On 08/03/2026 19:34, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 8, 2026 at 12:59:17 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<[email protected]>:
On 08/03/2026 05:25, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 5, 2026 at 1:35:21 PM MST, "Apd" wrote
<10ocpeb$45rm$[email protected]>:
On 05/03/2026 20:00, David B. wrote:
On 05/03/2026 19:50, Apd wrote:
Oh, you mean capital. I have a few investments.
Me either!
You don't have investments?
The markets are a bit volatile right now!
Mine are longer term.
I have a good mix. With the market down I am down a bit but nothing
concerning.
Most folk reading here may find your statement surprising! 😉
I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are
poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in my
actual comments and they are deeply insecure. What they say should not
be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does not
even make sense. Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing.
Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin confusing
an Internet boot with a local one. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy, they
push it to get attention and to promote their in-group nonsense. They
are basically MAGA and think like them: it is about tribalism and
scapegoating to them, not honesty or evidence.
Well I, for one, have never seen evidence of you living on State
Benefits (as we call them).
For me, though, cash is king at present!
On Sun, 8 Mar 2026 19:48:22 +0000, David B. wrote:
On 08/03/2026 19:34, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 8, 2026 at 12:59:17 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<[email protected]>:
On 08/03/2026 05:25, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 5, 2026 at 1:35:21 PM MST, "Apd" wrote
<10ocpeb$45rm$[email protected]>:
On 05/03/2026 20:00, David B. wrote:
On 05/03/2026 19:50, Apd wrote:
Oh, you mean capital. I have a few investments.
Me either!
You don't have investments?
The markets are a bit volatile right now!
Mine are longer term.
I have a good mix. With the market down I am down a bit but nothing
concerning.
Most folk reading here may find your statement surprising! 😉
I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are
poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in my
actual comments and they are deeply insecure. What they say should not
be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does not
even make sense. Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing.
Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin confusing
an Internet boot with a local one. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy, they
push it to get attention and to promote their in-group nonsense. They
are basically MAGA and think like them: it is about tribalism and
scapegoating to them, not honesty or evidence.
Well I, for one, have never seen evidence of you living on State
Benefits (as we call them).
Then you are either stupid or providing shade for Glasser.
If you would like a tutorial in how snit lies his ass off read below. I suspect you already know this but if you are truly an honest person you
will read it and comment with something other than "Glasser has never lied
to me" when everyone else knows that too is a lie.
So let's begin.
Based upon the comments by Glasser listed above.
1 "I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are
poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in my
actual comments and they are deeply insecure."
Nobody attacks Glasser because he is or is not poor. What does get pointed out is that snit is a lazy grifter scamming the government regarding disability claims.
There are many posts in groups like *.anxiety and other blogs where snit admits he is housebound, has lost jobs because of his various illnesses.
Additionally you may or may not be aware that prior to Glasser's
appearance in ACW at one time he was posting 1000's upon 1000's of
messages, many quite lengthy to COLA and CSMA along with various Linux
groups where he managed to piss off many of the regular posters like Marek Novotny for example.
If you are truly honest, you might want to use your detective skills to research that name and how it applies to snit.
Anyhow, so how does a person holding a legitimate, tax paying job manage
to perform his job and at the same time post 1000's of messages at all
hours of the day and night to Usenet?
How is this possible?
The answer is, it is not possible.
Then of course you have his failed Computer Business, The Prescott
Computer Guy" along with his failed daycare business Wickaboo Daycare or something like that.
So now, how does Glasser post 1000's upon 1000's of messages to Usenet
while he has a legitimate, tax paying job AND is running a side business, failures or not? And BTW nobody cares if his home businesses were legit
and paying taxes as long as they, especially the daycare, was licensed
which it was not and why it was shut down.
Are you beginning to understand now?
2. " What they say should not
be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does not
even make sense."
The other shop offering a Michael Glasser discount surfaced long before Glasser ever started posting in ACW.
snit was well known as such a technical incompetent, which is why his Computer Guy business failed, that someone took the time to call the competitor who was well aware of Glasser because people mistakenly took
their computers to Glasser instead of the other shop because the names
were similar.
they had horrible experiences with Glasser's The Prescott Computer Guy and the other business started to receive complaints for computers they never tried to repair.
So their brand was being destroyed by snit.
That's when the Michael Glasser discount began and numerous people called that shop and confirmed it.
Glasser is the only one denying it happened.
This is another one of snit's antics you can dig up if you are honest.
You claim to be a detective and this is 101 level.
3. " Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing."
See how Glasser twists what actually happened? This is Glasser altering
his version of the story he tells.
Snit posted about his personal problems with a computer and Gremlin among others offered suggestions. It was obvious that Glasser had zero chance of repairing it.
People were doing him a favor.
Personally I would take it as an honor for someone with Gremlin's vast knowledge offering to assist me.
Snit twists that into "Glasser asking Gremlin to help with a computer.
See it?
Of course you do.
Now will you admit it or run away?
4. Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin confusing
an Internet boot with a local one."
More of snit attempting to alter the story of what actually happened. Pothead, AFAIK, never blamed you for Gremlin confusing boot methods.
That's Glasser making up shit again. Glasser didn't even know how to get
into recovery mode on a MAC which is a REQUIREMENT to Internet boot.
Gremlin had to show Glasser how and Gremlin isn't a Mac person but Glasser claims to be one.
<eyeroll>
See it David?
Or will you run from this one as well?
5. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy, they
push it to get attention and to promote their in-group nonsense.
For this one Glasser's lame defense is that if you look currently at
various court sites in the various places where Glasser lived, like Las Vegas, and numerous places in Arizona, very little is CURRENTLY publicly viewable.
Glasser tries to claim that this proves the legal issues are made up to
harm him.
Nothing is farther from the truth.
The PUBLIC viewable web pages only keep violations posted for a number of years which depends upon the particular court at which point they are
purged from the PUBLIC website.
They are however obtainable from the court for a small fee because they
are considered public record.
This is why if you run a background check on Michael Glasser these still
show up.
And many people have posted screenshots which actually did show the
incidents before they were removed from the public website.
Glasser claims they are faked which is a lie.
As for Michael Glasser's public harassment arrest that too was screenshot
by numerous people and removed from the public website because despite
being arrested, fingerprinted, mugshot and so forth, a settlement between
the court and Michael Glasser was reached so it was rightfully removed.
It's just more lies by Michael Glasser.
That should keep you busy for a while David.
For me, though, cash is king at present!
It is for Glasser as well.
He collects his government disability check and then works off the books,
not paying taxes, doing odd jobs.
His ex wife was part of it which is why they were never officially married but for divorce purposes considered a common law marriage.
On Sun, 8 Mar 2026 19:48:22 +0000, David B. wrote:
On 08/03/2026 19:34, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 8, 2026 at 12:59:17 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<[email protected]>:
On 08/03/2026 05:25, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 5, 2026 at 1:35:21 PM MST, "Apd" wrote
<10ocpeb$45rm$[email protected]>:
On 05/03/2026 20:00, David B. wrote:
On 05/03/2026 19:50, Apd wrote:
Oh, you mean capital. I have a few investments.
Me either!
You don't have investments?
The markets are a bit volatile right now!
Mine are longer term.
I have a good mix. With the market down I am down a bit but nothing
concerning.
Most folk reading here may find your statement surprising! 😉
I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are
poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in my
actual comments and they are deeply insecure. What they say should not
be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does not
even make sense. Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing.
Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin confusing
an Internet boot with a local one. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy, they
push it to get attention and to promote their in-group nonsense. They
are basically MAGA and think like them: it is about tribalism and
scapegoating to them, not honesty or evidence.
Well I, for one, have never seen evidence of you living on State
Benefits (as we call them).
Then you are either stupid or providing shade for Glasser.
If you would like a tutorial in how snit lies his ass off read below. I suspect you already know this but if you are truly an honest person you
will read it and comment with something other than "Glasser has never lied
to me" when everyone else knows that too is a lie.
So let's begin.
Based upon the comments by Glasser listed above.
1 "I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are
poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in my
actual comments and they are deeply insecure."
Nobody attacks Glasser because he is or is not poor. What does get pointed out is that snit is a lazy grifter scamming the government regarding disability claims.
There are many posts in groups like *.anxiety and other blogs where snit admits he is housebound, has lost jobs because of his various illnesses.
Additionally you may or may not be aware that prior to Glasser's
appearance in ACW at one time he was posting 1000's upon 1000's of
messages, many quite lengthy to COLA and CSMA along with various Linux
groups where he managed to piss off many of the regular posters like Marek Novotny for example.
If you are truly honest, you might want to use your detective skills to research that name and how it applies to snit.
Anyhow, so how does a person holding a legitimate, tax paying job manage
to perform his job and at the same time post 1000's of messages at all
hours of the day and night to Usenet?
How is this possible?
The answer is, it is not possible.
Then of course you have his failed Computer Business, The Prescott
Computer Guy" along with his failed daycare business Wickaboo Daycare or something like that.
So now, how does Glasser post 1000's upon 1000's of messages to Usenet
while he has a legitimate, tax paying job AND is running a side business, failures or not? And BTW nobody cares if his home businesses were legit
and paying taxes as long as they, especially the daycare, was licensed
which it was not and why it was shut down.
Are you beginning to understand now?
2. " What they say should not
be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does not
even make sense."
The other shop offering a Michael Glasser discount surfaced long before Glasser ever started posting in ACW.
snit was well known as such a technical incompetent, which is why his Computer Guy business failed, that someone took the time to call the competitor who was well aware of Glasser because people mistakenly took
their computers to Glasser instead of the other shop because the names
were similar.
they had horrible experiences with Glasser's The Prescott Computer Guy and the other business started to receive complaints for computers they never tried to repair.
So their brand was being destroyed by snit.
That's when the Michael Glasser discount began and numerous people called that shop and confirmed it.
Glasser is the only one denying it happened.
This is another one of snit's antics you can dig up if you are honest.
You claim to be a detective and this is 101 level.
3. " Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing."
See how Glasser twists what actually happened? This is Glasser altering
his version of the story he tells.
Snit posted about his personal problems with a computer and Gremlin among others offered suggestions. It was obvious that Glasser had zero chance of repairing it.
People were doing him a favor.
Personally I would take it as an honor for someone with Gremlin's vast knowledge offering to assist me.
Snit twists that into "Glasser asking Gremlin to help with a computer.
See it?
Of course you do.
Now will you admit it or run away?
4. Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin confusing
an Internet boot with a local one."
More of snit attempting to alter the story of what actually happened. Pothead, AFAIK, never blamed you for Gremlin confusing boot methods.
That's Glasser making up shit again. Glasser didn't even know how to get
into recovery mode on a MAC which is a REQUIREMENT to Internet boot.
Gremlin had to show Glasser how and Gremlin isn't a Mac person but Glasser claims to be one.
<eyeroll>
See it David?
Or will you run from this one as well?
5. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy, they
push it to get attention and to promote their in-group nonsense.
For this one Glasser's lame defense is that if you look currently at
various court sites in the various places where Glasser lived, like Las Vegas, and numerous places in Arizona, very little is CURRENTLY publicly viewable.
Glasser tries to claim that this proves the legal issues are made up to
harm him.
Nothing is farther from the truth.
The PUBLIC viewable web pages only keep violations posted for a number of years which depends upon the particular court at which point they are
purged from the PUBLIC website.
They are however obtainable from the court for a small fee because they
are considered public record.
This is why if you run a background check on Michael Glasser these still
show up.
And many people have posted screenshots which actually did show the
incidents before they were removed from the public website.
Glasser claims they are faked which is a lie.
As for Michael Glasser's public harassment arrest that too was screenshot
by numerous people and removed from the public website because despite
being arrested, fingerprinted, mugshot and so forth, a settlement between
the court and Michael Glasser was reached so it was rightfully removed.
It's just more lies by Michael Glasser.
That should keep you busy for a while David.
For me, though, cash is king at present!
It is for Glasser as well.
He collects his government disability check and then works off the books,
not paying taxes, doing odd jobs.
His ex wife was part of it which is why they were never officially married but for divorce purposes considered a common law marriage.
On 09/03/2026 21:51, Glock wrote:
On Sun, 8 Mar 2026 19:48:22 +0000, David B. wrote:
On 08/03/2026 19:34, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 8, 2026 at 12:59:17 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<[email protected]>:
On 08/03/2026 05:25, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 5, 2026 at 1:35:21 PM MST, "Apd" wrote
<10ocpeb$45rm$[email protected]>:
On 05/03/2026 20:00, David B. wrote:
On 05/03/2026 19:50, Apd wrote:
Oh, you mean capital. I have a few investments.
Me either!
You don't have investments?
The markets are a bit volatile right now!
Mine are longer term.
I have a good mix. With the market down I am down a bit but nothing >>>>>> concerning.
Most folk reading here may find your statement surprising! 😉
I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are
poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in my
actual comments and they are deeply insecure. What they say should not >>>> be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does not
even make sense. Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing.
Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin confusing
an Internet boot with a local one. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy, they >>>> push it to get attention and to promote their in-group nonsense. They
are basically MAGA and think like them: it is about tribalism and
scapegoating to them, not honesty or evidence.
Well I, for one, have never seen evidence of you living on State
Benefits (as we call them).
Then you are either stupid or providing shade for Glasser.
If you would like a tutorial in how snit lies his ass off read below. I
suspect you already know this but if you are truly an honest person you
will read it and comment with something other than "Glasser has never lied >> to me" when everyone else knows that too is a lie.
So let's begin.
Based upon the comments by Glasser listed above.
1 "I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are
poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in my
actual comments and they are deeply insecure."
Nobody attacks Glasser because he is or is not poor. What does get pointed >> out is that snit is a lazy grifter scamming the government regarding
disability claims.
There are many posts in groups like *.anxiety and other blogs where snit
admits he is housebound, has lost jobs because of his various illnesses.
Additionally you may or may not be aware that prior to Glasser's
appearance in ACW at one time he was posting 1000's upon 1000's of
messages, many quite lengthy to COLA and CSMA along with various Linux
groups where he managed to piss off many of the regular posters like Marek >> Novotny for example.
If you are truly honest, you might want to use your detective skills to
research that name and how it applies to snit.
Anyhow, so how does a person holding a legitimate, tax paying job manage
to perform his job and at the same time post 1000's of messages at all
hours of the day and night to Usenet?
How is this possible?
The answer is, it is not possible.
Then of course you have his failed Computer Business, The Prescott
Computer Guy" along with his failed daycare business Wickaboo Daycare or
something like that.
So now, how does Glasser post 1000's upon 1000's of messages to Usenet
while he has a legitimate, tax paying job AND is running a side business,
failures or not? And BTW nobody cares if his home businesses were legit
and paying taxes as long as they, especially the daycare, was licensed
which it was not and why it was shut down.
Are you beginning to understand now?
2. " What they say should not
be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does not
even make sense."
The other shop offering a Michael Glasser discount surfaced long before
Glasser ever started posting in ACW.
snit was well known as such a technical incompetent, which is why his
Computer Guy business failed, that someone took the time to call the
competitor who was well aware of Glasser because people mistakenly took
their computers to Glasser instead of the other shop because the names
were similar.
they had horrible experiences with Glasser's The Prescott Computer Guy and >> the other business started to receive complaints for computers they never
tried to repair.
So their brand was being destroyed by snit.
That's when the Michael Glasser discount began and numerous people called
that shop and confirmed it.
Glasser is the only one denying it happened.
This is another one of snit's antics you can dig up if you are honest.
You claim to be a detective and this is 101 level.
3. " Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing."
See how Glasser twists what actually happened? This is Glasser altering
his version of the story he tells.
Snit posted about his personal problems with a computer and Gremlin among
others offered suggestions. It was obvious that Glasser had zero chance of >> repairing it.
People were doing him a favor.
Personally I would take it as an honor for someone with Gremlin's vast
knowledge offering to assist me.
Snit twists that into "Glasser asking Gremlin to help with a computer.
See it?
Of course you do.
Now will you admit it or run away?
4. Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin confusing
an Internet boot with a local one."
More of snit attempting to alter the story of what actually happened.
Pothead, AFAIK, never blamed you for Gremlin confusing boot methods.
That's Glasser making up shit again. Glasser didn't even know how to get
into recovery mode on a MAC which is a REQUIREMENT to Internet boot.
Gremlin had to show Glasser how and Gremlin isn't a Mac person but Glasser >> claims to be one.
<eyeroll>
See it David?
Or will you run from this one as well?
5. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy, they
push it to get attention and to promote their in-group nonsense.
For this one Glasser's lame defense is that if you look currently at
various court sites in the various places where Glasser lived, like Las
Vegas, and numerous places in Arizona, very little is CURRENTLY publicly
viewable.
Glasser tries to claim that this proves the legal issues are made up to
harm him.
Nothing is farther from the truth.
The PUBLIC viewable web pages only keep violations posted for a number of
years which depends upon the particular court at which point they are
purged from the PUBLIC website.
They are however obtainable from the court for a small fee because they
are considered public record.
This is why if you run a background check on Michael Glasser these still
show up.
And many people have posted screenshots which actually did show the
incidents before they were removed from the public website.
Glasser claims they are faked which is a lie.
As for Michael Glasser's public harassment arrest that too was screenshot
by numerous people and removed from the public website because despite
being arrested, fingerprinted, mugshot and so forth, a settlement between
the court and Michael Glasser was reached so it was rightfully removed.
It's just more lies by Michael Glasser.
That should keep you busy for a while David.
For me, though, cash is king at present!
It is for Glasser as well.
He collects his government disability check and then works off the books,
not paying taxes, doing odd jobs.
His ex wife was part of it which is why they were never officially married >> but for divorce purposes considered a common law marriage.
Provide *EVIDENCE* of any claim and I will investigate.
Glock wrote:
On Sun, 8 Mar 2026 19:48:22 +0000, David B. wrote:your taxes would still be the same so shut up
On 08/03/2026 19:34, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 8, 2026 at 12:59:17 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<[email protected]>:
On 08/03/2026 05:25, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 5, 2026 at 1:35:21 PM MST, "Apd" wrote
<10ocpeb$45rm$[email protected]>:
On 05/03/2026 20:00, David B. wrote:
On 05/03/2026 19:50, Apd wrote:
Oh, you mean capital. I have a few investments.
Me either!
You don't have investments?
The markets are a bit volatile right now!
Mine are longer term.
I have a good mix. With the market down I am down a bit but nothing >>>>>> concerning.
Most folk reading here may find your statement surprising! 😉
I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are
poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in my
actual comments and they are deeply insecure. What they say should not >>>> be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does not
even make sense. Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing.
Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin confusing
an Internet boot with a local one. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy, they >>>> push it to get attention and to promote their in-group nonsense. They
are basically MAGA and think like them: it is about tribalism and
scapegoating to them, not honesty or evidence.
Well I, for one, have never seen evidence of you living on State
Benefits (as we call them).
Then you are either stupid or providing shade for Glasser.
If you would like a tutorial in how snit lies his ass off read below. I
suspect you already know this but if you are truly an honest person you
will read it and comment with something other than "Glasser has never lied >> to me" when everyone else knows that too is a lie.
So let's begin.
Based upon the comments by Glasser listed above.
1 "I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are
poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in my
actual comments and they are deeply insecure."
Nobody attacks Glasser because he is or is not poor. What does get pointed >> out is that snit is a lazy grifter scamming the government regarding
disability claims.
There are many posts in groups like *.anxiety and other blogs where snit
admits he is housebound, has lost jobs because of his various illnesses.
Additionally you may or may not be aware that prior to Glasser's
appearance in ACW at one time he was posting 1000's upon 1000's of
messages, many quite lengthy to COLA and CSMA along with various Linux
groups where he managed to piss off many of the regular posters like Marek >> Novotny for example.
If you are truly honest, you might want to use your detective skills to
research that name and how it applies to snit.
Anyhow, so how does a person holding a legitimate, tax paying job manage
to perform his job and at the same time post 1000's of messages at all
hours of the day and night to Usenet?
How is this possible?
The answer is, it is not possible.
Then of course you have his failed Computer Business, The Prescott
Computer Guy" along with his failed daycare business Wickaboo Daycare or
something like that.
So now, how does Glasser post 1000's upon 1000's of messages to Usenet
while he has a legitimate, tax paying job AND is running a side business,
failures or not? And BTW nobody cares if his home businesses were legit
and paying taxes as long as they, especially the daycare, was licensed
which it was not and why it was shut down.
Are you beginning to understand now?
2. " What they say should not
be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does not
even make sense."
The other shop offering a Michael Glasser discount surfaced long before
Glasser ever started posting in ACW.
snit was well known as such a technical incompetent, which is why his
Computer Guy business failed, that someone took the time to call the
competitor who was well aware of Glasser because people mistakenly took
their computers to Glasser instead of the other shop because the names
were similar.
they had horrible experiences with Glasser's The Prescott Computer Guy and >> the other business started to receive complaints for computers they never
tried to repair.
So their brand was being destroyed by snit.
That's when the Michael Glasser discount began and numerous people called
that shop and confirmed it.
Glasser is the only one denying it happened.
This is another one of snit's antics you can dig up if you are honest.
You claim to be a detective and this is 101 level.
3. " Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing."
See how Glasser twists what actually happened? This is Glasser altering
his version of the story he tells.
Snit posted about his personal problems with a computer and Gremlin among
others offered suggestions. It was obvious that Glasser had zero chance of >> repairing it.
People were doing him a favor.
Personally I would take it as an honor for someone with Gremlin's vast
knowledge offering to assist me.
Snit twists that into "Glasser asking Gremlin to help with a computer.
See it?
Of course you do.
Now will you admit it or run away?
4. Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin confusing
an Internet boot with a local one."
More of snit attempting to alter the story of what actually happened.
Pothead, AFAIK, never blamed you for Gremlin confusing boot methods.
That's Glasser making up shit again. Glasser didn't even know how to get
into recovery mode on a MAC which is a REQUIREMENT to Internet boot.
Gremlin had to show Glasser how and Gremlin isn't a Mac person but Glasser >> claims to be one.
<eyeroll>
See it David?
Or will you run from this one as well?
5. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy, they
push it to get attention and to promote their in-group nonsense.
For this one Glasser's lame defense is that if you look currently at
various court sites in the various places where Glasser lived, like Las
Vegas, and numerous places in Arizona, very little is CURRENTLY publicly
viewable.
Glasser tries to claim that this proves the legal issues are made up to
harm him.
Nothing is farther from the truth.
The PUBLIC viewable web pages only keep violations posted for a number of
years which depends upon the particular court at which point they are
purged from the PUBLIC website.
They are however obtainable from the court for a small fee because they
are considered public record.
This is why if you run a background check on Michael Glasser these still
show up.
And many people have posted screenshots which actually did show the
incidents before they were removed from the public website.
Glasser claims they are faked which is a lie.
As for Michael Glasser's public harassment arrest that too was screenshot
by numerous people and removed from the public website because despite
being arrested, fingerprinted, mugshot and so forth, a settlement between
the court and Michael Glasser was reached so it was rightfully removed.
It's just more lies by Michael Glasser.
That should keep you busy for a while David.
For me, though, cash is king at present!
It is for Glasser as well.
He collects his government disability check and then works off the books,
not paying taxes, doing odd jobs.
His ex wife was part of it which is why they were never officially married >> but for divorce purposes considered a common law marriage.
On Sun, 8 Mar 2026 19:48:22 +0000, David B. wrote:
On 08/03/2026 19:34, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 8, 2026 at 12:59:17 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<[email protected]>:
On 08/03/2026 05:25, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 5, 2026 at 1:35:21 PM MST, "Apd" wrote
<10ocpeb$45rm$[email protected]>:
On 05/03/2026 20:00, David B. wrote:
On 05/03/2026 19:50, Apd wrote:
Oh, you mean capital. I have a few investments.
Me either!
You don't have investments?
The markets are a bit volatile right now!
Mine are longer term.
nothing >>>> concerning.I have a good mix. With the market down I am down a bit but
my >> actual comments and they are deeply insecure. What they sayMost folk reading here may find your statement surprising! 😉
I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are
poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in
should not >> be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at
the never >> ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts...
it does not >> even make sense. Or his nonsense about me asking him
to help with a >> computer when I did no such thing.
confusing >> an Internet boot with a local one. Or idiotic and easily disproved >> claims about legal issues. They do not really believeOr Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin
this idiocy, they >> push it to get attention and to promote their
in-group nonsense. They >> are basically MAGA and think like them: it
is about tribalism and >> scapegoating to them, not honesty or
evidence.
Well I, for one, have never seen evidence of you living on State
Benefits (as we call them).
Then you are either stupid or providing shade for Glasser.
If you would like a tutorial in how snit lies his ass off read below.
I suspect you already know this but if you are truly an honest person
you will read it and comment with something other than "Glasser has
never lied to me" when everyone else knows that too is a lie.
So let's begin.
Based upon the comments by Glasser listed above.
1 "I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are
poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in my
actual comments and they are deeply insecure."
Nobody attacks Glasser because he is or is not poor. What does get
pointed out is that snit is a lazy grifter scamming the government
regarding disability claims.
There are many posts in groups like *.anxiety and other blogs where
snit admits he is housebound, has lost jobs because of his various
illnesses.
Additionally you may or may not be aware that prior to Glasser's
appearance in ACW at one time he was posting 1000's upon 1000's of
messages, many quite lengthy to COLA and CSMA along with various
Linux groups where he managed to piss off many of the regular posters
like Marek Novotny for example.
If you are truly honest, you might want to use your detective skills
to research that name and how it applies to snit.
Anyhow, so how does a person holding a legitimate, tax paying job
manage to perform his job and at the same time post 1000's of
messages at all hours of the day and night to Usenet?
How is this possible?
The answer is, it is not possible.
Then of course you have his failed Computer Business, The Prescott
Computer Guy" along with his failed daycare business Wickaboo Daycare
or something like that.
So now, how does Glasser post 1000's upon 1000's of messages to
Usenet while he has a legitimate, tax paying job AND is running a
side business, failures or not? And BTW nobody cares if his home
businesses were legit and paying taxes as long as they, especially
the daycare, was licensed which it was not and why it was shut down.
Are you beginning to understand now?
2. " What they say should not
be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does not
even make sense."
The other shop offering a Michael Glasser discount surfaced long
before Glasser ever started posting in ACW.
snit was well known as such a technical incompetent, which is why his Computer Guy business failed, that someone took the time to call the competitor who was well aware of Glasser because people mistakenly
took their computers to Glasser instead of the other shop because the
names were similar.
they had horrible experiences with Glasser's The Prescott Computer
Guy and the other business started to receive complaints for
computers they never tried to repair.
So their brand was being destroyed by snit.
That's when the Michael Glasser discount began and numerous people
called that shop and confirmed it.
Glasser is the only one denying it happened.
This is another one of snit's antics you can dig up if you are honest.
You claim to be a detective and this is 101 level.
3. " Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing."
See how Glasser twists what actually happened? This is Glasser
altering his version of the story he tells.
Snit posted about his personal problems with a computer and Gremlin
among others offered suggestions. It was obvious that Glasser had
zero chance of repairing it.
People were doing him a favor.
Personally I would take it as an honor for someone with Gremlin's
vast knowledge offering to assist me.
Snit twists that into "Glasser asking Gremlin to help with a
computer.
See it?
Of course you do.
Now will you admit it or run away?
4. Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin
confusing an Internet boot with a local one."
More of snit attempting to alter the story of what actually happened. Pothead, AFAIK, never blamed you for Gremlin confusing boot methods.
That's Glasser making up shit again. Glasser didn't even know how to
get into recovery mode on a MAC which is a REQUIREMENT to Internet
boot.
Gremlin had to show Glasser how and Gremlin isn't a Mac person but
Glasser claims to be one.
<eyeroll>
See it David?
Or will you run from this one as well?
5. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy,
they push it to get attention and to promote their in-group nonsense.
For this one Glasser's lame defense is that if you look currently at
various court sites in the various places where Glasser lived, like
Las Vegas, and numerous places in Arizona, very little is CURRENTLY
publicly viewable.
