor Greene discusses the future of the Republican Party. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZT7mYDBhPIY>
It's an hour long, but you may be astonished at the depth of her
anti-Trump, post Republican epiphany.
I am seriously impressed with what she's saying.
She admits to her age.
She admits she didn't become a Republican until she ran for Congress.
She admits she wasn't a habitual voter before she ran.
She confirms Trump's hypocrisies.
She admits MAGA is a cult, refers to MAGAs as "them" and says,
"they're liars and hypocrites and they're in a cult."
She relates a story about Trump trying to force her to vote for a bill
she didn't like.
She refers to Republicans as "them".
She complains that both parties have "screwed us over".
I clicked on this and figured I'd skip about and hear a few words. I clicked, she had just started speaking and I can't stop listening. I
very much like, well, *almost* everything that's coming out of her
mouth.
Whether or not you watch any of this video, keep an eye on Greene. She
could prove to be a powerful ally of centrist causes.
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in >news:[email protected]:
On Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:06:23 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
The Trump children have spent their
entire lives living in their fathers inner
circle. Even the Reagan and Bush and Clinton
children broke out of their paternal nest
and started careers of their own.
What sort of "success requires hard work"
example can be learned from the current First
Family?
What kind of hard work have you done, Hollowhead?
Evasion noted, answer the question.
On Sun, 18 Oct 2026 13:21:50 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote inEvasion noted, answer the question.
news:[email protected]:
On Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:06:23 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
The Trump children have spent their
entire lives living in their fathers inner
circle. Even the Reagan and Bush and Clinton
children broke out of their paternal nest
and started careers of their own.
What sort of "success requires hard work"
example can be learned from the current First
Family?
What kind of hard work have you done, Hollowhead?
Evasion noted, answer the question.
--
Hollowhead is always ready to make accusations about the people he
doesn't like. Here's a little backatcha
Apparently, Hollowhead believes conservative leaders would treat their families as he would treat his... which makes me stop and contemplate
the fact that Hollowhead has never posted anything about his family
life.... Has he ever had one? He snips, cuts and runs whenever I
mention his employment.
I don't recall that I don't recall him (if, indeed, Hollow is a him)
posting anything about his life, past or present...
Hollowhead is very secretive....
IHollowhead must have a lot to be secretive about.
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
On Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:06:23 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> wrote:
The Trump children have spent their
entire lives living in their fathers inner
circle. Even the Reagan and Bush and Clinton
children broke out of their paternal nest
and started careers of their own.
What sort of "success requires hard work"
example can be learned from the current First
Family?
What kind of hard work have you done, Hollowhead?
Evasion noted, answer the question.
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
On Sat, 17 Oct 2026 13:10:48 -0600, Blaine <[email protected]>
wrote:
Someone here said yeah, so his father gave him money, what of it?
You have ignored this repeatedly, more content to post the same
thing over & over.
My father didn't give me much money except allowance, but one time
he bought me an ounce of gold. It was worth over $600. I'm not going
to stand around and complain that my father never gave me anything.
Why do you feel that to be compelling?
The point you missed is that Trump and his fans love to brag on his
enormous skills as a businessman and wealth creator when in fact, his
wealth was inherited and all he did was spend decades finding ways to
steal money because he wasn't competent enough as a businessman to
make it legitimately.
So all those hotels and holdings don't really exist?
You know what doesn't exist?
Trump Airlines - failed.
Trump Vodka - failed.
Trump University - failed.
Trump Casinos - failed.
Trump Steaks - failed.
Trump Mortgage - failed
Trump The Game - failed.
Trump Magazine - failed
Trump Ice - failed
Trump Football Team - failed
Trump Oceans resorts - failed.
Trump Network - failed.
Trump News Media - failed.
Trumps first 2 marriages - failed.
Trump Taj Mahal - bankrupt
Trump's Castle- bankrupt
Trump Plaza Casinos - bankrupt
Trump Plaza Hotel - bankrupt
Trump Hotels and Casinos Resorts - bankrupt
Trump Entertainment Resorts - bankrupt
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]<snip 23 lines>
says...
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
You know what doesn't exist?
Trump Airlines - failed.
Trump Vodka - failed.
Trump University - failed.
Trump Casinos - failed.
Trump Steaks - failed.
Trump Mortgage - failed
Trump The Game - failed.
Trump Magazine - failed
Trump Ice - failed
Trump Football Team - failed
Trump Oceans resorts - failed.
Trump Network - failed.
Trump News Media - failed.
Trumps first 2 marriages - failed.
Trump Taj Mahal - bankrupt
Trump's Castle- bankrupt
Trump Plaza Casinos - bankrupt
Trump Plaza Hotel - bankrupt
Trump Hotels and Casinos Resorts - bankrupt
Trump Entertainment Resorts - bankrupt
And he's still rich and can own you. What's your point? What
businesses do you own?
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...<snip 8 lines>
On Sat, 17 Oct 2026 13:10:48 -0600, Blaine <[email protected]>
wrote:
The point you missed is that Trump and his fans love to brag on his
enormous skills as a businessman and wealth creator when in fact, his
wealth was inherited and all he did was spend decades finding ways to
steal money because he wasn't competent enough as a businessman to
make it legitimately.
So all those hotels and holdings don't really exist? What do YOU have?
On Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:06:23 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
The Trump children have spent their
entire lives living in their fathers inner
circle. Even the Reagan and Bush and Clinton
children broke out of their paternal nest
and started careers of their own.
What sort of "success requires hard work"
example can be learned from the current First
Family?
What kind of hard work have you done, Hollowhead?
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote
On Sat, 17 Oct 2026 13:10:48 -0600, Blaine <[email protected]>So all those hotels and holdings don't really exist?
wrote:
Someone here said yeah, so his father gave him money, what of it?The point you missed is that Trump and his fans love to brag on his
You have ignored this repeatedly, more content to post the same
thing over & over.
My father didn't give me much money except allowance, but one time
he bought me an ounce of gold. It was worth over $600. I'm not going
to stand around and complain that my father never gave me anything.
Why do you feel that to be compelling?
enormous skills as a businessman and wealth creator when in fact, his
wealth was inherited and all he did was spend decades finding ways to
steal money because he wasn't competent enough as a businessman to
make it legitimately.
You know what doesn't exist?
Trump Airlines - failed.--
Trump Vodka - failed.
Trump University - failed.
Trump Casinos - failed.
Trump Steaks - failed.
Trump Mortgage - failed
Trump The Game - failed.
Trump Magazine - failed
Trump Ice - failed
Trump Football Team - failed
Trump Oceans resorts - failed.
Trump Network - failed.
Trump News Media - failed.
Trumps first 2 marriages - failed.
Trump Taj Mahal - bankrupt
Trump's Castle- bankrupt
Trump Plaza Casinos - bankrupt
Trump Plaza Hotel - bankrupt
Trump Hotels and Casinos Resorts - bankrupt
Trump Entertainment Resorts - bankrupt
Marjorie Taylor Greene discusses the future of the Republican Party.
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZT7mYDBhPIY>
It's an hour long, but you may be astonished at the depth of her
anti-Trump, post Republican epiphany.
I am seriously impressed with what she's saying.
She admits to her age.
She admits she didn't become a Republican until she ran for Congress.
