From Newsgroup: comp.theory

it's trying to define a ordering of computational complexity using a
hierarchy of hypothesized oracles that cannot even exist as computations
as per the theory...??? talking about the complexity for solutions that
can't even exist seems a bit freaking presumptuous, eh? i guess it's a
fine thought experiment, so in that sense it was worth exploring, but i wouldn't hold it up as certain logical fact:

if a theory of computation did manage to overcome the most fundamental
of them: for example including the halting problem ... then the
hierarchy would collapse as it's necessity would cease to exist
--
arising us out of the computing dark ages,
please excuse my pseudo-pyscript,
~ the lil crank that could
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 6/3/26 7:51 AM, dart200 wrote:

it's trying to define a ordering of computational complexity using a hierarchy of hypothesized oracles that cannot even exist as computations
as per the theory...??? talking about the complexity for solutions that can't even exist seems a bit freaking presumptuous, eh? i guess it's a
fine thought experiment, so in that sense it was worth exploring, but i wouldn't hold it up as certain logical fact:

if a theory of computation did manage to overcome the most fundamental
of them: for example including the halting problem ... then the
hierarchy would collapse as it's necessity would cease to exist

no comments polcott?
--
arising us out of the computing dark ages,
please excuse my pseudo-pyscript,
~ the lil crank that could
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 6/4/26 12:26 AM, dart200 wrote:

On 6/3/26 7:51 AM, dart200 wrote:

it's trying to define a ordering of computational complexity using a
hierarchy of hypothesized oracles that cannot even exist as
computations as per the theory...??? talking about the complexity for
solutions that can't even exist seems a bit freaking presumptuous, eh?
i guess it's a fine thought experiment, so in that sense it was worth
exploring, but i wouldn't hold it up as certain logical fact:

if a theory of computation did manage to overcome the most fundamental
of them: for example including the halting problem ... then the
hierarchy would collapse as it's necessity would cease to exist

no comments polcott?

lol seriously... none of u chucklefucks want to discuss how silly it is
to apply the type hierarchy to computing problems that can't even have solutions, as per the theory??? what the fuck is that even about anyways???

u'd rather just banter back and forth with polcott's ai induced psychosis???

this fking goup eh??? 🤣🤣🤣
--
arising us out of the computing dark ages,
please excuse my pseudo-pyscript,
~ the lil crank that could

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 05/06/2026 07:41, dart200 wrote:

u'd rather just banter back and forth with polcott's ai induced
psychosis???

Olcott has no AI induced psychosis. An AI poweful enough to induce
psychosis is a fairly new thing.
--
Mikko
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 6/5/26 2:30 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 05/06/2026 07:41, dart200 wrote:

u'd rather just banter back and forth with polcott's ai induced
psychosis???

Olcott has no AI induced psychosis. An AI poweful enough to induce
psychosis is a fairly new thing.

oh right, ai enhanced psychosis i suppose...

but like seriously: wtf is up with trying to define the complexity for problems that can have no solution?

where each step up is defined by yet another undecidable situation?
--
arising us out of the computing dark ages,
please excuse my pseudo-pyscript,
~ the lil crank that could
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 6/5/2026 3:11 AM, dart200 wrote:

On 6/5/26 2:30 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 05/06/2026 07:41, dart200 wrote:

u'd rather just banter back and forth with polcott's ai induced
psychosis???

Olcott has no AI induced psychosis. An AI poweful enough to induce
psychosis is a fairly new thing.

oh right, ai enhanced psychosis i suppose...

but like seriously: wtf is up with trying to define the complexity for problems that can have no solution?

where each step up is defined by yet another undecidable situation?

PO is God, remember?
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 6/5/26 2:34 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

On 6/5/2026 3:11 AM, dart200 wrote:

On 6/5/26 2:30 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 05/06/2026 07:41, dart200 wrote:

u'd rather just banter back and forth with polcott's ai induced
psychosis???

Olcott has no AI induced psychosis. An AI poweful enough to induce
psychosis is a fairly new thing.

oh right, ai enhanced psychosis i suppose...

but like seriously: wtf is up with trying to define the complexity for
problems that can have no solution?

where each step up is defined by yet another undecidable situation?

PO is God, remember?

don't want to talk about actual computing theory... chris, mikko???

just want to trash on PO more???
--
arising us out of the computing dark ages,
please excuse my pseudo-pyscript,
~ the lil crank that could
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

Am 06.06.2026 um 00:01 schrieb dart200:

On 6/5/26 2:34 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

On 6/5/2026 3:11 AM, dart200 wrote:

On 6/5/26 2:30 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 05/06/2026 07:41, dart200 wrote:

u'd rather just banter back and forth with polcott's ai induced
psychosis???

Olcott has no AI induced psychosis. An AI poweful enough to induce
psychosis is a fairly new thing.

oh right, ai enhanced psychosis i suppose...

but like seriously: wtf is up with trying to define the complexity
for problems that can have no solution?

where each step up is defined by yet another undecidable situation?

PO is God, remember?

don't want to talk about actual computing theory... chris, mikko???

just want to trash on PO more???

Right. Enough is enough. Besides, it's off topic.
--
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast-Antivirussoftware auf Viren geprüft. www.avast.com
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

Am 05.06.2026 um 23:34 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

PO is God, remember?

Actually, I don't believe that this claim is true. :-P
Nuff said.
.
.
.
--
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast-Antivirussoftware auf Viren geprüft. www.avast.com
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

Am 06.06.2026 um 00:21 schrieb Moebius:

Am 05.06.2026 um 23:34 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

PO is God, remember?

Actually, I don't believe that this claim is true.

After all, I AM God!
.
.
.
--
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast-Antivirussoftware auf Viren geprüft. www.avast.com
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 6/5/2026 4:13 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 00:21 schrieb Moebius:

Am 05.06.2026 um 23:34 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

PO is God, remember?

