• IBM To Cut Thousands Of Jobs As Red Hat Growth Slows

    From Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?=@[email protected] to comp.os.linux.misc on Wed Nov 5 21:40:07 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.misc

    There are still some who have difficulty appreciating that the Linux
    world is much bigger than Red Hat. Here <https://www.computerworld.com/article/4084865/ibm-to-cut-thousands-of-jobs-as-red-hat-growth-slows-2.html>
    is another reminder. Red Hat may well be the most profitable part of
    IBM left (which is why its troubles are having such an outsize impact
    on the company as a whole), but in the whole Open Source scheme of
    things, it is but one of many players.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John McCue@[email protected] to comp.os.linux.misc on Thu Nov 6 00:57:37 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.misc

    Lawrence D’Oliveiro <[email protected]d> wrote:
    There are still some who have difficulty appreciating that the Linux
    world is much bigger than Red Hat. Here <https://www.computerworld.com/article/4084865/ibm-to-cut-thousands-of-jobs-as-red-hat-growth-slows-2.html>
    is another reminder. Red Hat may well be the most profitable part of
    IBM left (which is why its troubles are having such an outsize impact
    on the company as a whole), but in the whole Open Source scheme of
    things, it is but one of many players.

    The mainframe department brings in a lot of cash too, and
    their margins are huge. But yes, RH is probably the only
    other area that is making $.

    But I am sure IBM will fix the RH profit problem eventually :)
    I heard have started integrating some RH people into IBM
    proper.
    --
    [t]csh(1) - "An elegant shell, for a more... civilized age."
    - Paraphrasing Star Wars
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From c186282@[email protected] to comp.os.linux.misc on Wed Nov 5 21:52:34 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.misc

    On 11/5/25 16:40, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
    There are still some who have difficulty appreciating that the Linux
    world is much bigger than Red Hat. Here <https://www.computerworld.com/article/4084865/ibm-to-cut-thousands-of-jobs-as-red-hat-growth-slows-2.html>
    is another reminder. Red Hat may well be the most profitable part of
    IBM left (which is why its troubles are having such an outsize impact
    on the company as a whole), but in the whole Open Source scheme of
    things, it is but one of many players.


    IBM has always kept many irons in the proverbial fire.

    Don't expect it to go bust anytime soon.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?=@[email protected] to comp.os.linux.misc on Thu Nov 6 03:25:08 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.misc

    On Thu, 6 Nov 2025 00:57:37 -0000 (UTC), John McCue wrote:

    The mainframe department brings in a lot of cash too, and their margins
    are huge.

    Doesn’t seem like it, though, does it? Remember the layoffs are the result of the Red Hat division growing by only 14% instead of the predicted 16%.

    If that can have such a great impact, then the mainframe division can’t be big enough to offset such a small hiccup of a couple of percentage points
    any more.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From c186282@[email protected] to comp.os.linux.misc on Wed Nov 5 22:31:31 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.misc

    On 11/5/25 16:40, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
    There are still some who have difficulty appreciating that the Linux
    world is much bigger than Red Hat. Here <https://www.computerworld.com/article/4084865/ibm-to-cut-thousands-of-jobs-as-red-hat-growth-slows-2.html>
    is another reminder. Red Hat may well be the most profitable part of
    IBM left (which is why its troubles are having such an outsize impact
    on the company as a whole), but in the whole Open Source scheme of
    things, it is but one of many players.

    Hmmmmmm ... is the REAL reason less to do with "slower
    RHEL growth" but more "AI growth" ???

    Left to themselves, the big corps would have one CEO
    with a big paycheck and NO humans anywhere else. Really
    looks to be heading that way now.

    Of course disemployed humans can't BUY your stuff - but
    that never seems to be figured into the equation .....

    Oh, GOTTA have the CEO ... Machiavellian politics.
    The primary stockholders MUST have someone to blame
    if anything goes wrong :-)

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From c186282@[email protected] to comp.os.linux.misc on Wed Nov 5 22:43:06 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.misc

    On 11/5/25 19:57, John McCue wrote:
    Lawrence D’Oliveiro <[email protected]d> wrote:
    There are still some who have difficulty appreciating that the Linux
    world is much bigger than Red Hat. Here
    <https://www.computerworld.com/article/4084865/ibm-to-cut-thousands-of-jobs-as-red-hat-growth-slows-2.html>
    is another reminder. Red Hat may well be the most profitable part of
    IBM left (which is why its troubles are having such an outsize impact
    on the company as a whole), but in the whole Open Source scheme of
    things, it is but one of many players.

    The mainframe department brings in a lot of cash too, and
    their margins are huge. But yes, RH is probably the only
    other area that is making $.

    But I am sure IBM will fix the RH profit problem eventually :)
    I heard have started integrating some RH people into IBM
    proper.


    IBM has proven to be versatile, a consistent player.
    It's into many area of sci/tech/computing either up
    front or as a background supporter.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2