From Newsgroup: comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware

http://ps-2.kev009.com/ohland/8590/Testing_90_Power_Supply.html

There was a recent launch excursion. It drove home the importance of
attaching your test leads to the correct conductors.

Being a visual guy, I modified some existing images [without AI, I might
add] and included the test values inside the test attachment illustrations.

I need to turbo-diddle a wee bit more and add (+) and (-) next to the
lead attachment points.

Comments will be either incorporated or blithely ignored.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware

Louis Ohland wrote: http://ps-2.kev009.com/ohland/8590/Testing_90_Power_Supply.html

There was a recent launch excursion. It drove home the importance of attaching your test leads to the correct conductors.

Being a visual guy, I modified some existing images [without AI, I might
add] and included the test values inside the test attachment illustrations.

I need to turbo-diddle a wee bit more and add (+) and (-) next to the
lead attachment points.

Comments will be either incorporated or blithely ignored.

Thanks Louis!


This response appears in the discussion at: http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=705420915#705420915
--
Via JLA Forums web gateway for comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware: http://www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=93
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware

Folks, if the Tool illuminates something so you can grasp the concept,
then that is good.

If something is confusing, then it needs to be clarified.

MummyChunk wrote:

Louis Ohland wrote:
http://ps-2.kev009.com/ohland/8590/Testing_90_Power_Supply.html

There was a recent launch excursion. It drove home the importance of
attaching your test leads to the correct conductors.

Being a visual guy, I modified some existing images [without AI, I might
add] and included the test values inside the test attachment
illustrations.

I need to turbo-diddle a wee bit more and add (+) and (-) next to the
lead attachment points.

Comments will be either incorporated or blithely ignored.

Thanks Louis!

This response appears in the discussion at: http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=705420915#705420915

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2