Actually, I don't believe that this claim is true.

After all, I AM God!

I am the real God. ;^) lol. anyway, shit happens.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 6/5/2026 3:01 PM, dart200 wrote:

On 6/5/26 2:34 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

On 6/5/2026 3:11 AM, dart200 wrote:

On 6/5/26 2:30 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 05/06/2026 07:41, dart200 wrote:

u'd rather just banter back and forth with polcott's ai induced
psychosis???

Olcott has no AI induced psychosis. An AI poweful enough to induce
psychosis is a fairly new thing.

oh right, ai enhanced psychosis i suppose...

but like seriously: wtf is up with trying to define the complexity
for problems that can have no solution?

where each step up is defined by yet another undecidable situation?

PO is God, remember?

don't want to talk about actual computing theory... chris, mikko???

I still like my fuzzers wrt trying to deal with the halting problem.

just want to trash on PO more???

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

Am 06.06.2026 um 02:05 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

On 6/5/2026 4:13 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 00:21 schrieb Moebius:

Am 05.06.2026 um 23:34 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

PO is God, remember?

Actually, I don't believe that this claim is true.

After all, I AM God!

I am the real God. ;^) lol. anyway, shit happens.

No, no, YOU ARE CRAZY, after all *I* am the real God.
You are just a lost case, man, sorry.
--
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast-Antivirussoftware auf Viren geprüft. www.avast.com
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

Am 06.06.2026 um 02:16 schrieb Moebius:

Am 06.06.2026 um 02:05 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

On 6/5/2026 4:13 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 00:21 schrieb Moebius:

Am 05.06.2026 um 23:34 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

PO is God, remember?

Actually, I don't believe that this claim is true.

After all, I AM God!

I am the real God. ;^) lol. anyway, shit happens.

No, no, YOU ARE CRAZY!

It's called delusion, man!

After all, *I* am the real God.

You are just a lost case, man, sorry.

Seek help, soon!
.
.
.
--
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast-Antivirussoftware auf Viren geprüft. www.avast.com
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 6/5/26 5:16 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 02:05 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

On 6/5/2026 4:13 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 00:21 schrieb Moebius:

Am 05.06.2026 um 23:34 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

PO is God, remember?

Actually, I don't believe that this claim is true.

After all, I AM God!

I am the real God. ;^) lol. anyway, shit happens.

No, no, YOU ARE CRAZY, after all *I* am the real God.

You are just a lost case, man, sorry.

can't we all just agree that _we are god_ ???

> sheesh
>
> #god
--
why are we god?
let's end war 🙃

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

Am 06.06.2026 um 04:03 schrieb dart200:

On 6/5/26 5:16 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 02:05 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

On 6/5/2026 4:13 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 00:21 schrieb Moebius:

Am 05.06.2026 um 23:34 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

PO is God, remember?

Actually, I don't believe that this claim is true.

After all, I AM God!

I am the real God. ;^) lol. anyway, shit happens.

No, no, YOU ARE CRAZY, after all *I* am the real God.

You are just a lost case, man, sorry.

Can't we all just agree that _we are god_ ???

We might. But, on the other had, there's the "sxiom"
there is only one God
(maybe you heard about that).
So *I* am God. Sorry guys. It's just a simple fact. (!)
(I mean, at least if we are not all one and the same being. Are we all one?)
.
.
.
--
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast-Antivirussoftware auf Viren geprüft. www.avast.com
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

Am 06.06.2026 um 04:03 schrieb dart200:

On 6/5/26 5:16 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 02:05 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

On 6/5/2026 4:13 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 00:21 schrieb Moebius:

Am 05.06.2026 um 23:34 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

PO is God, remember?

Actually, I don't believe that this claim is true.

After all, I AM God!

I am the real God. ;^) lol. anyway, shit happens.

No, no, YOU ARE CRAZY, after all *I* am the real God.

You are just a lost case, man, sorry.

Can't we all just agree that _we are god_ ???

We might. But, on the other hand, there's the "sxiom"

there is only one God

(maybe you heard about that).

So *I* am God. Sorry guys. It's just a simple fact. (!)

(I mean, at least if we are not all one and the same being. Are we all one?)

.
.
.
--
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast-Antivirussoftware auf Viren geprüft. www.avast.com
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 6/5/26 7:17 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 04:03 schrieb dart200:

On 6/5/26 5:16 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 02:05 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

On 6/5/2026 4:13 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 00:21 schrieb Moebius:

Am 05.06.2026 um 23:34 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

PO is God, remember?

Actually, I don't believe that this claim is true.

After all, I AM God!

I am the real God. ;^) lol. anyway, shit happens.

No, no, YOU ARE CRAZY, after all *I* am the real God.

You are just a lost case, man, sorry.

Can't we all just agree that _we are god_ ???

We might. But, on the other hand, there's the "sxiom"

    there is only one God

(maybe you heard about that).

So *I* am God. Sorry guys. It's just a simple fact. (!)

(I mean, at least if we are not all one and the same being. Are we all
one?)

yes, we are all-one god ...

> what's not to get? 😇
>
> #god
--
why are we god?
let's end war 🙃

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

Am 06.06.2026 um 04:17 schrieb Moebius:

Are we all one?

Just serious for a second: I think we are, but we don't know.
.
.
.
--
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast-Antivirussoftware auf Viren geprüft. www.avast.com
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

Am 06.06.2026 um 04:22 schrieb dart200:

let's end war 🙃

I wish we could.

.
.
.
--
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast-Antivirussoftware auf Viren geprüft. www.avast.com
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 6/5/26 7:22 PM, dart200 wrote:

On 6/5/26 7:17 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 04:03 schrieb dart200:

On 6/5/26 5:16 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 02:05 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

On 6/5/2026 4:13 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 00:21 schrieb Moebius:

Am 05.06.2026 um 23:34 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

PO is God, remember?