She admits she wasn't a habitual voter before she ran.
She confirms Trump's hypocrisies.
She admits MAGA is a cult, refers to MAGAs as "them" and says,
"they're liars and hypocrites and they're in a cult."
She relates a story about Trump trying to force her to vote for a bill
she didn't like.
She refers to Republicans as "them".
She complains that both parties have "screwed us over".
I clicked on this and figured I'd skip about and hear a few words. I
clicked, she had just started speaking and I can't stop listening. I
very much like, well, *almost* everything that's coming out of her
mouth.
Is she still a holocaust denier?
On Sun, 18 Oct 2026 13:21:50 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in >>news:[email protected]:
On Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:06:23 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
The Trump children have spent their
entire lives living in their fathers inner
circle. Even the Reagan and Bush and Clinton
children broke out of their paternal nest
and started careers of their own.
What sort of "success requires hard work"
example can be learned from the current First
Family?
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in >news:[email protected]:
On Sun, 18 Oct 2026 13:21:50 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in >>>news:[email protected]:
On Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:06:23 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
The Trump children have spent their
entire lives living in their fathers inner
circle. Even the Reagan and Bush and Clinton
children broke out of their paternal nest
and started careers of their own.
What sort of "success requires hard work"
example can be learned from the current First
Family?
Well?
On Sun, 18 Oct 2026 18:27:30 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in >>news:[email protected]:
On Sun, 18 Oct 2026 13:21:50 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>news:[email protected]:
On Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:06:23 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote:
The Trump children have spent their
entire lives living in their fathers inner
circle. Even the Reagan and Bush and Clinton
children broke out of their paternal nest
and started careers of their own.
What sort of "success requires hard work"
example can be learned from the current First
Family?
Well?
Well, well... Very well????
--
Hollowhead is always ready to make accusations about the people he
doesn't like. Here's a little backatcha
Apparently, Hollowhead believes conservative leaders would treat their >families as he would treat his...
which makes me stop and contemplate
the fact that Hollowhead has never posted anything about his family
life.... Has he ever had one? He snips, cuts and runs whenever I
mention his employment.
I don't recall that I don't recall him (if, indeed, Hollow is a him)
posting anything about his life, past or present...
Hollowhead is very secretive....
IHollowhead must have a lot to be secretive about.
On Sun, 18 Oct 2026 14:40:12 -0400, Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sun, 18 Oct 2026 18:27:30 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Sun, 18 Oct 2026 13:21:50 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
On Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:06:23 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote:
The Trump children have spent their
entire lives living in their fathers inner
circle. Even the Reagan and Bush and Clinton
children broke out of their paternal nest
and started careers of their own.
What sort of "success requires hard work"
example can be learned from the current First
Family?
Well?
Well, well... Very well????
--
Hollowhead is always ready to make accusations about the people he
doesn't like. Here's a little backatcha
<laughs and points>
You were the one who started it.
Apparently, Hollowhead believes conservative leaders would treat their
families as he would treat his...
So ... conservatives *don't* make their children get jobs and earn
their own way?
which makes me stop and contemplate
the fact that Hollowhead has never posted anything about his family
life.... Has he ever had one? He snips, cuts and runs whenever I
mention his employment.
Your complaint is that he isn't posting enough PII?
<laughs and points>
How about we doxx you instead?
I don't recall that I don't recall him (if, indeed, Hollow is a him)
posting anything about his life, past or present...
Hollowhead is very secretive....
IHollowhead must have a lot to be secretive about.
Um, post your address and phone number first.
In other words, you can't answer his question and thought your
bullshit would escape response if you moved it below the sig line.
Clue: Some of us know how to reply to stuff below a sig line, Dummy.
"Have I Got News For You" <https://play.hbomax.com/video/watch/8ba7d6bb-ee4b-4722-bc60-b043a67fefbd>
On Sun, 18 Oct 2026 04:00:14 -0400, Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:06:23 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> >wrote:
The Trump children have spent their
entire lives living in their fathers inner
circle. Even the Reagan and Bush and Clinton
children broke out of their paternal nest
and started careers of their own.
What sort of "success requires hard work"
example can be learned from the current First
Family?
What kind of hard work have you done, Hollowhead?
That doesn't answer the question, chicken shit.
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
On Sun, 18 Oct 2026 13:21:50 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> wrote:
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in >>news:[email protected]:
On Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:06:23 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
The Trump children have spent their
entire lives living in their fathers inner
circle. Even the Reagan and Bush and Clinton
children broke out of their paternal nest
and started careers of their own.
What sort of "success requires hard work"
example can be learned from the current First
Family?
Well?
On Sun, 18 Oct 2026 14:40:12 -0400, Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sun, 18 Oct 2026 18:27:30 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> >wrote:
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in >>news:[email protected]:
On Sun, 18 Oct 2026 13:21:50 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>news:[email protected]:
On Sun, 18 Oct 2026 02:06:23 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote:
The Trump children have spent their
entire lives living in their fathers inner
circle. Even the Reagan and Bush and Clinton
children broke out of their paternal nest
and started careers of their own.
What sort of "success requires hard work"
example can be learned from the current First
Family?
Well?
Well, well... Very well????
--
Hollowhead is always ready to make accusations about the people he
doesn't like. Here's a little backatcha
<laughs and points>
You were the one who started it.
Apparently, Hollowhead believes conservative leaders would treat their >families as he would treat his...
So ... conservatives *don't* make their children get jobs and earn
their own way?
which makes me stop and contemplate
the fact that Hollowhead has never posted anything about his family >life.... Has he ever had one? He snips, cuts and runs whenever I
mention his employment.
Your complaint is that he isn't posting enough PII?
<laughs and points>
How about we doxx you instead?
I don't recall that I don't recall him (if, indeed, Hollow is a him) >posting anything about his life, past or present...
Hollowhead is very secretive....
IHollowhead must have a lot to be secretive about.
Um, post your address and phone number first.
In other words, you can't answer his question and thought your
bullshit would escape response if you moved it below the sig line.
Clue: Some of us know how to reply to stuff below a sig line, Dummy.
"Have I Got News For You" <https://play.hbomax.com/video/watch/8ba7d6bb-ee4b-4722-bc60-b043a67fefbd>--
On Sat, 17 Oct 2026 19:02:47 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in >>news:11b0987$ck4e$[email protected]:
On 2026-10-15, Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2026 02:15:09 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>news:11ap157$1tcm8$[email protected]:
On 2026-10-12, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <11aiqmt$3lrjk$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 10/12/2026 10:04 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 09:54:03 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 10/12/2026 9:39 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 13:04:33 +0000, Mitchell Holman
<[email protected]> wrote:
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
Lefftists aren't in favor of freedom.
The party that wants to ban drag shows and
rainbows and pride parades and library books
dares to talk about freedom.
Nobody wants to ban your drag shows or library books, Dummy, >>>>>>>> >>> we just want to protect children from your perversions.
You mean you want to control children, instead of letting them >>>>>>>> >> grow up naturally.
Indeed, I favor parental control over "it takes a village." >>>>>>>> > That's why me, my siblings and my children are living the good >>>>>>>> > life.
