From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy


Q: What kind of person participates on a thread, and then flatly denies it?
A: ?

Here's a verbatim response to one of the Apple posters, moments ago.
The fact Apple posters can't absorb any facts tells us something.
Being completely incapable of absorbing facts, is not a good thing.

Not being able to comprehend facts, means not ever being able to learn.

(verbatim)

Chris wrote:

Please stop denying threads exist that you, yourself, participated in.

Link or it didn't happen.

Just stop it.

For God's sake, you even *authored* one of those threads, Chris.

Link or it didn't happen.

Chris,

All intelligent people have excellent memories because you can't absorb
tons of detail about any subject without having an excellent memory.

I said I posted those links already to your own thread that YOU authored.
I also posted it to badgolferman's thread. And also to my own thread.

Those are facts.
Why can I remember those facts, and yet, you can't remember them?

Worse, why do you outright DENY that you *participated* on those threads!
And yet, today, you deny all knowledge of me having posted them.

Who does that?
What kind of person participates on a thread, and then flatly denies it?

What you're proving is it's impossible for you Apple posters to learn. Seriously.

You were told many times, on threads that you participated in.
And now, you deny that fact?

What kind of strange person does that, Chris?
Seriously.

Look it up.

The fact you deny all facts you hate, tells us something about you.
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

Tom Elam wrote:

On 4/19/26 1:21 PM, Maria Sophia wrote:

This is old news that Apple historically has put el-cheapo components into >> the iPhone batteries (in addition to laughably puny capacity sizes), so
many of these supporting links are 404 by now, but they've been discussed
in the Apple newsgroups for years, so nobody can deny a statement of fact.

OMG, all those articles are WAY outdated.

Given the point was to prove that Apple did it, that's to be expected.

For those who don't know how Apple religious zealots work, while they
defend Apple to the death, no matter what, they do so using the first
utterly absurd excuse they can come up with, which is what Tom did above.

Their only goal is to deflect, deny, and change the subject somehow,
so that facts about Apple can not be discussed in an adult manner.

In that particular proof that Apple chooses to use crappy components,
the whole point was that on the Apple newsgroup, we've been tracking the
known fact that Apple historically puts crappy batteries in the iPhone.

Some of the Apple religious zealots insisted, always without a shred of evidence, that not only did we NOT talk about it, but that it was false.

So we resurrected the proof that it happened & that we discussed it.
Yet, today, the Apple religious zealots absurdly denied it even happened.

What kind of strange person does that?
I don't know.

It's how Apple religious zealots are.

The absurdity of these ridiculous excuses of the Apple religious zealots
was proven by pointing out exact message Id's of threads in which the Apple religious zealots who denied knowing anything about these facts, actually participated on multiple threads discussing these very facts, and, in some cases, these Apple religious zealots who denied knowing anything about the topic (and hence, they said it was false) actually authored the threads!

What this proves is the Apple zealot likely *hates* all facts about Apple
that don't match with the (admittedly brilliant) propaganda they believed.
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2