Actually, I don't believe that this claim is true.

After all, I AM God!

I am the real God. ;^) lol. anyway, shit happens.

No, no, YOU ARE CRAZY, after all *I* am the real God.

You are just a lost case, man, sorry.

Can't we all just agree that _we are god_ ???

We might. But, on the other hand, there's the "sxiom"

     there is only one God

(maybe you heard about that).

So *I* am God. Sorry guys. It's just a simple fact. (!)

(I mean, at least if we are not all one and the same being. Are we all
one?)

yes, we are all-one god ...

  > what's not to get? 😇
  >
  > #god

okokok, let me try to be more specific on my terminology here...

we are not all one being, we are all-one god!

god is not _one_ being, therefor i am _not_ god, for any "i"...

god = all beings as all-one

don't both buddah and jesus kinda agree on this?
--
why are we god?
let's end war 🙃

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 6/5/26 7:27 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 04:22 schrieb dart200:

let's end war 🙃

I wish we could.

tbh ending war is gunna be the easy part.

> we just have to not go to war
>
> #god

it is a type of _inaction_ vs a any specific action.

surviving all the ecological pollution we put out in our war blinded industrial haze is a whole other story ... cause that's gunna be a whole
lot of actual _actions_ we haven't even really begun to work out fully.
--
why are we god?
let's end war 🙃

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

Am 06.06.2026 um 04:34 schrieb dart200:

don't both buddah and jesus kinda agree on this?

Actually, I don't know: I've never met them!
.
.
.
--
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast-Antivirussoftware auf Viren geprüft. www.avast.com
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

Am 06.06.2026 um 04:38 schrieb dart200:

On 6/5/26 7:27 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 04:22 schrieb dart200:

let's end war 🙃

I wish we could.

tbh ending war is gunna be the easy part.

  > we just have to not go to war

Yeah, an old saying: "What if they gave a war and no one came?"

Hint: I'm a conscientious objector.

.
.
.
--
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast-Antivirussoftware auf Viren geprüft. www.avast.com
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 6/5/26 7:39 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 04:34 schrieb dart200:

don't both buddah and jesus kinda agree on this?

Actually, I don't know: I've never met them!

well that's why i cross-posted it to the enlightenment experts here at alt.buddha.short.fat.guy! 👳🏾‍♂️

we'll be getting some responses back when they feel like it, if ever...

it may or may not be useful, who knows??? 🤷🤷🤷

one thing's for sure, if ever they post:

nothing else could have happened 🧘
--
why are we god?
let's end war 🙃

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 6/5/26 7:46 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 04:38 schrieb dart200:

On 6/5/26 7:27 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 04:22 schrieb dart200:

let's end war 🙃

I wish we could.

tbh ending war is gunna be the easy part.

   > we just have to not go to war

Yeah, an old saying: "What if they gave a war and no one came?"

Hint: I'm a conscientious objector.

bro my idea is to just have literally the entire planet sign a global
peace treaty on an individual basis, then not only can we objectively
measure the total global population's objection to continued war, we can socially hold people accountable to that signature

we haven't quite built out the infrastructure to do that, but we're
gotten _very_ close, and with the latest data center AI push we'll have
far more than the required capacity to do so in short order
--
hi, i'm nick!
let's end war 🙃

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

Am 06.06.2026 um 04:49 schrieb dart200:

On 6/5/26 7:39 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 04:34 schrieb dart200:

don't both buddah and jesus kinda agree on this?

Actually, I don't know: I've never met them!

well that's why i cross-posted it to the enlightenment experts here at alt.buddha.short.fat.guy! 👳🏾‍♂️

Hey, man, I'm enlighted too! After all, I'm God AND I KNOW IT!

:-)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Btw, I'm short and fat too. Doesn't that mean something?
--
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast-Antivirussoftware auf Viren geprüft. www.avast.com
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

Am 06.06.2026 um 04:55 schrieb dart200:

On 6/5/26 7:46 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 04:38 schrieb dart200:

On 6/5/26 7:27 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 04:22 schrieb dart200:

let's end war 🙃

I wish we could.

ending war is gunna be the easy part.

   > we just have to not go to war

Yeah, an old saying: "What if they gave a war and no one came?"

Hint: I'm a conscientious objector.

bro my idea is to just have literally the entire planet sign a global
peace treaty on an individual basis, then not only can we objectively measure the total global population's objection to continued war, we can socially hold people accountable to that signature

Ok, I just signed that treaty.

we haven't quite built out the infrastructure to do that, but we're
gotten _very_ close [...]

In Germany we have a saying. "Dein Wort in Gottes Ohr". [„From your lips
to God's ears!“]

.
.
.
--
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast-Antivirussoftware auf Viren geprüft. www.avast.com
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

Am 06.06.2026 um 04:49 schrieb dart200:

On 6/5/26 7:39 PM, Moebius wrote:

nothing else could have happened 🧘

"Nothing ever happens."

.
.
.
--
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast-Antivirussoftware auf Viren geprüft. www.avast.com
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 6/5/2026 7:22 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 04:17 schrieb Moebius:

Are we all one?

Just serious for a second: I think we are, but we don't know.

Looks like something got snipped in the translation. Try again.

To the guy that invented the zero: thanks for nothing!

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 6/5/26 8:49 PM, Dude wrote:

On 6/5/2026 7:22 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 04:17 schrieb Moebius:

Are we all one?

Just serious for a second: I think we are, but we don't know.

Looks like something got snipped in the translation. Try again.

To the guy that invented the zero: thanks for nothing!

u don't use the threaded view, eh dud???
--
hi, i'm nick!
let's end war 🙃

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 6/5/2026 9:05 PM, dart200 wrote:

On 6/5/26 8:49 PM, Dude wrote:

On 6/5/2026 7:22 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 04:17 schrieb Moebius:

Are we all one?