There's a certain amazement, frankly, that you're so clueless as >>>>>>>> to think your preference can be the ruling point of view. We're >>>>>>>> not trying to meddle with your lifestyle, but there are other
ones out there that you might come across, you don't get to
control diversity. 16 and 17 year-old people have certain adult >>>>>>>> rights, and any kid has the right to express him or herself,
parents have to step back and allow development to progress, and >>>>>>>> let people have connections with others.
Unless they are 18 and leaving the house they will live by my
rules.
Correct.
My kids turned out fine with useful advanced degrees that have
allowed them to purchase homes.
Thanks to government schools and government
insured loans.
Indeed. A person would be a fool not to take advantage of all that if
it was needed.
Absolutely.
Along with scholarships, grants, work-study programs and so forth.
My kids worked hard during high school and thus were able to take
advantage of grants and so forth.
Even your kids depended on others
to their bills.
Everybody in the USA does, Hollowhead, so what's your point?
The lazy kids ran up their student loans, in many cases never
graduated or graduated with basket weaving degrees and thus were deep
in debt. It's called responsibility.
Responsibiity, like in going to
bankruptcy court to dodge your bills
over and over?
Resonsibility, like divorcing
wife after wife whenever a sexy
younger woman catches your eye?
"Children, come meet your newest mother"
<image of Hollowhead dragging goalposts around>
Of course the fact that my siblings and my kids had
good parents who provided good role models and enough income to have
a good safe home, clothes to wear, food on the table, and safe
reliable transportation to and from where they needed to go were even
bigger contributing factors.
Once again in many cases success or failure is a direct result of
parenting. Spare the rod and spoil the child has more than a little
truth in it.
Spoiled children, like Trump's
offspring who have never earned a dime
their Daddy didn't steer to them.
But Trump. Hollowhead complains.....
----
Freedom for a Socialist/Communist means that you
are free to do what other people want you to do.
On 2026-10-17, Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sat, 17 Oct 2026 19:02:47 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in >>>news:11b0987$ck4e$[email protected]:
On 2026-10-15, Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2026 02:15:09 +0000, Mitchell Holman
<[email protected]> wrote:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>news:11ap157$1tcm8$[email protected]:
On 2026-10-12, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <11aiqmt$3lrjk$[email protected]>, [email protected] >>>>>>>> says...
On 10/12/2026 10:04 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 09:54:03 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 10/12/2026 9:39 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 13:04:33 +0000, Mitchell Holman
<[email protected]> wrote:
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
Lefftists aren't in favor of freedom.
The party that wants to ban drag shows and
rainbows and pride parades and library books
dares to talk about freedom.
Nobody wants to ban your drag shows or library books,
Dummy, we just want to protect children from your
perversions.
You mean you want to control children, instead of letting >>>>>>>>> >> them grow up naturally.
Indeed, I favor parental control over "it takes a village." >>>>>>>>> > That's why me, my siblings and my children are living the
good life.
There's a certain amazement, frankly, that you're so clueless >>>>>>>>> as to think your preference can be the ruling point of view. >>>>>>>>> We're not trying to meddle with your lifestyle, but there are >>>>>>>>> other ones out there that you might come across, you don't get >>>>>>>>> to control diversity. 16 and 17 year-old people have certain >>>>>>>>> adult rights, and any kid has the right to express him or
herself, parents have to step back and allow development to
progress, and let people have connections with others.
Unless they are 18 and leaving the house they will live by my
rules.
Correct.
My kids turned out fine with useful advanced degrees that have
allowed them to purchase homes.
Thanks to government schools and government
insured loans.
Indeed. A person would be a fool not to take advantage of all that
if it was needed.
Absolutely.
Along with scholarships, grants, work-study programs and so forth.
My kids worked hard during high school and thus were able to take
advantage of grants and so forth.
Even your kids depended on others
to their bills.
Everybody in the USA does, Hollowhead, so what's your point?
It's free money from the University so why not?
And it's not like a student loan that the students expect others to
pay back for them.
The lazy kids ran up their student loans, in many cases never
graduated or graduated with basket weaving degrees and thus were
deep in debt. It's called responsibility.
Responsibiity, like in going to
bankruptcy court to dodge your bills
over and over?
Resonsibility, like divorcing
wife after wife whenever a sexy
younger woman catches your eye?
"Children, come meet your newest mother"
<image of Hollowhead dragging goalposts around>
Hollow has become a raving lunatic.
He really should get some mental health counseling before he goes
postal. Or in his case, goes tranny.
Of course the fact that my siblings and my kids had
good parents who provided good role models and enough income to
have a good safe home, clothes to wear, food on the table, and
safe reliable transportation to and from where they needed to go
were even bigger contributing factors.
Once again in many cases success or failure is a direct result of
parenting. Spare the rod and spoil the child has more than a little
truth in it.
Spoiled children, like Trump's
offspring who have never earned a dime
their Daddy didn't steer to them.
But Trump. Hollowhead complains.....
Hollow displays the classic signs of a born loser.
He is very similar to that snit loony toon who behaves similar and is
a loser's loser.
It's typical of the left to foam and froth at the corners of their
mouth spewing hate for those who have been successful.
It's why I say that if the left spent less time complaining and
attacking the wealthy, successful people they would have more time to
spend building their own wealth. But they won't and the main reason,
mental illness aside, is because they are too lazy. It's far easier to
blame everything on the rich. In fact the democrat party has had that
as part of their platform for decades.
And the libbys are too ignorant to realize when they are being lied
to.
It's why I say that if the left spent less time complaining and
attacking the wealthy, successful people they would have more time to
spend building their own wealth. But they won't and the main reason,
mental illness aside, is because they are too lazy. It's far easier
to blame everything on the rich. In fact the democrat party has had
that as part of their platform for decades. And the libbys are too
ignorant to realize when they are being lied to.
Conservatives: Liberals should earn
their wealth like conservatives (Paris
Hilton, Leona Helmsley, the Trumps) do.
Also Conservatives: How dare those
liberal Hollywood actors whe earned
their wealth criticize rich Trust Fund
babies!
Resonsibility, like divorcing
wife after wife whenever a sexy
younger woman catches your eye?
"Children, come meet your newest mother"
<image of Hollowhead dragging goalposts around>
Hollow has become a raving lunatic.
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in news:11b3ljb$1j4nd$[email protected]:
On 2026-10-17, Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sat, 17 Oct 2026 19:02:47 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in >>>news:11b0987$ck4e$[email protected]:
On 2026-10-15, Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2026 02:15:09 +0000, Mitchell Holman
<[email protected]> wrote:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>news:11ap157$1tcm8$[email protected]:
On 2026-10-12, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <11aiqmt$3lrjk$[email protected]>, [email protected] >>>>>>>> says...
On 10/12/2026 10:04 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 09:54:03 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 10/12/2026 9:39 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 13:04:33 +0000, Mitchell Holman
<[email protected]> wrote:
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>> >>>> news:[email protected]:
Lefftists aren't in favor of freedom.
The party that wants to ban drag shows and
rainbows and pride parades and library books
dares to talk about freedom.
Nobody wants to ban your drag shows or library books,
Dummy, we just want to protect children from your
perversions.
You mean you want to control children, instead of letting >>>>>>>>> >> them grow up naturally.
Indeed, I favor parental control over "it takes a village." >>>>>>>>> > That's why me, my siblings and my children are living the >>>>>>>>> > good life.
