• Anyone know how this happens

    From The Natural Philosopher@[email protected] to comp.os.linux.misc on Sat Nov 1 19:47:12 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.misc


    Completely blank firefox - no sites loaded

    netstat -an | grep tcp | grep 443

    tcp 0 0 192.168.0.7:51446 34.107.243.93:443
    ESTABLISHED
    tcp 0 0 192.168.0.7:55090 199.232.57.91:443
    ESTABLISHED
    tcp 0 0 192.168.0.7:51442 34.120.208.123:443
    ESTABLISHED
    tcp 0 0 192.168.0.7:48282 142.250.129.95:443
    TIME_WAIT

    All google apart from Fastly inc.

    Later on more google connections show up.

    netstat -an | grep tcp | grep 443
    tcp 0 0 192.168.0.7:59228 142.250.117.95:443
    ESTABLISHED
    tcp 0 0 192.168.0.7:39762 142.251.29.138:443
    ESTABLISHED
    tcp 0 0 192.168.0.7:51446 34.107.243.93:443
    ESTABLISHED
    tcp 0 0 192.168.0.7:39770 142.250.140.95:443
    ESTABLISHED
    tcp 0 0 192.168.0.7:45788 142.250.117.105:443
    ESTABLISHED
    tcp 0 0 192.168.0.7:51442 34.120.208.123:443
    TIME_WAIT
    --
    "And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch".

    Gospel of St. Mathew 15:14

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?=@[email protected] to comp.os.linux.misc on Sat Nov 1 20:35:51 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.misc

    On Sat, 1 Nov 2025 19:47:12 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    netstat -an | grep tcp | grep 443

    You’ve got “-a”, which means include all local ports, followed by “-n”,
    which means only show connected ports. Plus all the chucking away of
    output you didn’t even want in the first place.

    Try this:

    ss -nt 'dport = 443 || sport = 443'

    or even

    ss -t state connected 'dport = 443 || sport = 443'
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?=@[email protected] to comp.os.linux.misc on Sat Nov 1 20:54:28 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.misc

    On Sat, 1 Nov 2025 20:35:51 -0000 (UTC), I wrote:

    You’ve got “-a”, which means include all local ports, followed by “-n”,
    which means only show connected ports. Plus all the chucking away of
    output you didn’t even want in the first place.

    Oops, sorry, forgot that “-n” actually means “display numeric port numbers, not service names”.

    The rest of it still works, though.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From not@[email protected] (Computer Nerd Kev) to comp.os.linux.misc on Sun Nov 2 08:04:02 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.misc

    The Natural Philosopher <[email protected]d> wrote:

    Completely blank firefox - no sites loaded

    netstat -an | grep tcp | grep 443

    tcp 0 0 192.168.0.7:51446 34.107.243.93:443
    ESTABLISHED

    I get (Firefox 140.4.0esr):
    tcp 0 0 192.168.1.100:51410 151.101.81.91:443 ESTABLISHED
    tcp 0 0 192.168.1.100:59912 34.160.144.191:443 ESTABLISHED
    tcp 0 0 192.168.1.100:51390 151.101.81.91:443 ESTABLISHED

    The "about:networking" page lists
    "content-signature-2.cdn.mozilla.net" which resolves to
    34.160.144.191. Also "firefox.settings.services.mozilla.com" and "firefox-settings-attachments.cdn.mozilla.net" which are
    151.101.81.91:

    $ dig content-signature-2.cdn.mozilla.net

    ; <<>> DiG 9.18.25 <<>> content-signature-2.cdn.mozilla.net
    ;; global options: +cmd
    ;; Got answer:
    ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 10399
    ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1

    ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
    ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 512
    ;; QUESTION SECTION:
    ;content-signature-2.cdn.mozilla.net. IN A

    ;; ANSWER SECTION:
    content-signature-2.cdn.mozilla.net. 483 IN CNAME content-signature-chains.prod.autograph.services.mozaws.net.
    content-signature-chains.prod.autograph.services.mozaws.net. 186 IN A 34.160.144.191

    $ dig firefox.settings.services.mozilla.com

    ; <<>> DiG 9.18.25 <<>> firefox.settings.services.mozilla.com
    ;; global options: +cmd
    ;; Got answer:
    ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 46401
    ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1

    ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
    ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 512
    ;; QUESTION SECTION:
    ;firefox.settings.services.mozilla.com. IN A

    ;; ANSWER SECTION:
    firefox.settings.services.mozilla.com. 28 IN CNAME mozilla.map.fastly.net. mozilla.map.fastly.net. 31 IN A 151.101.81.91

    $ dig firefox-settings-attachments.cdn.mozilla.net

    ; <<>> DiG 9.18.25 <<>> firefox-settings-attachments.cdn.mozilla.net
    ;; global options: +cmd
    ;; Got answer:
    ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 7059
    ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1

    ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
    ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 512
    ;; QUESTION SECTION:
    ;firefox-settings-attachments.cdn.mozilla.net. IN A