Just serious for a second: I think we are, but we don't know.

Looks like something got snipped in the translation. Try again.

To the guy that invented the zero: thanks for nothing!

u don't use the threaded view, eh dud???

No, just the Quick View. It's faster to just see the alias of the
informant is usually all I need to know if it's a spammer, or a cry for
help finding enlightenment. YMMV.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 6/5/2026 5:16 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 02:05 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

On 6/5/2026 4:13 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 00:21 schrieb Moebius:

Am 05.06.2026 um 23:34 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

PO is God, remember?

Actually, I don't believe that this claim is true.

After all, I AM God!

I am the real God. ;^) lol. anyway, shit happens.

No, no, YOU ARE CRAZY, after all *I* am the real God.

I have two II's in my real name, so I am the real GOD?

You are just a lost case, man, sorry.

Lost in the realm of my God like nature... ;^D ROFL!!!!!!!!!!!!!
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 6/5/2026 5:20 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 02:16 schrieb Moebius:

Am 06.06.2026 um 02:05 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

On 6/5/2026 4:13 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 00:21 schrieb Moebius:

Am 05.06.2026 um 23:34 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

PO is God, remember?

Actually, I don't believe that this claim is true.

After all, I AM God!

I am the real God. ;^) lol. anyway, shit happens.

No, no, YOU ARE CRAZY!

It's called delusion, man!

delusion indeed. We all know that PO is the one real unity, GOD, and we
are all stupid!?

lol. ;^D

After all, *I* am the real God.

You are just a lost case, man, sorry.

Seek help, soon!

Help us repent oh PO the allmighty!

Btw, My God, me, is better than his PO... ;^D rofl.

Funny how this shit cracks me up so much. I am laughing out loud here.
Fun sarcasm.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 6/5/2026 7:10 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 04:03 schrieb dart200:

On 6/5/26 5:16 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 02:05 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

On 6/5/2026 4:13 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 00:21 schrieb Moebius:

Am 05.06.2026 um 23:34 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

PO is God, remember?

Actually, I don't believe that this claim is true.

After all, I AM God!

I am the real God. ;^) lol. anyway, shit happens.

No, no, YOU ARE CRAZY, after all *I* am the real God.

You are just a lost case, man, sorry.

Can't we all just agree that _we are god_ ???

We might. But, on the other had, there's the "sxiom"

    there is only one God

(maybe you heard about that).

So *I* am God. Sorry guys. It's just a simple fact. (!)

Moebius and I were never actually born for we were always there. But I
say, II am god, so mine is way more real because I use two II's. Got it?
Now, put a dollar in the box and worship me. ;^) rofl.

(I mean, at least if we are not all one and the same being. Are we all
one?)

.
.
.

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

Am 06.06.2026 um 22:44 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

On 6/5/2026 5:16 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 02:05 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

On 6/5/2026 4:13 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 00:21 schrieb Moebius:

Am 05.06.2026 um 23:34 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

PO is God, remember?

Actually, I don't believe that this claim is true.

After all, I AM God!

I am the real God. ;^) lol. anyway, shit happens.

No, no, YOU ARE CRAZY, after all *I* am the real God.

I have two II's in my real name, so I am the real GOD?

No, you aren't.
After all, there is only ONE (real) God. And this one is me.
Sorry, buddy.

You are just a lost case, man, sorry.

Lost in the realm of my God like nature...

Man, you are deluded!!!
.
.
.
--
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast-Antivirussoftware auf Viren geprüft. www.avast.com
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 6/5/2026 7:22 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 04:17 schrieb Moebius:

Are we all one?

Just serious for a second: I think we are, but we don't know.

GOD is the collective us? lol.

Anyway, this made me laugh. Thanks.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

Am 06.06.2026 um 22:48 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

Funny how this shit cracks me up so much. I am laughing out loud here.

Glad to see that it worked. :-)
.
.
.
--
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast-Antivirussoftware auf Viren geprüft. www.avast.com
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

Am 06.06.2026 um 22:51 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

On 6/5/2026 7:22 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 04:17 schrieb Moebius:

Are we all one?

Just serious for a second: I think we are, but we don't know.

God is the collective us? lol.

God is much more, imho. :-P
.
.
.
--
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast-Antivirussoftware auf Viren geprüft. www.avast.com
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 6/6/2026 1:54 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 22:51 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

On 6/5/2026 7:22 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 04:17 schrieb Moebius:

Are we all one?

Just serious for a second: I think we are, but we don't know.

God is the collective us? lol.

God is much more, imho. :-P

Something that was always there? Never born, will never pass away, and
will always be there?
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 6/6/2026 1:50 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 22:44 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

On 6/5/2026 5:16 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 02:05 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

On 6/5/2026 4:13 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 00:21 schrieb Moebius:

Am 05.06.2026 um 23:34 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

PO is God, remember?

Actually, I don't believe that this claim is true.

After all, I AM God!

I am the real God. ;^) lol. anyway, shit happens.

No, no, YOU ARE CRAZY, after all *I* am the real God.

I have two II's in my real name, so I am the real GOD?

No, you aren't.

After all, there is only ONE (real) God. And this one is me.

That must mean we are the same person? ;^D

Sorry, buddy.

You are just a lost case, man, sorry.

Lost in the realm of my God like nature...

Man, you are deluded!!!

.
.
.

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

Am 06.06.2026 um 22:49 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

Moebius and I were never actually born for we were always there. But I
say, II am god, so mine is way more real because I use two II's. Got it? > Now, put a dollar in the box and worship me. ;^) rofl.

It's called delusion, man. DELUSION!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delusion
.
.
.
--
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast-Antivirussoftware auf Viren geprüft. www.avast.com
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 6/6/2026 1:53 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 22:48 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

Funny how this shit cracks me up so much. I am laughing out loud here.