There's a certain amazement, frankly, that you're so clueless >>>>>>>>> as to think your preference can be the ruling point of view. >>>>>>>>> We're not trying to meddle with your lifestyle, but there are >>>>>>>>> other ones out there that you might come across, you don't get >>>>>>>>> to control diversity. 16 and 17 year-old people have certain >>>>>>>>> adult rights, and any kid has the right to express him or
herself, parents have to step back and allow development to >>>>>>>>> progress, and let people have connections with others.
Unless they are 18 and leaving the house they will live by my >>>>>>>> rules.
Correct.
My kids turned out fine with useful advanced degrees that have >>>>>>> allowed them to purchase homes.
Thanks to government schools and government
insured loans.
Indeed. A person would be a fool not to take advantage of all that >>>>> if it was needed.
Absolutely.
Along with scholarships, grants, work-study programs and so forth.
My kids worked hard during high school and thus were able to take
advantage of grants and so forth.
Even your kids depended on others
to their bills.
Everybody in the USA does, Hollowhead, so what's your point?
It's free money from the University so why not?
And it's not like a student loan that the students expect others to
pay back for them.
The lazy kids ran up their student loans, in many cases never
graduated or graduated with basket weaving degrees and thus were
deep in debt. It's called responsibility.
Responsibiity, like in going to
bankruptcy court to dodge your bills
over and over?
Resonsibility, like divorcing
wife after wife whenever a sexy
younger woman catches your eye?
"Children, come meet your newest mother"
<image of Hollowhead dragging goalposts around>
Hollow has become a raving lunatic.
He really should get some mental health counseling before he goes
postal. Or in his case, goes tranny.
Of course the fact that my siblings and my kids had
good parents who provided good role models and enough income to
have a good safe home, clothes to wear, food on the table, and
safe reliable transportation to and from where they needed to go
were even bigger contributing factors.
Once again in many cases success or failure is a direct result of
parenting. Spare the rod and spoil the child has more than a little
truth in it.
Spoiled children, like Trump's
offspring who have never earned a dime
their Daddy didn't steer to them.
But Trump. Hollowhead complains.....
Hollow displays the classic signs of a born loser.
He is very similar to that snit loony toon who behaves similar and is
a loser's loser.
It's typical of the left to foam and froth at the corners of their
mouth spewing hate for those who have been successful.
It's why I say that if the left spent less time complaining and
attacking the wealthy, successful people they would have more time to
spend building their own wealth. But they won't and the main reason,
mental illness aside, is because they are too lazy. It's far easier to blame everything on the rich. In fact the democrat party has had that
as part of their platform for decades.
And the libbys are too ignorant to realize when they are being lied
to.
Conservatives: Liberals should earn
their wealth like conservatives (Paris
Hilton, Leona Helmsley, the Trumps) do.
Also Conservatives: How dare those
liberal Hollywood actors whe earned
their wealth criticize rich Trust Fund
babies!
On Sun, 18 Oct 2026 23:43:39 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<[email protected]> wrote:
Resonsibility, like divorcing
wife after wife whenever a sexy
younger woman catches your eye?
"Children, come meet your newest mother"
<image of Hollowhead dragging goalposts around>
Hollow has become a raving lunatic.
Why? Because he keeps pointing out how bad the orange man really is?
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]<snip 145 lines>
says...
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:11b3ljb$1j4nd$[email protected]:
Conservatives: Liberals should earn
their wealth like conservatives (Paris
Hilton, Leona Helmsley, the Trumps) do.
There are rich people on both sides. You are cherry picking.
Also Conservatives: How dare those
liberal Hollywood actors whe earned
their wealth criticize rich Trust Fund
babies!
Hollywood actors are just that. Actors.
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:11b3ljb$1j4nd$[email protected]:
On 2026-10-17, Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sat, 17 Oct 2026 19:02:47 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
wrote:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:11b0987$ck4e$[email protected]:
On 2026-10-15, Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2026 02:15:09 +0000, Mitchell Holman
<[email protected]> wrote:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:11ap157$1tcm8$[email protected]:
On 2026-10-12, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <11aiqmt$3lrjk$[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
On 10/12/2026 10:04 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 09:54:03 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 10/12/2026 9:39 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 13:04:33 +0000, Mitchell Holman
<[email protected]> wrote:
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
Lefftists aren't in favor of freedom.
The party that wants to ban drag shows and
rainbows and pride parades and library books
dares to talk about freedom.
Nobody wants to ban your drag shows or library books,
Dummy, we just want to protect children from your
perversions.
You mean you want to control children, instead of letting
them grow up naturally.
Indeed, I favor parental control over "it takes a village."
That's why me, my siblings and my children are living the
good life.
There's a certain amazement, frankly, that you're so clueless
as to think your preference can be the ruling point of view.
We're not trying to meddle with your lifestyle, but there are
other ones out there that you might come across, you don't get
to control diversity. 16 and 17 year-old people have certain
adult rights, and any kid has the right to express him or
herself, parents have to step back and allow development to
progress, and let people have connections with others.
Unless they are 18 and leaving the house they will live by my
rules.
Correct.
My kids turned out fine with useful advanced degrees that have
allowed them to purchase homes.
Thanks to government schools and government
insured loans.
Indeed. A person would be a fool not to take advantage of all that
if it was needed.
Absolutely.
Along with scholarships, grants, work-study programs and so forth.
My kids worked hard during high school and thus were able to take
advantage of grants and so forth.
Even your kids depended on others
to their bills.
Everybody in the USA does, Hollowhead, so what's your point?
It's free money from the University so why not?
And it's not like a student loan that the students expect others to
pay back for them.
The lazy kids ran up their student loans, in many cases never
graduated or graduated with basket weaving degrees and thus were
deep in debt. It's called responsibility.
Responsibiity, like in going to
bankruptcy court to dodge your bills
over and over?
Resonsibility, like divorcing
wife after wife whenever a sexy
younger woman catches your eye?
"Children, come meet your newest mother"
<image of Hollowhead dragging goalposts around>
Hollow has become a raving lunatic.
He really should get some mental health counseling before he goes
postal. Or in his case, goes tranny.
Of course the fact that my siblings and my kids had
good parents who provided good role models and enough income to
have a good safe home, clothes to wear, food on the table, and
safe reliable transportation to and from where they needed to go
were even bigger contributing factors.
Once again in many cases success or failure is a direct result of
parenting. Spare the rod and spoil the child has more than a little
truth in it.
Spoiled children, like Trump's
offspring who have never earned a dime
their Daddy didn't steer to them.
But Trump. Hollowhead complains.....
Hollow displays the classic signs of a born loser.
He is very similar to that snit loony toon who behaves similar and is
a loser's loser.
It's typical of the left to foam and froth at the corners of their
mouth spewing hate for those who have been successful.
It's why I say that if the left spent less time complaining and
attacking the wealthy, successful people they would have more time to
spend building their own wealth. But they won't and the main reason,
mental illness aside, is because they are too lazy. It's far easier to
blame everything on the rich. In fact the democrat party has had that
as part of their platform for decades.
And the libbys are too ignorant to realize when they are being lied
to.
Conservatives: Liberals should earn
their wealth like conservatives (Paris
Hilton, Leona Helmsley, the Trumps) do.