    ;; ANSWER SECTION:
    firefox-settings-attachments.cdn.mozilla.net. 42 IN CNAME mozilla.map.fastly.net.
    mozilla.map.fastly.net. 54 IN A 151.101.81.91


    So Mozilla's using Google and Fastly as hosts for services Firefox
    is connecting to automatically. However in the past I've tried to
    block these mystery services from connecting, so thanks for the
    tip. Also a connection to a government website that I haven't even
    visited for weeks! I really which I could ditch FF and just use
    Dillo.
    --
    __ __
    #_ < |\| |< _#
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Richard Kettlewell@[email protected] to comp.os.linux.misc on Sat Nov 1 22:35:07 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.misc

    The Natural Philosopher <[email protected]d> writes:
    Completely blank firefox - no sites loaded

    netstat -an | grep tcp | grep 443

    tcp 0 0 192.168.0.7:51446 34.107.243.93:443
    ESTABLISHED
    tcp 0 0 192.168.0.7:55090 199.232.57.91:443
    ESTABLISHED
    tcp 0 0 192.168.0.7:51442 34.120.208.123:443
    ESTABLISHED
    tcp 0 0 192.168.0.7:48282 142.250.129.95:443
    TIME_WAIT

    https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/how-stop-firefox-making-automatic-connections
    --
    https://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From not@[email protected] (Computer Nerd Kev) to comp.os.linux.misc on Sun Nov 2 09:14:25 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.misc

    Richard Kettlewell <[email protected]d> wrote:
    The Natural Philosopher <[email protected]d> writes:
    Completely blank firefox - no sites loaded

    netstat -an | grep tcp | grep 443

    tcp 0 0 192.168.0.7:51446 34.107.243.93:443
    ESTABLISHED
    tcp 0 0 192.168.0.7:55090 199.232.57.91:443
    ESTABLISHED
    tcp 0 0 192.168.0.7:51442 34.120.208.123:443
    ESTABLISHED
    tcp 0 0 192.168.0.7:48282 142.250.129.95:443
    TIME_WAIT

    https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/how-stop-firefox-making-automatic-connections

    So this claims to explain the
    "firefox.settings.services.mozilla.com" connection I get:

    "Login breach information
    Firefox Monitor warns you if your online accounts were involved in
    a known data breach. For more information, see Firefox Password
    Manager - Alerts for breached websites.
    To get the latest login breach information and more, Firefox
    connects to firefox.settings.services.mozilla.com"

    And it links to this page which describes disabling it:

    "Turn off website breach alerts
    Disabling the feature also prevents Firefox from checking to see if
    you've reused these potentially vulnerable passwords on any of your
    other saved logins.
    1. In the Menu bar at the top of the screen, click Firefox and
    select Settings (select Preferences on older macOS versions).Click
    the menu button and select Settings.
    2. Select the Privacy & Security panel on the left and scroll down
    to the Logins and PasswordsPasswords section.
    3. Deselect the checkbox for Show alerts about passwords for
    breached websites."

    But the "Show alerts about passwords for breached web sites"
    checkbox was already unselected. Yet the connection was still
    made at start-up!
    --
    __ __
    #_ < |\| |< _#
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Andy Burns@[email protected] to comp.os.linux.misc on Sun Nov 2 09:24:40 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.misc

    The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    Completely blank firefox - no sites loaded

    netstat -an | grep tcp | grep 443
    in a command window with admin rights, try netstat -nob

    in most cases it shows the process name, so you can tell if it's
    something other than firefox, downside is that it's multiple row
    output, so grepping for :443 doesn't play nice.

    if you have too many connections to see the wood for the trees, and need filtering, switch to powershell with get-netTCPconnection


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Richard Kettlewell@[email protected] to comp.os.linux.misc on Sun Nov 2 10:01:43 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.misc

    [email protected]d (Computer Nerd Kev) writes:
    "Login breach information
    Firefox Monitor warns you if your online accounts were involved in
    a known data breach. For more information, see Firefox Password
    Manager - Alerts for breached websites.
    To get the latest login breach information and more, Firefox
    ^^^^^^^^
    connects to firefox.settings.services.mozilla.com"
    [...]
    But the "Show alerts about passwords for breached web sites" checkbox
    was already unselected. Yet the connection was still made at
    start-up!

    Presumably it’s the ‘and more’ in the description.
    --
    https://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Natural Philosopher@[email protected] to comp.os.linux.misc on Sun Nov 2 11:21:56 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.misc

    On 01/11/2025 22:04, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
    So Mozilla's using Google and Fastly as hosts for services Firefox
    is connecting to automatically. However in the past I've tried to
    block these mystery services from connecting, so thanks for the
    tip. Also a connection to a government website that I haven't even
    visited for weeks! I really which I could ditch FF and just use
    Dillo.

    Yes. I looked further and these sites are supposed to be for downloading
    lists of 'bad sites' etc.