Glad to see that it worked. :-)

:^D Nice. she works in mysterious ways! ;^)

(Mysterious Ways)
https://youtu.be/6t96B5bD_8g?list=RD6t96B5bD_8g
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 6/6/2026 1:57 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 22:49 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

Moebius and I were never actually born for we were always there. But I
say, II am god, so mine is way more real because I use two II's. Got
it? Now, put a dollar in the box and worship me. ;^) rofl.

It's called delusion, man. DELUSION!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delusion

delusion right into more than zero dollars in the box... ;^D

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

Am 06.06.2026 um 22:57 schrieb Moebius:

Am 06.06.2026 um 22:49 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

Moebius and I were never actually born for we were always there. But I
say, II am god, so mine is way more real because I use two II's. Got
it? Now, put a dollar in the box and worship me. ;^) rofl.

It's called delusion, man. DELUSION!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delusion

Man, this SO funny... Have to laugh myself!
See:
https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/71wEIpFfivL._SY679_.jpg

.
.
.

--
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast-Antivirussoftware auf Viren geprüft. www.avast.com
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 6/5/2026 7:55 PM, dart200 wrote:

On 6/5/26 7:46 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 04:38 schrieb dart200:

On 6/5/26 7:27 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 04:22 schrieb dart200:

let's end war 🙃

I wish we could.

tbh ending war is gunna be the easy part.

   > we just have to not go to war

Yeah, an old saying: "What if they gave a war and no one came?"

Hint: I'm a conscientious objector.

bro my idea is to just have literally the entire planet sign a global
peace treaty on an individual basis

lol. Then things from another planet show up... Are they nice? Its
always a chicken and egg problem? ;^)

, then not only can we objectively
measure the total global population's objection to continued war, we can socially hold people accountable to that signature

we haven't quite built out the infrastructure to do that, but we're
gotten _very_ close, and with the latest data center AI push we'll have
far more than the required capacity to do so in short order

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 6/5/2026 7:34 PM, dart200 wrote:

On 6/5/26 7:22 PM, dart200 wrote:

On 6/5/26 7:17 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 04:03 schrieb dart200:

On 6/5/26 5:16 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 02:05 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

On 6/5/2026 4:13 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 00:21 schrieb Moebius:

Am 05.06.2026 um 23:34 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

PO is God, remember?

Actually, I don't believe that this claim is true.

After all, I AM God!

I am the real God. ;^) lol. anyway, shit happens.

No, no, YOU ARE CRAZY, after all *I* am the real God.

You are just a lost case, man, sorry.

Can't we all just agree that _we are god_ ???

We might. But, on the other hand, there's the "sxiom"

     there is only one God

(maybe you heard about that).

So *I* am God. Sorry guys. It's just a simple fact. (!)

(I mean, at least if we are not all one and the same being. Are we
all one?)

yes, we are all-one god ...

   > what's not to get? 😇
   >
   > #god

okokok, let me try to be more specific on my terminology here...

we are not all one being, we are all-one god!

god is not _one_ being, therefor i am _not_ god, for any "i"...

god = all beings as all-one

don't both buddah and jesus kinda agree on this?

Wonder if they ate the same strain of shrooms?
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 6/5/2026 7:55 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 04:49 schrieb dart200:

On 6/5/26 7:39 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 04:34 schrieb dart200:

don't both buddah and jesus kinda agree on this?

Actually, I don't know: I've never met them!

well that's why i cross-posted it to the enlightenment experts here at
alt.buddha.short.fat.guy! 👳🏾‍♂️

Hey, man, I'm enlighted too! After all, I'm God AND I KNOW IT!

:-)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Btw, I'm short and fat too. Doesn't that mean something?

It sure does! I though I saw god once at the store. It was driving
around in a little scooter, was short and REALLY fat. Not just fat. So,
they have one up on you where one = 345 pounds? rofl. ;^)
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

Am 06.06.2026 um 23:04 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

On 6/5/2026 7:34 PM, dart200 wrote:

don't both buddah and jesus kinda agree on this?

Wonder if they ate the same strain of shrooms?

Sacrilege!
.
.
.
--
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast-Antivirussoftware auf Viren geprüft. www.avast.com
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

Am 06.06.2026 um 23:06 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

On 6/5/2026 7:55 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 04:49 schrieb dart200:

On 6/5/26 7:39 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 04:34 schrieb dart200:

don't both buddah and jesus kinda agree on this?

Actually, I don't know: I've never met them!

well that's why i cross-posted it to the enlightenment experts here
at alt.buddha.short.fat.guy! 👳🏾‍♂️

Hey, man, I'm enlighted too! After all, I'm God AND I KNOW IT!

:-)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Btw, I'm short and fat too. Doesn't that mean something?

It sure does!

Thought so.

I saw God once at the store. It [he/she/it] was driving around in a little scooter [...]

Sorry, can't have been me (God).

.
.
.
--
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast-Antivirussoftware auf Viren geprüft. www.avast.com
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 6/6/2026 2:03 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 22:57 schrieb Moebius:

Am 06.06.2026 um 22:49 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

Moebius and I were never actually born for we were always there. But
I say, II am god, so mine is way more real because I use two II's.
Got it? Now, put a dollar in the box and worship me. ;^) rofl.

It's called delusion, man. DELUSION!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delusion

Man, this SO funny... Have to laugh myself!

See: https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/ I/71wEIpFfivL._SY679_.jpg

Oh my god, that is it! Who knew God made a movie. ;^) kidding, but too fun.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 6/6/2026 2:08 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 23:04 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

On 6/5/2026 7:34 PM, dart200 wrote:

don't both buddah and jesus kinda agree on this?

Wonder if they ate the same strain of shrooms?

Sacrilege!

Yeah. Sorry, GOD. I forgot he only ate peyote? Na. This is running its
course. Funny though. ;^)
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

Am 06.06.2026 um 23:30 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

On 6/6/2026 2:08 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 23:04 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

On 6/5/2026 7:34 PM, dart200 wrote:

don't both buddah and jesus kinda agree on this?

