From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

"Billy Joe McSweeny" <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:

Sgt. Joe Friday wrote:

In article <6a1ba5e9$0$21$[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...

On May 30, 2026 at 7:20:09�PM MST, """Ryan Sullivan"" wrote
<[email protected]>:

Sgt. Joe Friday wrote:

This one is a real gem!

Notice how dishonest snit Michael Glasser is.
He piles one lie on top of another in a vain attempt to
squirm out of being caught.

The snit actually tries to lie and claim that his wife,
at the time, Anne Glasser is not really his wife!

And yet no MID. No quote. Why is that?

Not needed.
The entire thread is posted in context.
If you want MID, look up the thread.

WTF is wrong with Michael Glasser?

https://usenet.sandman.net/pages/wifedenial

Notice the page offers NO evidence that can be verified. And the
link is to the wrong person. LOL!

Nope.
All the evidence can easily be verified and nothing you
can post or say can dispute that.
Keep lying snit.
You aren't fooling anyone.

The "screenshot" claim makes no sense. The claim is I removed
something from an account other than mine. That is not how FB
works. My guess -- someone, likely Carroll, made a fake account and
posted. Or Sandman faked it. Whatever. Who cares? Gee, but guess
who "found" that a FB account went away.

Carroll again?
That's your usual excuse.
The screenshot proves you are a liar.
It is not faked, which is another one of your lame
excuses snit.

Who cares?

You do snit.
You are the person who keeps bringing up items from the
early 2000's or even earlier but you begin to twitch
when your lies, forgeries, dishonesty is pointed out.

Carroll.

My suspicion confirmed.

Nope.
Keep trying.

"
Hello and welcome to another Snit digest. Here we will
quote and document one of his latest lies - that his
wife is not his wife!
So it all started with this post:
15 Dec 2015 Mrs. Snit bemoans her life
Dr. John Grubor <[email protected]d>

I simply can't do it all. Guess what that means
for us? Our house is far from perfect! It means our
dishes stack up, clean laundry sits either in the dryer
or basket for days sometimes, and other things just
don't get done. That's O.K. My kids know I love them
with all my heart and that's the most important thing
to me.

Poor Anne, having to clean up after kids and a
child-like adult.
dcourier.com...
John Grubor

Now, just to be clear, I don't condone bringing in the
personal life of anyone on USENET as an argumentative
point, but then again, it's not like Snit hasn't done
similar things to others in the past.


Secondly, the quote in itself isn't very incriminating,

John is clearly reading more into this than meets the
eye. And again, not something Snit hasn't done to
others, but the point is that Snit could have answered
with a simple "Yeah, so what? Dishes stacks up
sometimes, it happens, that's life" and be done with
it, but no - not Snit. Being a pathological liar, he
can't take the honest and honorable route. He needs to
deny it all, because... well, I'm not sure why, like I
said, ignoring or acknowledging the comment wouldn't
have meant anything to him.


Anyway, he quickly removed his wife's comment, another
way his wife's use of social media is being limited.
And said this:

15 Dec 2015 Re: Mrs. Snit bemoans her life
Snit <[email protected]>

The comment is not from anyone in my family... it
is someone (likely Carroll though I have no proof) who
is forging the name. Already reported it to Facebook...
will have to see if they do anything.
Snit

There it is - he is explicitly stating that "the
comment" did not came from his wife, and explicitly
stated that whoever made the comment was forging his
wife.


The problem with this is, of course, that the comment
was made using the Facebook comment plugin, meaning
that one could click the profile name and end up on the
persons Facebook page, which was this page:
www.facebook.com...


Snit, having removed the comment, thought he had
covered his tracks and now wanted to pretend that there
is nothing that shows that the comment came from that
FB profile. Anticipating this, I had already made a
screen dump of the page in question (note the link in
the status bar):


Which, ironically, he implied was forged, but for
obvious reasons couldn't substantiate.


And there you have it, Snit in his effort to lie to try
to prevent his private life being exposed on usenet led
to his private life being even more exposed on usenet.

Because, had he not lied about it, there would have
been no need to investigate this any further.
Forging


A few days later, after having denied all the support
for his lies, Snit tries another way, forging stuff to
try to falsify the support. Steve Carroll is on to him
early on
22 Dec 2015 Re: Snit removes his wife's website
Steve Carroll <[email protected]>
(2601:280:4300:9298:49e4:b9ca:b594:de4a)

I find it weird that 'Anne Glasser' now has a new
FB account:
www.facebook.com...
Something tells me the other one:
www.facebook.com...
... will be going away soon, after her friends all
connect to the new one.
Steve Carrol

Now, when I clicked that new link, all I got was this:
So whatever was going on had already been closed. But
someone had created the page and then closed it. But
why? It is soon revealed when Snit posts with his sock
puppet:
23 Dec 2015 Sandman and Petruzzellis (AKA Carroll) lied
- proved
tmelmosfire (Snit) <[email protected]>
(198.50.145.72)

The real one does not say "Battle Creek, Michigan"
where the false one does.

And with that claim, he posts this image:
Which is the search function of FB. Snit is here
claiming, supposedly, that the "real one" is the first
hit with the smiley face, while this supposed false one
is the other hit with the smiley face.
So Snit again is trying to forge things to disprove
substantiated facts. The "real one" is this one:
www.facebook.com... and as can be seen, it clearly
states "From Battle Creek, Michigan", and if he manages
to change that in the future, further damaging his wife
social network presence, here's a screenshot of the
profile:
As you can see, Anne has on her actual FB profile
stated where she is from, and that is "Battle Creek,
Michigan".
What probably happened was that Snit created a similar-
looking FB profile and was going to use that as proof
of who was and wasn't his wife and who made that
comment. But Steve caught him while doing it and he had
to take a screenshot and then close the new profile and
since he didn't manage to populate the new profile with
convincing data, he couldn't actually screenshot it
with a link to it, and data from it to support it. He
could only screenshot the FB auto-completion search
function and make claims based on that. It's called
obfuscation and since this is all based on a lie of
his, it just means he dug a deeper hole.

The above is a scathing explanation, with proof, of
your trolling, dishonesty and general nastiness.
There is no denying it.
You have no case. No leg to stand on. No evidence.
nothing but your usual blame Carroll bullshit.
And the more you attempt to lie your way out of it the
more guilty you appear.

So keep digging your own virtual grave.

Oh, and be warned, there is a LOT more information on
that site and others exposing your miserable life snit
and that will be coming soon.
All in good time snit.
I want to make sure you suffer as much as possible just
like you have made others suffer with your trolling for
many years.
This is your karma snit.
Accepting it is the only way to peace.

Karma?
You actually believe in karma?
I'll bet you believe in a mythical god as well.

Either way, that site is full of bullshit altered messages, statements
taken out of context and just basic attacks against snit and others.
I drilled into the site and have yet to find any of the claims to be verifiable.

If you wish to be taken seriously, provide the Message-ID for the
comments in the threads.

I smell the foul odor of a snit sock puppet.

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2