Glasser tries to claim that this proves the legal issues are made up
to harm him.
Nothing is farther from the truth.
The PUBLIC viewable web pages only keep violations posted for a
number of years which depends upon the particular court at which
point they are purged from the PUBLIC website.
They are however obtainable from the court for a small fee because
they are considered public record.
This is why if you run a background check on Michael Glasser these
still show up.
And many people have posted screenshots which actually did show the incidents before they were removed from the public website.
Glasser claims they are faked which is a lie.
As for Michael Glasser's public harassment arrest that too was
screenshot by numerous people and removed from the public website
because despite being arrested, fingerprinted, mugshot and so forth,
a settlement between the court and Michael Glasser was reached so it
was rightfully removed.
It's just more lies by Michael Glasser.
That should keep you busy for a while David.
For me, though, cash is king at present!
It is for Glasser as well.
He collects his government disability check and then works off the
books, not paying taxes, doing odd jobs.
His ex wife was part of it which is why they were never officially
married but for divorce purposes considered a common law marriage.
On Mar 9, 2026 at 2:58:54 PM MST, "%" wrote <[email protected]>:
Glock wrote:
On Sun, 8 Mar 2026 19:48:22 +0000, David B. wrote:your taxes would still be the same so shut up
On 08/03/2026 19:34, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 8, 2026 at 12:59:17 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<[email protected]>:
On 08/03/2026 05:25, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 5, 2026 at 1:35:21 PM MST, "Apd" wrote
<10ocpeb$45rm$[email protected]>:
On 05/03/2026 20:00, David B. wrote:
On 05/03/2026 19:50, Apd wrote:
Oh, you mean capital. I have a few investments.
Me either!
You don't have investments?
The markets are a bit volatile right now!
Mine are longer term.
I have a good mix. With the market down I am down a bit but nothing >>>>>>> concerning.
Most folk reading here may find your statement surprising! 😉
I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are
poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in my >>>>> actual comments and they are deeply insecure. What they say should not >>>>> be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does not >>>>> even make sense. Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing.
Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin confusing >>>>> an Internet boot with a local one. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy, they >>>>> push it to get attention and to promote their in-group nonsense. They >>>>> are basically MAGA and think like them: it is about tribalism and
scapegoating to them, not honesty or evidence.
Well I, for one, have never seen evidence of you living on State
Benefits (as we call them).
Then you are either stupid or providing shade for Glasser.
If you would like a tutorial in how snit lies his ass off read below. I
suspect you already know this but if you are truly an honest person you
will read it and comment with something other than "Glasser has never lied >>> to me" when everyone else knows that too is a lie.
So let's begin.
Based upon the comments by Glasser listed above.
1 "I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are
poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in my
actual comments and they are deeply insecure."
Nobody attacks Glasser because he is or is not poor. What does get pointed >>> out is that snit is a lazy grifter scamming the government regarding
disability claims.
There are many posts in groups like *.anxiety and other blogs where snit >>> admits he is housebound, has lost jobs because of his various illnesses. >>>
Additionally you may or may not be aware that prior to Glasser's
appearance in ACW at one time he was posting 1000's upon 1000's of
messages, many quite lengthy to COLA and CSMA along with various Linux
groups where he managed to piss off many of the regular posters like Marek >>> Novotny for example.
If you are truly honest, you might want to use your detective skills to
research that name and how it applies to snit.
Anyhow, so how does a person holding a legitimate, tax paying job manage >>> to perform his job and at the same time post 1000's of messages at all
hours of the day and night to Usenet?
How is this possible?
The answer is, it is not possible.
Then of course you have his failed Computer Business, The Prescott
Computer Guy" along with his failed daycare business Wickaboo Daycare or >>> something like that.
So now, how does Glasser post 1000's upon 1000's of messages to Usenet
while he has a legitimate, tax paying job AND is running a side business, >>> failures or not? And BTW nobody cares if his home businesses were legit
and paying taxes as long as they, especially the daycare, was licensed
which it was not and why it was shut down.
Are you beginning to understand now?
2. " What they say should not
be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does not
even make sense."
The other shop offering a Michael Glasser discount surfaced long before
Glasser ever started posting in ACW.
snit was well known as such a technical incompetent, which is why his
Computer Guy business failed, that someone took the time to call the
competitor who was well aware of Glasser because people mistakenly took
their computers to Glasser instead of the other shop because the names
were similar.
they had horrible experiences with Glasser's The Prescott Computer Guy and >>> the other business started to receive complaints for computers they never >>> tried to repair.
So their brand was being destroyed by snit.
That's when the Michael Glasser discount began and numerous people called >>> that shop and confirmed it.
Glasser is the only one denying it happened.
This is another one of snit's antics you can dig up if you are honest.
You claim to be a detective and this is 101 level.
3. " Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing."
See how Glasser twists what actually happened? This is Glasser altering
his version of the story he tells.
Snit posted about his personal problems with a computer and Gremlin among >>> others offered suggestions. It was obvious that Glasser had zero chance of >>> repairing it.
People were doing him a favor.
Personally I would take it as an honor for someone with Gremlin's vast
knowledge offering to assist me.
Snit twists that into "Glasser asking Gremlin to help with a computer.
See it?
Of course you do.
Now will you admit it or run away?
4. Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin confusing >>> an Internet boot with a local one."
More of snit attempting to alter the story of what actually happened.
Pothead, AFAIK, never blamed you for Gremlin confusing boot methods.
That's Glasser making up shit again. Glasser didn't even know how to get >>> into recovery mode on a MAC which is a REQUIREMENT to Internet boot.
Gremlin had to show Glasser how and Gremlin isn't a Mac person but Glasser >>> claims to be one.
<eyeroll>
See it David?
Or will you run from this one as well?
5. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy, they
push it to get attention and to promote their in-group nonsense.
For this one Glasser's lame defense is that if you look currently at
various court sites in the various places where Glasser lived, like Las
Vegas, and numerous places in Arizona, very little is CURRENTLY publicly >>> viewable.
Glasser tries to claim that this proves the legal issues are made up to
harm him.
Nothing is farther from the truth.
The PUBLIC viewable web pages only keep violations posted for a number of >>> years which depends upon the particular court at which point they are
purged from the PUBLIC website.
They are however obtainable from the court for a small fee because they
are considered public record.
This is why if you run a background check on Michael Glasser these still >>> show up.
And many people have posted screenshots which actually did show the
incidents before they were removed from the public website.
Glasser claims they are faked which is a lie.
As for Michael Glasser's public harassment arrest that too was screenshot >>> by numerous people and removed from the public website because despite
being arrested, fingerprinted, mugshot and so forth, a settlement between >>> the court and Michael Glasser was reached so it was rightfully removed.
It's just more lies by Michael Glasser.
That should keep you busy for a while David.
For me, though, cash is king at present!
It is for Glasser as well.
He collects his government disability check and then works off the books, >>> not paying taxes, doing odd jobs.
His ex wife was part of it which is why they were never officially married >>> but for divorce purposes considered a common law marriage.
Carroll is having another tantrum.
Glock wrote:
On Sun, 8 Mar 2026 19:48:22 +0000, David B. wrote:
On 08/03/2026 19:34, Brock McNuggets wrote:nothing >>>> concerning.
On Mar 8, 2026 at 12:59:17 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<[email protected]>:
On 08/03/2026 05:25, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 5, 2026 at 1:35:21 PM MST, "Apd" wrote
<10ocpeb$45rm$[email protected]>:
On 05/03/2026 20:00, David B. wrote:
On 05/03/2026 19:50, Apd wrote:
Oh, you mean capital. I have a few investments.
Me either!
You don't have investments?
The markets are a bit volatile right now!
Mine are longer term.
I have a good mix. With the market down I am down a bit but
my >> actual comments and they are deeply insecure. What they say
Most folk reading here may find your statement surprising! 😉
I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are
poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in
should not >> be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at
the never >> ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts...
it does not >> even make sense. Or his nonsense about me asking him
to help with a >> computer when I did no such thing.
confusing >> an Internet boot with a local one. Or idiotic and easilyOr Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin
disproved >> claims about legal issues. They do not really believe
this idiocy, they >> push it to get attention and to promote their
in-group nonsense. They >> are basically MAGA and think like them: it
is about tribalism and >> scapegoating to them, not honesty or
evidence.
Well I, for one, have never seen evidence of you living on State
Benefits (as we call them).
Then you are either stupid or providing shade for Glasser.
If you would like a tutorial in how snit lies his ass off read below.
I suspect you already know this but if you are truly an honest person
you will read it and comment with something other than "Glasser has
never lied to me" when everyone else knows that too is a lie.
So let's begin.
Based upon the comments by Glasser listed above.
1 "I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are
poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in my
actual comments and they are deeply insecure."
Nobody attacks Glasser because he is or is not poor. What does get
pointed out is that snit is a lazy grifter scamming the government
regarding disability claims.
There are many posts in groups like *.anxiety and other blogs where
snit admits he is housebound, has lost jobs because of his various
illnesses.
Additionally you may or may not be aware that prior to Glasser's
appearance in ACW at one time he was posting 1000's upon 1000's of
messages, many quite lengthy to COLA and CSMA along with various
Linux groups where he managed to piss off many of the regular posters
like Marek Novotny for example.
If you are truly honest, you might want to use your detective skills
to research that name and how it applies to snit.
Anyhow, so how does a person holding a legitimate, tax paying job
manage to perform his job and at the same time post 1000's of
messages at all hours of the day and night to Usenet?
How is this possible?
The answer is, it is not possible.
Then of course you have his failed Computer Business, The Prescott
Computer Guy" along with his failed daycare business Wickaboo Daycare
or something like that.
So now, how does Glasser post 1000's upon 1000's of messages to
Usenet while he has a legitimate, tax paying job AND is running a
side business, failures or not? And BTW nobody cares if his home
businesses were legit and paying taxes as long as they, especially
the daycare, was licensed which it was not and why it was shut down.
Are you beginning to understand now?
2. " What they say should not
be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does not
even make sense."
The other shop offering a Michael Glasser discount surfaced long
before Glasser ever started posting in ACW.
snit was well known as such a technical incompetent, which is why his
Computer Guy business failed, that someone took the time to call the
competitor who was well aware of Glasser because people mistakenly
took their computers to Glasser instead of the other shop because the
names were similar.
they had horrible experiences with Glasser's The Prescott Computer
Guy and the other business started to receive complaints for
computers they never tried to repair.
So their brand was being destroyed by snit.
That's when the Michael Glasser discount began and numerous people
called that shop and confirmed it.
Glasser is the only one denying it happened.
This is another one of snit's antics you can dig up if you are honest.
You claim to be a detective and this is 101 level.
3. " Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing."
See how Glasser twists what actually happened? This is Glasser
altering his version of the story he tells.
Snit posted about his personal problems with a computer and Gremlin
among others offered suggestions. It was obvious that Glasser had
zero chance of repairing it.
People were doing him a favor.
Personally I would take it as an honor for someone with Gremlin's
vast knowledge offering to assist me.
Snit twists that into "Glasser asking Gremlin to help with a
computer.
See it?
Of course you do.
Now will you admit it or run away?
4. Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin
confusing an Internet boot with a local one."
More of snit attempting to alter the story of what actually happened.
Pothead, AFAIK, never blamed you for Gremlin confusing boot methods.
That's Glasser making up shit again. Glasser didn't even know how to
get into recovery mode on a MAC which is a REQUIREMENT to Internet
boot.
Gremlin had to show Glasser how and Gremlin isn't a Mac person but
Glasser claims to be one.
<eyeroll>
See it David?
Or will you run from this one as well?
5. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy,
they push it to get attention and to promote their in-group nonsense.
For this one Glasser's lame defense is that if you look currently at
various court sites in the various places where Glasser lived, like
Las Vegas, and numerous places in Arizona, very little is CURRENTLY
publicly viewable.
Glasser tries to claim that this proves the legal issues are made up
to harm him.
Nothing is farther from the truth.
The PUBLIC viewable web pages only keep violations posted for a
number of years which depends upon the particular court at which
point they are purged from the PUBLIC website.
They are however obtainable from the court for a small fee because
they are considered public record.
This is why if you run a background check on Michael Glasser these
still show up.
And many people have posted screenshots which actually did show the
incidents before they were removed from the public website.
Glasser claims they are faked which is a lie.
As for Michael Glasser's public harassment arrest that too was
screenshot by numerous people and removed from the public website
because despite being arrested, fingerprinted, mugshot and so forth,
a settlement between the court and Michael Glasser was reached so it
was rightfully removed.
It's just more lies by Michael Glasser.
That should keep you busy for a while David.
For me, though, cash is king at present!
It is for Glasser as well.
He collects his government disability check and then works off the
books, not paying taxes, doing odd jobs.
His ex wife was part of it which is why they were never officially
married but for divorce purposes considered a common law marriage.
Is this the same snit who was trolling usenet 10 years ago? If so, I
cannot believe he is still alive and kicking. He used to flood various
Linux groups with his crossposting and as a result was a major pain in
the posterior and there were so many people who wanted to confront him
F2F in real life and teach him a lesson about libeling decent people
with his bullshit.
The general consensus was that it wasn't worth the time and effort as
snit was so sickly that one day he would probably collapse and croak. I
can't believe that COVID didn't kill him.
Marek was a well respected poster to various Linux groups and a
generous and kind person as well.
He gifted snit a laptop as snit's wife's laptop died. So what did snit
do? He attacked Marek and subsequently sold the laptop on ebay.
This alone demonstrates what a miserable person snit is.
I can't comment on his wife however back then it was obvious that snit
was not employed because he was posting so many articles to Usenet that
there is no way he could have been employed.
I don't recall any crimes posted regarding snit.
That doesn't mean someone didn't post them, but I don't recall seeing
the posts.
Anyone who doesn't believe what has been written about snit can easily
look in the archives for al.linux,alt.os.linux,alt.suse.linux.comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac .advocacy and form their own opinions regarding snit.
He seems to be absent from the popular Linux groups so maybe he has
learned his lesson?
Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 9, 2026 at 2:58:54 PM MST, "%" wroteover worked penis tugging
<[email protected]>:
Glock wrote:
On Sun, 8 Mar 2026 19:48:22 +0000, David B. wrote:your taxes would still be the same so shut up
On 08/03/2026 19:34, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 8, 2026 at 12:59:17 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<[email protected]>:
On 08/03/2026 05:25, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 5, 2026 at 1:35:21 PM MST, "Apd" wrote
<10ocpeb$45rm$[email protected]>:
On 05/03/2026 20:00, David B. wrote:
On 05/03/2026 19:50, Apd wrote:
Oh, you mean capital. I have a few investments.
Me either!
You don't have investments?
The markets are a bit volatile right now!
Mine are longer term.
I have a good mix. With the market down I am down a bit but nothing >>>>>>>> concerning.
Most folk reading here may find your statement surprising! 😉
I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are >>>>>> poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in my >>>>>> actual comments and they are deeply insecure. What they say should not >>>>>> be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does not >>>>>> even make sense. Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a >>>>>> computer when I did no such thing.
Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin confusing >>>>>> an Internet boot with a local one. Or idiotic and easily disproved >>>>>> claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy, they >>>>>> push it to get attention and to promote their in-group nonsense. They >>>>>> are basically MAGA and think like them: it is about tribalism and
scapegoating to them, not honesty or evidence.
Well I, for one, have never seen evidence of you living on State
Benefits (as we call them).
Then you are either stupid or providing shade for Glasser.
If you would like a tutorial in how snit lies his ass off read below. I >>>> suspect you already know this but if you are truly an honest person you >>>> will read it and comment with something other than "Glasser has never lied >>>> to me" when everyone else knows that too is a lie.
So let's begin.
Based upon the comments by Glasser listed above.
1 "I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are
poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in my
actual comments and they are deeply insecure."
Nobody attacks Glasser because he is or is not poor. What does get pointed >>>> out is that snit is a lazy grifter scamming the government regarding
disability claims.
There are many posts in groups like *.anxiety and other blogs where snit >>>> admits he is housebound, has lost jobs because of his various illnesses. >>>>
Additionally you may or may not be aware that prior to Glasser's
appearance in ACW at one time he was posting 1000's upon 1000's of
messages, many quite lengthy to COLA and CSMA along with various Linux >>>> groups where he managed to piss off many of the regular posters like Marek >>>> Novotny for example.
If you are truly honest, you might want to use your detective skills to >>>> research that name and how it applies to snit.
Anyhow, so how does a person holding a legitimate, tax paying job manage >>>> to perform his job and at the same time post 1000's of messages at all >>>> hours of the day and night to Usenet?
How is this possible?
The answer is, it is not possible.
Then of course you have his failed Computer Business, The Prescott
Computer Guy" along with his failed daycare business Wickaboo Daycare or >>>> something like that.
So now, how does Glasser post 1000's upon 1000's of messages to Usenet >>>> while he has a legitimate, tax paying job AND is running a side business, >>>> failures or not? And BTW nobody cares if his home businesses were legit >>>> and paying taxes as long as they, especially the daycare, was licensed >>>> which it was not and why it was shut down.
Are you beginning to understand now?
2. " What they say should not
be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does not
even make sense."
The other shop offering a Michael Glasser discount surfaced long before >>>> Glasser ever started posting in ACW.
snit was well known as such a technical incompetent, which is why his
Computer Guy business failed, that someone took the time to call the
competitor who was well aware of Glasser because people mistakenly took >>>> their computers to Glasser instead of the other shop because the names >>>> were similar.
they had horrible experiences with Glasser's The Prescott Computer Guy and >>>> the other business started to receive complaints for computers they never >>>> tried to repair.
So their brand was being destroyed by snit.
That's when the Michael Glasser discount began and numerous people called >>>> that shop and confirmed it.
Glasser is the only one denying it happened.
This is another one of snit's antics you can dig up if you are honest. >>>> You claim to be a detective and this is 101 level.
3. " Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing."
See how Glasser twists what actually happened? This is Glasser altering >>>> his version of the story he tells.
Snit posted about his personal problems with a computer and Gremlin among >>>> others offered suggestions. It was obvious that Glasser had zero chance of >>>> repairing it.
People were doing him a favor.
Personally I would take it as an honor for someone with Gremlin's vast >>>> knowledge offering to assist me.
Snit twists that into "Glasser asking Gremlin to help with a computer. >>>>
See it?
Of course you do.
Now will you admit it or run away?
4. Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin confusing >>>> an Internet boot with a local one."
More of snit attempting to alter the story of what actually happened.
Pothead, AFAIK, never blamed you for Gremlin confusing boot methods.
That's Glasser making up shit again. Glasser didn't even know how to get >>>> into recovery mode on a MAC which is a REQUIREMENT to Internet boot.
Gremlin had to show Glasser how and Gremlin isn't a Mac person but Glasser >>>> claims to be one.
<eyeroll>
See it David?
Or will you run from this one as well?
5. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy, they >>>> push it to get attention and to promote their in-group nonsense.
For this one Glasser's lame defense is that if you look currently at
various court sites in the various places where Glasser lived, like Las >>>> Vegas, and numerous places in Arizona, very little is CURRENTLY publicly >>>> viewable.
Glasser tries to claim that this proves the legal issues are made up to >>>> harm him.
Nothing is farther from the truth.
The PUBLIC viewable web pages only keep violations posted for a number of >>>> years which depends upon the particular court at which point they are
purged from the PUBLIC website.
They are however obtainable from the court for a small fee because they >>>> are considered public record.
This is why if you run a background check on Michael Glasser these still >>>> show up.
And many people have posted screenshots which actually did show the
incidents before they were removed from the public website.
Glasser claims they are faked which is a lie.
As for Michael Glasser's public harassment arrest that too was screenshot >>>> by numerous people and removed from the public website because despite >>>> being arrested, fingerprinted, mugshot and so forth, a settlement between >>>> the court and Michael Glasser was reached so it was rightfully removed. >>>>
It's just more lies by Michael Glasser.
That should keep you busy for a while David.
For me, though, cash is king at present!
It is for Glasser as well.
He collects his government disability check and then works off the books, >>>> not paying taxes, doing odd jobs.
His ex wife was part of it which is why they were never officially married >>>> but for divorce purposes considered a common law marriage.
Carroll is having another tantrum.
Linuxiac wrote:
Glock wrote:sock
On Sun, 8 Mar 2026 19:48:22 +0000, David B. wrote:
On 08/03/2026 19:34, Brock McNuggets wrote:nothing >>>> concerning.
On Mar 8, 2026 at 12:59:17 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<[email protected]>:
On 08/03/2026 05:25, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 5, 2026 at 1:35:21 PM MST, "Apd" wrote
<10ocpeb$45rm$[email protected]>:
On 05/03/2026 20:00, David B. wrote:
On 05/03/2026 19:50, Apd wrote:
Oh, you mean capital. I have a few investments.
Me either!
You don't have investments?
The markets are a bit volatile right now!
Mine are longer term.
I have a good mix. With the market down I am down a bit but
my >> actual comments and they are deeply insecure. What they say
Most folk reading here may find your statement surprising! 😉
I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are
poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in
should not >> be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at
the never >> ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts...
it does not >> even make sense. Or his nonsense about me asking him
to help with a >> computer when I did no such thing.
confusing >> an Internet boot with a local one. Or idiotic and easilyOr Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin
disproved >> claims about legal issues. They do not really believe
this idiocy, they >> push it to get attention and to promote their
in-group nonsense. They >> are basically MAGA and think like them: it
is about tribalism and >> scapegoating to them, not honesty or
evidence.
Well I, for one, have never seen evidence of you living on State
Benefits (as we call them).
Then you are either stupid or providing shade for Glasser.
If you would like a tutorial in how snit lies his ass off read below.
I suspect you already know this but if you are truly an honest person
you will read it and comment with something other than "Glasser has
never lied to me" when everyone else knows that too is a lie.
So let's begin.
Based upon the comments by Glasser listed above.
1 "I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are
poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in my
actual comments and they are deeply insecure."
Nobody attacks Glasser because he is or is not poor. What does get
pointed out is that snit is a lazy grifter scamming the government
regarding disability claims.
There are many posts in groups like *.anxiety and other blogs where
snit admits he is housebound, has lost jobs because of his various
illnesses.
Additionally you may or may not be aware that prior to Glasser's
appearance in ACW at one time he was posting 1000's upon 1000's of
messages, many quite lengthy to COLA and CSMA along with various
Linux groups where he managed to piss off many of the regular posters
like Marek Novotny for example.
If you are truly honest, you might want to use your detective skills
to research that name and how it applies to snit.
Anyhow, so how does a person holding a legitimate, tax paying job
manage to perform his job and at the same time post 1000's of
messages at all hours of the day and night to Usenet?
How is this possible?
The answer is, it is not possible.
Then of course you have his failed Computer Business, The Prescott
Computer Guy" along with his failed daycare business Wickaboo Daycare
or something like that.
So now, how does Glasser post 1000's upon 1000's of messages to
Usenet while he has a legitimate, tax paying job AND is running a
side business, failures or not? And BTW nobody cares if his home
businesses were legit and paying taxes as long as they, especially
the daycare, was licensed which it was not and why it was shut down.
Are you beginning to understand now?
2. " What they say should not
be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does not
even make sense."
The other shop offering a Michael Glasser discount surfaced long
before Glasser ever started posting in ACW.
snit was well known as such a technical incompetent, which is why his
Computer Guy business failed, that someone took the time to call the
competitor who was well aware of Glasser because people mistakenly
took their computers to Glasser instead of the other shop because the
names were similar.
they had horrible experiences with Glasser's The Prescott Computer
Guy and the other business started to receive complaints for
computers they never tried to repair.
So their brand was being destroyed by snit.
That's when the Michael Glasser discount began and numerous people
called that shop and confirmed it.
Glasser is the only one denying it happened.
This is another one of snit's antics you can dig up if you are honest.
You claim to be a detective and this is 101 level.
3. " Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing."
See how Glasser twists what actually happened? This is Glasser
altering his version of the story he tells.
Snit posted about his personal problems with a computer and Gremlin
among others offered suggestions. It was obvious that Glasser had
zero chance of repairing it.
People were doing him a favor.
Personally I would take it as an honor for someone with Gremlin's
vast knowledge offering to assist me.
Snit twists that into "Glasser asking Gremlin to help with a
computer.
See it?
Of course you do.
Now will you admit it or run away?
4. Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin
confusing an Internet boot with a local one."
More of snit attempting to alter the story of what actually happened.
Pothead, AFAIK, never blamed you for Gremlin confusing boot methods.
That's Glasser making up shit again. Glasser didn't even know how to
get into recovery mode on a MAC which is a REQUIREMENT to Internet
boot.
Gremlin had to show Glasser how and Gremlin isn't a Mac person but
Glasser claims to be one.
<eyeroll>
See it David?
Or will you run from this one as well?
5. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy,
they push it to get attention and to promote their in-group nonsense.
For this one Glasser's lame defense is that if you look currently at
various court sites in the various places where Glasser lived, like
Las Vegas, and numerous places in Arizona, very little is CURRENTLY
publicly viewable.
Glasser tries to claim that this proves the legal issues are made up
to harm him.
Nothing is farther from the truth.
The PUBLIC viewable web pages only keep violations posted for a
number of years which depends upon the particular court at which
point they are purged from the PUBLIC website.
They are however obtainable from the court for a small fee because
they are considered public record.
This is why if you run a background check on Michael Glasser these
still show up.
And many people have posted screenshots which actually did show the
incidents before they were removed from the public website.
Glasser claims they are faked which is a lie.
As for Michael Glasser's public harassment arrest that too was
screenshot by numerous people and removed from the public website
because despite being arrested, fingerprinted, mugshot and so forth,
a settlement between the court and Michael Glasser was reached so it
was rightfully removed.
It's just more lies by Michael Glasser.
That should keep you busy for a while David.
For me, though, cash is king at present!
It is for Glasser as well.
He collects his government disability check and then works off the
books, not paying taxes, doing odd jobs.
His ex wife was part of it which is why they were never officially
married but for divorce purposes considered a common law marriage.
Is this the same snit who was trolling usenet 10 years ago? If so, I
cannot believe he is still alive and kicking. He used to flood various
Linux groups with his crossposting and as a result was a major pain in
the posterior and there were so many people who wanted to confront him
F2F in real life and teach him a lesson about libeling decent people
with his bullshit.
The general consensus was that it wasn't worth the time and effort as
snit was so sickly that one day he would probably collapse and croak. I
can't believe that COVID didn't kill him.
Marek was a well respected poster to various Linux groups and a
generous and kind person as well.
He gifted snit a laptop as snit's wife's laptop died. So what did snit
do? He attacked Marek and subsequently sold the laptop on ebay.
This alone demonstrates what a miserable person snit is.
I can't comment on his wife however back then it was obvious that snit
was not employed because he was posting so many articles to Usenet that
there is no way he could have been employed.
I don't recall any crimes posted regarding snit.
That doesn't mean someone didn't post them, but I don't recall seeing
the posts.
Anyone who doesn't believe what has been written about snit can easily
look in the archives for
al.linux,alt.os.linux,alt.suse.linux.comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac
.advocacy and form their own opinions regarding snit.
He seems to be absent from the popular Linux groups so maybe he has
learned his lesson?
Glock wrote:
On Sun, 8 Mar 2026 19:48:22 +0000, David B. wrote:
On 08/03/2026 19:34, Brock McNuggets wrote:nothing >>>> concerning.
On Mar 8, 2026 at 12:59:17 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<[email protected]>:
On 08/03/2026 05:25, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 5, 2026 at 1:35:21 PM MST, "Apd" wrote
<10ocpeb$45rm$[email protected]>:
On 05/03/2026 20:00, David B. wrote:
On 05/03/2026 19:50, Apd wrote:
Oh, you mean capital. I have a few investments.
Me either!
You don't have investments?
The markets are a bit volatile right now!
Mine are longer term.