Wonder if they ate the same strain of shrooms?

Sacrilege!

Yeah. Sorry, GOD. I forgot he only ate peyote? Na. This is running its course. Funny though. ;^)

C'mon man, I'm quite sure that none of them ate shrooms (just like me).
grrr
--
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast-Antivirussoftware auf Viren geprüft. www.avast.com
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 6/5/2026 7:49 PM, dart200 wrote:

On 6/5/26 7:39 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 04:34 schrieb dart200:

don't both buddah and jesus kinda agree on this?

Actually, I don't know: I've never met them!

well that's why i cross-posted it to the enlightenment experts here at alt.buddha.short.fat.guy! 👳🏾‍♂️

we'll be getting some responses back when they feel like it, if ever...

it may or may not be useful, who knows??? 🤷🤷🤷

one thing's for sure, if ever they post:

nothing else could have happened 🧘

The claim you are referring to is entirely false and fabricated,
originating from a mashup of internet rumors and memes made up by
informants which have all been refuted and found to be spurious, crude
and biased.

The 9/11 fall of WTC-7 was not an inside planted destruction job.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 6/6/26 7:04 PM, Dude wrote:

On 6/5/2026 7:49 PM, dart200 wrote:

On 6/5/26 7:39 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 04:34 schrieb dart200:

don't both buddah and jesus kinda agree on this?

Actually, I don't know: I've never met them!

well that's why i cross-posted it to the enlightenment experts here at
alt.buddha.short.fat.guy! 👳🏾‍♂️

we'll be getting some responses back when they feel like it, if ever...

it may or may not be useful, who knows??? 🤷🤷🤷

one thing's for sure, if ever they post:

nothing else could have happened 🧘

The claim you are referring to is entirely false and fabricated,
originating from a mashup of internet rumors and memes made up by
informants which have all been refuted and found to be spurious, crude
and biased.

The 9/11 fall of WTC-7 was not an inside planted destruction job.

fires don't cause near-simultaneous failure of _every_ column in the
building
--
why are we god?
let's end war 🙃

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

Am 07.06.2026 um 15:23 schrieb dart200:

On 6/6/26 7:04 PM, Dude wrote:

The 9/11 fall of WTC-7 was not an inside planted destruction job.

fires don't cause near-simultaneous failure of _every_ column in the
building

Hint: This was not just an ordinary "fire". This has to be taken in consideration.
Sophisticated Computer-simulations have SHOWN that the course of events
is totally "plausible" i.e. possible in this case.
.
.
.
--
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast-Antivirussoftware auf Viren geprüft. www.avast.com
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 6/6/2026 2:04 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

On 6/5/2026 7:34 PM, dart200 wrote:

On 6/5/26 7:22 PM, dart200 wrote:

On 6/5/26 7:17 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 04:03 schrieb dart200:

On 6/5/26 5:16 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 02:05 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

On 6/5/2026 4:13 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 00:21 schrieb Moebius:

Am 05.06.2026 um 23:34 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

PO is God, remember?

Actually, I don't believe that this claim is true.

After all, I AM God!

I am the real God. ;^) lol. anyway, shit happens.

No, no, YOU ARE CRAZY, after all *I* am the real God.

You are just a lost case, man, sorry.

Can't we all just agree that _we are god_ ???

We might. But, on the other hand, there's the "sxiom"

     there is only one God

(maybe you heard about that).

So *I* am God. Sorry guys. It's just a simple fact. (!)

(I mean, at least if we are not all one and the same being. Are we
all one?)

yes, we are all-one god ...

   > what's not to get? 😇
   >
   > #god

okokok, let me try to be more specific on my terminology here...

we are not all one being, we are all-one god!

god is not _one_ being, therefor i am _not_ god, for any "i"...

god = all beings as all-one

don't both buddah and jesus kinda agree on this?

Wonder if they ate the same strain of shrooms?

Apparently they both ingested Amanita Muscaria, Soma - nectar of the Gods.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 6/6/2026 2:37 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 23:30 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

On 6/6/2026 2:08 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 23:04 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

On 6/5/2026 7:34 PM, dart200 wrote:

don't both buddah and jesus kinda agree on this?

Wonder if they ate the same strain of shrooms?

Sacrilege!

Yeah. Sorry, GOD. I forgot he only ate peyote? Na. This is running its
course. Funny though. ;^)

C'mon man, I'm quite sure that none of them ate shrooms (just like me).

grrr

It's pretty obvious John of Patmos was on something.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 6/7/2026 11:04 PM, Dude wrote:

On 6/6/2026 2:37 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 23:30 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

On 6/6/2026 2:08 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 23:04 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

On 6/5/2026 7:34 PM, dart200 wrote:

don't both buddah and jesus kinda agree on this?

Wonder if they ate the same strain of shrooms?

Sacrilege!

Yeah. Sorry, GOD. I forgot he only ate peyote? Na. This is running
its course. Funny though. ;^)

C'mon man, I'm quite sure that none of them ate shrooms (just like me).

grrr

It's pretty obvious John of Patmos was on something.

Yes he said he had the visions on;y after he ate a small book
--
Copyright 2026 Olcott

My 28 year goal has been to make
"true on the basis of meaning expressed in language"
reliably computable for the entire body of knowledge.
The complete structure of this system is now defined.

The entire body of knowledge expressed in language is
comprised of two types of relations between finite strings:
(a) *Axioms* Expressions of language that are stipulated to be true.

My system bridges the analytic/synthetic distinction by
expressly encoding all empirical "atomic facts" in a formal
language such as CycL of the Cyc project.