There are rich people on both sides. You are cherry picking.
Also Conservatives: How dare those
liberal Hollywood actors whe earned
their wealth criticize rich Trust Fund
babies!
Hollywood actors are just that. Actors.
On 2026-10-19, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:11b3ljb$1j4nd$[email protected]:
On 2026-10-17, Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sat, 17 Oct 2026 19:02:47 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> >> >> wrote:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:11b0987$ck4e$[email protected]:
On 2026-10-15, Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2026 02:15:09 +0000, Mitchell Holman
<[email protected]> wrote:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:11ap157$1tcm8$[email protected]:
On 2026-10-12, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <11aiqmt$3lrjk$[email protected]>, [email protected] >> >>>>>>>> says...
On 10/12/2026 10:04 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 09:54:03 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 10/12/2026 9:39 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 13:04:33 +0000, Mitchell Holman
<[email protected]> wrote:
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
Lefftists aren't in favor of freedom.
The party that wants to ban drag shows and
rainbows and pride parades and library books
dares to talk about freedom.
Nobody wants to ban your drag shows or library books,
Dummy, we just want to protect children from your
perversions.
You mean you want to control children, instead of letting
them grow up naturally.
Indeed, I favor parental control over "it takes a village." >> >>>>>>>>> > That's why me, my siblings and my children are living the
good life.
There's a certain amazement, frankly, that you're so clueless
as to think your preference can be the ruling point of view.
We're not trying to meddle with your lifestyle, but there are
other ones out there that you might come across, you don't get >> >>>>>>>>> to control diversity. 16 and 17 year-old people have certain
adult rights, and any kid has the right to express him or
herself, parents have to step back and allow development to
progress, and let people have connections with others.
Unless they are 18 and leaving the house they will live by my
rules.
Correct.
My kids turned out fine with useful advanced degrees that have
allowed them to purchase homes.
Thanks to government schools and government
insured loans.
Indeed. A person would be a fool not to take advantage of all that >> >>>>> if it was needed.
Absolutely.
Along with scholarships, grants, work-study programs and so forth.
My kids worked hard during high school and thus were able to take
advantage of grants and so forth.
Even your kids depended on others
to their bills.
Everybody in the USA does, Hollowhead, so what's your point?
It's free money from the University so why not?
And it's not like a student loan that the students expect others to
pay back for them.
The lazy kids ran up their student loans, in many cases never
graduated or graduated with basket weaving degrees and thus were
deep in debt. It's called responsibility.
Responsibiity, like in going to
bankruptcy court to dodge your bills
over and over?
Resonsibility, like divorcing
wife after wife whenever a sexy
younger woman catches your eye?
"Children, come meet your newest mother"
<image of Hollowhead dragging goalposts around>
Hollow has become a raving lunatic.
He really should get some mental health counseling before he goes
postal. Or in his case, goes tranny.
Of course the fact that my siblings and my kids had
good parents who provided good role models and enough income to
have a good safe home, clothes to wear, food on the table, and
safe reliable transportation to and from where they needed to go
were even bigger contributing factors.
Once again in many cases success or failure is a direct result of
parenting. Spare the rod and spoil the child has more than a little >> >>>> truth in it.
Spoiled children, like Trump's
offspring who have never earned a dime
their Daddy didn't steer to them.
But Trump. Hollowhead complains.....
Hollow displays the classic signs of a born loser.
He is very similar to that snit loony toon who behaves similar and is
a loser's loser.
It's typical of the left to foam and froth at the corners of their
mouth spewing hate for those who have been successful.
It's why I say that if the left spent less time complaining and
attacking the wealthy, successful people they would have more time to
spend building their own wealth. But they won't and the main reason,
mental illness aside, is because they are too lazy. It's far easier to >> > blame everything on the rich. In fact the democrat party has had that >> > as part of their platform for decades.
And the libbys are too ignorant to realize when they are being lied
to.
Conservatives: Liberals should earn
their wealth like conservatives (Paris
Hilton, Leona Helmsley, the Trumps) do.
There are rich people on both sides. You are cherry picking.
Also Conservatives: How dare those
liberal Hollywood actors whe earned
their wealth criticize rich Trust Fund
babies!
Hollywood actors are just that. Actors.
Elon Musk is worth ~ $500 Billion.
Taylor Swift is worth ~ $2.1 Billion.
Elon Musk employs ~ 160,000 people directly and ~600,000 indirectly via suppliers.
Taylor Swift employees 20 full time and a couple of thousand of workers when she is
touring.
Elon Musk has accomplished, among other things:
Elon Musk (https://www.google.com/search?kgmid=%2Fm%2F03nzf1&q=Elon+Musk) has achieved
major milestones across space exploration, electric vehicles, renewable energy, and
artificial intelligence, detailed further in Encyclopaedia Britannica's Elon Musk
Overview. [1] (https://www.britannica.com/question/What-are-Elon-Musks-top-accomplishments)
Space Exploration (SpaceX)
? Founded SpaceX (2002): Built a private aerospace manufacturer aimed at lowering
spaceflight costs and enabling Mars colonization.
? Reusable Rockets: Pioneered the development and landing of orbital-class reusable
rockets, including the Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy.
? Crewed Spaceflight: Developed the Dragon spacecraft to transport NASA astronauts and
cargo to and from the International Space Station (ISS).
? Starlink: Deployed a massive low-Earth orbit satellite constellation providing global
broadband internet access. [1] (https://www.careeraddict.com/elon-musk-accomplishments),
[2] (https://www.investing.com/academy/statistics/elon-musk-facts/), [3] (https://www.forbes.com/profile/elon-musk/), [4] (https://www.vedantu.com/biography/elon-musk), [5] (https://www.moneytalksnews.com/slideshows/elon-musk-greatest-accomplishments/)
Electric Vehicles & Energy (Tesla)
? Tesla Leadership (2008?Present): Became CEO and product architect, transforming Tesla
into a pioneer of mainstream electric vehicles.
? Pioneering Models: Spearheaded the creation of the Tesla Roadster (https://www.google.com/search?kgmid=%2Fm%2F0f35r8&q=Tesla+Roadster), Model S (https://www.google.com/search?kgmid=%2Fm%2F04cylkl&q=Model+S), Model X (https://www.google.com/search?kgmid=%2Fm%2F0fq05ym&q=Model+X), Model 3 (https://www.google.com/search?kgmid=%2Fg%2F11c3x48pb7&q=Model+3), Model Y (https://www.google.com/search?kgmid=%2Fg%2F11gb_4f22x&q=Model+Y), and Cybertruck
(https://www.google.com/search?kgmid=%2Fg%2F11g1bplvvh&q=Cybertruck).
? Sustainable Energy: Integrated SolarCity into Tesla to provide solar energy generation
and commercial/residential battery storage (Powerwall and Megapack). [1] (https://www.edge.org/memberbio/elon_musk), [2] (https://www.tesla.com/elon-musk), [3]
(https://www.investing.com/academy/statistics/elon-musk-facts/), [4] (https://www.careeraddict.com/elon-musk-accomplishments)
Technology & Other Ventures
? Early Tech Successes: Co-founded Zip2 (sold in 1999) and X.com, which merged to become
PayPal (sold to eBay in 2002).
? Neuralink (2016): Co-founded the neurotechnology company to develop implantable
brain-computer interfaces.