I have a good mix. With the market down I am down a bit but
my >> actual comments and they are deeply insecure. What they say
Most folk reading here may find your statement surprising! 😉
I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are
poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in
should not >> be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at
the never >> ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts...
it does not >> even make sense. Or his nonsense about me asking him
to help with a >> computer when I did no such thing.
confusing >> an Internet boot with a local one. Or idiotic and easilyOr Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin
disproved >> claims about legal issues. They do not really believe
this idiocy, they >> push it to get attention and to promote their
in-group nonsense. They >> are basically MAGA and think like them: it
is about tribalism and >> scapegoating to them, not honesty or
evidence.
Well I, for one, have never seen evidence of you living on State
Benefits (as we call them).
Then you are either stupid or providing shade for Glasser.
If you would like a tutorial in how snit lies his ass off read below.
I suspect you already know this but if you are truly an honest person
you will read it and comment with something other than "Glasser has
never lied to me" when everyone else knows that too is a lie.
So let's begin.
Based upon the comments by Glasser listed above.
1 "I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are
poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in my
actual comments and they are deeply insecure."
Nobody attacks Glasser because he is or is not poor. What does get
pointed out is that snit is a lazy grifter scamming the government
regarding disability claims.
There are many posts in groups like *.anxiety and other blogs where
snit admits he is housebound, has lost jobs because of his various
illnesses.
Additionally you may or may not be aware that prior to Glasser's
appearance in ACW at one time he was posting 1000's upon 1000's of
messages, many quite lengthy to COLA and CSMA along with various
Linux groups where he managed to piss off many of the regular posters
like Marek Novotny for example.
If you are truly honest, you might want to use your detective skills
to research that name and how it applies to snit.
Anyhow, so how does a person holding a legitimate, tax paying job
manage to perform his job and at the same time post 1000's of
messages at all hours of the day and night to Usenet?
How is this possible?
The answer is, it is not possible.
Then of course you have his failed Computer Business, The Prescott
Computer Guy" along with his failed daycare business Wickaboo Daycare
or something like that.
So now, how does Glasser post 1000's upon 1000's of messages to
Usenet while he has a legitimate, tax paying job AND is running a
side business, failures or not? And BTW nobody cares if his home
businesses were legit and paying taxes as long as they, especially
the daycare, was licensed which it was not and why it was shut down.
Are you beginning to understand now?
2. " What they say should not
be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does not
even make sense."
The other shop offering a Michael Glasser discount surfaced long
before Glasser ever started posting in ACW.
snit was well known as such a technical incompetent, which is why his
Computer Guy business failed, that someone took the time to call the
competitor who was well aware of Glasser because people mistakenly
took their computers to Glasser instead of the other shop because the
names were similar.
they had horrible experiences with Glasser's The Prescott Computer
Guy and the other business started to receive complaints for
computers they never tried to repair.
So their brand was being destroyed by snit.
That's when the Michael Glasser discount began and numerous people
called that shop and confirmed it.
Glasser is the only one denying it happened.
This is another one of snit's antics you can dig up if you are honest.
You claim to be a detective and this is 101 level.
3. " Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing."
See how Glasser twists what actually happened? This is Glasser
altering his version of the story he tells.
Snit posted about his personal problems with a computer and Gremlin
among others offered suggestions. It was obvious that Glasser had
zero chance of repairing it.
People were doing him a favor.
Personally I would take it as an honor for someone with Gremlin's
vast knowledge offering to assist me.
Snit twists that into "Glasser asking Gremlin to help with a
computer.
See it?
Of course you do.
Now will you admit it or run away?
4. Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin
confusing an Internet boot with a local one."
More of snit attempting to alter the story of what actually happened.
Pothead, AFAIK, never blamed you for Gremlin confusing boot methods.
That's Glasser making up shit again. Glasser didn't even know how to
get into recovery mode on a MAC which is a REQUIREMENT to Internet
boot.
Gremlin had to show Glasser how and Gremlin isn't a Mac person but
Glasser claims to be one.
<eyeroll>
See it David?
Or will you run from this one as well?
5. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy,
they push it to get attention and to promote their in-group nonsense.
For this one Glasser's lame defense is that if you look currently at
various court sites in the various places where Glasser lived, like
Las Vegas, and numerous places in Arizona, very little is CURRENTLY
publicly viewable.
Glasser tries to claim that this proves the legal issues are made up
to harm him.
Nothing is farther from the truth.
The PUBLIC viewable web pages only keep violations posted for a
number of years which depends upon the particular court at which
point they are purged from the PUBLIC website.
They are however obtainable from the court for a small fee because
they are considered public record.
This is why if you run a background check on Michael Glasser these
still show up.
And many people have posted screenshots which actually did show the
incidents before they were removed from the public website.
Glasser claims they are faked which is a lie.
As for Michael Glasser's public harassment arrest that too was
screenshot by numerous people and removed from the public website
because despite being arrested, fingerprinted, mugshot and so forth,
a settlement between the court and Michael Glasser was reached so it
was rightfully removed.
It's just more lies by Michael Glasser.
That should keep you busy for a while David.
For me, though, cash is king at present!
It is for Glasser as well.
He collects his government disability check and then works off the
books, not paying taxes, doing odd jobs.
His ex wife was part of it which is why they were never officially
married but for divorce purposes considered a common law marriage.
Is this the same snit who was trolling usenet 10 years ago? If so, I
cannot believe he is still alive and kicking. He used to flood various
Linux groups with his crossposting and as a result was a major pain in
the posterior and there were so many people who wanted to confront him
F2F in real life and teach him a lesson about libeling decent people
with his bullshit.
The general consensus was that it wasn't worth the time and effort as
snit was so sickly that one day he would probably collapse and croak. I
can't believe that COVID didn't kill him.
Marek was a well respected poster to various Linux groups and a
generous and kind person as well.
He gifted snit a laptop as snit's wife's laptop died. So what did snit
do? He attacked Marek and subsequently sold the laptop on ebay.
This alone demonstrates what a miserable person snit is.
I can't comment on his wife however back then it was obvious that snit
was not employed because he was posting so many articles to Usenet that
there is no way he could have been employed.
I don't recall any crimes posted regarding snit.
That doesn't mean someone didn't post them, but I don't recall seeing
the posts.
Anyone who doesn't believe what has been written about snit can easily
look in the archives for al.linux,alt.os.linux,alt.suse.linux.comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac .advocacy and form their own opinions regarding snit.
He seems to be absent from the popular Linux groups so maybe he has
learned his lesson?
On Mar 9, 2026 at 5:07:22 PM MST, "%" wrote <[email protected]>:
Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 9, 2026 at 2:58:54 PM MST, "%" wroteover worked penis tugging
<[email protected]>:
Glock wrote:
On Sun, 8 Mar 2026 19:48:22 +0000, David B. wrote:your taxes would still be the same so shut up
On 08/03/2026 19:34, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 8, 2026 at 12:59:17 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<[email protected]>:
On 08/03/2026 05:25, Brock McNuggets wrote:I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are >>>>>>> poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in my >>>>>>> actual comments and they are deeply insecure. What they say should not >>>>>>> be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never >>>>>>> ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does not >>>>>>> even make sense. Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a >>>>>>> computer when I did no such thing.
On Mar 5, 2026 at 1:35:21 PM MST, "Apd" wrote
<10ocpeb$45rm$[email protected]>:
On 05/03/2026 20:00, David B. wrote:
On 05/03/2026 19:50, Apd wrote:
Oh, you mean capital. I have a few investments.
Me either!
You don't have investments?
The markets are a bit volatile right now!
Mine are longer term.
I have a good mix. With the market down I am down a bit but nothing >>>>>>>>> concerning.
Most folk reading here may find your statement surprising! 😉 >>>>>>>
Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin confusing >>>>>>> an Internet boot with a local one. Or idiotic and easily disproved >>>>>>> claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy, they >>>>>>> push it to get attention and to promote their in-group nonsense. They >>>>>>> are basically MAGA and think like them: it is about tribalism and >>>>>>> scapegoating to them, not honesty or evidence.
Well I, for one, have never seen evidence of you living on State
Benefits (as we call them).
Then you are either stupid or providing shade for Glasser.
If you would like a tutorial in how snit lies his ass off read below. I >>>>> suspect you already know this but if you are truly an honest person you >>>>> will read it and comment with something other than "Glasser has never lied
to me" when everyone else knows that too is a lie.
So let's begin.
Based upon the comments by Glasser listed above.
1 "I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are >>>>> poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in my >>>>> actual comments and they are deeply insecure."
Nobody attacks Glasser because he is or is not poor. What does get pointed
out is that snit is a lazy grifter scamming the government regarding >>>>> disability claims.
There are many posts in groups like *.anxiety and other blogs where snit >>>>> admits he is housebound, has lost jobs because of his various illnesses. >>>>>
Additionally you may or may not be aware that prior to Glasser's
appearance in ACW at one time he was posting 1000's upon 1000's of
messages, many quite lengthy to COLA and CSMA along with various Linux >>>>> groups where he managed to piss off many of the regular posters like Marek
Novotny for example.
If you are truly honest, you might want to use your detective skills to >>>>> research that name and how it applies to snit.
Anyhow, so how does a person holding a legitimate, tax paying job manage >>>>> to perform his job and at the same time post 1000's of messages at all >>>>> hours of the day and night to Usenet?
How is this possible?
The answer is, it is not possible.
Then of course you have his failed Computer Business, The Prescott
Computer Guy" along with his failed daycare business Wickaboo Daycare or >>>>> something like that.
So now, how does Glasser post 1000's upon 1000's of messages to Usenet >>>>> while he has a legitimate, tax paying job AND is running a side business, >>>>> failures or not? And BTW nobody cares if his home businesses were legit >>>>> and paying taxes as long as they, especially the daycare, was licensed >>>>> which it was not and why it was shut down.
Are you beginning to understand now?
2. " What they say should not
be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does not >>>>> even make sense."
The other shop offering a Michael Glasser discount surfaced long before >>>>> Glasser ever started posting in ACW.
snit was well known as such a technical incompetent, which is why his >>>>> Computer Guy business failed, that someone took the time to call the >>>>> competitor who was well aware of Glasser because people mistakenly took >>>>> their computers to Glasser instead of the other shop because the names >>>>> were similar.
they had horrible experiences with Glasser's The Prescott Computer Guy and
the other business started to receive complaints for computers they never >>>>> tried to repair.
So their brand was being destroyed by snit.
That's when the Michael Glasser discount began and numerous people called >>>>> that shop and confirmed it.
Glasser is the only one denying it happened.
This is another one of snit's antics you can dig up if you are honest. >>>>> You claim to be a detective and this is 101 level.
3. " Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing."
See how Glasser twists what actually happened? This is Glasser altering >>>>> his version of the story he tells.
Snit posted about his personal problems with a computer and Gremlin among >>>>> others offered suggestions. It was obvious that Glasser had zero chance of
repairing it.
People were doing him a favor.
Personally I would take it as an honor for someone with Gremlin's vast >>>>> knowledge offering to assist me.
Snit twists that into "Glasser asking Gremlin to help with a computer. >>>>>
See it?
Of course you do.
Now will you admit it or run away?
4. Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin confusing >>>>> an Internet boot with a local one."
More of snit attempting to alter the story of what actually happened. >>>>> Pothead, AFAIK, never blamed you for Gremlin confusing boot methods. >>>>> That's Glasser making up shit again. Glasser didn't even know how to get >>>>> into recovery mode on a MAC which is a REQUIREMENT to Internet boot. >>>>>
Gremlin had to show Glasser how and Gremlin isn't a Mac person but Glasser
claims to be one.
<eyeroll>
See it David?
Or will you run from this one as well?
5. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy, they >>>>> push it to get attention and to promote their in-group nonsense.
For this one Glasser's lame defense is that if you look currently at >>>>> various court sites in the various places where Glasser lived, like Las >>>>> Vegas, and numerous places in Arizona, very little is CURRENTLY publicly >>>>> viewable.
Glasser tries to claim that this proves the legal issues are made up to >>>>> harm him.
Nothing is farther from the truth.
The PUBLIC viewable web pages only keep violations posted for a number of >>>>> years which depends upon the particular court at which point they are >>>>> purged from the PUBLIC website.
They are however obtainable from the court for a small fee because they >>>>> are considered public record.
This is why if you run a background check on Michael Glasser these still >>>>> show up.
And many people have posted screenshots which actually did show the
incidents before they were removed from the public website.
Glasser claims they are faked which is a lie.
As for Michael Glasser's public harassment arrest that too was screenshot >>>>> by numerous people and removed from the public website because despite >>>>> being arrested, fingerprinted, mugshot and so forth, a settlement between >>>>> the court and Michael Glasser was reached so it was rightfully removed. >>>>>
It's just more lies by Michael Glasser.
That should keep you busy for a while David.
For me, though, cash is king at present!
It is for Glasser as well.
He collects his government disability check and then works off the books, >>>>> not paying taxes, doing odd jobs.
His ex wife was part of it which is why they were never officially married
but for divorce purposes considered a common law marriage.
Carroll is having another tantrum.
He never mentions any partner. Hmmmm....
On Mar 9, 2026 at 5:09:04 PM MST, "%" wrote <[email protected]>:
Linuxiac wrote:
Glock wrote:sock
On Sun, 8 Mar 2026 19:48:22 +0000, David B. wrote:
On 08/03/2026 19:34, Brock McNuggets wrote:nothing >>>> concerning.
On Mar 8, 2026 at 12:59:17 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<[email protected]>:
On 08/03/2026 05:25, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 5, 2026 at 1:35:21 PM MST, "Apd" wrote
<10ocpeb$45rm$[email protected]>:
On 05/03/2026 20:00, David B. wrote:
On 05/03/2026 19:50, Apd wrote:
Oh, you mean capital. I have a few investments.
Me either!
You don't have investments?
The markets are a bit volatile right now!
Mine are longer term.
I have a good mix. With the market down I am down a bit but
my >> actual comments and they are deeply insecure. What they say
Most folk reading here may find your statement surprising! 😉
I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are >>>>>> poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in
should not >> be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at
the never >> ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts...
it does not >> even make sense. Or his nonsense about me asking him
to help with a >> computer when I did no such thing.
confusing >> an Internet boot with a local one. Or idiotic and easilyOr Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin
disproved >> claims about legal issues. They do not really believe
this idiocy, they >> push it to get attention and to promote their
in-group nonsense. They >> are basically MAGA and think like them: it
is about tribalism and >> scapegoating to them, not honesty or
evidence.
Well I, for one, have never seen evidence of you living on State
Benefits (as we call them).
Then you are either stupid or providing shade for Glasser.
If you would like a tutorial in how snit lies his ass off read below.
I suspect you already know this but if you are truly an honest person
you will read it and comment with something other than "Glasser has
never lied to me" when everyone else knows that too is a lie.
So let's begin.
Based upon the comments by Glasser listed above.
1 "I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are
poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in my
actual comments and they are deeply insecure."
Nobody attacks Glasser because he is or is not poor. What does get
pointed out is that snit is a lazy grifter scamming the government
regarding disability claims.
There are many posts in groups like *.anxiety and other blogs where
snit admits he is housebound, has lost jobs because of his various
illnesses.
Additionally you may or may not be aware that prior to Glasser's
appearance in ACW at one time he was posting 1000's upon 1000's of
messages, many quite lengthy to COLA and CSMA along with various
Linux groups where he managed to piss off many of the regular posters
like Marek Novotny for example.
If you are truly honest, you might want to use your detective skills
to research that name and how it applies to snit.
Anyhow, so how does a person holding a legitimate, tax paying job
manage to perform his job and at the same time post 1000's of
messages at all hours of the day and night to Usenet?
How is this possible?
The answer is, it is not possible.
Then of course you have his failed Computer Business, The Prescott
Computer Guy" along with his failed daycare business Wickaboo Daycare
or something like that.
So now, how does Glasser post 1000's upon 1000's of messages to
Usenet while he has a legitimate, tax paying job AND is running a
side business, failures or not? And BTW nobody cares if his home
businesses were legit and paying taxes as long as they, especially
the daycare, was licensed which it was not and why it was shut down.
Are you beginning to understand now?
2. " What they say should not
be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does not
even make sense."
The other shop offering a Michael Glasser discount surfaced long
before Glasser ever started posting in ACW.
snit was well known as such a technical incompetent, which is why his
Computer Guy business failed, that someone took the time to call the
competitor who was well aware of Glasser because people mistakenly
took their computers to Glasser instead of the other shop because the
names were similar.
they had horrible experiences with Glasser's The Prescott Computer
Guy and the other business started to receive complaints for
computers they never tried to repair.
So their brand was being destroyed by snit.
That's when the Michael Glasser discount began and numerous people
called that shop and confirmed it.
Glasser is the only one denying it happened.
This is another one of snit's antics you can dig up if you are honest. >>>> You claim to be a detective and this is 101 level.
3. " Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing."
See how Glasser twists what actually happened? This is Glasser
altering his version of the story he tells.
Snit posted about his personal problems with a computer and Gremlin
among others offered suggestions. It was obvious that Glasser had
zero chance of repairing it.
People were doing him a favor.
Personally I would take it as an honor for someone with Gremlin's
vast knowledge offering to assist me.
Snit twists that into "Glasser asking Gremlin to help with a
computer.
See it?
Of course you do.
Now will you admit it or run away?
4. Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin
confusing an Internet boot with a local one."
More of snit attempting to alter the story of what actually happened.
Pothead, AFAIK, never blamed you for Gremlin confusing boot methods.
That's Glasser making up shit again. Glasser didn't even know how to
get into recovery mode on a MAC which is a REQUIREMENT to Internet
boot.
Gremlin had to show Glasser how and Gremlin isn't a Mac person but
Glasser claims to be one.
<eyeroll>
See it David?
Or will you run from this one as well?
5. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy,
they push it to get attention and to promote their in-group nonsense.
For this one Glasser's lame defense is that if you look currently at
various court sites in the various places where Glasser lived, like
Las Vegas, and numerous places in Arizona, very little is CURRENTLY
publicly viewable.
Glasser tries to claim that this proves the legal issues are made up
to harm him.
Nothing is farther from the truth.
The PUBLIC viewable web pages only keep violations posted for a
number of years which depends upon the particular court at which
point they are purged from the PUBLIC website.
They are however obtainable from the court for a small fee because
they are considered public record.
This is why if you run a background check on Michael Glasser these
still show up.
And many people have posted screenshots which actually did show the
incidents before they were removed from the public website.
Glasser claims they are faked which is a lie.
As for Michael Glasser's public harassment arrest that too was
screenshot by numerous people and removed from the public website
because despite being arrested, fingerprinted, mugshot and so forth,
a settlement between the court and Michael Glasser was reached so it
was rightfully removed.
It's just more lies by Michael Glasser.
That should keep you busy for a while David.
For me, though, cash is king at present!
It is for Glasser as well.
He collects his government disability check and then works off the
books, not paying taxes, doing odd jobs.
His ex wife was part of it which is why they were never officially
married but for divorce purposes considered a common law marriage.
Is this the same snit who was trolling usenet 10 years ago? If so, I
cannot believe he is still alive and kicking. He used to flood various
Linux groups with his crossposting and as a result was a major pain in
the posterior and there were so many people who wanted to confront him
F2F in real life and teach him a lesson about libeling decent people
with his bullshit.
The general consensus was that it wasn't worth the time and effort as
snit was so sickly that one day he would probably collapse and croak. I
can't believe that COVID didn't kill him.
Marek was a well respected poster to various Linux groups and a
generous and kind person as well.
He gifted snit a laptop as snit's wife's laptop died. So what did snit
do? He attacked Marek and subsequently sold the laptop on ebay.
This alone demonstrates what a miserable person snit is.
I can't comment on his wife however back then it was obvious that snit
was not employed because he was posting so many articles to Usenet that
there is no way he could have been employed.
I don't recall any crimes posted regarding snit.
That doesn't mean someone didn't post them, but I don't recall seeing
the posts.
Anyone who doesn't believe what has been written about snit can easily
look in the archives for
al.linux,alt.os.linux,alt.suse.linux.comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac >>> .advocacy and form their own opinions regarding snit.
He seems to be absent from the popular Linux groups so maybe he has
learned his lesson?
Sock boy strikes again!
Weird how Carroll and his crew claim I sold it on eBay but nobody ever found the listing.
Just sick lies because they cannot quote me doing as they do.
On Sun, 8 Mar 2026 19:48:22 +0000, David B. wrote:
On 08/03/2026 19:34, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 8, 2026 at 12:59:17 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<[email protected]>:
On 08/03/2026 05:25, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 5, 2026 at 1:35:21 PM MST, "Apd" wrote
<10ocpeb$45rm$[email protected]>:
On 05/03/2026 20:00, David B. wrote:
On 05/03/2026 19:50, Apd wrote:
Oh, you mean capital. I have a few investments.
Me either!
You don't have investments?
The markets are a bit volatile right now!
Mine are longer term.
I have a good mix. With the market down I am down a bit but nothing
concerning.
Most folk reading here may find your statement surprising! 😉
I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are
poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in my
actual comments and they are deeply insecure. What they say should not
be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does not
even make sense. Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing.
Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin confusing
an Internet boot with a local one. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy, they
push it to get attention and to promote their in-group nonsense. They
are basically MAGA and think like them: it is about tribalism and
scapegoating to them, not honesty or evidence.
Well I, for one, have never seen evidence of you living on State
Benefits (as we call them).
Then you are either stupid or providing shade for Glasser.
If you would like a tutorial in how snit lies his ass off read below. I suspect you already know this but if you are truly an honest person you
will read it and comment with something other than "Glasser has never lied to me" when everyone else knows that too is a lie.
So let's begin.
Based upon the comments by Glasser listed above.
1 "I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are
poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in my
actual comments and they are deeply insecure."
Nobody attacks Glasser because he is or is not poor. What does get pointed out is that snit is a lazy grifter scamming the government regarding disability claims.
There are many posts in groups like *.anxiety and other blogs where snit admits he is housebound, has lost jobs because of his various illnesses.
Additionally you may or may not be aware that prior to Glasser's
appearance in ACW at one time he was posting 1000's upon 1000's of
messages, many quite lengthy to COLA and CSMA along with various Linux groups where he managed to piss off many of the regular posters like Marek Novotny for example.
If you are truly honest, you might want to use your detective skills to research that name and how it applies to snit.
Anyhow, so how does a person holding a legitimate, tax paying job manage
to perform his job and at the same time post 1000's of messages at all
hours of the day and night to Usenet?
How is this possible?
The answer is, it is not possible.
Then of course you have his failed Computer Business, The Prescott
Computer Guy" along with his failed daycare business Wickaboo Daycare or something like that.
So now, how does Glasser post 1000's upon 1000's of messages to Usenet
while he has a legitimate, tax paying job AND is running a side business, failures or not? And BTW nobody cares if his home businesses were legit
and paying taxes as long as they, especially the daycare, was licensed
which it was not and why it was shut down.
Are you beginning to understand now?
2. " What they say should not
be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does not
even make sense."
The other shop offering a Michael Glasser discount surfaced long before Glasser ever started posting in ACW.
snit was well known as such a technical incompetent, which is why his Computer Guy business failed, that someone took the time to call the competitor who was well aware of Glasser because people mistakenly took their computers to Glasser instead of the other shop because the names
were similar.
They had horrible experiences with Glasser's The Prescott Computer Guy and the other business started to receive complaints for computers they never tried to repair.
So their brand was being destroyed by snit.
That's when the Michael Glasser discount began and numerous people called that shop and confirmed it.
Glasser is the only one denying it happened.
This is another one of snit's antics you can dig up if you are honest.
You claim to be a detective and this is 101 level.
3. " Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing."
See how Glasser twists what actually happened? This is Glasser altering
his version of the story he tells.
Snit posted about his personal problems with a computer and Gremlin among others offered suggestions. It was obvious that Glasser had zero chance of repairing it.
People were doing him a favor.
Personally I would take it as an honor for someone with Gremlin's vast knowledge offering to assist me.
Snit twists that into "Glasser asking Gremlin to help with a computer.
See it?
Of course you do.
Now will you admit it or run away?
4. Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin confusing
an Internet boot with a local one."
More of snit attempting to alter the story of what actually happened. Pothead, AFAIK, never blamed you for Gremlin confusing boot methods.
That's Glasser making up shit again. Glasser didn't even know how to get into recovery mode on a MAC which is a REQUIREMENT to Internet boot.
Gremlin had to show Glasser how and Gremlin isn't a Mac person but Glasser claims to be one.
<eyeroll>
See it David?
Or will you run from this one as well?
5. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy, they
push it to get attention and to promote their in-group nonsense.
For this one Glasser's lame defense is that if you look currently at
various court sites in the various places where Glasser lived, like Las Vegas, and numerous places in Arizona, very little is CURRENTLY publicly viewable.
Glasser tries to claim that this proves the legal issues are made up to
harm him.
Nothing is farther from the truth.
The PUBLIC viewable web pages only keep violations posted for a number of years which depends upon the particular court at which point they are
purged from the PUBLIC website.
They are however obtainable from the court for a small fee because they
are considered public record.
This is why if you run a background check on Michael Glasser these still show up.
And many people have posted screenshots which actually did show the incidents before they were removed from the public website.
Glasser claims they are faked which is a lie.
As for Michael Glasser's public harassment arrest that too was screenshot
by numerous people and removed from the public website because despite
being arrested, fingerprinted, mugshot and so forth, a settlement between the court and Michael Glasser was reached so it was rightfully removed.
It's just more lies by Michael Glasser.
That should keep you busy for a while David.
Glock wrote:
On Sun, 8 Mar 2026 19:48:22 +0000, David B. wrote:
On 08/03/2026 19:34, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 8, 2026 at 12:59:17 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<[email protected]>:
On 08/03/2026 05:25, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 5, 2026 at 1:35:21 PM MST, "Apd" wrote
<10ocpeb$45rm$[email protected]>:
On 05/03/2026 20:00, David B. wrote:
On 05/03/2026 19:50, Apd wrote:
Oh, you mean capital. I have a few investments.
Me either!
You don't have investments?
The markets are a bit volatile right now!
Mine are longer term.
nothing >>>> concerning.I have a good mix. With the market down I am down a bit but
are >> poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrongMost folk reading here may find your statement surprising! 😉
I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you
doing in my >> actual comments and they are deeply insecure. What
they say should not >> be taken to reflect what they actually
believe. Look at the never >> ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot
claim of discounts... it does not >> even make sense. Or his
nonsense about me asking him to help with a >> computer when I did
no such thing. >> Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible
for Gremlin confusing >> an Internet boot with a local one. Or
idiotic and easily disproved >> claims about legal issues. They do
not really believe this idiocy, they >> push it to get attention
and to promote their in-group nonsense. They >> are basically MAGA
and think like them: it is about tribalism and >> scapegoating to
them, not honesty or evidence.
Well I, for one, have never seen evidence of you living on State
Benefits (as we call them).
Then you are either stupid or providing shade for Glasser.
If you would like a tutorial in how snit lies his ass off read
below. I suspect you already know this but if you are truly an
honest person you will read it and comment with something other
than "Glasser has never lied to me" when everyone else knows that
too is a lie. So let's begin.
Based upon the comments by Glasser listed above.
1 "I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you
are poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing
in my actual comments and they are deeply insecure."
Nobody attacks Glasser because he is or is not poor. What does get
pointed out is that snit is a lazy grifter scamming the government regarding disability claims.
There are many posts in groups like *.anxiety and other blogs where
snit admits he is housebound, has lost jobs because of his various illnesses.
Additionally you may or may not be aware that prior to Glasser's appearance in ACW at one time he was posting 1000's upon 1000's of messages, many quite lengthy to COLA and CSMA along with various
Linux groups where he managed to piss off many of the regular
posters like Marek Novotny for example.
If you are truly honest, you might want to use your detective skills
to research that name and how it applies to snit.
Anyhow, so how does a person holding a legitimate, tax paying job
manage to perform his job and at the same time post 1000's of
messages at all hours of the day and night to Usenet?
How is this possible?
The answer is, it is not possible.
Then of course you have his failed Computer Business, The Prescott Computer Guy" along with his failed daycare business Wickaboo
Daycare or something like that.