(b) *Inference Rules* Expressions of language that are semantically
entailed syntactically from (a) and/or (b).
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 6/7/2026 9:00 PM, Dude wrote:

On 6/6/2026 2:04 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

On 6/5/2026 7:34 PM, dart200 wrote:

On 6/5/26 7:22 PM, dart200 wrote:

On 6/5/26 7:17 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 04:03 schrieb dart200:

On 6/5/26 5:16 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 02:05 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

On 6/5/2026 4:13 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 00:21 schrieb Moebius:

Am 05.06.2026 um 23:34 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

PO is God, remember?

Actually, I don't believe that this claim is true.

After all, I AM God!

I am the real God. ;^) lol. anyway, shit happens.

No, no, YOU ARE CRAZY, after all *I* am the real God.

You are just a lost case, man, sorry.

Can't we all just agree that _we are god_ ???

We might. But, on the other hand, there's the "sxiom"

     there is only one God

(maybe you heard about that).

So *I* am God. Sorry guys. It's just a simple fact. (!)

(I mean, at least if we are not all one and the same being. Are we
all one?)

yes, we are all-one god ...

   > what's not to get? 😇
   >
   > #god

okokok, let me try to be more specific on my terminology here...

we are not all one being, we are all-one god!

god is not _one_ being, therefor i am _not_ god, for any "i"...

god = all beings as all-one

don't both buddah and jesus kinda agree on this?

Wonder if they ate the same strain of shrooms?

Apparently they both ingested Amanita Muscaria, Soma - nectar of the Gods.

It has to be way better than taking Jimsonweed. wow.

Btw, when you are really bored, you should watch the following movie:

(The Bear (1988) - Bear Eats Magic Mushrooms) a scene: https://youtu.be/99x4i9858RQ

Always loved that movie. It might be on Youtube full thing:

Hey now, its for free and its official:

https://youtu.be/wJogk28uCAw




Skip navigation
the bear movie 1988




Create


Avatar image
The Bear
Free with ads
PG
YouTube Movies & TV
YouTube Movies & TV
198M subscribers



--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 6/7/2026 9:27 PM, olcott wrote:

On 6/7/2026 11:04 PM, Dude wrote:

On 6/6/2026 2:37 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 23:30 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

On 6/6/2026 2:08 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 23:04 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

On 6/5/2026 7:34 PM, dart200 wrote:

don't both buddah and jesus kinda agree on this?

Wonder if they ate the same strain of shrooms?

Sacrilege!

Yeah. Sorry, GOD. I forgot he only ate peyote? Na. This is running
its course. Funny though. ;^)

C'mon man, I'm quite sure that none of them ate shrooms (just like me).

grrr

It's pretty obvious John of Patmos was on something.

Yes he said he had the visions on;y after he ate a small book

After eating he had visions.

Whatever he ate, it was some powerful substance. Probably mushrooms
chased with hemp. Apparently they both grow wild on Patmos.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 6/8/2026 4:26 PM, Dude wrote:

On 6/7/2026 9:27 PM, olcott wrote:

On 6/7/2026 11:04 PM, Dude wrote:

On 6/6/2026 2:37 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 23:30 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

On 6/6/2026 2:08 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 06.06.2026 um 23:04 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

On 6/5/2026 7:34 PM, dart200 wrote:

don't both buddah and jesus kinda agree on this?

Wonder if they ate the same strain of shrooms?

Sacrilege!

Yeah. Sorry, GOD. I forgot he only ate peyote? Na. This is running
its course. Funny though. ;^)

C'mon man, I'm quite sure that none of them ate shrooms (just like me). >>>>
grrr

It's pretty obvious John of Patmos was on something.

Yes he said he had the visions on;y after he ate a small book

After eating he had visions.

Whatever he ate, it was some powerful substance. Probably mushrooms
chased with hemp. Apparently they both grow wild on Patmos.

Then I took the little book out of the angel’s hand and
ate it, and it was as sweet as honey in my mouth. But
when I had eaten it, my stomach became bitter.

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Revelation%2010%3A8-11&version=NKJV

I took this to mean blotter acid.
LSD on a tiny piece of paper.
--
Copyright 2026 Olcott

My 28 year goal has been to make
"true on the basis of meaning expressed in language"
reliably computable for the entire body of knowledge.
The complete structure of this system is now defined.

The entire body of knowledge expressed in language is
comprised of two types of relations between finite strings:
(a) *Axioms* Expressions of language that are stipulated to be true.

My system bridges the analytic/synthetic distinction by
expressly encoding all empirical "atomic facts" in a formal
language such as CycL of the Cyc project.

(b) *Inference Rules* Expressions of language that are semantically
entailed syntactically from (a) and/or (b).
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

Am 08.06.2026 um 07:37 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

The Bear (1988)
Always loved that movie. It might be on Youtube full thing: https://youtu.be/wJogk28uCAw

Yeah, great film. He shouldn't have ate magic mushrooms, imho. :-)
Nice sceen though.
.
.
.
--
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast-Antivirussoftware auf Viren geprüft. www.avast.com
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

Am 09.06.2026 um 06:44 schrieb Moebius:

Am 08.06.2026 um 07:37 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

The Bear (1988)
Always loved that movie. It might be on Youtube full thing:
https://youtu.be/wJogk28uCAw

Yeah, great film. He shouldn't have ate magic mushrooms, imho. :-)

Nice sceen though.

Anyway, beare of the drugs!

.
.
.

--
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast-Antivirussoftware auf Viren geprüft. www.avast.com
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

Am 09.06.2026 um 06:44 schrieb Moebius:

Am 08.06.2026 um 07:37 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

The Bear (1988)
Always loved that movie. It might be on Youtube full thing:
https://youtu.be/wJogk28uCAw

Yeah, great film. He shouldn't have ate magic mushrooms, imho. :-)

Nice sceen though.

Anyway, beware of the drugs!

.
.
.