? The Boring Company (2016): Founded the infrastructure and tunnel-construction venture to
alleviate urban traffic congestion.
? xAI (2023): Founded the artificial intelligence company to advance deep-learning systems
and general intelligence research. [1] (https://www.britannica.com/question/What-are-Elon-Musks-top-accomplishments), [2]
(https://www.investing.com/academy/statistics/elon-musk-facts/), [3] (https://www.edge.org/memberbio/elon_musk)
Major Honors & Recognition
? National Medal of Science (2026): Awarded at the White House for contributions to space
exploration, intelligent systems, and communications.
? Time Person of the Year (2021): Recognized for his sweeping impact on global commerce,
technology, and the green transition. [1] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_awards_and_honors_received_by_Elon_Musk), [2]
(https://www.facebook.com/businessinsiderssa/videos/tesla-and-spacex-ceo-elon-musk-was-
among-the-technology-leaders-honored-by-us-pr/1485174530111178/)
Would you like to dive deeper into a specific company (such as SpaceX or Tesla) or focus
on his financial milestones and net worth?
Taylor Swift sings songs about her failed relationships............
In article <11b5fbc$25kje$[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
On 2026-10-19, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>>
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:11b3ljb$1j4nd$[email protected]:
On 2026-10-17, Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sat, 17 Oct 2026 19:02:47 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:11b0987$ck4e$[email protected]:
On 2026-10-15, Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Oct 2026 02:15:09 +0000, Mitchell Holman
<[email protected]> wrote:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:11ap157$1tcm8$[email protected]:
On 2026-10-12, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <11aiqmt$3lrjk$[email protected]>, [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>> says...
Unless they are 18 and leaving the house they will live by my >>>>>>>>>>>> rules.
On 10/12/2026 10:04 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 09:54:03 -0400, "Joel W. Crump" >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
On 10/12/2026 9:39 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 13:04:33 +0000, Mitchell Holman >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Lefftists aren't in favor of freedom.
The party that wants to ban drag shows and
rainbows and pride parades and library books >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dares to talk about freedom.
Nobody wants to ban your drag shows or library books, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dummy, we just want to protect children from your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> perversions.
You mean you want to control children, instead of letting >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them grow up naturally.
Indeed, I favor parental control over "it takes a village." >>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's why me, my siblings and my children are living the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> good life.
There's a certain amazement, frankly, that you're so clueless >>>>>>>>>>>>> as to think your preference can be the ruling point of view. >>>>>>>>>>>>> We're not trying to meddle with your lifestyle, but there are >>>>>>>>>>>>> other ones out there that you might come across, you don't get >>>>>>>>>>>>> to control diversity. 16 and 17 year-old people have certain >>>>>>>>>>>>> adult rights, and any kid has the right to express him or >>>>>>>>>>>>> herself, parents have to step back and allow development to >>>>>>>>>>>>> progress, and let people have connections with others. >>>>>>>>>>>>
Correct.
My kids turned out fine with useful advanced degrees that have >>>>>>>>>>> allowed them to purchase homes.
Thanks to government schools and government
insured loans.
Indeed. A person would be a fool not to take advantage of all that >>>>>>>>> if it was needed.
Absolutely.
Along with scholarships, grants, work-study programs and so forth. >>>>>>>>
My kids worked hard during high school and thus were able to take >>>>>>>> advantage of grants and so forth.
Even your kids depended on others
to their bills.
Everybody in the USA does, Hollowhead, so what's your point?
It's free money from the University so why not?
And it's not like a student loan that the students expect others to
pay back for them.
The lazy kids ran up their student loans, in many cases never
graduated or graduated with basket weaving degrees and thus were >>>>>>>> deep in debt. It's called responsibility.
Responsibiity, like in going to
bankruptcy court to dodge your bills
over and over?
Resonsibility, like divorcing
wife after wife whenever a sexy
younger woman catches your eye?
"Children, come meet your newest mother"
<image of Hollowhead dragging goalposts around>
Hollow has become a raving lunatic.
He really should get some mental health counseling before he goes
postal. Or in his case, goes tranny.
Of course the fact that my siblings and my kids had
good parents who provided good role models and enough income to >>>>>>>>> have a good safe home, clothes to wear, food on the table, and >>>>>>>>> safe reliable transportation to and from where they needed to go >>>>>>>>> were even bigger contributing factors.
Once again in many cases success or failure is a direct result of >>>>>>>> parenting. Spare the rod and spoil the child has more than a little >>>>>>>> truth in it.
Spoiled children, like Trump's
offspring who have never earned a dime
their Daddy didn't steer to them.
But Trump. Hollowhead complains.....
Hollow displays the classic signs of a born loser.
He is very similar to that snit loony toon who behaves similar and is >>>>> a loser's loser.
It's typical of the left to foam and froth at the corners of their
mouth spewing hate for those who have been successful.
It's why I say that if the left spent less time complaining and
attacking the wealthy, successful people they would have more time to >>>>> spend building their own wealth. But they won't and the main reason, >>>>> mental illness aside, is because they are too lazy. It's far easier to >>>>> blame everything on the rich. In fact the democrat party has had that >>>>> as part of their platform for decades.
And the libbys are too ignorant to realize when they are being lied
to.
Conservatives: Liberals should earn
their wealth like conservatives (Paris
Hilton, Leona Helmsley, the Trumps) do.
There are rich people on both sides. You are cherry picking.
Also Conservatives: How dare those
liberal Hollywood actors whe earned
their wealth criticize rich Trust Fund
babies!
Hollywood actors are just that. Actors.
Elon Musk is worth ~ $500 Billion.
Taylor Swift is worth ~ $2.1 Billion.
Elon Musk employs ~ 160,000 people directly and ~600,000 indirectly via suppliers.
Taylor Swift employees 20 full time and a couple of thousand of workers when she is
touring.
Elon Musk has accomplished, among other things:
Elon Musk (https://www.google.com/search?kgmid=%2Fm%2F03nzf1&q=Elon+Musk) has achieved
major milestones across space exploration, electric vehicles, renewable energy, and
artificial intelligence, detailed further in Encyclopaedia Britannica's Elon Musk
Overview. [1]
(https://www.britannica.com/question/What-are-Elon-Musks-top-accomplishments)
Space Exploration (SpaceX)
? Founded SpaceX (2002): Built a private aerospace manufacturer aimed at lowering
spaceflight costs and enabling Mars colonization.
? Reusable Rockets: Pioneered the development and landing of orbital-class reusable
rockets, including the Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy.
? Crewed Spaceflight: Developed the Dragon spacecraft to transport NASA astronauts and
cargo to and from the International Space Station (ISS).
? Starlink: Deployed a massive low-Earth orbit satellite constellation providing global
broadband internet access. [1] (https://www.careeraddict.com/elon-musk-accomplishments),
[2] (https://www.investing.com/academy/statistics/elon-musk-facts/), [3]
(https://www.forbes.com/profile/elon-musk/), [4]
(https://www.vedantu.com/biography/elon-musk), [5]
(https://www.moneytalksnews.com/slideshows/elon-musk-greatest-accomplishments/)
Electric Vehicles & Energy (Tesla)
? Tesla Leadership (2008?Present): Became CEO and product architect, transforming Tesla
into a pioneer of mainstream electric vehicles.