So now, how does Glasser post 1000's upon 1000's of messages to
Usenet while he has a legitimate, tax paying job AND is running a
side business, failures or not? And BTW nobody cares if his home
businesses were legit and paying taxes as long as they, especially
the daycare, was licensed which it was not and why it was shut down.
Are you beginning to understand now?
2. " What they say should not
be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does not
even make sense."
The other shop offering a Michael Glasser discount surfaced long
before Glasser ever started posting in ACW.
snit was well known as such a technical incompetent, which is why
his Computer Guy business failed, that someone took the time to
call the competitor who was well aware of Glasser because people
mistakenly took their computers to Glasser instead of the other
shop because the names were similar.
they had horrible experiences with Glasser's The Prescott Computer
Guy and the other business started to receive complaints for
computers they never tried to repair.
So their brand was being destroyed by snit.
That's when the Michael Glasser discount began and numerous people
called that shop and confirmed it.
Glasser is the only one denying it happened.
This is another one of snit's antics you can dig up if you are
honest. You claim to be a detective and this is 101 level.
3. " Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing."
See how Glasser twists what actually happened? This is Glasser
altering his version of the story he tells.
Snit posted about his personal problems with a computer and Gremlin
among others offered suggestions. It was obvious that Glasser had
zero chance of repairing it.
People were doing him a favor.
Personally I would take it as an honor for someone with Gremlin's
vast knowledge offering to assist me.
Snit twists that into "Glasser asking Gremlin to help with a
computer.
See it?
Of course you do.
Now will you admit it or run away?
4. Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin
confusing an Internet boot with a local one."
More of snit attempting to alter the story of what actually
happened. Pothead, AFAIK, never blamed you for Gremlin confusing
boot methods. That's Glasser making up shit again. Glasser didn't
even know how to get into recovery mode on a MAC which is a
REQUIREMENT to Internet boot.
Gremlin had to show Glasser how and Gremlin isn't a Mac person but
Glasser claims to be one.
<eyeroll>
See it David?
Or will you run from this one as well?
5. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy,
they push it to get attention and to promote their in-group
nonsense.
For this one Glasser's lame defense is that if you look currently
at various court sites in the various places where Glasser lived,
like Las Vegas, and numerous places in Arizona, very little is
CURRENTLY publicly viewable.
Glasser tries to claim that this proves the legal issues are made up
to harm him.
Nothing is farther from the truth.
The PUBLIC viewable web pages only keep violations posted for a
number of years which depends upon the particular court at which
point they are purged from the PUBLIC website.
They are however obtainable from the court for a small fee because
they are considered public record.
This is why if you run a background check on Michael Glasser these
still show up.
And many people have posted screenshots which actually did show the incidents before they were removed from the public website.
Glasser claims they are faked which is a lie.
As for Michael Glasser's public harassment arrest that too was
screenshot by numerous people and removed from the public website
because despite being arrested, fingerprinted, mugshot and so forth,
a settlement between the court and Michael Glasser was reached so it
was rightfully removed.
It's just more lies by Michael Glasser.
That should keep you busy for a while David.
For me, though, cash is king at present!
It is for Glasser as well.
He collects his government disability check and then works off the
books, not paying taxes, doing odd jobs.
His ex wife was part of it which is why they were never officially
married but for divorce purposes considered a common law marriage.
Is this the same snit who was trolling usenet 10 years ago? If so, I
cannot believe he is still alive and kicking. He used to flood various
Linux groups with his crossposting and as a result was a major pain in
the posterior and there were so many people who wanted to confront him
F2F in real life and teach him a lesson about libeling decent people
with his bullshit.
The general consensus was that it wasn't worth the time and effort as
snit was so sickly that one day he would probably collapse and croak.
I can't believe that COVID didn't kill him.
Marek was a well respected poster to various Linux groups and a
generous and kind person as well.
He gifted snit a laptop as snit's wife's laptop died. So what did snit
do? He attacked Marek and subsequently sold the laptop on ebay.
This alone demonstrates what a miserable person snit is.
I can't comment on his wife however back then it was obvious that snit
was not employed because he was posting so many articles to Usenet
that there is no way he could have been employed.
I don't recall any crimes posted regarding snit.
That doesn't mean someone didn't post them, but I don't recall seeing
the posts.
Anyone who doesn't believe what has been written about snit can easily
look in the archives for al.linux,alt.os.linux,alt.suse.linux.comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.m
ac .advocacy and form their own opinions regarding snit.
He seems to be absent from the popular Linux groups so maybe he has
learned his lesson?
On 2026-03-09, Glock <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sun, 8 Mar 2026 19:48:22 +0000, David B. wrote:
On 08/03/2026 19:34, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 8, 2026 at 12:59:17 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<[email protected]>:
On 08/03/2026 05:25, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 5, 2026 at 1:35:21 PM MST, "Apd" wrote
<10ocpeb$45rm$[email protected]>:
On 05/03/2026 20:00, David B. wrote:
On 05/03/2026 19:50, Apd wrote:
Oh, you mean capital. I have a few investments.
Me either!
You don't have investments?
The markets are a bit volatile right now!
Mine are longer term.
I have a good mix. With the market down I am down a bit but nothing >>>>>> concerning.
Most folk reading here may find your statement surprising! 😉
I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are
poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in my
actual comments and they are deeply insecure. What they say should not >>>> be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does not
even make sense. Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing.
Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin confusing
an Internet boot with a local one. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy, they >>>> push it to get attention and to promote their in-group nonsense. They
are basically MAGA and think like them: it is about tribalism and
scapegoating to them, not honesty or evidence.
Well I, for one, have never seen evidence of you living on State
Benefits (as we call them).
Then you are either stupid or providing shade for Glasser.
DB is not *THAT* stupid. Snit is still a useful idiot for him so he hasn't tossed him under the bus.
*Yet*.
If you would like a tutorial in how snit lies his ass off read below. I
suspect you already know this but if you are truly an honest person you
will read it and comment with something other than "Glasser has never lied >> to me" when everyone else knows that too is a lie.
So let's begin.
Based upon the comments by Glasser listed above.
DB will deny everything, ignore common sense and logic and demand further proof.
Snit will probably call you and everyone else a sock. I have snit at -9999 so I only see replies.
And of course snit the troll who prides himself as providing receipts will never provide
receipts to prove someone is a sock.
It's how snit's diseased brain functions.
Bizarre isn't it?
1 "I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are
poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in my
actual comments and they are deeply insecure."
Nobody attacks Glasser because he is or is not poor. What does get pointed >> out is that snit is a lazy grifter scamming the government regarding
disability claims.
There are many posts in groups like *.anxiety and other blogs where snit
admits he is housebound, has lost jobs because of his various illnesses.
Have you dug up posts where snit asks about prescription cocktails?
What a loose nut.
Additionally you may or may not be aware that prior to Glasser's
appearance in ACW at one time he was posting 1000's upon 1000's of
messages, many quite lengthy to COLA and CSMA along with various Linux
groups where he managed to piss off many of the regular posters like Marek >> Novotny for example.
Not counting snit's floodbot.
If you are truly honest, you might want to use your detective skills to
research that name and how it applies to snit.
Anyhow, so how does a person holding a legitimate, tax paying job manage
to perform his job and at the same time post 1000's of messages at all
hours of the day and night to Usenet?
How is this possible?
The answer is, it is not possible.
Unless his job is being paid to troll, of course it's not possible.
How does one stay up half the night and then get up to go to a job in the morning?
Those snit drug cocktails will only work to a point and then only for a while.
Then of course you have his failed Computer Business, The Prescott
Computer Guy" along with his failed daycare business Wickaboo Daycare or
something like that.
Well, to his credit at least he did try to go into business for himself.
But having a guaranteed government income does help.
It's not like quitting your job at Exxon to start a house cleaning business where you no longer have the income from Exxon to rely on.
So now, how does Glasser post 1000's upon 1000's of messages to Usenet
while he has a legitimate, tax paying job AND is running a side business,
failures or not? And BTW nobody cares if his home businesses were legit
and paying taxes as long as they, especially the daycare, was licensed
which it was not and why it was shut down.
There are a lot of businesses in the underground economy.
However choosing a business like child care which requires insurance and associated documentation is not a business to start if you want to remain
in the underground economy.
Are you beginning to understand now?
DB has understood from day one.
He's manipulated snit into his very own useful idiot.
And of course snit took the bait.
2. " What they say should not
be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does not
even make sense."
The other shop offering a Michael Glasser discount surfaced long before
Glasser ever started posting in ACW.
True.
Search COLA and you will find numerous people who confirmed the snit discount.
snit was well known as such a technical incompetent, which is why his
Computer Guy business failed, that someone took the time to call the
competitor who was well aware of Glasser because people mistakenly took
their computers to Glasser instead of the other shop because the names
were similar.
It was a brilliant marketing strategy IMHO.
It's right out of the movie "Miracle on 34th Street" where if Macy's department
store didn't stock a particular item, they sent the customer to Gimbels department
store which was their main competitor at the time.
They had horrible experiences with Glasser's The Prescott Computer Guy and >> the other business started to receive complaints for computers they never
tried to repair.
So their brand was being destroyed by snit.
Makes sense.
That's when the Michael Glasser discount began and numerous people called
that shop and confirmed it.
Glasser is the only one denying it happened.
True.
This is another one of snit's antics you can dig up if you are honest.
You claim to be a detective and this is 101 level.
3. " Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing."
See how Glasser twists what actually happened? This is Glasser altering
his version of the story he tells.
That's one of snit's go to tricks.
He assumes that people are too ignorant to notice.
He is wrong.
Snit posted about his personal problems with a computer and Gremlin among
others offered suggestions. It was obvious that Glasser had zero chance of >> repairing it.
People were doing him a favor.
Obviously a total waste of time.
That's why snit is -9999.
Personally I would take it as an honor for someone with Gremlin's vast
knowledge offering to assist me.
Snit twists that into "Glasser asking Gremlin to help with a computer.
Same.
Gremlin complimented me on cleaning a rather nasty virus from a friend's Windows
PC and it meant a lot to me. I don't even run Windows! Common sense and a well
at that time did not detect it.
Gremlin knows his stuff and applies his diagnostic troublshooting skills across
platforms.
that kind of knowledge cannot be learned from a book. It's experience coupled with
a mind that is able to think analytically.
Neither of which snit possess which is why he so obviously jealous of Gremlin and Steve Carroll as well.
See it?
Of course you do.
Now will you admit it or run away?
He will run away.
4. Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin confusing
an Internet boot with a local one."
More of snit attempting to alter the story of what actually happened.
Pothead, AFAIK, never blamed you for Gremlin confusing boot methods.
That's Glasser making up shit again. Glasser didn't even know how to get
into recovery mode on a MAC which is a REQUIREMENT to Internet boot.
That is correct.
Gremlin had to show Glasser how and Gremlin isn't a Mac person but Glasser >> claims to be one.
<eyeroll>
Correct again.
Can you imagine a person running a business offering repairs of computers
who has no clue how to boot into recovery mode?
That's like someone opening up an auto repair business and is asking "what are
these
numbers on my wrenches ?".
See it David?
Or will you run from this one as well?
Run DB, run!
You are no Forest Gump though.
5. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy, they
push it to get attention and to promote their in-group nonsense.
For this one Glasser's lame defense is that if you look currently at
various court sites in the various places where Glasser lived, like Las
Vegas, and numerous places in Arizona, very little is CURRENTLY publicly
viewable.
Glasser tries to claim that this proves the legal issues are made up to
harm him.
At first snit attempted to spin it claiming Usenet isn't an accurate source of
information while ignoring that the official court website was posted and it was a
.gov site so unlikely to be fake.
Snit is simply a dishonest piece of shit.
It's what he is.
There is no other explanation for his behavior.
Nothing is farther from the truth.
The PUBLIC viewable web pages only keep violations posted for a number of
years which depends upon the particular court at which point they are
purged from the PUBLIC website.
They are however obtainable from the court for a small fee because they
are considered public record.
This is true and has been explained to snit many times already.
Aside from his divorce and haressment in public criminal arrest, the
majority of snit's court cases are multitudes of traffic violations.
Mostly for speeding and not having active insurance or financial responsibility.
Same as the childcare business he ran out of his trailer. For someone who claims to be honest
and honorable he sure breaks the law a lot.
Here is AZ policy.
<https://share.google/aimode/2PECv8mjLbC8qd4MF>
"Traffic violations generally remain on Arizona public court websites and motor vehicle records for three to five years, though points for those violations are officially active for only 1 year. More serious, criminal violations (e.g., DUI, reckless driving) may remain accessible on court records for a longer period."
This is why if you run a background check on Michael Glasser these still
show up.
Several people have done this.
However, in order to obtain the documents one has to agree to not post
them publicly and they are somehow watermarked so it's not a good idea.
Besides nothing further is required as a decent background check reveals snit's sordid criminal history.
In truth, snit should not be allowed to get behind the wheel of a car.
And many people have posted screenshots which actually did show the
incidents before they were removed from the public website.
Glasser claims they are faked which is a lie.
Snit is tossing whatever he can at the wall and trying to conflate the issue. Enough honest people took screenshots or viewed the original files to
debunk snit's lame claims.
As for Michael Glasser's public harassment arrest that too was screenshot
by numerous people and removed from the public website because despite
being arrested, fingerprinted, mugshot and so forth, a settlement between
the court and Michael Glasser was reached so it was rightfully removed.
Correct.
It's just more lies by Michael Glasser.
That should keep you busy for a while David.
Here is another one snit keeps pushing:
'Snit, Where is Your Proof That Carroll Claimed The Police Visited Him?'
https://groups.google.com/g/talk.politics.guns/c/BpDIKI3GVn0/m/Zc1f0gBMAwAJ
Read through this one to see how many times snit has changed his story.
It's hilarious!
Why snit continues to make a fool of himself in public remains a mystery though.
Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 9, 2026 at 5:09:04 PM MST, "%" wrotehe's an idiot
<[email protected]>:
Linuxiac wrote:
Glock wrote:sock
On Sun, 8 Mar 2026 19:48:22 +0000, David B. wrote:
On 08/03/2026 19:34, Brock McNuggets wrote:nothing >>>> concerning.
On Mar 8, 2026 at 12:59:17 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<[email protected]>:
On 08/03/2026 05:25, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 5, 2026 at 1:35:21 PM MST, "Apd" wrote
<10ocpeb$45rm$[email protected]>:
On 05/03/2026 20:00, David B. wrote:
On 05/03/2026 19:50, Apd wrote:
Oh, you mean capital. I have a few investments.
Me either!
You don't have investments?
The markets are a bit volatile right now!
Mine are longer term.
I have a good mix. With the market down I am down a bit but
should not >> be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at >>>>> the never >> ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... >>>>> it does not >> even make sense. Or his nonsense about me asking himI doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are >>>>>>> poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in >>>>> my >> actual comments and they are deeply insecure. What they say
Most folk reading here may find your statement surprising! 😉 >>>>>>>
to help with a >> computer when I did no such thing.
confusing >> an Internet boot with a local one. Or idiotic and easily >>>>> disproved >> claims about legal issues. They do not really believeOr Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin
this idiocy, they >> push it to get attention and to promote their
in-group nonsense. They >> are basically MAGA and think like them: it >>>>> is about tribalism and >> scapegoating to them, not honesty or
evidence.
Well I, for one, have never seen evidence of you living on State
Benefits (as we call them).
Then you are either stupid or providing shade for Glasser.
If you would like a tutorial in how snit lies his ass off read below. >>>>> I suspect you already know this but if you are truly an honest person >>>>> you will read it and comment with something other than "Glasser has
never lied to me" when everyone else knows that too is a lie.
So let's begin.
Based upon the comments by Glasser listed above.
1 "I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are >>>>> poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in my >>>>> actual comments and they are deeply insecure."
Nobody attacks Glasser because he is or is not poor. What does get
pointed out is that snit is a lazy grifter scamming the government
regarding disability claims.
There are many posts in groups like *.anxiety and other blogs where
snit admits he is housebound, has lost jobs because of his various
illnesses.
Additionally you may or may not be aware that prior to Glasser's
appearance in ACW at one time he was posting 1000's upon 1000's of
messages, many quite lengthy to COLA and CSMA along with various
Linux groups where he managed to piss off many of the regular posters >>>>> like Marek Novotny for example.
If you are truly honest, you might want to use your detective skills >>>>> to research that name and how it applies to snit.
Anyhow, so how does a person holding a legitimate, tax paying job
manage to perform his job and at the same time post 1000's of
messages at all hours of the day and night to Usenet?
How is this possible?
The answer is, it is not possible.
Then of course you have his failed Computer Business, The Prescott
Computer Guy" along with his failed daycare business Wickaboo Daycare >>>>> or something like that.
So now, how does Glasser post 1000's upon 1000's of messages to
Usenet while he has a legitimate, tax paying job AND is running a
side business, failures or not? And BTW nobody cares if his home
businesses were legit and paying taxes as long as they, especially
the daycare, was licensed which it was not and why it was shut down. >>>>>
Are you beginning to understand now?
2. " What they say should not
be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does not >>>>> even make sense."
The other shop offering a Michael Glasser discount surfaced long
before Glasser ever started posting in ACW.
snit was well known as such a technical incompetent, which is why his >>>>> Computer Guy business failed, that someone took the time to call the >>>>> competitor who was well aware of Glasser because people mistakenly
took their computers to Glasser instead of the other shop because the >>>>> names were similar.
they had horrible experiences with Glasser's The Prescott Computer
Guy and the other business started to receive complaints for
computers they never tried to repair.
So their brand was being destroyed by snit.
That's when the Michael Glasser discount began and numerous people
called that shop and confirmed it.
Glasser is the only one denying it happened.
This is another one of snit's antics you can dig up if you are honest. >>>>> You claim to be a detective and this is 101 level.
3. " Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing."
See how Glasser twists what actually happened? This is Glasser
altering his version of the story he tells.
Snit posted about his personal problems with a computer and Gremlin
among others offered suggestions. It was obvious that Glasser had
zero chance of repairing it.
People were doing him a favor.
Personally I would take it as an honor for someone with Gremlin's
vast knowledge offering to assist me.
Snit twists that into "Glasser asking Gremlin to help with a
computer.
See it?
Of course you do.
Now will you admit it or run away?
4. Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin
confusing an Internet boot with a local one."
More of snit attempting to alter the story of what actually happened. >>>>> Pothead, AFAIK, never blamed you for Gremlin confusing boot methods. >>>>> That's Glasser making up shit again. Glasser didn't even know how to >>>>> get into recovery mode on a MAC which is a REQUIREMENT to Internet
boot.
Gremlin had to show Glasser how and Gremlin isn't a Mac person but
Glasser claims to be one.
<eyeroll>
See it David?
Or will you run from this one as well?
5. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy,
they push it to get attention and to promote their in-group nonsense. >>>>>
For this one Glasser's lame defense is that if you look currently at >>>>> various court sites in the various places where Glasser lived, like
Las Vegas, and numerous places in Arizona, very little is CURRENTLY
publicly viewable.
Glasser tries to claim that this proves the legal issues are made up >>>>> to harm him.
Nothing is farther from the truth.
The PUBLIC viewable web pages only keep violations posted for a
number of years which depends upon the particular court at which
point they are purged from the PUBLIC website.
They are however obtainable from the court for a small fee because
they are considered public record.
This is why if you run a background check on Michael Glasser these
still show up.
And many people have posted screenshots which actually did show the
incidents before they were removed from the public website.
Glasser claims they are faked which is a lie.
As for Michael Glasser's public harassment arrest that too was
screenshot by numerous people and removed from the public website
because despite being arrested, fingerprinted, mugshot and so forth, >>>>> a settlement between the court and Michael Glasser was reached so it >>>>> was rightfully removed.
It's just more lies by Michael Glasser.
That should keep you busy for a while David.
For me, though, cash is king at present!
It is for Glasser as well.
He collects his government disability check and then works off the
books, not paying taxes, doing odd jobs.
His ex wife was part of it which is why they were never officially
married but for divorce purposes considered a common law marriage.
Is this the same snit who was trolling usenet 10 years ago? If so, I
cannot believe he is still alive and kicking. He used to flood various >>>> Linux groups with his crossposting and as a result was a major pain in >>>> the posterior and there were so many people who wanted to confront him >>>> F2F in real life and teach him a lesson about libeling decent people
with his bullshit.
The general consensus was that it wasn't worth the time and effort as
snit was so sickly that one day he would probably collapse and croak. I >>>> can't believe that COVID didn't kill him.
Marek was a well respected poster to various Linux groups and a
generous and kind person as well.
He gifted snit a laptop as snit's wife's laptop died. So what did snit >>>> do? He attacked Marek and subsequently sold the laptop on ebay.
This alone demonstrates what a miserable person snit is.
I can't comment on his wife however back then it was obvious that snit >>>> was not employed because he was posting so many articles to Usenet that >>>> there is no way he could have been employed.
I don't recall any crimes posted regarding snit.
That doesn't mean someone didn't post them, but I don't recall seeing
the posts.
Anyone who doesn't believe what has been written about snit can easily >>>> look in the archives for
al.linux,alt.os.linux,alt.suse.linux.comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac >>>> .advocacy and form their own opinions regarding snit.
He seems to be absent from the popular Linux groups so maybe he has
learned his lesson?
Sock boy strikes again!
Weird how Carroll and his crew claim I sold it on eBay but nobody ever found >> the listing.
Just sick lies because they cannot quote me doing as they do.
Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 9, 2026 at 5:07:22 PM MST, "%" wrotehe doesn't have time he's always here
<[email protected]>:
Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 9, 2026 at 2:58:54 PM MST, "%" wroteover worked penis tugging
<[email protected]>:
Glock wrote:
On Sun, 8 Mar 2026 19:48:22 +0000, David B. wrote:your taxes would still be the same so shut up
On 08/03/2026 19:34, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 8, 2026 at 12:59:17 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<[email protected]>:
On 08/03/2026 05:25, Brock McNuggets wrote:I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are >>>>>>>> poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in my >>>>>>>> actual comments and they are deeply insecure. What they say should not >>>>>>>> be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never >>>>>>>> ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does not >>>>>>>> even make sense. Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a >>>>>>>> computer when I did no such thing.
On Mar 5, 2026 at 1:35:21 PM MST, "Apd" wrote
<10ocpeb$45rm$[email protected]>:
On 05/03/2026 20:00, David B. wrote:
On 05/03/2026 19:50, Apd wrote:
Oh, you mean capital. I have a few investments.
Me either!
You don't have investments?
The markets are a bit volatile right now!
Mine are longer term.
I have a good mix. With the market down I am down a bit but nothing >>>>>>>>>> concerning.
Most folk reading here may find your statement surprising! 😉 >>>>>>>>
Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin confusing >>>>>>>> an Internet boot with a local one. Or idiotic and easily disproved >>>>>>>> claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy, they
push it to get attention and to promote their in-group nonsense. They >>>>>>>> are basically MAGA and think like them: it is about tribalism and >>>>>>>> scapegoating to them, not honesty or evidence.
Well I, for one, have never seen evidence of you living on State >>>>>>> Benefits (as we call them).
Then you are either stupid or providing shade for Glasser.
If you would like a tutorial in how snit lies his ass off read below. I >>>>>> suspect you already know this but if you are truly an honest person you >>>>>> will read it and comment with something other than "Glasser has never lied
to me" when everyone else knows that too is a lie.
So let's begin.
Based upon the comments by Glasser listed above.
1 "I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are >>>>>> poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in my >>>>>> actual comments and they are deeply insecure."
Nobody attacks Glasser because he is or is not poor. What does get pointed
out is that snit is a lazy grifter scamming the government regarding >>>>>> disability claims.
There are many posts in groups like *.anxiety and other blogs where snit >>>>>> admits he is housebound, has lost jobs because of his various illnesses. >>>>>>
Additionally you may or may not be aware that prior to Glasser's
appearance in ACW at one time he was posting 1000's upon 1000's of >>>>>> messages, many quite lengthy to COLA and CSMA along with various Linux >>>>>> groups where he managed to piss off many of the regular posters like Marek
Novotny for example.
If you are truly honest, you might want to use your detective skills to >>>>>> research that name and how it applies to snit.
Anyhow, so how does a person holding a legitimate, tax paying job manage >>>>>> to perform his job and at the same time post 1000's of messages at all >>>>>> hours of the day and night to Usenet?
How is this possible?
The answer is, it is not possible.
Then of course you have his failed Computer Business, The Prescott >>>>>> Computer Guy" along with his failed daycare business Wickaboo Daycare or >>>>>> something like that.
So now, how does Glasser post 1000's upon 1000's of messages to Usenet >>>>>> while he has a legitimate, tax paying job AND is running a side business,
failures or not? And BTW nobody cares if his home businesses were legit >>>>>> and paying taxes as long as they, especially the daycare, was licensed >>>>>> which it was not and why it was shut down.
Are you beginning to understand now?
2. " What they say should not
be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does not >>>>>> even make sense."
The other shop offering a Michael Glasser discount surfaced long before >>>>>> Glasser ever started posting in ACW.
snit was well known as such a technical incompetent, which is why his >>>>>> Computer Guy business failed, that someone took the time to call the >>>>>> competitor who was well aware of Glasser because people mistakenly took >>>>>> their computers to Glasser instead of the other shop because the names >>>>>> were similar.
they had horrible experiences with Glasser's The Prescott Computer Guy and
the other business started to receive complaints for computers they never
tried to repair.
So their brand was being destroyed by snit.
That's when the Michael Glasser discount began and numerous people called
that shop and confirmed it.
Glasser is the only one denying it happened.
This is another one of snit's antics you can dig up if you are honest. >>>>>> You claim to be a detective and this is 101 level.
3. " Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing."
See how Glasser twists what actually happened? This is Glasser altering >>>>>> his version of the story he tells.
Snit posted about his personal problems with a computer and Gremlin among
others offered suggestions. It was obvious that Glasser had zero chance of
repairing it.
People were doing him a favor.
Personally I would take it as an honor for someone with Gremlin's vast >>>>>> knowledge offering to assist me.
Snit twists that into "Glasser asking Gremlin to help with a computer. >>>>>>
See it?
Of course you do.
Now will you admit it or run away?
4. Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin confusing >>>>>> an Internet boot with a local one."
More of snit attempting to alter the story of what actually happened. >>>>>> Pothead, AFAIK, never blamed you for Gremlin confusing boot methods. >>>>>> That's Glasser making up shit again. Glasser didn't even know how to get >>>>>> into recovery mode on a MAC which is a REQUIREMENT to Internet boot. >>>>>>
Gremlin had to show Glasser how and Gremlin isn't a Mac person but Glasser
claims to be one.
<eyeroll>
See it David?
Or will you run from this one as well?
5. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy, they >>>>>> push it to get attention and to promote their in-group nonsense.
For this one Glasser's lame defense is that if you look currently at >>>>>> various court sites in the various places where Glasser lived, like Las >>>>>> Vegas, and numerous places in Arizona, very little is CURRENTLY publicly >>>>>> viewable.
Glasser tries to claim that this proves the legal issues are made up to >>>>>> harm him.
Nothing is farther from the truth.
The PUBLIC viewable web pages only keep violations posted for a number of
years which depends upon the particular court at which point they are >>>>>> purged from the PUBLIC website.
They are however obtainable from the court for a small fee because they >>>>>> are considered public record.
This is why if you run a background check on Michael Glasser these still >>>>>> show up.
And many people have posted screenshots which actually did show the >>>>>> incidents before they were removed from the public website.
Glasser claims they are faked which is a lie.
As for Michael Glasser's public harassment arrest that too was screenshot
by numerous people and removed from the public website because despite >>>>>> being arrested, fingerprinted, mugshot and so forth, a settlement between
the court and Michael Glasser was reached so it was rightfully removed. >>>>>>
It's just more lies by Michael Glasser.
That should keep you busy for a while David.
For me, though, cash is king at present!
It is for Glasser as well.
He collects his government disability check and then works off the books,
not paying taxes, doing odd jobs.
His ex wife was part of it which is why they were never officially married
but for divorce purposes considered a common law marriage.
Carroll is having another tantrum.
He never mentions any partner. Hmmmm....
