Pink is still not a physical colour; there are no pink photons.
/Flibble
On 11/1/25 1:02 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
Pink is still not a physical colour; there are no pink photons.But physical color isn't about single photon.
/Flibble
Even your source points out that the usage you want to claim is a
special case non-normal usage.
All you are doing is showing how stupid you are.
On Sat, 01 Nov 2025 11:59:31 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 11/1/2025 10:02 AM, Mr Flibble wrote:
Pink is still not a physical colour; there are no pink photons.
Are there any rgb(0, 0, 0) photons?
Black is also not a physical colour.
On 11/1/2025 1:16 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
On Sat, 01 Nov 2025 11:59:31 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 11/1/2025 10:02 AM, Mr Flibble wrote:
Pink is still not a physical colour; there are no pink photons.
Are there any rgb(0, 0, 0) photons?
Black is also not a physical colour.
Well, what about a photon at rgb(1, 1, 1) for float, rgb(255, 255, 255)
for 8 bit color channels. Is that the all color? ;^) From which all
other colors can be realized or measures, defined, named? Pink as pink.
Think if Cat was spelled Dog? ;^)
What about a white photon passing through a medium that alters its
"color" when it reaches a sensor ready to try to measure it?
On Sun, 02 Nov 2025 12:58:59 -0800, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 11/1/2025 1:16 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
On Sat, 01 Nov 2025 11:59:31 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 11/1/2025 10:02 AM, Mr Flibble wrote:
Pink is still not a physical colour; there are no pink photons.
Are there any rgb(0, 0, 0) photons?
Black is also not a physical colour.
Well, what about a photon at rgb(1, 1, 1) for float, rgb(255, 255, 255)
for 8 bit color channels. Is that the all color? ;^) From which all
other colors can be realized or measures, defined, named? Pink as pink.
Think if Cat was spelled Dog? ;^)
What about a white photon passing through a medium that alters its
"color" when it reaches a sensor ready to try to measure it?
There are no white photons -- white isn't a physical colour either.
On 11/2/2025 1:29 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
On Sun, 02 Nov 2025 12:58:59 -0800, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 11/1/2025 1:16 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
On Sat, 01 Nov 2025 11:59:31 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 11/1/2025 10:02 AM, Mr Flibble wrote:
Pink is still not a physical colour; there are no pink photons.
Are there any rgb(0, 0, 0) photons?
Black is also not a physical colour.
Well, what about a photon at rgb(1, 1, 1) for float, rgb(255, 255,
255)
for 8 bit color channels. Is that the all color? ;^) From which all
other colors can be realized or measures, defined, named? Pink as
pink.
Think if Cat was spelled Dog? ;^)
What about a white photon passing through a medium that alters its
"color" when it reaches a sensor ready to try to measure it?
There are no white photons -- white isn't a physical colour either.
Shit, what about rgb(.5, .5, .5)?
On Sun, 02 Nov 2025 13:38:56 -0800, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 11/2/2025 1:29 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
On Sun, 02 Nov 2025 12:58:59 -0800, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 11/1/2025 1:16 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
On Sat, 01 Nov 2025 11:59:31 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 11/1/2025 10:02 AM, Mr Flibble wrote:
Pink is still not a physical colour; there are no pink photons.
Are there any rgb(0, 0, 0) photons?
Black is also not a physical colour.
Well, what about a photon at rgb(1, 1, 1) for float, rgb(255, 255,
255)
for 8 bit color channels. Is that the all color? ;^) From which all
other colors can be realized or measures, defined, named? Pink as
pink.
Think if Cat was spelled Dog? ;^)
What about a white photon passing through a medium that alters its
"color" when it reaches a sensor ready to try to measure it?
There are no white photons -- white isn't a physical colour either.
Shit, what about rgb(.5, .5, .5)?
There are red, green and blue photons, but no grey photons.
On Sun, 02 Nov 2025 14:10:29 -0500, Richard Damon wrote:
On 11/1/25 1:02 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
Pink is still not a physical colour; there are no pink photons.But physical color isn't about single photon.
/Flibble
Even your source points out that the usage you want to claim is a
special case non-normal usage.
All you are doing is showing how stupid you are.
No, you are stupid, ignorant of the science. There are no pink photons.
On 2025-11-02, Mr Flibble <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sun, 02 Nov 2025 14:10:29 -0500, Richard Damon wrote:
On 11/1/25 1:02 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
But physical color isn't about single photon.
Even your source points out that the usage you want to claim is a
special case non-normal usage.
All you are doing is showing how stupid you are.
No, you are stupid, ignorant of the science. There are no pink photons.
There are also no water molecules that can indiviudally be at 100°C therefore boiling is not a physical phenomenon.
On 02/11/2025 22:24, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
On 2025-11-02, Mr Flibble <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sun, 02 Nov 2025 14:10:29 -0500, Richard Damon wrote:
On 11/1/25 1:02 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
<snip>
There are also no water molecules that can indiviudally be at 100°CBut physical color isn't about single photon.
Even your source points out that the usage you want to claim is a
special case non-normal usage.
All you are doing is showing how stupid you are.
No, you are stupid, ignorant of the science. There are no pink photons. >>
therefore boiling is not a physical phenomenon.
And therefore a watched pot never boils.
On Sat, 01 Nov 2025 11:59:31 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 11/1/2025 10:02 AM, Mr Flibble wrote:
Pink is still not a physical colour; there are no pink photons.