--
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast-Antivirussoftware auf Viren geprüft. www.avast.com
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 6/8/2026 9:48 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 09.06.2026 um 06:44 schrieb Moebius:

Am 08.06.2026 um 07:37 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

The Bear (1988)
Always loved that movie. It might be on Youtube full thing:
https://youtu.be/wJogk28uCAw

Yeah, great film. He shouldn't have ate magic mushrooms, imho. :-)

Nice sceen though.

Anyway, beware of the drugs!

Ditto.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 6/10/26 12:16 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

On 6/8/2026 9:48 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 09.06.2026 um 06:44 schrieb Moebius:

Am 08.06.2026 um 07:37 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

The Bear (1988)
Always loved that movie. It might be on Youtube full thing:
https://youtu.be/wJogk28uCAw

Yeah, great film. He shouldn't have ate magic mushrooms, imho. :-)

Nice sceen though.

Anyway, beware of the drugs!

Ditto.

gunna have to hard disagree there,

> altered states of mind are incredibly important from time to time
>
> #god
--
why are we god?
let's end war 🙃

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 6/10/2026 12:46 PM, dart200 wrote:

On 6/10/26 12:16 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

On 6/8/2026 9:48 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 09.06.2026 um 06:44 schrieb Moebius:

Am 08.06.2026 um 07:37 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

The Bear (1988)
Always loved that movie. It might be on Youtube full thing:
https://youtu.be/wJogk28uCAw

Yeah, great film. He shouldn't have ate magic mushrooms, imho. :-)

Nice sceen though.

Anyway, beware of the drugs!

Ditto.

gunna have to hard disagree there,

; altered states of mind are incredibly important from time to time

; #god

Go ask Alice!

Amrita: The elixir of the Gods

SOMA

The Soma elixir, requiring an elaborate preparation during the Soma
sacrifice, was probably originally a hallucinogenic or intoxicating
substance prepared from the Soma mushroom plant.

This plant, as Gordon Wasson has argued, may have been the fly agaric
mushroom (Amanita muscaria) whose use in inducing mystical states of conscious is attested in Shamanism.

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 05/06/2026 10:30, Mikko wrote:

On 05/06/2026 07:41, dart200 wrote:

u'd rather just banter back and forth with polcott's ai induced
psychosis???

Olcott has no AI induced psychosis. An AI poweful enough to induce
psychosis is a fairly new thing.

The public demonstration of such seems to be new, but I don't think you
can know the stronger claim to be so.
--
Tristan Wibberley

The message body is Copyright (C) 2026 Tristan Wibberley except
citations and quotations noted. All Rights Reserved except that you may,
of course, cite it academically giving credit to me, distribute it
verbatim as part of a usenet system or its archives, and use it to
promote my greatness and general superiority without misrepresentation
of my opinions other than my opinion of my greatness and general
superiority which you _may_ misrepresent. You definitely MAY NOT train
any production AI system with it but you may train experimental AI that
will only be used for evaluation of the AI methods it implements.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 05/06/2026 11:11, dart200 wrote:

On 6/5/26 2:30 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 05/06/2026 07:41, dart200 wrote:

u'd rather just banter back and forth with polcott's ai induced
psychosis???

Olcott has no AI induced psychosis. An AI poweful enough to induce
psychosis is a fairly new thing.

oh right, ai enhanced psychosis i suppose...

but like seriously: wtf is up with trying to define the complexity for problems that can have no solution?

To characterise the attempt? There is an element of resource consumption
that may be used to thwart a computational adversary (time vs space vs order/heat).

consider Lieutenant Commander Data's complicated loop with which he
defeated The Borg.
--
Tristan Wibberley

The message body is Copyright (C) 2026 Tristan Wibberley except
citations and quotations noted. All Rights Reserved except that you may,
of course, cite it academically giving credit to me, distribute it
verbatim as part of a usenet system or its archives, and use it to
promote my greatness and general superiority without misrepresentation
of my opinions other than my opinion of my greatness and general
superiority which you _may_ misrepresent. You definitely MAY NOT train
any production AI system with it but you may train experimental AI that
will only be used for evaluation of the AI methods it implements.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 12/06/2026 00:00, Tristan Wibberley wrote:

On 05/06/2026 10:30, Mikko wrote:

On 05/06/2026 07:41, dart200 wrote:

u'd rather just banter back and forth with polcott's ai induced
psychosis???

Olcott has no AI induced psychosis. An AI poweful enough to induce
psychosis is a fairly new thing.

The public demonstration of such seems to be new, but I don't think you
can know the stronger claim to be so.

Doens't matter. Olcott has had no access to other than public AI.
--
Mikko
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.theory

On 6/11/26 2:03 PM, Tristan Wibberley wrote:

On 05/06/2026 11:11, dart200 wrote:

On 6/5/26 2:30 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 05/06/2026 07:41, dart200 wrote:

u'd rather just banter back and forth with polcott's ai induced
psychosis???

Olcott has no AI induced psychosis. An AI poweful enough to induce
psychosis is a fairly new thing.

oh right, ai enhanced psychosis i suppose...

but like seriously: wtf is up with trying to define the complexity for
problems that can have no solution?

To characterize the attempt? There is an element of resource consumption

characterize the attempt to totally solve a problem proven to not be
totally solvable?

it's an unsolvable problem, as per the theory: a solution to it would
imply a contradiction

the thought experiment constructs this hierarchy by banning
self-reference within each step of hierarchy. a halting oracle O' can
decide on all machines, but nothing that involves itself O'. a 2nd-tier halting oracle O'' can decide on O', but not itself O''

to me this is _avoiding_ the problem, not hypothesizing a resolution. a
true resolution would provide allow for self-referential analysis to
occur in a coherent manner, and would collapse the basis for the hierarchy

that may be used to thwart a computational adversary (time vs space vs order/heat).

consider Lieutenant Commander Data's complicated loop with which he
defeated The Borg.

--
arising us out of the computing dark ages,
please excuse my pseudo-pyscript,
~ the lil crank that could
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2