Linuxiac wrote:
Glock wrote:
On Sun, 8 Mar 2026 19:48:22 +0000, David B. wrote:
On 08/03/2026 19:34, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 8, 2026 at 12:59:17 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<[email protected]>:
On 08/03/2026 05:25, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 5, 2026 at 1:35:21 PM MST, "Apd" wrote
<10ocpeb$45rm$[email protected]>:
On 05/03/2026 20:00, David B. wrote:
On 05/03/2026 19:50, Apd wrote:
Oh, you mean capital. I have a few investments.
Me either!
You don't have investments?
The markets are a bit volatile right now!
Mine are longer term.
I have a good mix. With the market down I am down a bit but nothing >>>> concerning.
are >> poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrongMost folk reading here may find your statement surprising! 😉
I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you
doing in my >> actual comments and they are deeply insecure. What
they say should not >> be taken to reflect what they actually
believe. Look at the never >> ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot
claim of discounts... it does not >> even make sense. Or his
nonsense about me asking him to help with a >> computer when I did
no such thing. >> Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible
for Gremlin confusing >> an Internet boot with a local one. Or
idiotic and easily disproved >> claims about legal issues. They do
not really believe this idiocy, they >> push it to get attention
and to promote their in-group nonsense. They >> are basically MAGA
and think like them: it is about tribalism and >> scapegoating to
them, not honesty or evidence.
Well I, for one, have never seen evidence of you living on State Benefits (as we call them).
Then you are either stupid or providing shade for Glasser.
If you would like a tutorial in how snit lies his ass off read
below. I suspect you already know this but if you are truly an
honest person you will read it and comment with something other
than "Glasser has never lied to me" when everyone else knows that
too is a lie. So let's begin.
Based upon the comments by Glasser listed above.
1 "I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you
are poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong
doing in my actual comments and they are deeply insecure."
Nobody attacks Glasser because he is or is not poor. What does get pointed out is that snit is a lazy grifter scamming the government regarding disability claims.
There are many posts in groups like *.anxiety and other blogs
where snit admits he is housebound, has lost jobs because of his
various illnesses.
Additionally you may or may not be aware that prior to Glasser's appearance in ACW at one time he was posting 1000's upon 1000's
of messages, many quite lengthy to COLA and CSMA along with
various Linux groups where he managed to piss off many of the
regular posters like Marek Novotny for example.
If you are truly honest, you might want to use your detective
skills to research that name and how it applies to snit.
Anyhow, so how does a person holding a legitimate, tax paying job
manage to perform his job and at the same time post 1000's of
messages at all hours of the day and night to Usenet?
How is this possible?
The answer is, it is not possible.
Then of course you have his failed Computer Business, The
Prescott Computer Guy" along with his failed daycare business
Wickaboo Daycare or something like that.
So now, how does Glasser post 1000's upon 1000's of messages to
Usenet while he has a legitimate, tax paying job AND is running a
side business, failures or not? And BTW nobody cares if his home businesses were legit and paying taxes as long as they, especially
the daycare, was licensed which it was not and why it was shut
down.
Are you beginning to understand now?
2. " What they say should not
be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does
not even make sense."
The other shop offering a Michael Glasser discount surfaced long
before Glasser ever started posting in ACW.
snit was well known as such a technical incompetent, which is why
his Computer Guy business failed, that someone took the time to
call the competitor who was well aware of Glasser because people mistakenly took their computers to Glasser instead of the other
shop because the names were similar.
they had horrible experiences with Glasser's The Prescott Computer
Guy and the other business started to receive complaints for
computers they never tried to repair.
So their brand was being destroyed by snit.
That's when the Michael Glasser discount began and numerous people
called that shop and confirmed it.
Glasser is the only one denying it happened.
This is another one of snit's antics you can dig up if you are
honest. You claim to be a detective and this is 101 level.
3. " Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing."
See how Glasser twists what actually happened? This is Glasser
altering his version of the story he tells.
Snit posted about his personal problems with a computer and
Gremlin among others offered suggestions. It was obvious that
Glasser had zero chance of repairing it.
People were doing him a favor.
Personally I would take it as an honor for someone with Gremlin's
vast knowledge offering to assist me.
Snit twists that into "Glasser asking Gremlin to help with a
computer.
See it?
Of course you do.
Now will you admit it or run away?
4. Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin
confusing an Internet boot with a local one."
More of snit attempting to alter the story of what actually
happened. Pothead, AFAIK, never blamed you for Gremlin confusing
boot methods. That's Glasser making up shit again. Glasser didn't
even know how to get into recovery mode on a MAC which is a
REQUIREMENT to Internet boot.
Gremlin had to show Glasser how and Gremlin isn't a Mac person but Glasser claims to be one.
<eyeroll>
See it David?
Or will you run from this one as well?
5. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy,
they push it to get attention and to promote their in-group
nonsense.
For this one Glasser's lame defense is that if you look currently
at various court sites in the various places where Glasser lived,
like Las Vegas, and numerous places in Arizona, very little is
CURRENTLY publicly viewable.
Glasser tries to claim that this proves the legal issues are made
up to harm him.
Nothing is farther from the truth.
The PUBLIC viewable web pages only keep violations posted for a
number of years which depends upon the particular court at which
point they are purged from the PUBLIC website.
They are however obtainable from the court for a small fee because
they are considered public record.
This is why if you run a background check on Michael Glasser these
still show up.
And many people have posted screenshots which actually did show
the incidents before they were removed from the public website.
Glasser claims they are faked which is a lie.
As for Michael Glasser's public harassment arrest that too was
screenshot by numerous people and removed from the public website
because despite being arrested, fingerprinted, mugshot and so
forth, a settlement between the court and Michael Glasser was
reached so it was rightfully removed.
It's just more lies by Michael Glasser.
That should keep you busy for a while David.
For me, though, cash is king at present!
It is for Glasser as well.
He collects his government disability check and then works off the
books, not paying taxes, doing odd jobs.
His ex wife was part of it which is why they were never officially married but for divorce purposes considered a common law
marriage.
Is this the same snit who was trolling usenet 10 years ago? If so, I
cannot believe he is still alive and kicking. He used to flood
various Linux groups with his crossposting and as a result was a
major pain in the posterior and there were so many people who
wanted to confront him F2F in real life and teach him a lesson
about libeling decent people with his bullshit.
The general consensus was that it wasn't worth the time and effort
as snit was so sickly that one day he would probably collapse and
croak. I can't believe that COVID didn't kill him.
Marek was a well respected poster to various Linux groups and a
generous and kind person as well.
He gifted snit a laptop as snit's wife's laptop died. So what did
snit do? He attacked Marek and subsequently sold the laptop on ebay.
This alone demonstrates what a miserable person snit is.
I can't comment on his wife however back then it was obvious that
snit was not employed because he was posting so many articles to
Usenet that there is no way he could have been employed.
I don't recall any crimes posted regarding snit.
That doesn't mean someone didn't post them, but I don't recall
seeing the posts.
Anyone who doesn't believe what has been written about snit can
easily look in the archives for al.linux,alt.os.linux,alt.suse.linux.comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.m
ac .advocacy and form their own opinions regarding snit.
He seems to be absent from the popular Linux groups so maybe he has
learned his lesson?
tell me what is the obsession with this snit poster? From cross posts
in alt.home.repair and comp.sys.mac.advocacy, both of which I lurk in,
snit seems to be mentally retarded, at least from what I have read.
He or she doesn't seem to be a troll but more of an ill informed
poster.
I do have one direct question for you Linuxiac and that is why do you seemingly have the same ASCII art X-Face of a chicken as snit does?
Maybe my outdated newsreader is tripping on itself again, but I'm
curious. I'm sure there is an explanation and if I am wrong, someone
please correct me.
On Mar 10, 2026 at 3:42:10 PM MST, "pothead" wrote <10oq6o2$l0n8$[email protected]>:
On 2026-03-09, Glock <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sun, 8 Mar 2026 19:48:22 +0000, David B. wrote:
On 08/03/2026 19:34, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 8, 2026 at 12:59:17 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<[email protected]>:
On 08/03/2026 05:25, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 5, 2026 at 1:35:21 PM MST, "Apd" wrote
<10ocpeb$45rm$[email protected]>:
On 05/03/2026 20:00, David B. wrote:
On 05/03/2026 19:50, Apd wrote:
Oh, you mean capital. I have a few investments.
Me either!
You don't have investments?
The markets are a bit volatile right now!
Mine are longer term.
I have a good mix. With the market down I am down a bit but
nothing concerning.
Most folk reading here may find your statement surprising! 😉
I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you
are poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong
doing in my actual comments and they are deeply insecure. What
they say should not be taken to reflect what they actually
believe. Look at the never ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot
claim of discounts... it does not even make sense. Or his
nonsense about me asking him to help with a computer when I did
no such thing. Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible
for Gremlin confusing an Internet boot with a local one. Or
idiotic and easily disproved claims about legal issues. They do
not really believe this idiocy, they push it to get attention
and to promote their in-group nonsense. They are basically MAGA
and think like them: it is about tribalism and scapegoating to
them, not honesty or evidence.
Well I, for one, have never seen evidence of you living on State
Benefits (as we call them).
Then you are either stupid or providing shade for Glasser.
DB is not *THAT* stupid. Snit is still a useful idiot for him so he
hasn't tossed him under the bus.
*Yet*.
If you would like a tutorial in how snit lies his ass off read
below. I suspect you already know this but if you are truly an
honest person you will read it and comment with something other
than "Glasser has never lied to me" when everyone else knows that
too is a lie. So let's begin.
Based upon the comments by Glasser listed above.
DB will deny everything, ignore common sense and logic and demand
further proof.
Snit will probably call you and everyone else a sock. I have snit
at -9999 so I only see replies.
And of course snit the troll who prides himself as providing
receipts will never provide
receipts to prove someone is a sock.
It's how snit's diseased brain functions.
Bizarre isn't it?
1 "I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you
are poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong
doing in my actual comments and they are deeply insecure."
Nobody attacks Glasser because he is or is not poor. What does get
pointed out is that snit is a lazy grifter scamming the government
regarding disability claims.
There are many posts in groups like *.anxiety and other blogs
where snit admits he is housebound, has lost jobs because of his
various illnesses.
Have you dug up posts where snit asks about prescription cocktails?
What a loose nut.
Additionally you may or may not be aware that prior to Glasser's
appearance in ACW at one time he was posting 1000's upon 1000's of
messages, many quite lengthy to COLA and CSMA along with various
Linux groups where he managed to piss off many of the regular
posters like Marek Novotny for example.
Not counting snit's floodbot.
If you are truly honest, you might want to use your detective
skills to research that name and how it applies to snit.
Anyhow, so how does a person holding a legitimate, tax paying job
manage to perform his job and at the same time post 1000's of
messages at all hours of the day and night to Usenet?
How is this possible?
The answer is, it is not possible.
Unless his job is being paid to troll, of course it's not possible.
How does one stay up half the night and then get up to go to a job
in the morning?
Those snit drug cocktails will only work to a point and then only
for a while.
Then of course you have his failed Computer Business, The Prescott
Computer Guy" along with his failed daycare business Wickaboo
Daycare or something like that.
Well, to his credit at least he did try to go into business for
himself. But having a guaranteed government income does help.
It's not like quitting your job at Exxon to start a house cleaning
business where you no longer have the income from Exxon to rely on.
So now, how does Glasser post 1000's upon 1000's of messages to
Usenet while he has a legitimate, tax paying job AND is running a
side business, failures or not? And BTW nobody cares if his home
businesses were legit and paying taxes as long as they, especially
the daycare, was licensed which it was not and why it was shut
down.
There are a lot of businesses in the underground economy.
However choosing a business like child care which requires
insurance and associated documentation is not a business to start
if you want to remain in the underground economy.
Are you beginning to understand now?
DB has understood from day one.
He's manipulated snit into his very own useful idiot.
And of course snit took the bait.
2. " What they say should not
be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does
not even make sense."
The other shop offering a Michael Glasser discount surfaced long
before Glasser ever started posting in ACW.
True.
Search COLA and you will find numerous people who confirmed the
snit discount.
snit was well known as such a technical incompetent, which is why
his Computer Guy business failed, that someone took the time to
call the competitor who was well aware of Glasser because people
mistakenly took their computers to Glasser instead of the other
shop because the names were similar.
It was a brilliant marketing strategy IMHO.
It's right out of the movie "Miracle on 34th Street" where if
Macy's department store didn't stock a particular item, they sent
the customer to Gimbels department
store which was their main competitor at the time.
They had horrible experiences with Glasser's The Prescott Computer
Guy and the other business started to receive complaints for
computers they never tried to repair.
So their brand was being destroyed by snit.
Makes sense.
That's when the Michael Glasser discount began and numerous people
called that shop and confirmed it.
Glasser is the only one denying it happened.
True.
This is another one of snit's antics you can dig up if you are
honest. You claim to be a detective and this is 101 level.
3. " Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing."
See how Glasser twists what actually happened? This is Glasser
altering his version of the story he tells.
That's one of snit's go to tricks.
He assumes that people are too ignorant to notice.
He is wrong.
Snit posted about his personal problems with a computer and
Gremlin among others offered suggestions. It was obvious that
Glasser had zero chance of repairing it.
People were doing him a favor.
Obviously a total waste of time.
That's why snit is -9999.
Personally I would take it as an honor for someone with Gremlin's
vast knowledge offering to assist me.
Snit twists that into "Glasser asking Gremlin to help with a
computer.
Same.
Gremlin complimented me on cleaning a rather nasty virus from a
friend's Windows
PC and it meant a lot to me. I don't even run Windows! Common sense
and a well at that time did not detect it.
Gremlin knows his stuff and applies his diagnostic troublshooting
skills across platforms.
that kind of knowledge cannot be learned from a book. It's
experience coupled with
a mind that is able to think analytically.
Neither of which snit possess which is why he so obviously jealous
of Gremlin and Steve Carroll as well.
See it?
Of course you do.
Now will you admit it or run away?
He will run away.
4. Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin
confusing an Internet boot with a local one."
More of snit attempting to alter the story of what actually
happened. Pothead, AFAIK, never blamed you for Gremlin confusing
boot methods. That's Glasser making up shit again. Glasser didn't
even know how to get into recovery mode on a MAC which is a
REQUIREMENT to Internet boot.
That is correct.
Gremlin had to show Glasser how and Gremlin isn't a Mac person but
Glasser claims to be one.
<eyeroll>
Correct again.
Can you imagine a person running a business offering repairs of
computers who has no clue how to boot into recovery mode?
That's like someone opening up an auto repair business and is
asking "what are these
numbers on my wrenches ?".
See it David?
Or will you run from this one as well?
Run DB, run!
You are no Forest Gump though.
5. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy,
they push it to get attention and to promote their in-group
nonsense.
For this one Glasser's lame defense is that if you look currently
at various court sites in the various places where Glasser lived,
like Las Vegas, and numerous places in Arizona, very little is
CURRENTLY publicly viewable.
Glasser tries to claim that this proves the legal issues are made
up to harm him.
At first snit attempted to spin it claiming Usenet isn't an
accurate source of information while ignoring that the official
court website was posted and it was a
.gov site so unlikely to be fake.
Snit is simply a dishonest piece of shit.
It's what he is.
There is no other explanation for his behavior.
Nothing is farther from the truth.
The PUBLIC viewable web pages only keep violations posted for a
number of years which depends upon the particular court at which
point they are purged from the PUBLIC website.
They are however obtainable from the court for a small fee because
they are considered public record.
This is true and has been explained to snit many times already.
Aside from his divorce and haressment in public criminal arrest, the majority of snit's court cases are multitudes of traffic violations.
Mostly for speeding and not having active insurance or financial responsibility.
Same as the childcare business he ran out of his trailer. For
someone who claims to be honest
and honorable he sure breaks the law a lot.
Here is AZ policy.
<https://share.google/aimode/2PECv8mjLbC8qd4MF>
"Traffic violations generally remain on Arizona public court
websites and motor vehicle records for three to five years, though
points for those violations are officially active for only 1 year.
More serious, criminal violations (e.g., DUI, reckless driving) may
remain accessible on court records for a longer period."
This is why if you run a background check on Michael Glasser these
still show up.
Several people have done this.
However, in order to obtain the documents one has to agree to not
post them publicly and they are somehow watermarked so it's not a
good idea.
Besides nothing further is required as a decent background check
reveals snit's sordid criminal history.
In truth, snit should not be allowed to get behind the wheel of a
car.
And many people have posted screenshots which actually did show the
incidents before they were removed from the public website.
Glasser claims they are faked which is a lie.
Snit is tossing whatever he can at the wall and trying to conflate
the issue. Enough honest people took screenshots or viewed the
original files to debunk snit's lame claims.
As for Michael Glasser's public harassment arrest that too was
screenshot by numerous people and removed from the public website
because despite being arrested, fingerprinted, mugshot and so
forth, a settlement between the court and Michael Glasser was
reached so it was rightfully removed.
Correct.
It's just more lies by Michael Glasser.
That should keep you busy for a while David.
Here is another one snit keeps pushing:
'Snit, Where is Your Proof That Carroll Claimed The Police Visited
Him?'
https://groups.google.com/g/talk.politics.guns/c/BpDIKI3GVn0/m/Zc1f0gBMAwAJ
Read through this one to see how many times snit has changed his
story. It's hilarious!
Why snit continues to make a fool of himself in public remains a
mystery though.
Notice how you lie your ass off. I bring receipts.
On 11 Mar 2026 01:43:22 GMT
Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> wrote:
On Mar 10, 2026 at 3:42:10 PM MST, "pothead" wroteSo you keep repeating yet you routinely accuse people of being socks so
<10oq6o2$l0n8$[email protected]>:
On 2026-03-09, Glock <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sun, 8 Mar 2026 19:48:22 +0000, David B. wrote:
On 08/03/2026 19:34, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 8, 2026 at 12:59:17 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<[email protected]>:
On 08/03/2026 05:25, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 5, 2026 at 1:35:21 PM MST, "Apd" wrote
<10ocpeb$45rm$[email protected]>:
On 05/03/2026 20:00, David B. wrote:
On 05/03/2026 19:50, Apd wrote:
Oh, you mean capital. I have a few investments.
Me either!
You don't have investments?
The markets are a bit volatile right now!
Mine are longer term.
I have a good mix. With the market down I am down a bit but
nothing concerning.
Most folk reading here may find your statement surprising! 😉
I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you
are poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong
doing in my actual comments and they are deeply insecure. What
they say should not be taken to reflect what they actually
believe. Look at the never ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot
claim of discounts... it does not even make sense. Or his
nonsense about me asking him to help with a computer when I did
no such thing. Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible
for Gremlin confusing an Internet boot with a local one. Or
idiotic and easily disproved claims about legal issues. They do
not really believe this idiocy, they push it to get attention
and to promote their in-group nonsense. They are basically MAGA
and think like them: it is about tribalism and scapegoating to
them, not honesty or evidence.
Well I, for one, have never seen evidence of you living on State
Benefits (as we call them).
Then you are either stupid or providing shade for Glasser.
DB is not *THAT* stupid. Snit is still a useful idiot for him so he
hasn't tossed him under the bus.
*Yet*.
If you would like a tutorial in how snit lies his ass off read
below. I suspect you already know this but if you are truly an
honest person you will read it and comment with something other
than "Glasser has never lied to me" when everyone else knows that
too is a lie. So let's begin.
Based upon the comments by Glasser listed above.
DB will deny everything, ignore common sense and logic and demand
further proof.
Snit will probably call you and everyone else a sock. I have snit
at -9999 so I only see replies.
And of course snit the troll who prides himself as providing
receipts will never provide
receipts to prove someone is a sock.
It's how snit's diseased brain functions.
Bizarre isn't it?
1 "I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you
are poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong
doing in my actual comments and they are deeply insecure."
Nobody attacks Glasser because he is or is not poor. What does get
pointed out is that snit is a lazy grifter scamming the government
regarding disability claims.
There are many posts in groups like *.anxiety and other blogs
where snit admits he is housebound, has lost jobs because of his
various illnesses.
Have you dug up posts where snit asks about prescription cocktails?
What a loose nut.
Additionally you may or may not be aware that prior to Glasser's
appearance in ACW at one time he was posting 1000's upon 1000's of
messages, many quite lengthy to COLA and CSMA along with various
Linux groups where he managed to piss off many of the regular
posters like Marek Novotny for example.
Not counting snit's floodbot.
If you are truly honest, you might want to use your detective
skills to research that name and how it applies to snit.
Anyhow, so how does a person holding a legitimate, tax paying job
manage to perform his job and at the same time post 1000's of
messages at all hours of the day and night to Usenet?
How is this possible?
The answer is, it is not possible.
Unless his job is being paid to troll, of course it's not possible.
How does one stay up half the night and then get up to go to a job
in the morning?
Those snit drug cocktails will only work to a point and then only
for a while.
Then of course you have his failed Computer Business, The Prescott
Computer Guy" along with his failed daycare business Wickaboo
Daycare or something like that.
Well, to his credit at least he did try to go into business for
himself. But having a guaranteed government income does help.
It's not like quitting your job at Exxon to start a house cleaning
business where you no longer have the income from Exxon to rely on.
So now, how does Glasser post 1000's upon 1000's of messages to
Usenet while he has a legitimate, tax paying job AND is running a
side business, failures or not? And BTW nobody cares if his home
businesses were legit and paying taxes as long as they, especially
the daycare, was licensed which it was not and why it was shut
down.
There are a lot of businesses in the underground economy.
However choosing a business like child care which requires
insurance and associated documentation is not a business to start
if you want to remain in the underground economy.
Are you beginning to understand now?
DB has understood from day one.
He's manipulated snit into his very own useful idiot.
And of course snit took the bait.
2. " What they say should not
be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does
not even make sense."
The other shop offering a Michael Glasser discount surfaced long
before Glasser ever started posting in ACW.
True.
Search COLA and you will find numerous people who confirmed the
snit discount.
snit was well known as such a technical incompetent, which is why
his Computer Guy business failed, that someone took the time to
call the competitor who was well aware of Glasser because people
mistakenly took their computers to Glasser instead of the other
shop because the names were similar.
It was a brilliant marketing strategy IMHO.
It's right out of the movie "Miracle on 34th Street" where if
Macy's department store didn't stock a particular item, they sent
the customer to Gimbels department
store which was their main competitor at the time.
They had horrible experiences with Glasser's The Prescott Computer
Guy and the other business started to receive complaints for
computers they never tried to repair.
So their brand was being destroyed by snit.
Makes sense.
That's when the Michael Glasser discount began and numerous people
called that shop and confirmed it.
Glasser is the only one denying it happened.
True.
This is another one of snit's antics you can dig up if you are
honest. You claim to be a detective and this is 101 level.
3. " Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing."
See how Glasser twists what actually happened? This is Glasser
altering his version of the story he tells.
That's one of snit's go to tricks.
He assumes that people are too ignorant to notice.
He is wrong.
Snit posted about his personal problems with a computer and
Gremlin among others offered suggestions. It was obvious that
Glasser had zero chance of repairing it.
People were doing him a favor.
Obviously a total waste of time.
That's why snit is -9999.
Personally I would take it as an honor for someone with Gremlin's
vast knowledge offering to assist me.
Snit twists that into "Glasser asking Gremlin to help with a
computer.
Same.
Gremlin complimented me on cleaning a rather nasty virus from a
friend's Windows
PC and it meant a lot to me. I don't even run Windows! Common sense
and a well at that time did not detect it.
Gremlin knows his stuff and applies his diagnostic troublshooting
skills across platforms.
that kind of knowledge cannot be learned from a book. It's
experience coupled with
a mind that is able to think analytically.
Neither of which snit possess which is why he so obviously jealous
of Gremlin and Steve Carroll as well.
See it?
Of course you do.
Now will you admit it or run away?
He will run away.
4. Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin
confusing an Internet boot with a local one."
More of snit attempting to alter the story of what actually
happened. Pothead, AFAIK, never blamed you for Gremlin confusing
boot methods. That's Glasser making up shit again. Glasser didn't
even know how to get into recovery mode on a MAC which is a
REQUIREMENT to Internet boot.
That is correct.
Gremlin had to show Glasser how and Gremlin isn't a Mac person but
Glasser claims to be one.
<eyeroll>
Correct again.
Can you imagine a person running a business offering repairs of
computers who has no clue how to boot into recovery mode?
That's like someone opening up an auto repair business and is
asking "what are these
numbers on my wrenches ?".
See it David?
Or will you run from this one as well?
Run DB, run!
You are no Forest Gump though.
5. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy,
they push it to get attention and to promote their in-group
nonsense.
For this one Glasser's lame defense is that if you look currently
at various court sites in the various places where Glasser lived,
like Las Vegas, and numerous places in Arizona, very little is
CURRENTLY publicly viewable.
Glasser tries to claim that this proves the legal issues are made
up to harm him.
At first snit attempted to spin it claiming Usenet isn't an
accurate source of information while ignoring that the official
court website was posted and it was a
.gov site so unlikely to be fake.
Snit is simply a dishonest piece of shit.
It's what he is.
There is no other explanation for his behavior.
Nothing is farther from the truth.
The PUBLIC viewable web pages only keep violations posted for a
number of years which depends upon the particular court at which
point they are purged from the PUBLIC website.
They are however obtainable from the court for a small fee because
they are considered public record.
This is true and has been explained to snit many times already.
Aside from his divorce and haressment in public criminal arrest, the
majority of snit's court cases are multitudes of traffic violations.
Mostly for speeding and not having active insurance or financial
responsibility.
Same as the childcare business he ran out of his trailer. For
someone who claims to be honest
and honorable he sure breaks the law a lot.
Here is AZ policy.
<https://share.google/aimode/2PECv8mjLbC8qd4MF>
"Traffic violations generally remain on Arizona public court
websites and motor vehicle records for three to five years, though
points for those violations are officially active for only 1 year.
More serious, criminal violations (e.g., DUI, reckless driving) may
remain accessible on court records for a longer period."
This is why if you run a background check on Michael Glasser these
still show up.
Several people have done this.
However, in order to obtain the documents one has to agree to not
post them publicly and they are somehow watermarked so it's not a
good idea.
Besides nothing further is required as a decent background check
reveals snit's sordid criminal history.
In truth, snit should not be allowed to get behind the wheel of a
car.
And many people have posted screenshots which actually did show the
incidents before they were removed from the public website.
Glasser claims they are faked which is a lie.
Snit is tossing whatever he can at the wall and trying to conflate
the issue. Enough honest people took screenshots or viewed the
original files to debunk snit's lame claims.
As for Michael Glasser's public harassment arrest that too was
screenshot by numerous people and removed from the public website
because despite being arrested, fingerprinted, mugshot and so
forth, a settlement between the court and Michael Glasser was
reached so it was rightfully removed.
Correct.
It's just more lies by Michael Glasser.
That should keep you busy for a while David.
Here is another one snit keeps pushing:
'Snit, Where is Your Proof That Carroll Claimed The Police Visited
Him?'
https://groups.google.com/g/talk.politics.guns/c/BpDIKI3GVn0/m/Zc1f0gBMAwAJ >>>
Read through this one to see how many times snit has changed his
story. It's hilarious!
Why snit continues to make a fool of himself in public remains a
mystery though.
Notice how you lie your ass off. I bring receipts.
where are your receipts to confirm those statements?
Have I missed them?
If you have provided evidence please re-post.
And if I am incorrect and you can prove it I will of course apologize.
On Mar 10, 2026 at 10:37:17 AM MST, "%" wrote <[email protected]>:
Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 9, 2026 at 5:09:04 PM MST, "%" wrotehe's an idiot
<[email protected]>:
Linuxiac wrote:
Glock wrote:sock
On Sun, 8 Mar 2026 19:48:22 +0000, David B. wrote:
On 08/03/2026 19:34, Brock McNuggets wrote:nothing >>>> concerning.