Are there any rgb(0, 0, 0) photons?
Black is also not a physical colour.
/Flibble
On Sun, 02 Nov 2025 13:38:56 -0800, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 11/2/2025 1:29 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
On Sun, 02 Nov 2025 12:58:59 -0800, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 11/1/2025 1:16 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
On Sat, 01 Nov 2025 11:59:31 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 11/1/2025 10:02 AM, Mr Flibble wrote:
Pink is still not a physical colour; there are no pink photons.
Are there any rgb(0, 0, 0) photons?
Black is also not a physical colour.
Well, what about a photon at rgb(1, 1, 1) for float, rgb(255, 255,
255)
for 8 bit color channels. Is that the all color? ;^) From which all
other colors can be realized or measures, defined, named? Pink as
pink.
Think if Cat was spelled Dog? ;^)
What about a white photon passing through a medium that alters its
"color" when it reaches a sensor ready to try to measure it?
There are no white photons -- white isn't a physical colour either.
Shit, what about rgb(.5, .5, .5)?
There are red, green and blue photons, but no grey photons.
/Flibble
On Sun, 02 Nov 2025 14:10:29 -0500, Richard Damon wrote:
On 11/1/25 1:02 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
Pink is still not a physical colour; there are no pink photons.But physical color isn't about single photon.
/Flibble
Even your source points out that the usage you want to claim is a
special case non-normal usage.
All you are doing is showing how stupid you are.
No, you are stupid, ignorant of the science. There are no pink photons.
/Flibble
On 2025-11-02, Mr Flibble <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sun, 02 Nov 2025 14:10:29 -0500, Richard Damon wrote:
On 11/1/25 1:02 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
Pink is still not a physical colour; there are no pink photons.But physical color isn't about single photon.
/Flibble
Even your source points out that the usage you want to claim is a
special case non-normal usage.
All you are doing is showing how stupid you are.
No, you are stupid, ignorant of the science. There are no pink photons.
There are also no water molecules that can indiviudally be at 100°C therefore boiling is not a physical phenomenon.
On 11/2/25 5:24 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
On 2025-11-02, Mr Flibble <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sun, 02 Nov 2025 14:10:29 -0500, Richard Damon wrote:There are also no water molecules that can indiviudally be at 100°C
On 11/1/25 1:02 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
Pink is still not a physical colour; there are no pink photons.But physical color isn't about single photon.
/Flibble
Even your source points out that the usage you want to claim is a
special case non-normal usage.
All you are doing is showing how stupid you are.
No, you are stupid, ignorant of the science. There are no pink photons. >>
therefore boiling is not a physical phenomenon.
Actually, the fact is that Water is not H2O,
but a mixture of H2O, H3O,
and OH units tied together into a mega structure.
Also, Temperature isn't defined for single molecules, just like color
isn't actually defined by a single photon.
If you see just a single photon, it will appear to be either a very
vibrant but dim Red, Green, or Blue, depending what color receptor it hit.
On 11/2/25 4:55 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
On Sun, 02 Nov 2025 13:38:56 -0800, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:No, there are not. As "Color" is a property of perception. Photons have
On 11/2/2025 1:29 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
On Sun, 02 Nov 2025 12:58:59 -0800, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 11/1/2025 1:16 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
On Sat, 01 Nov 2025 11:59:31 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 11/1/2025 10:02 AM, Mr Flibble wrote:
Pink is still not a physical colour; there are no pink photons. >>>>>>>Are there any rgb(0, 0, 0) photons?
Black is also not a physical colour.
Well, what about a photon at rgb(1, 1, 1) for float, rgb(255, 255,
255)
for 8 bit color channels. Is that the all color? ;^) From which all
other colors can be realized or measures, defined, named? Pink as
pink.
Think if Cat was spelled Dog? ;^)
What about a white photon passing through a medium that alters its
"color" when it reaches a sensor ready to try to measure it?
There are no white photons -- white isn't a physical colour either.
Shit, what about rgb(.5, .5, .5)?
There are red, green and blue photons, but no grey photons.
/Flibble
a specific frequency, to which for many of them, we perceive a specific color, but even then, different people might perceive the colors diffferently.
Your problem is you are stuck on an fringe, not-widely accepted, attempt
to define color.
Note, there are "colors" that can't be made by light as has been shown
by direct excitation of the light receptors in the eyes.
On 11/2/2025 8:45 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 11/2/25 5:24 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
On 2025-11-02, Mr Flibble <[email protected]> wrote:Actually, the fact is that Water is not H2O,
On Sun, 02 Nov 2025 14:10:29 -0500, Richard Damon wrote:
On 11/1/25 1:02 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
Pink is still not a physical colour; there are no pink photons.But physical color isn't about single photon.
/Flibble
Even your source points out that the usage you want to claim is a
special case non-normal usage.
All you are doing is showing how stupid you are.
No, you are stupid, ignorant of the science. There are no pink
photons.
There are also no water molecules that can indiviudally be at 100°C
therefore boiling is not a physical phenomenon.
Can we extract oxygen and hydrogen from water? One of them should be
around twice as much... lol. ;^) Right?
| Sysop: | DaiTengu |
|---|---|
| Location: | Appleton, WI |
| Users: | 1,076 |
| Nodes: | 10 (1 / 9) |
| Uptime: | 76:03:02 |
| Calls: | 13,805 |
| Files: | 186,990 |
| D/L today: |
4,753 files (1,565M bytes) |
| Messages: | 2,443,114 |