    I noticed a grotty network performance when using a pirate website to
    watch Scotland make fools of the USA in the Rugby match and wondered why.

    The pirate site was crawling with blocked adware.

    Having closed that down there was still a lot of stuff hitting the net
    even with no bowser windows open
    --
    "Nature does not give up the winter because people dislike the cold."

    ― Confucius

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From not@[email protected] (Computer Nerd Kev) to comp.os.linux.misc on Mon Nov 3 07:15:12 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.misc

    Richard Kettlewell <[email protected]d> wrote:
    [email protected]d (Computer Nerd Kev) writes:
    "Login breach information
    Firefox Monitor warns you if your online accounts were involved in
    a known data breach. For more information, see Firefox Password
    Manager - Alerts for breached websites.
    To get the latest login breach information and more, Firefox
    ^^^^^^^^
    connects to firefox.settings.services.mozilla.com"
    [...]
    But the "Show alerts about passwords for breached web sites" checkbox
    was already unselected. Yet the connection was still made at
    start-up!

    Presumably it's the 'and more' in the description.

    In that case they're not being very helpful on a page specifically
    about "How to stop Firefox from making automatic connections".

    "How do I stop Firefox making this automatic connection?"
    "You can disable one of the features which uses the data retrieved
    over that connection like this..."

    If that's really what they're saying then they're as bad as
    politicians.

    Now those hostnames are blocked in my /etc/hosts, along with most
    on this list:
    https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/domains-allow-firefox

    Another solution is apparantly to edit the URLs in "omni.ja". Since
    they've stopped storing all these URLs in the about:config settings
    where they were more easily edited in the past: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Firefox/Privacy#Editing_the_contents_of_omni.ja

    By the way, if Mozilla agree they need a page describing the long
    and complicated process (that doesn't work) of stopping Firefox
    from phoning home in countless different ways, why don't they just
    have a single setting in the browser to universally disable all
    such automatic connections? Overall it doesn't seem like they're
    acting in good faith with this.
    --
    __ __
    #_ < |\| |< _#
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Richard Kettlewell@[email protected] to comp.os.linux.misc on Sun Nov 2 23:18:10 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.misc

    [email protected]d (Computer Nerd Kev) writes:
    In that case they're not being very helpful on a page specifically
    about "How to stop Firefox from making automatic connections".

    "How do I stop Firefox making this automatic connection?"
    "You can disable one of the features which uses the data retrieved
    over that connection like this..."

    If that's really what they're saying then they're as bad as
    politicians.

    Now those hostnames are blocked in my /etc/hosts, along with most
    on this list:
    https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/domains-allow-firefox

    Another solution is apparantly to edit the URLs in "omni.ja". Since
    they've stopped storing all these URLs in the about:config settings
    where they were more easily edited in the past: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Firefox/Privacy#Editing_the_contents_of_omni.ja

    By the way, if Mozilla agree they need a page describing the long
    and complicated process (that doesn't work) of stopping Firefox
    from phoning home in countless different ways, why don't they just
    have a single setting in the browser to universally disable all
    such automatic connections? Overall it doesn't seem like they're
    acting in good faith with this.

    Mistakes happen, no need to assume bad faith. You can submit a bug
    report...
    --
    https://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Computer Nerd Kev@[email protected] to comp.os.linux.misc on Mon Nov 3 17:24:13 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.misc

    Richard Kettlewell <[email protected]d> wrote:
    [email protected]d (Computer Nerd Kev) writes:
    By the way, if Mozilla agree they need a page describing the long
    and complicated process (that doesn't work) of stopping Firefox
    from phoning home in countless different ways, why don't they just
    have a single setting in the browser to universally disable all
    such automatic connections? Overall it doesn't seem like they're
    acting in good faith with this.

    Mistakes happen, no need to assume bad faith. You can submit a bug
    report...

    Every time I've looked at doing that for a Firefox issue I've run
    into it turns out someone has already submitted the same bug and
    the developers just don't want to fix the problem (marked "INVALID"
    or "WONTFIX" or open and ignored for decades). Any other software
    from developers like that I wouldn't touch, but with many websites
    not just requiring Javascript but now actively blocking Dillo as a
    "bot", there's just no good option. So the whole thing really gets
    me annoyed.

    In this case it was already reported five years ago and they marked
    it as WONTFIX after linking to the same article you did: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1617392

    Also a similar bug for the background Firefox process ("agent") on
    Windows, closed as INVALID:
    "I suspect the URL you're seeing hit is on the remote settings
    server (https://firefox.settings.services.mozilla.com) ...
    We don't have a way to disable that request except to disable the
    entire agent"
    https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1689212#c8

    Anyway I wouldn't want to try reporting that bug even if it hadn't
    been covered already. Every time I look at these things on
    Bugzilla it's abundantly clear that I'm just not a member of their
    target userbase. It gets me angry just looking at other people's
    bug reports, I couldn't stand interacting politely with that crowd
    myself.
    --
    __ __
    #_ < |\| |< _#
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2