On Mar 8, 2026 at 12:59:17 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<[email protected]>:
On 08/03/2026 05:25, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 5, 2026 at 1:35:21 PM MST, "Apd" wrote
<10ocpeb$45rm$[email protected]>:
On 05/03/2026 20:00, David B. wrote:
On 05/03/2026 19:50, Apd wrote:
Oh, you mean capital. I have a few investments.
Me either!
You don't have investments?
The markets are a bit volatile right now!
Mine are longer term.
I have a good mix. With the market down I am down a bit but
should not >> be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at >>>>>> the never >> ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... >>>>>> it does not >> even make sense. Or his nonsense about me asking him >>>>>> to help with a >> computer when I did no such thing.I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are >>>>>>>> poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in >>>>>> my >> actual comments and they are deeply insecure. What they say
Most folk reading here may find your statement surprising! 😉 >>>>>>>>
confusing >> an Internet boot with a local one. Or idiotic and easily >>>>>> disproved >> claims about legal issues. They do not really believe >>>>>> this idiocy, they >> push it to get attention and to promote their >>>>>> in-group nonsense. They >> are basically MAGA and think like them: it >>>>>> is about tribalism and >> scapegoating to them, not honesty orOr Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin
evidence.
Well I, for one, have never seen evidence of you living on State >>>>>>> Benefits (as we call them).
Then you are either stupid or providing shade for Glasser.
If you would like a tutorial in how snit lies his ass off read below. >>>>>> I suspect you already know this but if you are truly an honest person >>>>>> you will read it and comment with something other than "Glasser has >>>>>> never lied to me" when everyone else knows that too is a lie.
So let's begin.
Based upon the comments by Glasser listed above.
1 "I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are >>>>>> poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in my >>>>>> actual comments and they are deeply insecure."
Nobody attacks Glasser because he is or is not poor. What does get >>>>>> pointed out is that snit is a lazy grifter scamming the government >>>>>> regarding disability claims.
There are many posts in groups like *.anxiety and other blogs where >>>>>> snit admits he is housebound, has lost jobs because of his various >>>>>> illnesses.
Additionally you may or may not be aware that prior to Glasser's
appearance in ACW at one time he was posting 1000's upon 1000's of >>>>>> messages, many quite lengthy to COLA and CSMA along with various
Linux groups where he managed to piss off many of the regular posters >>>>>> like Marek Novotny for example.
If you are truly honest, you might want to use your detective skills >>>>>> to research that name and how it applies to snit.
Anyhow, so how does a person holding a legitimate, tax paying job
manage to perform his job and at the same time post 1000's of
messages at all hours of the day and night to Usenet?
How is this possible?
The answer is, it is not possible.
Then of course you have his failed Computer Business, The Prescott >>>>>> Computer Guy" along with his failed daycare business Wickaboo Daycare >>>>>> or something like that.
So now, how does Glasser post 1000's upon 1000's of messages to
Usenet while he has a legitimate, tax paying job AND is running a
side business, failures or not? And BTW nobody cares if his home
businesses were legit and paying taxes as long as they, especially >>>>>> the daycare, was licensed which it was not and why it was shut down. >>>>>>
Are you beginning to understand now?
2. " What they say should not
be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does not >>>>>> even make sense."
The other shop offering a Michael Glasser discount surfaced long
before Glasser ever started posting in ACW.
snit was well known as such a technical incompetent, which is why his >>>>>> Computer Guy business failed, that someone took the time to call the >>>>>> competitor who was well aware of Glasser because people mistakenly >>>>>> took their computers to Glasser instead of the other shop because the >>>>>> names were similar.
they had horrible experiences with Glasser's The Prescott Computer >>>>>> Guy and the other business started to receive complaints for
computers they never tried to repair.
So their brand was being destroyed by snit.
That's when the Michael Glasser discount began and numerous people >>>>>> called that shop and confirmed it.
Glasser is the only one denying it happened.
This is another one of snit's antics you can dig up if you are honest. >>>>>> You claim to be a detective and this is 101 level.
3. " Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing."
See how Glasser twists what actually happened? This is Glasser
altering his version of the story he tells.
Snit posted about his personal problems with a computer and Gremlin >>>>>> among others offered suggestions. It was obvious that Glasser had
zero chance of repairing it.
People were doing him a favor.
Personally I would take it as an honor for someone with Gremlin's
vast knowledge offering to assist me.
Snit twists that into "Glasser asking Gremlin to help with a
computer.
See it?
Of course you do.
Now will you admit it or run away?
4. Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin
confusing an Internet boot with a local one."
More of snit attempting to alter the story of what actually happened. >>>>>> Pothead, AFAIK, never blamed you for Gremlin confusing boot methods. >>>>>> That's Glasser making up shit again. Glasser didn't even know how to >>>>>> get into recovery mode on a MAC which is a REQUIREMENT to Internet >>>>>> boot.
Gremlin had to show Glasser how and Gremlin isn't a Mac person but >>>>>> Glasser claims to be one.
<eyeroll>
See it David?
Or will you run from this one as well?
5. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy, >>>>>> they push it to get attention and to promote their in-group nonsense. >>>>>>
For this one Glasser's lame defense is that if you look currently at >>>>>> various court sites in the various places where Glasser lived, like >>>>>> Las Vegas, and numerous places in Arizona, very little is CURRENTLY >>>>>> publicly viewable.
Glasser tries to claim that this proves the legal issues are made up >>>>>> to harm him.
Nothing is farther from the truth.
The PUBLIC viewable web pages only keep violations posted for a
number of years which depends upon the particular court at which
point they are purged from the PUBLIC website.
They are however obtainable from the court for a small fee because >>>>>> they are considered public record.
This is why if you run a background check on Michael Glasser these >>>>>> still show up.
And many people have posted screenshots which actually did show the >>>>>> incidents before they were removed from the public website.
Glasser claims they are faked which is a lie.
As for Michael Glasser's public harassment arrest that too was
screenshot by numerous people and removed from the public website
because despite being arrested, fingerprinted, mugshot and so forth, >>>>>> a settlement between the court and Michael Glasser was reached so it >>>>>> was rightfully removed.
It's just more lies by Michael Glasser.
That should keep you busy for a while David.
For me, though, cash is king at present!
It is for Glasser as well.
He collects his government disability check and then works off the >>>>>> books, not paying taxes, doing odd jobs.
His ex wife was part of it which is why they were never officially >>>>>> married but for divorce purposes considered a common law marriage.
Is this the same snit who was trolling usenet 10 years ago? If so, I >>>>> cannot believe he is still alive and kicking. He used to flood various >>>>> Linux groups with his crossposting and as a result was a major pain in >>>>> the posterior and there were so many people who wanted to confront him >>>>> F2F in real life and teach him a lesson about libeling decent people >>>>> with his bullshit.
The general consensus was that it wasn't worth the time and effort as >>>>> snit was so sickly that one day he would probably collapse and croak. I >>>>> can't believe that COVID didn't kill him.
Marek was a well respected poster to various Linux groups and a
generous and kind person as well.
He gifted snit a laptop as snit's wife's laptop died. So what did snit >>>>> do? He attacked Marek and subsequently sold the laptop on ebay.
This alone demonstrates what a miserable person snit is.
I can't comment on his wife however back then it was obvious that snit >>>>> was not employed because he was posting so many articles to Usenet that >>>>> there is no way he could have been employed.
I don't recall any crimes posted regarding snit.
That doesn't mean someone didn't post them, but I don't recall seeing >>>>> the posts.
Anyone who doesn't believe what has been written about snit can easily >>>>> look in the archives for
al.linux,alt.os.linux,alt.suse.linux.comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac >>>>> .advocacy and form their own opinions regarding snit.
He seems to be absent from the popular Linux groups so maybe he has
learned his lesson?
Sock boy strikes again!
Weird how Carroll and his crew claim I sold it on eBay but nobody ever found
the listing.
Just sick lies because they cannot quote me doing as they do.
That is overstating him.
On Mar 10, 2026 at 10:36:33 AM MST, "%" wrote <[email protected]>:
Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 9, 2026 at 5:07:22 PM MST, "%" wrotehe doesn't have time he's always here
<[email protected]>:
Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 9, 2026 at 2:58:54 PM MST, "%" wroteover worked penis tugging
<[email protected]>:
Glock wrote:
On Sun, 8 Mar 2026 19:48:22 +0000, David B. wrote:your taxes would still be the same so shut up
On 08/03/2026 19:34, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 8, 2026 at 12:59:17 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<[email protected]>:
On 08/03/2026 05:25, Brock McNuggets wrote:I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are >>>>>>>>> poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in my >>>>>>>>> actual comments and they are deeply insecure. What they say should not
On Mar 5, 2026 at 1:35:21 PM MST, "Apd" wrote
<10ocpeb$45rm$[email protected]>:
On 05/03/2026 20:00, David B. wrote:
On 05/03/2026 19:50, Apd wrote:
Oh, you mean capital. I have a few investments.
Me either!
You don't have investments?
The markets are a bit volatile right now!
Mine are longer term.
I have a good mix. With the market down I am down a bit but nothing >>>>>>>>>>> concerning.
Most folk reading here may find your statement surprising! 😉 >>>>>>>>>
be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never >>>>>>>>> ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does not >>>>>>>>> even make sense. Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a >>>>>>>>> computer when I did no such thing.
Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin confusing >>>>>>>>> an Internet boot with a local one. Or idiotic and easily disproved >>>>>>>>> claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy, they
push it to get attention and to promote their in-group nonsense. They >>>>>>>>> are basically MAGA and think like them: it is about tribalism and >>>>>>>>> scapegoating to them, not honesty or evidence.
Well I, for one, have never seen evidence of you living on State >>>>>>>> Benefits (as we call them).
Then you are either stupid or providing shade for Glasser.
If you would like a tutorial in how snit lies his ass off read below. I >>>>>>> suspect you already know this but if you are truly an honest person you >>>>>>> will read it and comment with something other than "Glasser has never lied
to me" when everyone else knows that too is a lie.
So let's begin.
Based upon the comments by Glasser listed above.
1 "I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are >>>>>>> poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in my >>>>>>> actual comments and they are deeply insecure."
Nobody attacks Glasser because he is or is not poor. What does get pointed
out is that snit is a lazy grifter scamming the government regarding >>>>>>> disability claims.
There are many posts in groups like *.anxiety and other blogs where snit
admits he is housebound, has lost jobs because of his various illnesses.
Additionally you may or may not be aware that prior to Glasser's >>>>>>> appearance in ACW at one time he was posting 1000's upon 1000's of >>>>>>> messages, many quite lengthy to COLA and CSMA along with various Linux >>>>>>> groups where he managed to piss off many of the regular posters like Marek
Novotny for example.
If you are truly honest, you might want to use your detective skills to >>>>>>> research that name and how it applies to snit.
Anyhow, so how does a person holding a legitimate, tax paying job manage
to perform his job and at the same time post 1000's of messages at all >>>>>>> hours of the day and night to Usenet?
How is this possible?
The answer is, it is not possible.
Then of course you have his failed Computer Business, The Prescott >>>>>>> Computer Guy" along with his failed daycare business Wickaboo Daycare or
something like that.
So now, how does Glasser post 1000's upon 1000's of messages to Usenet >>>>>>> while he has a legitimate, tax paying job AND is running a side business,
failures or not? And BTW nobody cares if his home businesses were legit >>>>>>> and paying taxes as long as they, especially the daycare, was licensed >>>>>>> which it was not and why it was shut down.
Are you beginning to understand now?
2. " What they say should not
be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never >>>>>>> ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does not >>>>>>> even make sense."
The other shop offering a Michael Glasser discount surfaced long before >>>>>>> Glasser ever started posting in ACW.
snit was well known as such a technical incompetent, which is why his >>>>>>> Computer Guy business failed, that someone took the time to call the >>>>>>> competitor who was well aware of Glasser because people mistakenly took >>>>>>> their computers to Glasser instead of the other shop because the names >>>>>>> were similar.
they had horrible experiences with Glasser's The Prescott Computer Guy and
the other business started to receive complaints for computers they never
tried to repair.
So their brand was being destroyed by snit.
That's when the Michael Glasser discount began and numerous people called
that shop and confirmed it.
Glasser is the only one denying it happened.
This is another one of snit's antics you can dig up if you are honest. >>>>>>> You claim to be a detective and this is 101 level.
3. " Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing."
See how Glasser twists what actually happened? This is Glasser altering >>>>>>> his version of the story he tells.
Snit posted about his personal problems with a computer and Gremlin among
others offered suggestions. It was obvious that Glasser had zero chance of
repairing it.
People were doing him a favor.
Personally I would take it as an honor for someone with Gremlin's vast >>>>>>> knowledge offering to assist me.
Snit twists that into "Glasser asking Gremlin to help with a computer. >>>>>>>
See it?
Of course you do.
Now will you admit it or run away?
4. Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin confusing
an Internet boot with a local one."
More of snit attempting to alter the story of what actually happened. >>>>>>> Pothead, AFAIK, never blamed you for Gremlin confusing boot methods. >>>>>>> That's Glasser making up shit again. Glasser didn't even know how to get
into recovery mode on a MAC which is a REQUIREMENT to Internet boot. >>>>>>>
Gremlin had to show Glasser how and Gremlin isn't a Mac person but Glasser
claims to be one.
<eyeroll>
See it David?
Or will you run from this one as well?
5. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy, they >>>>>>> push it to get attention and to promote their in-group nonsense. >>>>>>>
For this one Glasser's lame defense is that if you look currently at >>>>>>> various court sites in the various places where Glasser lived, like Las >>>>>>> Vegas, and numerous places in Arizona, very little is CURRENTLY publicly
viewable.
Glasser tries to claim that this proves the legal issues are made up to >>>>>>> harm him.
Nothing is farther from the truth.
The PUBLIC viewable web pages only keep violations posted for a number of
years which depends upon the particular court at which point they are >>>>>>> purged from the PUBLIC website.
They are however obtainable from the court for a small fee because they >>>>>>> are considered public record.
This is why if you run a background check on Michael Glasser these still
show up.
And many people have posted screenshots which actually did show the >>>>>>> incidents before they were removed from the public website.
Glasser claims they are faked which is a lie.
As for Michael Glasser's public harassment arrest that too was screenshot
by numerous people and removed from the public website because despite >>>>>>> being arrested, fingerprinted, mugshot and so forth, a settlement between
the court and Michael Glasser was reached so it was rightfully removed. >>>>>>>
It's just more lies by Michael Glasser.
That should keep you busy for a while David.
For me, though, cash is king at present!
It is for Glasser as well.
He collects his government disability check and then works off the books,
not paying taxes, doing odd jobs.
His ex wife was part of it which is why they were never officially married
but for divorce purposes considered a common law marriage.
Carroll is having another tantrum.
He never mentions any partner. Hmmmm....
Using one of a thousand names.
On 11 Mar 2026 01:36:42 GMT
"Nobody" <[email protected]> wrote:
Linuxiac wrote:
Glock wrote:
On Sun, 8 Mar 2026 19:48:22 +0000, David B. wrote:
On 08/03/2026 19:34, Brock McNuggets wrote:nothing >>>> concerning.
On Mar 8, 2026 at 12:59:17 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<[email protected]>:
On 08/03/2026 05:25, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 5, 2026 at 1:35:21 PM MST, "Apd" wrote
<10ocpeb$45rm$[email protected]>:
On 05/03/2026 20:00, David B. wrote:
On 05/03/2026 19:50, Apd wrote:
Oh, you mean capital. I have a few investments.
Me either!
You don't have investments?
The markets are a bit volatile right now!
Mine are longer term.
I have a good mix. With the market down I am down a bit but
are >> poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong
Most folk reading here may find your statement surprising! 😉
I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you
doing in my >> actual comments and they are deeply insecure. What
they say should not >> be taken to reflect what they actually
believe. Look at the never >> ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot
claim of discounts... it does not >> even make sense. Or his
nonsense about me asking him to help with a >> computer when I did
no such thing. >> Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible
for Gremlin confusing >> an Internet boot with a local one. Or
idiotic and easily disproved >> claims about legal issues. They do
not really believe this idiocy, they >> push it to get attention
and to promote their in-group nonsense. They >> are basically MAGA
and think like them: it is about tribalism and >> scapegoating to
them, not honesty or evidence.
Well I, for one, have never seen evidence of you living on State
Benefits (as we call them).
Then you are either stupid or providing shade for Glasser.
If you would like a tutorial in how snit lies his ass off read
below. I suspect you already know this but if you are truly an
honest person you will read it and comment with something other
than "Glasser has never lied to me" when everyone else knows that
too is a lie. So let's begin.
Based upon the comments by Glasser listed above.
1 "I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you
are poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong
doing in my actual comments and they are deeply insecure."
Nobody attacks Glasser because he is or is not poor. What does get
pointed out is that snit is a lazy grifter scamming the government
regarding disability claims.
There are many posts in groups like *.anxiety and other blogs
where snit admits he is housebound, has lost jobs because of his
various illnesses.
Additionally you may or may not be aware that prior to Glasser's
appearance in ACW at one time he was posting 1000's upon 1000's
of messages, many quite lengthy to COLA and CSMA along with
various Linux groups where he managed to piss off many of the
regular posters like Marek Novotny for example.
If you are truly honest, you might want to use your detective
skills to research that name and how it applies to snit.
Anyhow, so how does a person holding a legitimate, tax paying job
manage to perform his job and at the same time post 1000's of
messages at all hours of the day and night to Usenet?
How is this possible?
The answer is, it is not possible.
Then of course you have his failed Computer Business, The
Prescott Computer Guy" along with his failed daycare business
Wickaboo Daycare or something like that.
So now, how does Glasser post 1000's upon 1000's of messages to
Usenet while he has a legitimate, tax paying job AND is running a
side business, failures or not? And BTW nobody cares if his home
businesses were legit and paying taxes as long as they, especially
the daycare, was licensed which it was not and why it was shut
down.
Are you beginning to understand now?
2. " What they say should not
be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does
not even make sense."
The other shop offering a Michael Glasser discount surfaced long
before Glasser ever started posting in ACW.
snit was well known as such a technical incompetent, which is why
his Computer Guy business failed, that someone took the time to
call the competitor who was well aware of Glasser because people
mistakenly took their computers to Glasser instead of the other
shop because the names were similar.
they had horrible experiences with Glasser's The Prescott Computer
Guy and the other business started to receive complaints for
computers they never tried to repair.
So their brand was being destroyed by snit.
That's when the Michael Glasser discount began and numerous people
called that shop and confirmed it.
Glasser is the only one denying it happened.
This is another one of snit's antics you can dig up if you are
honest. You claim to be a detective and this is 101 level.
3. " Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing."
See how Glasser twists what actually happened? This is Glasser
altering his version of the story he tells.
Snit posted about his personal problems with a computer and
Gremlin among others offered suggestions. It was obvious that
Glasser had zero chance of repairing it.
People were doing him a favor.
Personally I would take it as an honor for someone with Gremlin's
vast knowledge offering to assist me.
Snit twists that into "Glasser asking Gremlin to help with a
computer.
See it?
Of course you do.
Now will you admit it or run away?
4. Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin
confusing an Internet boot with a local one."
More of snit attempting to alter the story of what actually
happened. Pothead, AFAIK, never blamed you for Gremlin confusing
boot methods. That's Glasser making up shit again. Glasser didn't
even know how to get into recovery mode on a MAC which is a
REQUIREMENT to Internet boot.
Gremlin had to show Glasser how and Gremlin isn't a Mac person but
Glasser claims to be one.
<eyeroll>
See it David?
Or will you run from this one as well?
5. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy,
they push it to get attention and to promote their in-group
nonsense.
For this one Glasser's lame defense is that if you look currently
at various court sites in the various places where Glasser lived,
like Las Vegas, and numerous places in Arizona, very little is
CURRENTLY publicly viewable.
Glasser tries to claim that this proves the legal issues are made
up to harm him.
Nothing is farther from the truth.
The PUBLIC viewable web pages only keep violations posted for a
number of years which depends upon the particular court at which
point they are purged from the PUBLIC website.
They are however obtainable from the court for a small fee because
they are considered public record.
This is why if you run a background check on Michael Glasser these
still show up.
And many people have posted screenshots which actually did show
the incidents before they were removed from the public website.
Glasser claims they are faked which is a lie.
As for Michael Glasser's public harassment arrest that too was
screenshot by numerous people and removed from the public website
because despite being arrested, fingerprinted, mugshot and so
forth, a settlement between the court and Michael Glasser was
reached so it was rightfully removed.
It's just more lies by Michael Glasser.
That should keep you busy for a while David.
For me, though, cash is king at present!
It is for Glasser as well.
He collects his government disability check and then works off the
books, not paying taxes, doing odd jobs.
His ex wife was part of it which is why they were never officially
married but for divorce purposes considered a common law
marriage.
Is this the same snit who was trolling usenet 10 years ago? If so, I
cannot believe he is still alive and kicking. He used to flood
various Linux groups with his crossposting and as a result was a
major pain in the posterior and there were so many people who
wanted to confront him F2F in real life and teach him a lesson
about libeling decent people with his bullshit.
The general consensus was that it wasn't worth the time and effort
as snit was so sickly that one day he would probably collapse and
croak. I can't believe that COVID didn't kill him.
Marek was a well respected poster to various Linux groups and a
generous and kind person as well.
He gifted snit a laptop as snit's wife's laptop died. So what did
snit do? He attacked Marek and subsequently sold the laptop on ebay.
This alone demonstrates what a miserable person snit is.
I can't comment on his wife however back then it was obvious that
snit was not employed because he was posting so many articles to
Usenet that there is no way he could have been employed.
I don't recall any crimes posted regarding snit.
That doesn't mean someone didn't post them, but I don't recall
seeing the posts.
Anyone who doesn't believe what has been written about snit can
easily look in the archives for
al.linux,alt.os.linux,alt.suse.linux.comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.m
ac .advocacy and form their own opinions regarding snit.
He seems to be absent from the popular Linux groups so maybe he has
learned his lesson?
tell me what is the obsession with this snit poster? From cross posts
in alt.home.repair and comp.sys.mac.advocacy, both of which I lurk in,
snit seems to be mentally retarded, at least from what I have read.
He or she doesn't seem to be a troll but more of an ill informed
poster.
I do have one direct question for you Linuxiac and that is why do you
seemingly have the same ASCII art X-Face of a chicken as snit does?
Maybe my outdated newsreader is tripping on itself again, but I'm
curious. I'm sure there is an explanation and if I am wrong, someone
please correct me.
Looks like you have uncloaked yet another snit sock.
The post also seems to come from the same Mac usenet reader and version
that snit uses.
Let's see how he tries to lie his way out of this tell.
On 11 Mar 2026 01:36:42 GMT
"Nobody" <[email protected]> wrote:
Linuxiac wrote:
Glock wrote:
On Sun, 8 Mar 2026 19:48:22 +0000, David B. wrote:
On 08/03/2026 19:34, Brock McNuggets wrote:nothing >>>> concerning.
On Mar 8, 2026 at 12:59:17 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<[email protected]>:
On 08/03/2026 05:25, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 5, 2026 at 1:35:21 PM MST, "Apd" wrote
<10ocpeb$45rm$[email protected]>:
On 05/03/2026 20:00, David B. wrote:
On 05/03/2026 19:50, Apd wrote:
Oh, you mean capital. I have a few investments.
Me either!
You don't have investments?
The markets are a bit volatile right now!
Mine are longer term.
I have a good mix. With the market down I am down a bit but
are >> poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong
Most folk reading here may find your statement surprising! 😉
I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you
doing in my >> actual comments and they are deeply insecure. What
they say should not >> be taken to reflect what they actually
believe. Look at the never >> ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot
claim of discounts... it does not >> even make sense. Or his
nonsense about me asking him to help with a >> computer when I did
no such thing. >> Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible
for Gremlin confusing >> an Internet boot with a local one. Or
idiotic and easily disproved >> claims about legal issues. They do
not really believe this idiocy, they >> push it to get attention
and to promote their in-group nonsense. They >> are basically MAGA
and think like them: it is about tribalism and >> scapegoating to
them, not honesty or evidence.
Well I, for one, have never seen evidence of you living on State
Benefits (as we call them).
Then you are either stupid or providing shade for Glasser.
If you would like a tutorial in how snit lies his ass off read
below. I suspect you already know this but if you are truly an
honest person you will read it and comment with something other
than "Glasser has never lied to me" when everyone else knows that
too is a lie. So let's begin.
Based upon the comments by Glasser listed above.
1 "I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you
are poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong
doing in my actual comments and they are deeply insecure."
Nobody attacks Glasser because he is or is not poor. What does get
pointed out is that snit is a lazy grifter scamming the government
regarding disability claims.
There are many posts in groups like *.anxiety and other blogs
where snit admits he is housebound, has lost jobs because of his
various illnesses.
Additionally you may or may not be aware that prior to Glasser's
appearance in ACW at one time he was posting 1000's upon 1000's
of messages, many quite lengthy to COLA and CSMA along with
various Linux groups where he managed to piss off many of the
regular posters like Marek Novotny for example.
If you are truly honest, you might want to use your detective
skills to research that name and how it applies to snit.
Anyhow, so how does a person holding a legitimate, tax paying job
manage to perform his job and at the same time post 1000's of
messages at all hours of the day and night to Usenet?
How is this possible?
The answer is, it is not possible.
Then of course you have his failed Computer Business, The
Prescott Computer Guy" along with his failed daycare business
Wickaboo Daycare or something like that.
So now, how does Glasser post 1000's upon 1000's of messages to
Usenet while he has a legitimate, tax paying job AND is running a
side business, failures or not? And BTW nobody cares if his home
businesses were legit and paying taxes as long as they, especially
the daycare, was licensed which it was not and why it was shut
down.
Are you beginning to understand now?
2. " What they say should not
be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does
not even make sense."
The other shop offering a Michael Glasser discount surfaced long
before Glasser ever started posting in ACW.
snit was well known as such a technical incompetent, which is why
his Computer Guy business failed, that someone took the time to
call the competitor who was well aware of Glasser because people
mistakenly took their computers to Glasser instead of the other
shop because the names were similar.
they had horrible experiences with Glasser's The Prescott Computer
Guy and the other business started to receive complaints for
computers they never tried to repair.
So their brand was being destroyed by snit.
That's when the Michael Glasser discount began and numerous people
called that shop and confirmed it.
Glasser is the only one denying it happened.
This is another one of snit's antics you can dig up if you are
honest. You claim to be a detective and this is 101 level.
3. " Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing."
See how Glasser twists what actually happened? This is Glasser
altering his version of the story he tells.
Snit posted about his personal problems with a computer and
Gremlin among others offered suggestions. It was obvious that
Glasser had zero chance of repairing it.
People were doing him a favor.
Personally I would take it as an honor for someone with Gremlin's
vast knowledge offering to assist me.
Snit twists that into "Glasser asking Gremlin to help with a
computer.
See it?
Of course you do.
Now will you admit it or run away?
4. Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin
confusing an Internet boot with a local one."
More of snit attempting to alter the story of what actually
happened. Pothead, AFAIK, never blamed you for Gremlin confusing
boot methods. That's Glasser making up shit again. Glasser didn't
even know how to get into recovery mode on a MAC which is a
REQUIREMENT to Internet boot.
Gremlin had to show Glasser how and Gremlin isn't a Mac person but
Glasser claims to be one.
<eyeroll>
See it David?
Or will you run from this one as well?
5. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy,
they push it to get attention and to promote their in-group
nonsense.
For this one Glasser's lame defense is that if you look currently
at various court sites in the various places where Glasser lived,
like Las Vegas, and numerous places in Arizona, very little is
CURRENTLY publicly viewable.
Glasser tries to claim that this proves the legal issues are made
up to harm him.
Nothing is farther from the truth.
The PUBLIC viewable web pages only keep violations posted for a
number of years which depends upon the particular court at which
point they are purged from the PUBLIC website.
They are however obtainable from the court for a small fee because
they are considered public record.
This is why if you run a background check on Michael Glasser these
still show up.
And many people have posted screenshots which actually did show
the incidents before they were removed from the public website.
Glasser claims they are faked which is a lie.