? Pioneering Models: Spearheaded the creation of the Tesla Roadster
(https://www.google.com/search?kgmid=%2Fm%2F0f35r8&q=Tesla+Roadster), Model S
(https://www.google.com/search?kgmid=%2Fm%2F04cylkl&q=Model+S), Model X
(https://www.google.com/search?kgmid=%2Fm%2F0fq05ym&q=Model+X), Model 3
(https://www.google.com/search?kgmid=%2Fg%2F11c3x48pb7&q=Model+3), Model Y >> (https://www.google.com/search?kgmid=%2Fg%2F11gb_4f22x&q=Model+Y), and Cybertruck
(https://www.google.com/search?kgmid=%2Fg%2F11g1bplvvh&q=Cybertruck).
? Sustainable Energy: Integrated SolarCity into Tesla to provide solar energy generation
and commercial/residential battery storage (Powerwall and Megapack). [1]
(https://www.edge.org/memberbio/elon_musk), [2] (https://www.tesla.com/elon-musk), [3]
(https://www.investing.com/academy/statistics/elon-musk-facts/), [4]
(https://www.careeraddict.com/elon-musk-accomplishments)
Technology & Other Ventures
? Early Tech Successes: Co-founded Zip2 (sold in 1999) and X.com, which merged to become
PayPal (sold to eBay in 2002).
? Neuralink (2016): Co-founded the neurotechnology company to develop implantable
brain-computer interfaces.
? The Boring Company (2016): Founded the infrastructure and tunnel-construction venture to
alleviate urban traffic congestion.
? xAI (2023): Founded the artificial intelligence company to advance deep-learning systems
and general intelligence research. [1]
(https://www.britannica.com/question/What-are-Elon-Musks-top-accomplishments), [2]
(https://www.investing.com/academy/statistics/elon-musk-facts/), [3]
(https://www.edge.org/memberbio/elon_musk)
Major Honors & Recognition
? National Medal of Science (2026): Awarded at the White House for contributions to space
exploration, intelligent systems, and communications.
? Time Person of the Year (2021): Recognized for his sweeping impact on global commerce,
technology, and the green transition. [1]
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_awards_and_honors_received_by_Elon_Musk), [2]
(https://www.facebook.com/businessinsiderssa/videos/tesla-and-spacex-ceo-elon-musk-was-
among-the-technology-leaders-honored-by-us-pr/1485174530111178/)
Would you like to dive deeper into a specific company (such as SpaceX or Tesla) or focus
on his financial milestones and net worth?
Taylor Swift sings songs about her failed relationships............
LOL
And what has De Nero done?
On Oct 18, 2026 at 7:31 AM, Skeeter wrote in [email protected]:
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]<snip 23 lines>
says...
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
You know what doesn't exist?
Trump Airlines - failed.
Trump Vodka - failed.
Trump University - failed.
Trump Casinos - failed.
Trump Steaks - failed.
Trump Mortgage - failed
Trump The Game - failed.
Trump Magazine - failed
Trump Ice - failed
Trump Football Team - failed
Trump Oceans resorts - failed.
Trump Network - failed.
Trump News Media - failed.
Trumps first 2 marriages - failed.
Trump Taj Mahal - bankrupt
Trump's Castle- bankrupt
Trump Plaza Casinos - bankrupt
Trump Plaza Hotel - bankrupt
Trump Hotels and Casinos Resorts - bankrupt
Trump Entertainment Resorts - bankrupt
And he's still rich and can own you. What's your point? What businesses
do you own?
Whatever he does or does not own, he does not harm the country or people
as Trump does. Trump is a loser.
On Oct 18, 2026 at 3:43 AM, Skeeter wrote in [email protected]:
In article <[email protected]>,<snip 8 lines>
[email protected] says...
On Sat, 17 Oct 2026 13:10:48 -0600, Blaine <[email protected]>
wrote:
The point you missed is that Trump and his fans love to brag on his
enormous skills as a businessman and wealth creator when in fact, his
wealth was inherited and all he did was spend decades finding ways to
steal money because he wasn't competent enough as a businessman to
make it legitimately.
So all those hotels and holdings don't really exist? What do YOU have?
You actively missed the point because you know it was a correct one.
On Oct 19, 2026 at 8:07 AM, Skeeter wrote in [email protected]:
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]<snip 145 lines>
says...
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:11b3ljb$1j4nd$[email protected]:
Conservatives: Liberals should earn their wealth like conservatives
(Paris Hilton, Leona Helmsley, the Trumps) do.
There are rich people on both sides. You are cherry picking.
Also Conservatives: How dare those liberal Hollywood actors whe earned
their wealth criticize rich Trust Fund babies!
Hollywood actors are just that. Actors.
They work and get money. Capitalism. And the right wingers complain they speak out.
Elon Musk is worth ~ $500 Billion.
Skeeter wrote:
In article <11b5fbc$25kje$[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
On 2026-10-19, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:11b3ljb$1j4nd$[email protected]:
On 2026-10-17, Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 17 Oct 2026 19:02:47 +0000, Mitchell Holman <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:11b0987$ck4e$[email protected]:
On 2026-10-15, Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 15 Oct 2026 02:15:09 +0000, Mitchell Holman
<[email protected]> wrote:
pothead <[email protected]> wrote in
news:11ap157$1tcm8$[email protected]:
On 2026-10-12, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <11aiqmt$3lrjk$[email protected]>, [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>> says...
Unless they are 18 and leaving the house they will live by my >>>>>>>>>>>> rules.
On 10/12/2026 10:04 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 09:54:03 -0400, "Joel W. Crump" >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
On 10/12/2026 9:39 AM, Socialism is for losers wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 13:04:33 +0000, Mitchell Holman >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Lefftists aren't in favor of freedom.
The party that wants to ban drag shows and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rainbows and pride parades and library books >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dares to talk about freedom.
Nobody wants to ban your drag shows or library books, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dummy, we just want to protect children from your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> perversions.
You mean you want to control children, instead of letting >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them grow up naturally.
Indeed, I favor parental control over "it takes a village." >>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's why me, my siblings and my children are living the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> good life.
There's a certain amazement, frankly, that you're so clueless >>>>>>>>>>>>> as to think your preference can be the ruling point of view. >>>>>>>>>>>>> We're not trying to meddle with your lifestyle, but there are >>>>>>>>>>>>> other ones out there that you might come across, you don't get >>>>>>>>>>>>> to control diversity. 16 and 17 year-old people have certain >>>>>>>>>>>>> adult rights, and any kid has the right to express him or >>>>>>>>>>>>> herself, parents have to step back and allow development to >>>>>>>>>>>>> progress, and let people have connections with others. >>>>>>>>>>>>
Correct.
My kids turned out fine with useful advanced degrees that have >>>>>>>>>>> allowed them to purchase homes.
Thanks to government schools and government
insured loans.
Indeed. A person would be a fool not to take advantage of all that >>>>>>>>> if it was needed.
Absolutely.
Along with scholarships, grants, work-study programs and so forth. >>>>>>>>
My kids worked hard during high school and thus were able to take >>>>>>>> advantage of grants and so forth.
Even your kids depended on others
to their bills.
Everybody in the USA does, Hollowhead, so what's your point?