As for Michael Glasser's public harassment arrest that too was
screenshot by numerous people and removed from the public website
because despite being arrested, fingerprinted, mugshot and so
forth, a settlement between the court and Michael Glasser was
reached so it was rightfully removed.
It's just more lies by Michael Glasser.
That should keep you busy for a while David.
For me, though, cash is king at present!
It is for Glasser as well.
He collects his government disability check and then works off the
books, not paying taxes, doing odd jobs.
His ex wife was part of it which is why they were never officially
married but for divorce purposes considered a common law
marriage.
Is this the same snit who was trolling usenet 10 years ago? If so, I
cannot believe he is still alive and kicking. He used to flood
various Linux groups with his crossposting and as a result was a
major pain in the posterior and there were so many people who
wanted to confront him F2F in real life and teach him a lesson
about libeling decent people with his bullshit.
The general consensus was that it wasn't worth the time and effort
as snit was so sickly that one day he would probably collapse and
croak. I can't believe that COVID didn't kill him.
Marek was a well respected poster to various Linux groups and a
generous and kind person as well.
He gifted snit a laptop as snit's wife's laptop died. So what did
snit do? He attacked Marek and subsequently sold the laptop on ebay.
This alone demonstrates what a miserable person snit is.
I can't comment on his wife however back then it was obvious that
snit was not employed because he was posting so many articles to
Usenet that there is no way he could have been employed.
I don't recall any crimes posted regarding snit.
That doesn't mean someone didn't post them, but I don't recall
seeing the posts.
Anyone who doesn't believe what has been written about snit can
easily look in the archives for
al.linux,alt.os.linux,alt.suse.linux.comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.m
ac .advocacy and form their own opinions regarding snit.
He seems to be absent from the popular Linux groups so maybe he has
learned his lesson?
tell me what is the obsession with this snit poster? From cross posts
in alt.home.repair and comp.sys.mac.advocacy, both of which I lurk in,
snit seems to be mentally retarded, at least from what I have read.
He or she doesn't seem to be a troll but more of an ill informed
poster.
I do have one direct question for you Linuxiac and that is why do you
seemingly have the same ASCII art X-Face of a chicken as snit does?
Maybe my outdated newsreader is tripping on itself again, but I'm
curious. I'm sure there is an explanation and if I am wrong, someone
please correct me.
Looks like you have uncloaked yet another snit sock.
The post also seems to come from the same Mac usenet reader and version
that snit uses.
Let's see how he tries to lie his way out of this tell.
On 11 Mar 2026 01:43:22 GMT
Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> wrote:
On Mar 10, 2026 at 3:42:10 PM MST, "pothead" wrote <10oq6o2$l0n8$[email protected]>:
On 2026-03-09, Glock <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sun, 8 Mar 2026 19:48:22 +0000, David B. wrote:
On 08/03/2026 19:34, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 8, 2026 at 12:59:17 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<[email protected]>:
On 08/03/2026 05:25, Brock McNuggets wrote:I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you
On Mar 5, 2026 at 1:35:21 PM MST, "Apd" wrote
<10ocpeb$45rm$[email protected]>:
On 05/03/2026 20:00, David B. wrote:
On 05/03/2026 19:50, Apd wrote:
Oh, you mean capital. I have a few investments.
Me either!
You don't have investments?
The markets are a bit volatile right now!
Mine are longer term.
I have a good mix. With the market down I am down a bit but
nothing concerning.
Most folk reading here may find your statement surprising! 😉 >>>>
are poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong
doing in my actual comments and they are deeply insecure. What
they say should not be taken to reflect what they actually
believe. Look at the never ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot
claim of discounts... it does not even make sense. Or his
nonsense about me asking him to help with a computer when I did
no such thing. Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible
for Gremlin confusing an Internet boot with a local one. Or
idiotic and easily disproved claims about legal issues. They do
not really believe this idiocy, they push it to get attention
and to promote their in-group nonsense. They are basically MAGA
and think like them: it is about tribalism and scapegoating to
them, not honesty or evidence.
Well I, for one, have never seen evidence of you living on State
Benefits (as we call them).
Then you are either stupid or providing shade for Glasser.
DB is not *THAT* stupid. Snit is still a useful idiot for him so
he hasn't tossed him under the bus.
*Yet*.
If you would like a tutorial in how snit lies his ass off read
below. I suspect you already know this but if you are truly an
honest person you will read it and comment with something other
than "Glasser has never lied to me" when everyone else knows that
too is a lie. So let's begin.
Based upon the comments by Glasser listed above.
DB will deny everything, ignore common sense and logic and demand
further proof.
Snit will probably call you and everyone else a sock. I have snit
at -9999 so I only see replies.
And of course snit the troll who prides himself as providing
receipts will never provide
receipts to prove someone is a sock.
It's how snit's diseased brain functions.
Bizarre isn't it?
1 "I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you
are poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong
doing in my actual comments and they are deeply insecure."
Nobody attacks Glasser because he is or is not poor. What does
get pointed out is that snit is a lazy grifter scamming the
government regarding disability claims. There are many posts in
groups like *.anxiety and other blogs where snit admits he is
housebound, has lost jobs because of his various illnesses.
Have you dug up posts where snit asks about prescription
cocktails? What a loose nut.
Additionally you may or may not be aware that prior to Glasser's
appearance in ACW at one time he was posting 1000's upon 1000's
of messages, many quite lengthy to COLA and CSMA along with
various Linux groups where he managed to piss off many of the
regular posters like Marek Novotny for example.
Not counting snit's floodbot.
If you are truly honest, you might want to use your detective
skills to research that name and how it applies to snit.
Anyhow, so how does a person holding a legitimate, tax paying job
manage to perform his job and at the same time post 1000's of
messages at all hours of the day and night to Usenet?
How is this possible?
The answer is, it is not possible.
Unless his job is being paid to troll, of course it's not
possible. How does one stay up half the night and then get up to
go to a job in the morning?
Those snit drug cocktails will only work to a point and then only
for a while.
Then of course you have his failed Computer Business, The
Prescott Computer Guy" along with his failed daycare business
Wickaboo Daycare or something like that.
Well, to his credit at least he did try to go into business for
himself. But having a guaranteed government income does help.
It's not like quitting your job at Exxon to start a house
cleaning business where you no longer have the income from Exxon
to rely on.
So now, how does Glasser post 1000's upon 1000's of messages to
Usenet while he has a legitimate, tax paying job AND is running
a side business, failures or not? And BTW nobody cares if his
home businesses were legit and paying taxes as long as they,
especially the daycare, was licensed which it was not and why it
was shut down.
There are a lot of businesses in the underground economy.
However choosing a business like child care which requires
insurance and associated documentation is not a business to start
if you want to remain in the underground economy.
Are you beginning to understand now?
DB has understood from day one.
He's manipulated snit into his very own useful idiot.
And of course snit took the bait.
2. " What they say should not
be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does
not even make sense."
The other shop offering a Michael Glasser discount surfaced long
before Glasser ever started posting in ACW.
True.
Search COLA and you will find numerous people who confirmed the
snit discount.
snit was well known as such a technical incompetent, which is why
his Computer Guy business failed, that someone took the time to
call the competitor who was well aware of Glasser because people
mistakenly took their computers to Glasser instead of the other
shop because the names were similar.
It was a brilliant marketing strategy IMHO.
It's right out of the movie "Miracle on 34th Street" where if
Macy's department store didn't stock a particular item, they sent
the customer to Gimbels department
store which was their main competitor at the time.
They had horrible experiences with Glasser's The Prescott
Computer Guy and the other business started to receive
complaints for computers they never tried to repair. So their
brand was being destroyed by snit.
Makes sense.
That's when the Michael Glasser discount began and numerous
people called that shop and confirmed it. Glasser is the only
one denying it happened.
True.
This is another one of snit's antics you can dig up if you are
honest. You claim to be a detective and this is 101 level.
3. " Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing."
See how Glasser twists what actually happened? This is Glasser
altering his version of the story he tells.
That's one of snit's go to tricks.
He assumes that people are too ignorant to notice.
He is wrong.
Snit posted about his personal problems with a computer and
Gremlin among others offered suggestions. It was obvious that
Glasser had zero chance of repairing it.
People were doing him a favor.
Obviously a total waste of time.
That's why snit is -9999.
Personally I would take it as an honor for someone with Gremlin's
vast knowledge offering to assist me.
Snit twists that into "Glasser asking Gremlin to help with a
computer.
Same. Gremlin complimented me on cleaning a rather nasty virus
from a friend's Windows PC and it meant a lot to me. I don't even
run Windows! Common sense and a well at that time did not detect
it.
Gremlin knows his stuff and applies his diagnostic troublshooting
skills across platforms.
that kind of knowledge cannot be learned from a book. It's
experience coupled with
a mind that is able to think analytically.
Neither of which snit possess which is why he so obviously jealous
of Gremlin and Steve Carroll as well.
See it?
Of course you do.
Now will you admit it or run away?
He will run away.
4. Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin
confusing an Internet boot with a local one."
More of snit attempting to alter the story of what actually
happened. Pothead, AFAIK, never blamed you for Gremlin confusing
boot methods. That's Glasser making up shit again. Glasser didn't
even know how to get into recovery mode on a MAC which is a
REQUIREMENT to Internet boot.
That is correct.
Gremlin had to show Glasser how and Gremlin isn't a Mac person
but Glasser claims to be one. <eyeroll>
Correct again.
Can you imagine a person running a business offering repairs of
computers who has no clue how to boot into recovery mode?
That's like someone opening up an auto repair business and is
asking "what are these
numbers on my wrenches ?".
See it David?
Or will you run from this one as well?
Run DB, run!
You are no Forest Gump though.
5. Or idiotic and easily disproved claims about legal issues.
They do not really believe this idiocy, they push it to get
attention and to promote their in-group nonsense.
For this one Glasser's lame defense is that if you look currently
at various court sites in the various places where Glasser lived,
like Las Vegas, and numerous places in Arizona, very little is
CURRENTLY publicly viewable.
Glasser tries to claim that this proves the legal issues are made
up to harm him.
At first snit attempted to spin it claiming Usenet isn't an
accurate source of information while ignoring that the official
court website was posted and it was a
.gov site so unlikely to be fake.
Snit is simply a dishonest piece of shit.
It's what he is.
There is no other explanation for his behavior.
Nothing is farther from the truth. The PUBLIC viewable web pages
only keep violations posted for a number of years which depends
upon the particular court at which point they are purged from
the PUBLIC website. They are however obtainable from the court
for a small fee because they are considered public record.
This is true and has been explained to snit many times already.
Aside from his divorce and haressment in public criminal arrest,
the majority of snit's court cases are multitudes of traffic
violations. Mostly for speeding and not having active insurance
or financial responsibility.
Same as the childcare business he ran out of his trailer. For
someone who claims to be honest
and honorable he sure breaks the law a lot.
Here is AZ policy.
<https://share.google/aimode/2PECv8mjLbC8qd4MF>
"Traffic violations generally remain on Arizona public court
websites and motor vehicle records for three to five years,
though points for those violations are officially active for only
1 year. More serious, criminal violations (e.g., DUI, reckless
driving) may remain accessible on court records for a longer
period."
This is why if you run a background check on Michael Glasser
these still show up.
Several people have done this.
However, in order to obtain the documents one has to agree to not
post them publicly and they are somehow watermarked so it's not a
good idea.
Besides nothing further is required as a decent background check
reveals snit's sordid criminal history.
In truth, snit should not be allowed to get behind the wheel of a
car.
And many people have posted screenshots which actually did show
the incidents before they were removed from the public website.
Glasser claims they are faked which is a lie.
Snit is tossing whatever he can at the wall and trying to conflate
the issue. Enough honest people took screenshots or viewed the
original files to debunk snit's lame claims.
As for Michael Glasser's public harassment arrest that too was
screenshot by numerous people and removed from the public website
because despite being arrested, fingerprinted, mugshot and so
forth, a settlement between the court and Michael Glasser was
reached so it was rightfully removed.
Correct.
It's just more lies by Michael Glasser.
That should keep you busy for a while David.
Here is another one snit keeps pushing:
'Snit, Where is Your Proof That Carroll Claimed The Police Visited
Him?'
https://groups.google.com/g/talk.politics.guns/c/BpDIKI3GVn0/m/Zc1f0gBMAwAJ
Read through this one to see how many times snit has changed his
story. It's hilarious!
Why snit continues to make a fool of himself in public remains a
mystery though.
Notice how you lie your ass off. I bring receipts.
So you keep repeating yet you routinely accuse people of being socks
so where are your receipts to confirm those statements? Have I missed
them? If you have provided evidence please re-post. And if I am
incorrect and you can prove it I will of course apologize.
If someone criticizes Snit/Brock, then he dismisses their sound
arguments with "whatever, sockboy" and the like.
He's accused _me_ of being a "sock", when I'm pseudonymous -- not
anonymous.
On 11/03/2026 11:16, Creon wrote:
If someone criticizes Snit/Brock, then he dismisses their sound
arguments with "whatever, sockboy" and the like.
He's accused _me_ of being a "sock", when I'm pseudonymous -- not
anonymous.
Well, prove that you aren't!
Tell us who you *REALLY* are!
Isadore wrote:
On 11 Mar 2026 01:36:42 GMTsay it say it say it again
"Nobody" <[email protected]> wrote:
Linuxiac wrote:
Glock wrote:
On Sun, 8 Mar 2026 19:48:22 +0000, David B. wrote:
On 08/03/2026 19:34, Brock McNuggets wrote:nothing >>>> concerning.
On Mar 8, 2026 at 12:59:17 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<[email protected]>:
On 08/03/2026 05:25, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 5, 2026 at 1:35:21 PM MST, "Apd" wrote
<10ocpeb$45rm$[email protected]>:
On 05/03/2026 20:00, David B. wrote:
On 05/03/2026 19:50, Apd wrote:
Oh, you mean capital. I have a few investments.
Me either!
You don't have investments?
The markets are a bit volatile right now!
Mine are longer term.
I have a good mix. With the market down I am down a bit but
are >> poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong
Most folk reading here may find your statement surprising! 😉 >>>>>>>>
I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you
doing in my >> actual comments and they are deeply insecure. What
they say should not >> be taken to reflect what they actually
believe. Look at the never >> ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot
claim of discounts... it does not >> even make sense. Or his
nonsense about me asking him to help with a >> computer when I did
no such thing. >> Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible
for Gremlin confusing >> an Internet boot with a local one. Or
idiotic and easily disproved >> claims about legal issues. They do
not really believe this idiocy, they >> push it to get attention
and to promote their in-group nonsense. They >> are basically MAGA
and think like them: it is about tribalism and >> scapegoating to
them, not honesty or evidence.
Well I, for one, have never seen evidence of you living on State
Benefits (as we call them).
Then you are either stupid or providing shade for Glasser.
If you would like a tutorial in how snit lies his ass off read
below. I suspect you already know this but if you are truly an
honest person you will read it and comment with something other
than "Glasser has never lied to me" when everyone else knows that
too is a lie. So let's begin.
Based upon the comments by Glasser listed above.
1 "I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you
are poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong
doing in my actual comments and they are deeply insecure."
Nobody attacks Glasser because he is or is not poor. What does get
pointed out is that snit is a lazy grifter scamming the government
regarding disability claims.
There are many posts in groups like *.anxiety and other blogs
where snit admits he is housebound, has lost jobs because of his
various illnesses.
Additionally you may or may not be aware that prior to Glasser's
appearance in ACW at one time he was posting 1000's upon 1000's
of messages, many quite lengthy to COLA and CSMA along with
various Linux groups where he managed to piss off many of the
regular posters like Marek Novotny for example.
If you are truly honest, you might want to use your detective
skills to research that name and how it applies to snit.
Anyhow, so how does a person holding a legitimate, tax paying job
manage to perform his job and at the same time post 1000's of
messages at all hours of the day and night to Usenet?
How is this possible?
The answer is, it is not possible.
Then of course you have his failed Computer Business, The
Prescott Computer Guy" along with his failed daycare business
Wickaboo Daycare or something like that.
So now, how does Glasser post 1000's upon 1000's of messages to
Usenet while he has a legitimate, tax paying job AND is running a
side business, failures or not? And BTW nobody cares if his home
businesses were legit and paying taxes as long as they, especially
the daycare, was licensed which it was not and why it was shut
down.
Are you beginning to understand now?
2. " What they say should not
be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does
not even make sense."
The other shop offering a Michael Glasser discount surfaced long
before Glasser ever started posting in ACW.
snit was well known as such a technical incompetent, which is why
his Computer Guy business failed, that someone took the time to
call the competitor who was well aware of Glasser because people
mistakenly took their computers to Glasser instead of the other
shop because the names were similar.
they had horrible experiences with Glasser's The Prescott Computer
Guy and the other business started to receive complaints for
computers they never tried to repair.
So their brand was being destroyed by snit.
That's when the Michael Glasser discount began and numerous people
called that shop and confirmed it.
Glasser is the only one denying it happened.
This is another one of snit's antics you can dig up if you are
honest. You claim to be a detective and this is 101 level.
3. " Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing."
See how Glasser twists what actually happened? This is Glasser
altering his version of the story he tells.
Snit posted about his personal problems with a computer and
Gremlin among others offered suggestions. It was obvious that
Glasser had zero chance of repairing it.
People were doing him a favor.
Personally I would take it as an honor for someone with Gremlin's
vast knowledge offering to assist me.
Snit twists that into "Glasser asking Gremlin to help with a
computer.
See it?
Of course you do.
Now will you admit it or run away?
4. Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin
confusing an Internet boot with a local one."
More of snit attempting to alter the story of what actually
happened. Pothead, AFAIK, never blamed you for Gremlin confusing
boot methods. That's Glasser making up shit again. Glasser didn't
even know how to get into recovery mode on a MAC which is a
REQUIREMENT to Internet boot.
Gremlin had to show Glasser how and Gremlin isn't a Mac person but
Glasser claims to be one.
<eyeroll>
See it David?
Or will you run from this one as well?
5. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy,
they push it to get attention and to promote their in-group
nonsense.
For this one Glasser's lame defense is that if you look currently
at various court sites in the various places where Glasser lived,
like Las Vegas, and numerous places in Arizona, very little is
CURRENTLY publicly viewable.
Glasser tries to claim that this proves the legal issues are made
up to harm him.
Nothing is farther from the truth.
The PUBLIC viewable web pages only keep violations posted for a
number of years which depends upon the particular court at which
point they are purged from the PUBLIC website.
They are however obtainable from the court for a small fee because
they are considered public record.
This is why if you run a background check on Michael Glasser these
still show up.
And many people have posted screenshots which actually did show
the incidents before they were removed from the public website.
Glasser claims they are faked which is a lie.
As for Michael Glasser's public harassment arrest that too was
screenshot by numerous people and removed from the public website
because despite being arrested, fingerprinted, mugshot and so
forth, a settlement between the court and Michael Glasser was
reached so it was rightfully removed.
It's just more lies by Michael Glasser.
That should keep you busy for a while David.
For me, though, cash is king at present!
It is for Glasser as well.
He collects his government disability check and then works off the
books, not paying taxes, doing odd jobs.
His ex wife was part of it which is why they were never officially
married but for divorce purposes considered a common law
marriage.
Is this the same snit who was trolling usenet 10 years ago? If so, I
cannot believe he is still alive and kicking. He used to flood
various Linux groups with his crossposting and as a result was a
major pain in the posterior and there were so many people who
wanted to confront him F2F in real life and teach him a lesson
about libeling decent people with his bullshit.
The general consensus was that it wasn't worth the time and effort
as snit was so sickly that one day he would probably collapse and
croak. I can't believe that COVID didn't kill him.
Marek was a well respected poster to various Linux groups and a
generous and kind person as well.
He gifted snit a laptop as snit's wife's laptop died. So what did
snit do? He attacked Marek and subsequently sold the laptop on ebay.
This alone demonstrates what a miserable person snit is.
I can't comment on his wife however back then it was obvious that
snit was not employed because he was posting so many articles to
Usenet that there is no way he could have been employed.
I don't recall any crimes posted regarding snit.
That doesn't mean someone didn't post them, but I don't recall
seeing the posts.
Anyone who doesn't believe what has been written about snit can
easily look in the archives for
al.linux,alt.os.linux,alt.suse.linux.comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.m >>>> ac .advocacy and form their own opinions regarding snit.
He seems to be absent from the popular Linux groups so maybe he has
learned his lesson?
tell me what is the obsession with this snit poster? From cross posts
in alt.home.repair and comp.sys.mac.advocacy, both of which I lurk in,
snit seems to be mentally retarded, at least from what I have read.
He or she doesn't seem to be a troll but more of an ill informed
poster.
I do have one direct question for you Linuxiac and that is why do you
seemingly have the same ASCII art X-Face of a chicken as snit does?
Maybe my outdated newsreader is tripping on itself again, but I'm
curious. I'm sure there is an explanation and if I am wrong, someone
please correct me.
Looks like you have uncloaked yet another snit sock.
The post also seems to come from the same Mac usenet reader and version
that snit uses.
Let's see how he tries to lie his way out of this tell.
Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 10, 2026 at 10:36:33 AM MST, "%" wrotedaily
<[email protected]>:
Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 9, 2026 at 5:07:22 PM MST, "%" wrotehe doesn't have time he's always here
<[email protected]>:
Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 9, 2026 at 2:58:54 PM MST, "%" wroteover worked penis tugging
<[email protected]>:
Glock wrote:
On Sun, 8 Mar 2026 19:48:22 +0000, David B. wrote:your taxes would still be the same so shut up
On 08/03/2026 19:34, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 8, 2026 at 12:59:17 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<[email protected]>:
On 08/03/2026 05:25, Brock McNuggets wrote:I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are >>>>>>>>>> poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in my
On Mar 5, 2026 at 1:35:21 PM MST, "Apd" wrote
<10ocpeb$45rm$[email protected]>:
On 05/03/2026 20:00, David B. wrote:
On 05/03/2026 19:50, Apd wrote:
Oh, you mean capital. I have a few investments.
Me either!
You don't have investments?
The markets are a bit volatile right now!
Mine are longer term.
I have a good mix. With the market down I am down a bit but nothing
concerning.
Most folk reading here may find your statement surprising! 😉 >>>>>>>>>>
actual comments and they are deeply insecure. What they say should not
be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never >>>>>>>>>> ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does not >>>>>>>>>> even make sense. Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a >>>>>>>>>> computer when I did no such thing.
Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin confusing
an Internet boot with a local one. Or idiotic and easily disproved >>>>>>>>>> claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy, they
push it to get attention and to promote their in-group nonsense. They
are basically MAGA and think like them: it is about tribalism and >>>>>>>>>> scapegoating to them, not honesty or evidence.
Well I, for one, have never seen evidence of you living on State >>>>>>>>> Benefits (as we call them).
Then you are either stupid or providing shade for Glasser.
If you would like a tutorial in how snit lies his ass off read below. I
suspect you already know this but if you are truly an honest person you
will read it and comment with something other than "Glasser has never lied
to me" when everyone else knows that too is a lie.
So let's begin.
Based upon the comments by Glasser listed above.
1 "I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are >>>>>>>> poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in my >>>>>>>> actual comments and they are deeply insecure."
Nobody attacks Glasser because he is or is not poor. What does get pointed
out is that snit is a lazy grifter scamming the government regarding >>>>>>>> disability claims.
There are many posts in groups like *.anxiety and other blogs where snit
admits he is housebound, has lost jobs because of his various illnesses.
Additionally you may or may not be aware that prior to Glasser's >>>>>>>> appearance in ACW at one time he was posting 1000's upon 1000's of >>>>>>>> messages, many quite lengthy to COLA and CSMA along with various Linux >>>>>>>> groups where he managed to piss off many of the regular posters like Marek
Novotny for example.
If you are truly honest, you might want to use your detective skills to
research that name and how it applies to snit.
Anyhow, so how does a person holding a legitimate, tax paying job manage
to perform his job and at the same time post 1000's of messages at all >>>>>>>> hours of the day and night to Usenet?
How is this possible?
The answer is, it is not possible.
Then of course you have his failed Computer Business, The Prescott >>>>>>>> Computer Guy" along with his failed daycare business Wickaboo Daycare or
something like that.
So now, how does Glasser post 1000's upon 1000's of messages to Usenet >>>>>>>> while he has a legitimate, tax paying job AND is running a side business,
failures or not? And BTW nobody cares if his home businesses were legit
and paying taxes as long as they, especially the daycare, was licensed >>>>>>>> which it was not and why it was shut down.
Are you beginning to understand now?
2. " What they say should not
be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never >>>>>>>> ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does not >>>>>>>> even make sense."
The other shop offering a Michael Glasser discount surfaced long before
Glasser ever started posting in ACW.
snit was well known as such a technical incompetent, which is why his >>>>>>>> Computer Guy business failed, that someone took the time to call the >>>>>>>> competitor who was well aware of Glasser because people mistakenly took
their computers to Glasser instead of the other shop because the names >>>>>>>> were similar.
they had horrible experiences with Glasser's The Prescott Computer Guy and
the other business started to receive complaints for computers they never
tried to repair.
So their brand was being destroyed by snit.
That's when the Michael Glasser discount began and numerous people called
that shop and confirmed it.
Glasser is the only one denying it happened.
This is another one of snit's antics you can dig up if you are honest. >>>>>>>> You claim to be a detective and this is 101 level.
3. " Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing."
See how Glasser twists what actually happened? This is Glasser altering
his version of the story he tells.
Snit posted about his personal problems with a computer and Gremlin among
others offered suggestions. It was obvious that Glasser had zero chance of
repairing it.
People were doing him a favor.
Personally I would take it as an honor for someone with Gremlin's vast >>>>>>>> knowledge offering to assist me.
Snit twists that into "Glasser asking Gremlin to help with a computer. >>>>>>>>
See it?
Of course you do.
Now will you admit it or run away?
4. Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin confusing
an Internet boot with a local one."
More of snit attempting to alter the story of what actually happened. >>>>>>>> Pothead, AFAIK, never blamed you for Gremlin confusing boot methods. >>>>>>>> That's Glasser making up shit again. Glasser didn't even know how to get
into recovery mode on a MAC which is a REQUIREMENT to Internet boot. >>>>>>>>
Gremlin had to show Glasser how and Gremlin isn't a Mac person but Glasser
claims to be one.
<eyeroll>
See it David?
Or will you run from this one as well?
5. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy, they
push it to get attention and to promote their in-group nonsense. >>>>>>>>
For this one Glasser's lame defense is that if you look currently at >>>>>>>> various court sites in the various places where Glasser lived, like Las
Vegas, and numerous places in Arizona, very little is CURRENTLY publicly
viewable.
Glasser tries to claim that this proves the legal issues are made up to
harm him.
Nothing is farther from the truth.
The PUBLIC viewable web pages only keep violations posted for a number of
years which depends upon the particular court at which point they are >>>>>>>> purged from the PUBLIC website.
They are however obtainable from the court for a small fee because they
are considered public record.
This is why if you run a background check on Michael Glasser these still
show up.
And many people have posted screenshots which actually did show the >>>>>>>> incidents before they were removed from the public website.
Glasser claims they are faked which is a lie.
As for Michael Glasser's public harassment arrest that too was screenshot
by numerous people and removed from the public website because despite >>>>>>>> being arrested, fingerprinted, mugshot and so forth, a settlement between
the court and Michael Glasser was reached so it was rightfully removed.
It's just more lies by Michael Glasser.
That should keep you busy for a while David.
For me, though, cash is king at present!
It is for Glasser as well.
He collects his government disability check and then works off the books,
not paying taxes, doing odd jobs.
His ex wife was part of it which is why they were never officially married
but for divorce purposes considered a common law marriage.
Carroll is having another tantrum.
He never mentions any partner. Hmmmm....
Using one of a thousand names.
Isadore wrote:
On 11 Mar 2026 01:43:22 GMTits the sock agin
Brock McNuggets <[email protected]> wrote:
On Mar 10, 2026 at 3:42:10 PM MST, "pothead" wroteSo you keep repeating yet you routinely accuse people of being socks so
<10oq6o2$l0n8$[email protected]>:
On 2026-03-09, Glock <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sun, 8 Mar 2026 19:48:22 +0000, David B. wrote:
On 08/03/2026 19:34, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 8, 2026 at 12:59:17 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<[email protected]>:
On 08/03/2026 05:25, Brock McNuggets wrote:I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you
On Mar 5, 2026 at 1:35:21 PM MST, "Apd" wrote
<10ocpeb$45rm$[email protected]>:
On 05/03/2026 20:00, David B. wrote:
On 05/03/2026 19:50, Apd wrote:
Oh, you mean capital. I have a few investments.
Me either!
You don't have investments?
The markets are a bit volatile right now!
Mine are longer term.
I have a good mix. With the market down I am down a bit but
nothing concerning.
Most folk reading here may find your statement surprising! 😉 >>>>>>>
are poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong
doing in my actual comments and they are deeply insecure. What
they say should not be taken to reflect what they actually
believe. Look at the never ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot
claim of discounts... it does not even make sense. Or his
nonsense about me asking him to help with a computer when I did
no such thing. Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible
for Gremlin confusing an Internet boot with a local one. Or
idiotic and easily disproved claims about legal issues. They do
not really believe this idiocy, they push it to get attention
and to promote their in-group nonsense. They are basically MAGA
and think like them: it is about tribalism and scapegoating to
them, not honesty or evidence.
Well I, for one, have never seen evidence of you living on State
Benefits (as we call them).
Then you are either stupid or providing shade for Glasser.
DB is not *THAT* stupid. Snit is still a useful idiot for him so he
hasn't tossed him under the bus.
*Yet*.
If you would like a tutorial in how snit lies his ass off read
below. I suspect you already know this but if you are truly an
honest person you will read it and comment with something other
than "Glasser has never lied to me" when everyone else knows that
too is a lie. So let's begin.
Based upon the comments by Glasser listed above.
DB will deny everything, ignore common sense and logic and demand
further proof.
Snit will probably call you and everyone else a sock. I have snit
at -9999 so I only see replies.
And of course snit the troll who prides himself as providing
receipts will never provide
receipts to prove someone is a sock.
It's how snit's diseased brain functions.
Bizarre isn't it?
1 "I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you
are poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong
doing in my actual comments and they are deeply insecure."
Nobody attacks Glasser because he is or is not poor. What does get
pointed out is that snit is a lazy grifter scamming the government
regarding disability claims.
There are many posts in groups like *.anxiety and other blogs
where snit admits he is housebound, has lost jobs because of his
various illnesses.
Have you dug up posts where snit asks about prescription cocktails?
What a loose nut.
Additionally you may or may not be aware that prior to Glasser's
appearance in ACW at one time he was posting 1000's upon 1000's of
messages, many quite lengthy to COLA and CSMA along with various
Linux groups where he managed to piss off many of the regular
posters like Marek Novotny for example.
Not counting snit's floodbot.
If you are truly honest, you might want to use your detective
skills to research that name and how it applies to snit.
Anyhow, so how does a person holding a legitimate, tax paying job
manage to perform his job and at the same time post 1000's of
messages at all hours of the day and night to Usenet?
How is this possible?
The answer is, it is not possible.
Unless his job is being paid to troll, of course it's not possible.
How does one stay up half the night and then get up to go to a job
in the morning?
Those snit drug cocktails will only work to a point and then only
for a while.
Then of course you have his failed Computer Business, The Prescott
Computer Guy" along with his failed daycare business Wickaboo
Daycare or something like that.
Well, to his credit at least he did try to go into business for
himself. But having a guaranteed government income does help.
It's not like quitting your job at Exxon to start a house cleaning
business where you no longer have the income from Exxon to rely on.
So now, how does Glasser post 1000's upon 1000's of messages to
Usenet while he has a legitimate, tax paying job AND is running a
side business, failures or not? And BTW nobody cares if his home
businesses were legit and paying taxes as long as they, especially
the daycare, was licensed which it was not and why it was shut
down.
There are a lot of businesses in the underground economy.
However choosing a business like child care which requires
insurance and associated documentation is not a business to start
if you want to remain in the underground economy.
Are you beginning to understand now?
DB has understood from day one.
He's manipulated snit into his very own useful idiot.
And of course snit took the bait.
2. " What they say should not
be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does
not even make sense."
The other shop offering a Michael Glasser discount surfaced long
before Glasser ever started posting in ACW.
True.
Search COLA and you will find numerous people who confirmed the
snit discount.
snit was well known as such a technical incompetent, which is why
his Computer Guy business failed, that someone took the time to
call the competitor who was well aware of Glasser because people
mistakenly took their computers to Glasser instead of the other
shop because the names were similar.
It was a brilliant marketing strategy IMHO.
It's right out of the movie "Miracle on 34th Street" where if
Macy's department store didn't stock a particular item, they sent
the customer to Gimbels department
store which was their main competitor at the time.
They had horrible experiences with Glasser's The Prescott Computer
Guy and the other business started to receive complaints for
computers they never tried to repair.
So their brand was being destroyed by snit.
Makes sense.
That's when the Michael Glasser discount began and numerous people
called that shop and confirmed it.
Glasser is the only one denying it happened.
True.
This is another one of snit's antics you can dig up if you are
honest. You claim to be a detective and this is 101 level.
3. " Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing."
See how Glasser twists what actually happened? This is Glasser
altering his version of the story he tells.
That's one of snit's go to tricks.
He assumes that people are too ignorant to notice.
He is wrong.
Snit posted about his personal problems with a computer and
Gremlin among others offered suggestions. It was obvious that
Glasser had zero chance of repairing it.
People were doing him a favor.
Obviously a total waste of time.
That's why snit is -9999.
Personally I would take it as an honor for someone with Gremlin's
vast knowledge offering to assist me.
Snit twists that into "Glasser asking Gremlin to help with a
computer.
Same.
Gremlin complimented me on cleaning a rather nasty virus from a
friend's Windows
PC and it meant a lot to me. I don't even run Windows! Common sense
and a well at that time did not detect it.
Gremlin knows his stuff and applies his diagnostic troublshooting
skills across platforms.
that kind of knowledge cannot be learned from a book. It's
experience coupled with
a mind that is able to think analytically.
Neither of which snit possess which is why he so obviously jealous
of Gremlin and Steve Carroll as well.
See it?
Of course you do.
Now will you admit it or run away?
He will run away.
4. Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin
confusing an Internet boot with a local one."
More of snit attempting to alter the story of what actually
happened. Pothead, AFAIK, never blamed you for Gremlin confusing
boot methods. That's Glasser making up shit again. Glasser didn't
even know how to get into recovery mode on a MAC which is a
REQUIREMENT to Internet boot.
That is correct.
Gremlin had to show Glasser how and Gremlin isn't a Mac person but
Glasser claims to be one.
<eyeroll>
Correct again.
Can you imagine a person running a business offering repairs of
computers who has no clue how to boot into recovery mode?
That's like someone opening up an auto repair business and is
asking "what are these
numbers on my wrenches ?".
See it David?
Or will you run from this one as well?
Run DB, run!
You are no Forest Gump though.
5. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy,
they push it to get attention and to promote their in-group
nonsense.
For this one Glasser's lame defense is that if you look currently
at various court sites in the various places where Glasser lived,
like Las Vegas, and numerous places in Arizona, very little is
CURRENTLY publicly viewable.
Glasser tries to claim that this proves the legal issues are made
up to harm him.
At first snit attempted to spin it claiming Usenet isn't an
accurate source of information while ignoring that the official
court website was posted and it was a
.gov site so unlikely to be fake.
Snit is simply a dishonest piece of shit.
It's what he is.
There is no other explanation for his behavior.
Nothing is farther from the truth.
The PUBLIC viewable web pages only keep violations posted for a
number of years which depends upon the particular court at which
point they are purged from the PUBLIC website.
They are however obtainable from the court for a small fee because
they are considered public record.
This is true and has been explained to snit many times already.
Aside from his divorce and haressment in public criminal arrest, the
majority of snit's court cases are multitudes of traffic violations.
Mostly for speeding and not having active insurance or financial
responsibility.
Same as the childcare business he ran out of his trailer. For
someone who claims to be honest
and honorable he sure breaks the law a lot.
Here is AZ policy.
<https://share.google/aimode/2PECv8mjLbC8qd4MF>
"Traffic violations generally remain on Arizona public court
websites and motor vehicle records for three to five years, though
points for those violations are officially active for only 1 year.
More serious, criminal violations (e.g., DUI, reckless driving) may
remain accessible on court records for a longer period."
This is why if you run a background check on Michael Glasser these
still show up.
Several people have done this.
However, in order to obtain the documents one has to agree to not
post them publicly and they are somehow watermarked so it's not a
good idea.
Besides nothing further is required as a decent background check
reveals snit's sordid criminal history.
In truth, snit should not be allowed to get behind the wheel of a
car.
And many people have posted screenshots which actually did show the
incidents before they were removed from the public website.
Glasser claims they are faked which is a lie.
Snit is tossing whatever he can at the wall and trying to conflate
the issue. Enough honest people took screenshots or viewed the
original files to debunk snit's lame claims.
As for Michael Glasser's public harassment arrest that too was
screenshot by numerous people and removed from the public website
because despite being arrested, fingerprinted, mugshot and so
forth, a settlement between the court and Michael Glasser was
reached so it was rightfully removed.
Correct.
It's just more lies by Michael Glasser.
That should keep you busy for a while David.
Here is another one snit keeps pushing:
'Snit, Where is Your Proof That Carroll Claimed The Police Visited
Him?'
https://groups.google.com/g/talk.politics.guns/c/BpDIKI3GVn0/m/Zc1f0gBMAwAJ
Read through this one to see how many times snit has changed his
story. It's hilarious!
Why snit continues to make a fool of himself in public remains a
mystery though.
Notice how you lie your ass off. I bring receipts.
where are your receipts to confirm those statements?
Have I missed them?
If you have provided evidence please re-post.
And if I am incorrect and you can prove it I will of course apologize.
Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 10, 2026 at 10:37:17 AM MST, "%" wrotebut he still is
<[email protected]>:
Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 9, 2026 at 5:09:04 PM MST, "%" wrotehe's an idiot
<[email protected]>:
Linuxiac wrote:
Glock wrote:sock
On Sun, 8 Mar 2026 19:48:22 +0000, David B. wrote:Is this the same snit who was trolling usenet 10 years ago? If so, I >>>>>> cannot believe he is still alive and kicking. He used to flood various >>>>>> Linux groups with his crossposting and as a result was a major pain in >>>>>> the posterior and there were so many people who wanted to confront him >>>>>> F2F in real life and teach him a lesson about libeling decent people >>>>>> with his bullshit.
On 08/03/2026 19:34, Brock McNuggets wrote:nothing >>>> concerning.
On Mar 8, 2026 at 12:59:17 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<[email protected]>:
On 08/03/2026 05:25, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 5, 2026 at 1:35:21 PM MST, "Apd" wrote
<10ocpeb$45rm$[email protected]>:
On 05/03/2026 20:00, David B. wrote:
On 05/03/2026 19:50, Apd wrote:
Oh, you mean capital. I have a few investments.
Me either!
You don't have investments?
The markets are a bit volatile right now!
Mine are longer term.
I have a good mix. With the market down I am down a bit but
confusing >> an Internet boot with a local one. Or idiotic and easily >>>>>>> disproved >> claims about legal issues. They do not really believe >>>>>>> this idiocy, they >> push it to get attention and to promote their >>>>>>> in-group nonsense. They >> are basically MAGA and think like them: it >>>>>>> is about tribalism and >> scapegoating to them, not honesty orI doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are >>>>>>>>> poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in >>>>>>> my >> actual comments and they are deeply insecure. What they say >>>>>>> should not >> be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at >>>>>>> the never >> ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... >>>>>>> it does not >> even make sense. Or his nonsense about me asking him >>>>>>> to help with a >> computer when I did no such thing.
Most folk reading here may find your statement surprising! 😉 >>>>>>>>>
Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin
evidence.
Well I, for one, have never seen evidence of you living on State >>>>>>>> Benefits (as we call them).
Then you are either stupid or providing shade for Glasser.
If you would like a tutorial in how snit lies his ass off read below. >>>>>>> I suspect you already know this but if you are truly an honest person >>>>>>> you will read it and comment with something other than "Glasser has >>>>>>> never lied to me" when everyone else knows that too is a lie.
So let's begin.
Based upon the comments by Glasser listed above.
1 "I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you are >>>>>>> poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong doing in my >>>>>>> actual comments and they are deeply insecure."
Nobody attacks Glasser because he is or is not poor. What does get >>>>>>> pointed out is that snit is a lazy grifter scamming the government >>>>>>> regarding disability claims.
There are many posts in groups like *.anxiety and other blogs where >>>>>>> snit admits he is housebound, has lost jobs because of his various >>>>>>> illnesses.
Additionally you may or may not be aware that prior to Glasser's >>>>>>> appearance in ACW at one time he was posting 1000's upon 1000's of >>>>>>> messages, many quite lengthy to COLA and CSMA along with various >>>>>>> Linux groups where he managed to piss off many of the regular posters >>>>>>> like Marek Novotny for example.
If you are truly honest, you might want to use your detective skills >>>>>>> to research that name and how it applies to snit.
Anyhow, so how does a person holding a legitimate, tax paying job >>>>>>> manage to perform his job and at the same time post 1000's of
messages at all hours of the day and night to Usenet?
How is this possible?
The answer is, it is not possible.
Then of course you have his failed Computer Business, The Prescott >>>>>>> Computer Guy" along with his failed daycare business Wickaboo Daycare >>>>>>> or something like that.
So now, how does Glasser post 1000's upon 1000's of messages to
Usenet while he has a legitimate, tax paying job AND is running a >>>>>>> side business, failures or not? And BTW nobody cares if his home >>>>>>> businesses were legit and paying taxes as long as they, especially >>>>>>> the daycare, was licensed which it was not and why it was shut down. >>>>>>>
Are you beginning to understand now?
2. " What they say should not
be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never >>>>>>> ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does not >>>>>>> even make sense."
The other shop offering a Michael Glasser discount surfaced long >>>>>>> before Glasser ever started posting in ACW.
snit was well known as such a technical incompetent, which is why his >>>>>>> Computer Guy business failed, that someone took the time to call the >>>>>>> competitor who was well aware of Glasser because people mistakenly >>>>>>> took their computers to Glasser instead of the other shop because the >>>>>>> names were similar.
they had horrible experiences with Glasser's The Prescott Computer >>>>>>> Guy and the other business started to receive complaints for
computers they never tried to repair.
So their brand was being destroyed by snit.
That's when the Michael Glasser discount began and numerous people >>>>>>> called that shop and confirmed it.
Glasser is the only one denying it happened.
This is another one of snit's antics you can dig up if you are honest. >>>>>>> You claim to be a detective and this is 101 level.
3. " Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing."
See how Glasser twists what actually happened? This is Glasser
altering his version of the story he tells.
Snit posted about his personal problems with a computer and Gremlin >>>>>>> among others offered suggestions. It was obvious that Glasser had >>>>>>> zero chance of repairing it.
People were doing him a favor.
Personally I would take it as an honor for someone with Gremlin's >>>>>>> vast knowledge offering to assist me.
Snit twists that into "Glasser asking Gremlin to help with a
computer.
See it?
Of course you do.
Now will you admit it or run away?
4. Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin
confusing an Internet boot with a local one."
More of snit attempting to alter the story of what actually happened. >>>>>>> Pothead, AFAIK, never blamed you for Gremlin confusing boot methods. >>>>>>> That's Glasser making up shit again. Glasser didn't even know how to >>>>>>> get into recovery mode on a MAC which is a REQUIREMENT to Internet >>>>>>> boot.
Gremlin had to show Glasser how and Gremlin isn't a Mac person but >>>>>>> Glasser claims to be one.
<eyeroll>
See it David?
Or will you run from this one as well?
5. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy, >>>>>>> they push it to get attention and to promote their in-group nonsense. >>>>>>>
For this one Glasser's lame defense is that if you look currently at >>>>>>> various court sites in the various places where Glasser lived, like >>>>>>> Las Vegas, and numerous places in Arizona, very little is CURRENTLY >>>>>>> publicly viewable.
Glasser tries to claim that this proves the legal issues are made up >>>>>>> to harm him.
Nothing is farther from the truth.
The PUBLIC viewable web pages only keep violations posted for a
number of years which depends upon the particular court at which >>>>>>> point they are purged from the PUBLIC website.
They are however obtainable from the court for a small fee because >>>>>>> they are considered public record.
This is why if you run a background check on Michael Glasser these >>>>>>> still show up.
And many people have posted screenshots which actually did show the >>>>>>> incidents before they were removed from the public website.
Glasser claims they are faked which is a lie.
As for Michael Glasser's public harassment arrest that too was
screenshot by numerous people and removed from the public website >>>>>>> because despite being arrested, fingerprinted, mugshot and so forth, >>>>>>> a settlement between the court and Michael Glasser was reached so it >>>>>>> was rightfully removed.
It's just more lies by Michael Glasser.
That should keep you busy for a while David.
For me, though, cash is king at present!
It is for Glasser as well.
He collects his government disability check and then works off the >>>>>>> books, not paying taxes, doing odd jobs.
His ex wife was part of it which is why they were never officially >>>>>>> married but for divorce purposes considered a common law marriage. >>>>>>
The general consensus was that it wasn't worth the time and effort as >>>>>> snit was so sickly that one day he would probably collapse and croak. I >>>>>> can't believe that COVID didn't kill him.
Marek was a well respected poster to various Linux groups and a
generous and kind person as well.
He gifted snit a laptop as snit's wife's laptop died. So what did snit >>>>>> do? He attacked Marek and subsequently sold the laptop on ebay.
This alone demonstrates what a miserable person snit is.
I can't comment on his wife however back then it was obvious that snit >>>>>> was not employed because he was posting so many articles to Usenet that >>>>>> there is no way he could have been employed.
I don't recall any crimes posted regarding snit.
That doesn't mean someone didn't post them, but I don't recall seeing >>>>>> the posts.
Anyone who doesn't believe what has been written about snit can easily >>>>>> look in the archives for
al.linux,alt.os.linux,alt.suse.linux.comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac >>>>>> .advocacy and form their own opinions regarding snit.
He seems to be absent from the popular Linux groups so maybe he has >>>>>> learned his lesson?
Sock boy strikes again!
Weird how Carroll and his crew claim I sold it on eBay but nobody ever found
the listing.
Just sick lies because they cannot quote me doing as they do.
That is overstating him.
tell me what is the obsession with this snit poster?
From cross posts
in alt.home.repair and comp.sys.mac.advocacy, both of which I lurk in,
snit seems to be mentally retarded, at least from what I have read.
He or she doesn't seem to be a troll but more of an ill informed poster.
I do have one direct question for you Linuxiac and that is why do you seemingly have the same ASCII art X-Face of a chicken as snit does?
Maybe my outdated newsreader is tripping on itself again, but I'm
curious. I'm sure there is an explanation and if I am wrong, someone
please correct me.
On Mar 10, 2026 at 8:01:08 PM MST, "%" wrote <[email protected]>:
Isadore wrote:
On 11 Mar 2026 01:36:42 GMTsay it say it say it again
"Nobody" <[email protected]> wrote:
Linuxiac wrote:
Glock wrote:
On Sun, 8 Mar 2026 19:48:22 +0000, David B. wrote:
On 08/03/2026 19:34, Brock McNuggets wrote:nothing >>>> concerning.
On Mar 8, 2026 at 12:59:17 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<[email protected]>:
On 08/03/2026 05:25, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Mar 5, 2026 at 1:35:21 PM MST, "Apd" wrote
<10ocpeb$45rm$[email protected]>:
On 05/03/2026 20:00, David B. wrote:
On 05/03/2026 19:50, Apd wrote:
Oh, you mean capital. I have a few investments.
Me either!
You don't have investments?
The markets are a bit volatile right now!
Mine are longer term.
I have a good mix. With the market down I am down a bit but
are >> poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong
Most folk reading here may find your statement surprising! 😉 >>>>>>>>>
I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you >>>>>>>>
doing in my >> actual comments and they are deeply insecure. What
they say should not >> be taken to reflect what they actually
believe. Look at the never >> ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot
claim of discounts... it does not >> even make sense. Or his
nonsense about me asking him to help with a >> computer when I did >>>>>> no such thing. >> Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible >>>>>> for Gremlin confusing >> an Internet boot with a local one. Or
idiotic and easily disproved >> claims about legal issues. They do >>>>>> not really believe this idiocy, they >> push it to get attention
and to promote their in-group nonsense. They >> are basically MAGA >>>>>> and think like them: it is about tribalism and >> scapegoating to
them, not honesty or evidence.
Well I, for one, have never seen evidence of you living on State >>>>>>> Benefits (as we call them).
Then you are either stupid or providing shade for Glasser.
If you would like a tutorial in how snit lies his ass off read
below. I suspect you already know this but if you are truly an
honest person you will read it and comment with something other
than "Glasser has never lied to me" when everyone else knows that
too is a lie. So let's begin.
Based upon the comments by Glasser listed above.
1 "I doubt it. They attack me with variations of the bigoted "you
are poor" nonsense because they cannot find significant wrong
doing in my actual comments and they are deeply insecure."
Nobody attacks Glasser because he is or is not poor. What does get >>>>>> pointed out is that snit is a lazy grifter scamming the government >>>>>> regarding disability claims.
There are many posts in groups like *.anxiety and other blogs
where snit admits he is housebound, has lost jobs because of his
various illnesses.
Additionally you may or may not be aware that prior to Glasser's
appearance in ACW at one time he was posting 1000's upon 1000's
of messages, many quite lengthy to COLA and CSMA along with
various Linux groups where he managed to piss off many of the
regular posters like Marek Novotny for example.
If you are truly honest, you might want to use your detective
skills to research that name and how it applies to snit.
Anyhow, so how does a person holding a legitimate, tax paying job
manage to perform his job and at the same time post 1000's of
messages at all hours of the day and night to Usenet?
How is this possible?
The answer is, it is not possible.
Then of course you have his failed Computer Business, The
Prescott Computer Guy" along with his failed daycare business
Wickaboo Daycare or something like that.
So now, how does Glasser post 1000's upon 1000's of messages to
Usenet while he has a legitimate, tax paying job AND is running a
side business, failures or not? And BTW nobody cares if his home
businesses were legit and paying taxes as long as they, especially >>>>>> the daycare, was licensed which it was not and why it was shut
down.
Are you beginning to understand now?
2. " What they say should not
be taken to reflect what they actually believe. Look at the never
ending nonsense of Gremlin's idiot claim of discounts... it does
not even make sense."
The other shop offering a Michael Glasser discount surfaced long
before Glasser ever started posting in ACW.
snit was well known as such a technical incompetent, which is why
his Computer Guy business failed, that someone took the time to
call the competitor who was well aware of Glasser because people
mistakenly took their computers to Glasser instead of the other
shop because the names were similar.
they had horrible experiences with Glasser's The Prescott Computer >>>>>> Guy and the other business started to receive complaints for
computers they never tried to repair.
So their brand was being destroyed by snit.
That's when the Michael Glasser discount began and numerous people >>>>>> called that shop and confirmed it.
Glasser is the only one denying it happened.
This is another one of snit's antics you can dig up if you are
honest. You claim to be a detective and this is 101 level.
3. " Or his nonsense about me asking him to help with a
computer when I did no such thing."
See how Glasser twists what actually happened? This is Glasser
altering his version of the story he tells.
Snit posted about his personal problems with a computer and
Gremlin among others offered suggestions. It was obvious that
Glasser had zero chance of repairing it.
People were doing him a favor.
Personally I would take it as an honor for someone with Gremlin's
vast knowledge offering to assist me.
Snit twists that into "Glasser asking Gremlin to help with a
computer.
See it?
Of course you do.
Now will you admit it or run away?
4. Or Pothead saying that I am somehow responsible for Gremlin
confusing an Internet boot with a local one."
More of snit attempting to alter the story of what actually
happened. Pothead, AFAIK, never blamed you for Gremlin confusing
boot methods. That's Glasser making up shit again. Glasser didn't >>>>>> even know how to get into recovery mode on a MAC which is a
REQUIREMENT to Internet boot.
Gremlin had to show Glasser how and Gremlin isn't a Mac person but >>>>>> Glasser claims to be one.
<eyeroll>
See it David?
Or will you run from this one as well?
5. Or idiotic and easily disproved
claims about legal issues. They do not really believe this idiocy, >>>>>> they push it to get attention and to promote their in-group
nonsense.
For this one Glasser's lame defense is that if you look currently
at various court sites in the various places where Glasser lived,
like Las Vegas, and numerous places in Arizona, very little is
CURRENTLY publicly viewable.
Glasser tries to claim that this proves the legal issues are made
up to harm him.
Nothing is farther from the truth.
The PUBLIC viewable web pages only keep violations posted for a
number of years which depends upon the particular court at which
point they are purged from the PUBLIC website.
They are however obtainable from the court for a small fee because >>>>>> they are considered public record.
This is why if you run a background check on Michael Glasser these >>>>>> still show up.
And many people have posted screenshots which actually did show
the incidents before they were removed from the public website.
Glasser claims they are faked which is a lie.
As for Michael Glasser's public harassment arrest that too was
screenshot by numerous people and removed from the public website
because despite being arrested, fingerprinted, mugshot and so
forth, a settlement between the court and Michael Glasser was
reached so it was rightfully removed.
It's just more lies by Michael Glasser.
That should keep you busy for a while David.
For me, though, cash is king at present!
It is for Glasser as well.
He collects his government disability check and then works off the >>>>>> books, not paying taxes, doing odd jobs.
His ex wife was part of it which is why they were never officially >>>>>> married but for divorce purposes considered a common law
marriage.
Is this the same snit who was trolling usenet 10 years ago? If so, I >>>>> cannot believe he is still alive and kicking. He used to flood
various Linux groups with his crossposting and as a result was a
major pain in the posterior and there were so many people who
wanted to confront him F2F in real life and teach him a lesson
about libeling decent people with his bullshit.
The general consensus was that it wasn't worth the time and effort
as snit was so sickly that one day he would probably collapse and
croak. I can't believe that COVID didn't kill him.
Marek was a well respected poster to various Linux groups and a
generous and kind person as well.
He gifted snit a laptop as snit's wife's laptop died. So what did
snit do? He attacked Marek and subsequently sold the laptop on ebay. >>>>> This alone demonstrates what a miserable person snit is.
I can't comment on his wife however back then it was obvious that
snit was not employed because he was posting so many articles to
Usenet that there is no way he could have been employed.
I don't recall any crimes posted regarding snit.
That doesn't mean someone didn't post them, but I don't recall
seeing the posts.
Anyone who doesn't believe what has been written about snit can
easily look in the archives for
al.linux,alt.os.linux,alt.suse.linux.comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.m >>>>> ac .advocacy and form their own opinions regarding snit.
He seems to be absent from the popular Linux groups so maybe he has
learned his lesson?
tell me what is the obsession with this snit poster? From cross posts
in alt.home.repair and comp.sys.mac.advocacy, both of which I lurk in, >>>> snit seems to be mentally retarded, at least from what I have read.
He or she doesn't seem to be a troll but more of an ill informed
poster.
I do have one direct question for you Linuxiac and that is why do you
seemingly have the same ASCII art X-Face of a chicken as snit does?
Maybe my outdated newsreader is tripping on itself again, but I'm
curious. I'm sure there is an explanation and if I am wrong, someone
please correct me.
Looks like you have uncloaked yet another snit sock.
The post also seems to come from the same Mac usenet reader and version
that snit uses.
Let's see how he tries to lie his way out of this tell.
The socks they are a-sockin'!
| Sysop: | DaiTengu |
|---|---|
| Location: | Appleton, WI |
| Users: | 1,099 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 492379:05:06 |
| Calls: | 14,106 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 187,124 |
| D/L today: |
2,546 files (1,099M bytes) |
| Messages: | 2,496,244 |