It's free money from the University so why not?
And it's not like a student loan that the students expect others to >>>>> pay back for them.
The lazy kids ran up their student loans, in many cases never >>>>>>>> graduated or graduated with basket weaving degrees and thus were >>>>>>>> deep in debt. It's called responsibility.
Responsibiity, like in going to
bankruptcy court to dodge your bills
over and over?
Resonsibility, like divorcing
wife after wife whenever a sexy
younger woman catches your eye?
"Children, come meet your newest mother"
<image of Hollowhead dragging goalposts around>
Hollow has become a raving lunatic.
He really should get some mental health counseling before he goes
postal. Or in his case, goes tranny.
Of course the fact that my siblings and my kids had
good parents who provided good role models and enough income to >>>>>>>>> have a good safe home, clothes to wear, food on the table, and >>>>>>>>> safe reliable transportation to and from where they needed to go >>>>>>>>> were even bigger contributing factors.
Once again in many cases success or failure is a direct result of >>>>>>>> parenting. Spare the rod and spoil the child has more than a little >>>>>>>> truth in it.
Spoiled children, like Trump's
offspring who have never earned a dime
their Daddy didn't steer to them.
But Trump. Hollowhead complains.....
Hollow displays the classic signs of a born loser.
He is very similar to that snit loony toon who behaves similar and is >>>>> a loser's loser.
It's typical of the left to foam and froth at the corners of their >>>>> mouth spewing hate for those who have been successful.
It's why I say that if the left spent less time complaining and
attacking the wealthy, successful people they would have more time to >>>>> spend building their own wealth. But they won't and the main reason, >>>>> mental illness aside, is because they are too lazy. It's far easier to >>>>> blame everything on the rich. In fact the democrat party has had that >>>>> as part of their platform for decades.
And the libbys are too ignorant to realize when they are being lied >>>>> to.
Conservatives: Liberals should earn
their wealth like conservatives (Paris
Hilton, Leona Helmsley, the Trumps) do.
There are rich people on both sides. You are cherry picking.
Also Conservatives: How dare those
liberal Hollywood actors whe earned
their wealth criticize rich Trust Fund
babies!
Hollywood actors are just that. Actors.
Elon Musk is worth ~ $500 Billion.
Taylor Swift is worth ~ $2.1 Billion.
Elon Musk employs ~ 160,000 people directly and ~600,000 indirectly via suppliers.
Taylor Swift employees 20 full time and a couple of thousand of workers when she is
touring.
Elon Musk has accomplished, among other things:
Elon Musk (https://www.google.com/search?kgmid=%2Fm%2F03nzf1&q=Elon+Musk) has achieved
major milestones across space exploration, electric vehicles, renewable energy, and
artificial intelligence, detailed further in Encyclopaedia Britannica's Elon Musk
Overview. [1]
(https://www.britannica.com/question/What-are-Elon-Musks-top-accomplishments)
Space Exploration (SpaceX)
? Founded SpaceX (2002): Built a private aerospace manufacturer aimed at lowering
spaceflight costs and enabling Mars colonization.
? Reusable Rockets: Pioneered the development and landing of orbital-class reusable
rockets, including the Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy.
? Crewed Spaceflight: Developed the Dragon spacecraft to transport NASA astronauts and
cargo to and from the International Space Station (ISS).
? Starlink: Deployed a massive low-Earth orbit satellite constellation providing global
broadband internet access. [1] (https://www.careeraddict.com/elon-musk-accomplishments),
[2] (https://www.investing.com/academy/statistics/elon-musk-facts/), [3] >> (https://www.forbes.com/profile/elon-musk/), [4]
(https://www.vedantu.com/biography/elon-musk), [5]
(https://www.moneytalksnews.com/slideshows/elon-musk-greatest-accomplishments/)
Electric Vehicles & Energy (Tesla)
? Tesla Leadership (2008?Present): Became CEO and product architect, transforming Tesla
into a pioneer of mainstream electric vehicles.
? Pioneering Models: Spearheaded the creation of the Tesla Roadster
(https://www.google.com/search?kgmid=%2Fm%2F0f35r8&q=Tesla+Roadster), Model S
(https://www.google.com/search?kgmid=%2Fm%2F04cylkl&q=Model+S), Model X
(https://www.google.com/search?kgmid=%2Fm%2F0fq05ym&q=Model+X), Model 3
(https://www.google.com/search?kgmid=%2Fg%2F11c3x48pb7&q=Model+3), Model Y >> (https://www.google.com/search?kgmid=%2Fg%2F11gb_4f22x&q=Model+Y), and Cybertruck
(https://www.google.com/search?kgmid=%2Fg%2F11g1bplvvh&q=Cybertruck).
? Sustainable Energy: Integrated SolarCity into Tesla to provide solar energy generation
and commercial/residential battery storage (Powerwall and Megapack). [1] >> (https://www.edge.org/memberbio/elon_musk), [2] (https://www.tesla.com/elon-musk), [3]
(https://www.investing.com/academy/statistics/elon-musk-facts/), [4]
(https://www.careeraddict.com/elon-musk-accomplishments)
Technology & Other Ventures
? Early Tech Successes: Co-founded Zip2 (sold in 1999) and X.com, which merged to become
PayPal (sold to eBay in 2002).
? Neuralink (2016): Co-founded the neurotechnology company to develop implantable
brain-computer interfaces.
? The Boring Company (2016): Founded the infrastructure and tunnel-construction venture to
alleviate urban traffic congestion.
? xAI (2023): Founded the artificial intelligence company to advance deep-learning systems
and general intelligence research. [1]
(https://www.britannica.com/question/What-are-Elon-Musks-top-accomplishments), [2]
(https://www.investing.com/academy/statistics/elon-musk-facts/), [3]
(https://www.edge.org/memberbio/elon_musk)
Major Honors & Recognition
? National Medal of Science (2026): Awarded at the White House for contributions to space
exploration, intelligent systems, and communications.
? Time Person of the Year (2021): Recognized for his sweeping impact on global commerce,
technology, and the green transition. [1]
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_awards_and_honors_received_by_Elon_Musk), [2]
(https://www.facebook.com/businessinsiderssa/videos/tesla-and-spacex-ceo-elon-musk-was-
among-the-technology-leaders-honored-by-us-pr/1485174530111178/)
Would you like to dive deeper into a specific company (such as SpaceX or Tesla) or focus
on his financial milestones and net worth?
Taylor Swift sings songs about her failed relationships............
LOL
And what has De Nero done?
A lot of good stuff except for that Focker series.
In article <11b5n12$2ab4r$[email protected]>, [email protected]<snip 267 lines>
says...
Skeeter wrote:
In article <11b5fbc$25kje$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
A lot of good stuff except for that Focker series.
LOL
And what has De Nero done?
I agree. If he would just keep his mouth shut and act I would like him
as a person instead of an actor. I like Springsteens music too and saw
him twice back in the day. Powerful shows. But then he decided to get
into politics and ruin the whole thing.
| Sysop: | DaiTengu |
|---|---|
| Location: | Appleton, WI |
| Users: | 1,142 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 91:05:56 |
| Calls: | 14,704 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 186,497 |
| D/L today: |
1,894 files (564M bytes) |
| Messages: | 2,551,613 |